Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Do We Still Hurt Newborn Babies?

Do We Still Hurt Newborn Babies? BackgroundDespite an increasing awareness regarding pain management in neonates and the availability of published guidelines for the treatment of procedural pain, preterm neonates experience pain leading to short- and long-term detrimental effects.ObjectiveTo assess the frequency of use of analgesics in invasive procedures in neonates and the associated pain burden in this population.MethodsFor 151 neonates, we prospectively recorded all painful procedures, including the number of attempts required, and analgesic therapy used during the first 14 days of neonatal intensive care unit admission. These data were linked to estimates of the pain of each procedure, obtained from the opinions of experienced clinicians.ResultsOn average, each neonate was subjected to a mean ± SD of 14 ± 4 procedures per day. The highest exposure to painful procedures occurred during the first day of admission, and most procedures (63.6%) consisted of suctioning. Many procedures (26 of 31 listed on a questionnaire) were estimated to be painful (pain scores >4 on a 10-point scale). Preemptive analgesic therapy was provided to fewer than 35% of neonates per study day, while 39.7% of the neonates did not receive any analgesic therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit.ConclusionsClinicians estimated that most neonatal intensive care unit procedures are painful, but only a third of the neonates received appropriate analgesic therapy. Despite the accumulating evidence that neonatal procedural pain is harmful, analgesic treatment for painful procedures is limited. Systematic approaches are required to reduce the occurrence of pain and to improve the analgesic treatment of repetitive pain in neonates.ADVANCES IN perinatal care have increased the survival of preterm neonates in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) worldwide. The physiological instability and underlying diseases of these infants necessitate various invasive procedures, such as endotracheal intubation, heelsticks, insertion of indwelling venous and arterial catheters, as well as nasal, tracheal, and gastric suctioning. Although previous studieshave reported the frequency of daily procedures in the NICU (Table 1), many procedures such as nasopharyngeal tube insertions and nasal suctioning were not included, and the number of failed procedures has never been evaluated, to our knowledge.Table 1. Overview of Studies Investigating the Number of Procedures in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)SourceDuration of StudyNo. of InfantsTotal ProceduresNo. of ProceduresMost Frequently PerformedBarker and Rutter,1995Total NICU stay54328360.8 per patientHeelstick (56%)Johnston et al,1997First 7 days23921342-10 per dayHeelstick (61%)Porter and Anand,1998Total NICU stay144767253.3 per patientHeelstick (87%)Benis and Suresh,2001Total NICU stay1556636 per daySuctioning (51%)Present studyFirst 14 days15119 67414 per daySuctioning (63.6%)Despite the current knowledge that low birth weight infants are able to experience pain, many daily procedures are still performed without pharmacological or nonpharmacological analgesic therapy.Indeed, preterm neonates are highly sensitive to painand amass acute responses to painful procedures.Short- and long-term effects of painful procedures in neonatesoccur as a consequence of their immature and vulnerable nervous systems, reflected in an altered pain response,possibly leading to changes in neural development. Studies in animals indicate developmental changes in the brainand in the spinal dorsal hornthat are associated with neonatal pain. A higher frequency of painful invasive procedures in low birth weight infants has been associated with a greater pain response at 32 weeks compared with controls.Although it is unknown whether these changes in pain response persist until older age,more cognitiveand psychopathologicalproblems have been reported in children who are born preterm.A growing awareness in the past several years of the importance of adequate neonatal pain management led to the discussion whether analgesia should be given to all ventilated newborns.Although there is controversy about the risks and benefits of continuous opioid administration (and as a consequence neonatologists are reluctant to prescribe them), recently published international consensus statementshave provided neonatal pain management guidelines, including those for procedural interventions. Therefore, we hypothesized that analgesic therapy is frequently used and that procedural pain is minimal in neonates admitted to the NICU. Prospectively, we collected bedside data on the number and type of daily painful