Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Framework for Selection of Performance Measurement Systems: Attributes of Conformance

Framework for Selection of Performance Measurement Systems: Attributes of Conformance Framework for Selection of On the other data and is monitored organizations. hand, rapid (1996); quality Performance Measurement of the individual measurement at Systems: incorporation continuously systems partici¬ Attributes of Conformance into the accreditation without level (future). process pant that can useful Risk for ensuring they provide Adjustment/Stratification The Joint Commission's Board of Com¬ and relevant data would enhance Patient Factors: Rationale is not provided missioners has the the value of accreditation. for those measures that to account are recently approved Council on Performance Measurement's The evaluation framework risk and for those incorpo¬ adjusted/stratified recommendation on an initial framework rates six broad or "At¬ measures that are risk not characteristics, adjusted/ for the more than 140 can¬ tributes of and identi¬ stratified measures with denomi¬ evaluating Conformance," (1996); didate fies criteria that relate each ofindividual-level data measurement to nators performance sys¬ specific composed tems that have been submitted in con¬ attribute. The framework are risk with a acknowledges adjusted/stratified unique sideration for use in the future that most will not be able to model tailored to the measure systems potential specific accreditation As re¬ all of the criteria meet process. previously immediately. (future). the Joint each criterion is identified http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

Framework for Selection of Performance Measurement Systems: Attributes of Conformance

JAMA , Volume 275 (7) – Feb 21, 1996

Framework for Selection of Performance Measurement Systems: Attributes of Conformance

Abstract

Framework for Selection of On the other data and is monitored organizations. hand, rapid (1996); quality Performance Measurement of the individual measurement at Systems: incorporation continuously systems partici¬ Attributes of Conformance into the accreditation without level (future). process pant that can useful Risk for ensuring they provide Adjustment/Stratification The Joint Commission's Board of Com¬ and relevant data would enhance Patient Factors: Rationale is not...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/framework-for-selection-of-performance-measurement-systems-attributes-43dlHPFQEi

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1996.03530310012005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Framework for Selection of On the other data and is monitored organizations. hand, rapid (1996); quality Performance Measurement of the individual measurement at Systems: incorporation continuously systems partici¬ Attributes of Conformance into the accreditation without level (future). process pant that can useful Risk for ensuring they provide Adjustment/Stratification The Joint Commission's Board of Com¬ and relevant data would enhance Patient Factors: Rationale is not provided missioners has the the value of accreditation. for those measures that to account are recently approved Council on Performance Measurement's The evaluation framework risk and for those incorpo¬ adjusted/stratified recommendation on an initial framework rates six broad or "At¬ measures that are risk not characteristics, adjusted/ for the more than 140 can¬ tributes of and identi¬ stratified measures with denomi¬ evaluating Conformance," (1996); didate fies criteria that relate each ofindividual-level data measurement to nators performance sys¬ specific composed tems that have been submitted in con¬ attribute. The framework are risk with a acknowledges adjusted/stratified unique sideration for use in the future that most will not be able to model tailored to the measure systems potential specific accreditation As re¬ all of the criteria meet process. previously immediately. (future). the Joint each criterion is identified

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Feb 21, 1996

There are no references for this article.