Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Exclusionary Editorial Policy of Peer-Reviewed Publications and the Accuracy of News Tabloids-Reply

Exclusionary Editorial Policy of Peer-Reviewed Publications and the Accuracy of News Tabloids-Reply Abstract In Reply. —Medical news tabloids—or "throwaway journals" or specialty magazines—have existed in an uneasy parallel realm with peer-reviewed scientific journals for some time. Readership studies indicate that these controlled-circulation publications are received and read (or at least scanned) by large numbers of physicians. However, caution has been urged in evaluating original scientific information presented in the tabloids on the grounds that these publications frequently obscure the distinction between extemporaneous clinical observation and proved scientific fact.1,2 The unreliability, incompleteness, and inaccuracy of reporting by the tabloids thus becomes a crucial issue in evaluating the contribution of these publications to the medical community, as indicated by Mr Croes' correspondence. The burgeoning number of these publications in the last five years, which has threatened the economic survival of many peer-reviewed journals by diverting finite advertising revenue in a shrinking marketplace, has intensified the debate surrounding the tabloids' claim to legitimacy.Tabloids and References 1. Finkelstein D: Oh, the Times! Tabloids and other non-peer-reviewed publications . Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1641-1642.Crossref 2. Soffer A: Free medical publications or scientific medical journals? Chest 1982;81:397-398.Crossref 3. Correction of factual error: Amicar manufacturing origin . Ophthalmology Times , (Oct 1) , 1984. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Ophthalmology American Medical Association

Exclusionary Editorial Policy of Peer-Reviewed Publications and the Accuracy of News Tabloids-Reply

Archives of Ophthalmology , Volume 104 (8) – Aug 1, 1986

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/exclusionary-editorial-policy-of-peer-reviewed-publications-and-the-t3EtobAtCj
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0003-9950
eISSN
1538-3687
DOI
10.1001/archopht.1986.01050200017004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract In Reply. —Medical news tabloids—or "throwaway journals" or specialty magazines—have existed in an uneasy parallel realm with peer-reviewed scientific journals for some time. Readership studies indicate that these controlled-circulation publications are received and read (or at least scanned) by large numbers of physicians. However, caution has been urged in evaluating original scientific information presented in the tabloids on the grounds that these publications frequently obscure the distinction between extemporaneous clinical observation and proved scientific fact.1,2 The unreliability, incompleteness, and inaccuracy of reporting by the tabloids thus becomes a crucial issue in evaluating the contribution of these publications to the medical community, as indicated by Mr Croes' correspondence. The burgeoning number of these publications in the last five years, which has threatened the economic survival of many peer-reviewed journals by diverting finite advertising revenue in a shrinking marketplace, has intensified the debate surrounding the tabloids' claim to legitimacy.Tabloids and References 1. Finkelstein D: Oh, the Times! Tabloids and other non-peer-reviewed publications . Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1641-1642.Crossref 2. Soffer A: Free medical publications or scientific medical journals? Chest 1982;81:397-398.Crossref 3. Correction of factual error: Amicar manufacturing origin . Ophthalmology Times , (Oct 1) , 1984.

Journal

Archives of OphthalmologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Aug 1, 1986

References