procedures performed in 151 neonates during their stay in a tertiary care NICU, including failed procedures (eg, multiple attempts to insert peripheral venous catheters). These data were integrated with the results of a questionnaire evaluating the opinions of experienced clinicians about the pain of different procedures. Furthermore, the analgesic therapy used was evaluated and compared with current guidelines.METHODSPROCEDURESA pain research team (including a neonatologist [D.R.], pediatric intensivist [D.T.], research nurse, and psychologist [M. van D.]) with extensive researchand clinical experience compiled a checklist containing all daily painful procedures, invasive and noninvasive, including multiple attempts. The checklist designed for this study was tested and refined during a pilot study in December 2000 and January 2001, and 34 procedures were included in the final version.From February 1, 2001, to July 31, 2001, we documented all procedures performed in all neonates during the first 14 days of admission in a tertiary care NICU. The unit is part of the biggest children's hospital in the Netherlands, which comprises a perinatal center and pediatric surgery setting. Patients older than 3 days at admission and infants discharged or transferred within 24 hours after admission were excluded from the study. Nurses and physicians noted all procedures performed in real time each day, including the number of attempts for each procedure. The recorded procedures were cross-checked by the researchers every day to ensure accuracy. Background variables and mode of respiratory support were noted daily, and the Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB)was scored as a measure of severity of illness.In addition, all administered analgesics were noted during the study days. Standardized pharmacological analgesic therapy for procedural pain in our NICU is limited to a morphine loading dose (100 µg/kg of body weight) before tracheal intubation (unless intubation occurs in the delivery room) and before the insertion of thoracostomy tubes. Infants with indwelling thoracostomy tubes receive a continuous morphine infusion (10 µg/kg per hour) until the tube is removed.To estimate the pain of NICU procedures, we developed a questionnaire listing all invasive procedures from our checklist, with 2 noninvasive procedures (diaper change and cranial ultrasound) included as control variables. The questionnaire was distributed among the nurses and physicians of (1) the NICU, where the procedures were also counted, (2) a pediatric surgical intensive care unit present in the same hospital where newborns with major congenital anomalies are admitted, and (3) the level III NICU of another, nonuniversity, hospital (Isala Clinics). Participants were asked to estimate a rating from 0 (not painful) to 10 (most painful) for each procedure, without taking specific circumstances into account.STATISTICAL ANALYSISProcedures were counted per calendar day. Because the first and last study days are usually shorter than 24 hours, the numbers of procedures were corrected for the actual length of stay on these days.Random regression modeling (PROC MIXED; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to simultaneously estimate the effect of the time-varying covariates respiratory support (no support, nasal oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and mechanical ventilation), postnatal age, gestational age, and length of study on the number of procedures performed. Because a procedural volume difference on the first study day compared with the other days was expected, the study days were dichotomized into 2 variables: 0 (1 day) and 1 (2-14 days). The outcome variable, ie, frequency of procedures, was log-transformed (base 10) to achieve a normal distribution. The model incorporated random intercepts and random slopes.Multiple regression analysis was performed to estimate the effect of background variables (profession, sex, age, unit, hospital [Erasmus MC–Sophia Children's Hospital or Isala Clinics], parent [yes or no], and years of NICU experience) on the pain scoring of the participants.Data are presented as mean ± SD.RESULTSPATIENTSOne hundred fifty-one neonates were included in the study; 89 other newborns who were discharged within 24 hours were excluded. Table 2lists the study subjects' background characteristics and primary diagnoses. Most neonates (n = 129) were admitted and enrolled on the first postnatal day. Gestational ages ranged from 25.3 to 42.0 weeks, with a mean age of 32.4 ± 4.5 weeks. The CRIBscores ranged from 0 to 16, with a mean score of 3.9 ± 3.3. Study subjects required respiratory support consisting of mechanical ventilation on 49.6% of study days (one third high-frequency oscillation