Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Fluoride Supplementation

Fluoride Supplementation Abstract Sir.—The article "Fluoride Supplementation in Harris County, Texas" by Siegel and Gutgesell (Journal 1982; 136:61-63) was a timely reminder that physicians have room for improvement in encouraging oral fluoride supplementation. The authors reached the conclusion that family and general practitioners are significantly less informed about fluoride than are pediatricians. My review of the data presented in this article indicates that another variable may be more important. The authors state that "most of the general practitioners were over 45 years of age." This was true of the pediatricians. The practice of oral fluoride supplementation is relatively recent, and the age of the physician may affect his exposure to the importance of this practice. Siegel and Gutgesell state that "the majority of family physicians read medical journals that have been deficient in recent information about fluoride," and then they quote two articles from family medicine specialty publications that contain information about References 1. Simon JF: Pediatric preventive dentistry . Am Fam Physician 1974;10:173-177. 2. Braham RL, Barkin PR, Morris ME, et al: Nutrition and its importance in dental health . J Fam Pract 1978;6:49-58. 3. Margolis FJ, Burt BA, Schork MA, et al: Fluoride supplements for children: A survey of physicians' prescription practices . Am J Dis Child 1980;134:865-868.Crossref http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Diseases of Children American Medical Association

Fluoride Supplementation

Abstract

Abstract Sir.—The article "Fluoride Supplementation in Harris County, Texas" by Siegel and Gutgesell (Journal 1982; 136:61-63) was a timely reminder that physicians have room for improvement in encouraging oral fluoride supplementation. The authors reached the conclusion that family and general practitioners are significantly less informed about fluoride than are pediatricians. My review of the data presented in this article indicates that another variable may be more...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/fluoride-supplementation-AsGFCiYb40

References (3)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0002-922X
DOI
10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970460082021
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Sir.—The article "Fluoride Supplementation in Harris County, Texas" by Siegel and Gutgesell (Journal 1982; 136:61-63) was a timely reminder that physicians have room for improvement in encouraging oral fluoride supplementation. The authors reached the conclusion that family and general practitioners are significantly less informed about fluoride than are pediatricians. My review of the data presented in this article indicates that another variable may be more important. The authors state that "most of the general practitioners were over 45 years of age." This was true of the pediatricians. The practice of oral fluoride supplementation is relatively recent, and the age of the physician may affect his exposure to the importance of this practice. Siegel and Gutgesell state that "the majority of family physicians read medical journals that have been deficient in recent information about fluoride," and then they quote two articles from family medicine specialty publications that contain information about References 1. Simon JF: Pediatric preventive dentistry . Am Fam Physician 1974;10:173-177. 2. Braham RL, Barkin PR, Morris ME, et al: Nutrition and its importance in dental health . J Fam Pract 1978;6:49-58. 3. Margolis FJ, Burt BA, Schork MA, et al: Fluoride supplements for children: A survey of physicians' prescription practices . Am J Dis Child 1980;134:865-868.Crossref

Journal

American Journal of Diseases of ChildrenAmerican Medical Association

Published: Oct 1, 1982

There are no references for this article.