and two thirds conventional ventilation), continuous positive airway pressure on 22.5% of study days, nasal oxygen on 15.6% of study days, and subjects required no respiratory support on 12.2% of study days. During 55.2% of the study days, patients had an arterial line (42.8% peripheral arterial lines and 12.3% umbilical arterial lines).Table 2. Background Characteristics and Primary Diagnoses in 151 InfantsBackground CharacteristicValueMale/female82/69Gestational age, mean ± SD (range), wk32.4 ± 4.5 (25.3-42.0)Birth weight, mean ± SD, g1734 ± 979Clinical Risk Index for Babies score, mean ± SD (range)3.9 ± 3.3 (0-16)Duration of admission, mean ± SD, d9.2 ± 4.4Respiratory support, % of total daysNo support12.2Nasal oxygen15.6Continuous positive airway pressure22.5Conventional ventilation32.9High-frequency oscillation ventilation16.7Primary diagnosis, No.Prematurity104Small for gestational age (>2 SDs under mean birth weight)23Asphyxia15Respiratory insufficiency93Respiratory distress syndrome55Wet lung17Meconium aspiration syndrome5Pneumothorax9Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn7Infections20Sepsis42Meningitis2Necrotizing enterocolitis5Hyperbilirubinemia47Interventricular hemorrhage12Other cerebral abnormalities19Patent ductus arteriosus28Indomethacin sodium therapy25Surgical closure1No therapy2Congenital cardiac defects8FREQUENCYDuring 1375 patient-days, 19 674 procedures were performed, with a mean NICU stay of 9.1 ± 4.4 days per patient. Table 3gives the procedures rank-ordered by their frequency. Suctioning of nasal, endotracheal, and nasopharyngeal tubes constituted 63.6% of the performed procedures. The mean number of procedures per neonate per day was 14.3 ± 4, with a range of 0 to 53 procedures per day. Almost one third (30.9%) of the 1076 insertions of intravenous cannulae were not successful. Procedures for placement of central venous catheters, peripheral arterial catheters, and umbilical catheters were not successful in 45.6%, 37.5%, and 34.6% of attempts, respectively. Failure rates for venipunctures and lumbar punctures were 21.0% and 17.5%, respectively (Figure 1).Table 3. Incidence of Procedures, With Frequencies per Infant per DayProcedure% of Total ProceduresFrequency per Infant per Day, Mean ± SDNasal suctioning31.24.5 ± 2.3Endotracheal suctioning23.03.3 ± 4.0NPT suctioning9.41.3 ± 2.4Heelstick7.11.0 ± 1.6IV cannula insertion3.80.5 ± 0.6Nasogastric tube insertion3.80.5 ± 0.6IV cannula removal3.20.5 ± 0.7Nasogastric tube removal3.10.4 ± 0.5X-ray2.90.4 ± 0.9NPT insertion2.40.3 ± 0.6Attempt IV cannula insertion1.70.2 ± 0.9Laxative or enema1.20.2 ± 0.5Nasal oxygen cannula insertion1.00.2 ± 0.4Intubation0.90.1 ± 0.4Peripheral arterial line insertion0.80.1 ± 0.3TCPO2sticker removal0.80.1 ± 0.6Extubation0.70.1 ± 0.3Peripheral arterial line removal0.6<0.1 ± 0.3Attempt arterial line insertion0.5<0.1 ± 0.5Venipuncture0.4<0.1 ± 0.3Insertion umbilical line0.4<0.1 ± 0.2Lumbar puncture0.3<0.1 ± 0.2Changing central line sticker0.3<0.1 ± 0.2Removal umbilical line0.3<0.1 ± 0.2Bladder puncture0.2<0.1 ± 0.2Attempt umbilical line insertion0.2<0.1 ± 0.2Insertion central line0.2<0.1 ± 0.2Insertion chest tube0.1<0.1 ± 0.2Attempt central line insertion0.1<0.1 ± 0.2Venipuncture attempt0.1<0.1 ± 0.2Removal central line0.1<0.1 ± 0.1Removal chest tube0.1<0.1 ± 0.1Lumbar puncture attempt0.1<0.1 ± 0.1Intramuscular injection<0.1<0.1 ± 0.1Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; NPT, nasopharyngeal tube; TCPO2sticker, transcutaneous oxygen pressure sticker.Figure 1.Percentages of failed and successful procedures.Random regression modeling (Table 4) showed significantly higher frequencies of procedures during the first study day compared with days 2 to 14 (P<.001). The frequency of procedures was not predicted by gestational age (P= .51), day of admission (P= .50), or postnatal age (P= .72).Table 4. Random Regression Model for Predicting the Frequency of ProceduresVariable*βSE of βtPValueNasal oxygen†.18.028.57<.001Continuous positive airway pressure†.40.0219.40<.001Ventilation†.42.0222.38<.001Gestational age−.001.002−0.65.51Postnatal age−.00003.00008−0.35.72Day of admission.001.0020.67.50Day 1 vs days 2-14‡−.21.03−8.18<.001Length of stay.02.00113.81<.001*The outcome variable was the frequency of procedures. Boldface indicates significant predictor variables (P<.05).†Dummy coding was used, with no respiratory support as the reference group.‡Day of admission was dichotomized as 0 (day 1) vs 1 (days 2-14).Procedures were performed with significantly higher frequencies in patients receiving nasal oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and ventilation (P<.001 for all) compared with those without respiratory support.PAIN OF PROCEDURESTwo hundred forty-seven questionnaires were distributed, with a response rate of 59.9% (n = 148), which was similar for nurses and physicians (Table 5gives their background characteristics). The mean pain score, across all respondents and all procedures, on the 10-point scale was 5.2 ± 1.3. The mean pain score per procedure varied from 1.7 ± 1.6 for diaper change to 8.9 ± 1.4 for intubation. Pain ratings given by the nurses and physicians are shown in Figure 2.Table 5. Background Characteristics of 148 Questionnaire RespondentsCharacteristicNurses (n = 119)Physicians (n = 29)ParticipantsNICU Rotterdam, the Netherlands499PSICU Rotterdam316NICU Zwolle, the Netherlands3914Age, mean ± SD, y37 ± 734 ± 7Male/female7/11212/17Parent/not parent64/5512/17NICU experience, mean ± SD, y7.9 ± 6.24.2 ± 6.6Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PSICU, pediatric surgical intensive care unit.Figure 2.Questionnaire results per procedure are shown by median scores of physicians (triangles) and nurses (squares) and their interquartile ranges.Because procedures were scored on a 10-point scale, results of this questionnaire can be compared with a frequently used pain score, the visual analog scale. A visual analog scale score above 4 is generally used as a criterion for administration of extra analgesic therapy.Therefore, procedures with pain scores above 4 can be considered as moderately painful. Procedures that received lower scores included the control variables, diaper change and cranial ultrasound, as well as insertion of nasal cannulae, X-rays, and the removal of nasogastric tubes. All other procedures were considered moderately to severely painful.Multiple regression analyses (Table 6) showed that nurses scored various procedures as more painful than physicians (β = .30, P= .001), caregivers who were parents themselves scored procedures lower than persons without children (β = .27, P= .002), and ratings between the 2 hospitals were somewhat different (β = .20, P= .03). The multiple regression coefficient (R= 0.43) explained about 15% of the variance in the model.Table 6. Multiple Regression Model for Pain Scores of 148 RespondentsVariable*β (95% Confidence Interval)tPValueNurse vs physician−.30 (−.91 to .31)−3.30.001Sex.02 (−.67 to .71)0.17.87Age−.01 (−.05 to .03)−0.12.91Parent, no vs yes−.27 (−.70 to .16)−3.12.002NICU experience, y.10 (.06 to .14)0.91.36Hospital.20 (−.26 to .66)2.2.03Unit, NICU vs PSICU.17 (−.33 to .67)1.9.06Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PSICU, pediatric surgical intensive care unit.*The outcome variable was the mean pain score. Boldface indicates significant predictor variables (P<.05).ANALGESIC TREATMENTPharmacological analgesic treatment was studied in 126 patients (Figure 3); 25 neonates were excluded because they were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing morphine with placebo. Fifty patients (39.7%) did not receive any analgesic therapy during the study. Analgesic treatment regimens consisted of a morphine loading dose (given before intubation in 67.8% of administrations), continuous morphine infusion, or morphine in combination with vecuronium bromide, midazolam hydrochloride, or acetaminophen supplements. Fewer than 35% of newborns received analgesic therapy each day. Most therapy was administered during the first day, when 41 infants (32.5%) received analgesics, and decreased within 2 weeks to 12.2% and 14.6% of infants receiving analgesics on days 13 and 14, respectively.Figure 3.Pharmacological analgesic treatment per day of admission.Analgesic therapy, pharmacological and nonpharmacological, was rarely applied before invasive procedures. Analgesics were generally used only before tracheal intubation or insertion of a chest tube and usually were not given in association with other procedures with high pain scores. Although some nurses used pacifiers and tried to comfort infants during and after procedures by handling, nonpharmacological analgesic treatment was not given routinely for any of the procedures.COMMENTIn sharp contrast to the accumulating evidence that repetitive pain is harmful in newborns, and despite major clinical advances over the past 10 years, neonates experience up to 14 painful procedures per day, and, remarkably, more than 65% of the patients in this study did not receive appropriate analgesic therapy.We report a higher number of painful procedures in this study compared with previous studies, perhaps because we used a more extensive list of procedures and accounted for failed procedures (Table 1). For instance, Benis and Sureshreported a mean of 6 procedures per day during the entire NICU stay of 15 neonates. Barker and Rutterreported an increased number of procedures in infants younger than 31 weeks' gestation compared with older infants, but did not mention the length of NICU stay, which may explain the exposure to a greater number of invasive procedures. In the present study, however, the frequency of procedures per day was not related to gestational age, perhaps because term neonates admitted to the NICU may have a severity of illness comparable to that of preterm neonates.To our knowledge, we are the first to report prospective data on a substantial number of failed procedures in the NICU. Although attempts by even the most experienced clinicians may be unsuccessful, the relative inexperience of trainees may partly explain the high proportion of failed procedures in this study. These findings may, therefore, be applicable to NICUs located in other academic centers.Efforts should be aimed at minimizing the number of invasive procedures, as stated in recent consensus guidelines.Our study showed that the number of procedures is significantly higher in neonates requiring nasal oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, or ventilation and that procedures occur mostly on the first day of admission, because of initial stabilization, monitoring, and diagnostic evaluation. Furthermore, the number of heelsticks and venipunctures is subsequently decreased in patients having arterial lines. Our nursing protocols require tracheal suctioning every 4 hours and as needed for ventilated neonates, whereas a recent studyshowed comparable ventilatory outcomes when the frequency of routine suctioning was decreased to every 8 hours.Nurses and physicians agreed that most neonatal procedures cause moderate or severe pain,with pain scores above 4 estimated for 26 of the 31 procedures. Physicians ascribed lower pain scores; because they are mostly responsible for prescribing analgesics, this may contribute to the limited use of analgesic therapy in neonates.Others have reported comparable significant differences in pain scores of invasive procedures between nurses and physicians.The clinicians not returning the questionnaire might have been unmotivated and not interested in pain management in the NICU. However, a formal analysis of their motives was not undertaken. This lack of interest is probably related to their belief that these daily procedures are not that painful. As the response rate was not very high, the results of our questionnaire might show some overestimation of clinicians' overall opinion about the pain level of these procedures.In our NICU, nurses tried to cluster procedures during routine nursing care, after which they comforted patients by touch, pacifiers, or positioning (eg, swaddling), whereas other behavioral and environmental approaches were used irregularly. Similar to our results, a multicenter studyin France also showed minimal use of analgesics and a lack of standardization in the pharmacological regimens used in the NICU. Kahn et alreported a 28.6-fold variation in the use of opioids among 6 NICUs. Variations in attitude toward pain may limit the generalizability of our study findings to other centers around the world.Restrained use of opioids by neonatologists can be explained by the fact that there is wide disagreement as to whether the evidence base is sufficient to justify prolonged exposure to opioids in this vulnerable population. There is some evidence, from studies in rats, that neonatal morphine exposure causes specific long-term behavioral effectsand might cause retarded growth and motor development.Underlying pathologic mechanisms have been demonstrated by morphine-induced apoptosis in human fetal cell culturesand by µ-opiate receptor down-regulation following morphine treatment in neonatal rat brain.Prolonged use of high doses of opioids in animal and in vitro models complicates extrapolation of these findings to daily NICU practice. The only studyinvestigating long-term effects of human neonatal morphine treatment showed no effects in 5- to 6-year-olds. Anand and colleaguesreported decreased mortality with the use of postoperative analgesia in premature infants. However, a similar benefit of routine use of morphine has not been reported in this population without a surgical operation. Grunau et alfound that altered pain responses in preterm neonates were predicted by the number of previous painful procedures and were normalized by the early use of morphine analgesia. Although accumulating data suggest that analgesic therapy with morphine might be useful to prevent some of the long-term effects of repetitive neonatal pain, further evidence about the safety of prolonged use of opioids is needed.CONCLUSIONSWe recommend that a continuous intravenous infusion of opioids should be considered for infants requiring respiratory support during the first 24 hours of admission, in combination with well validated pain scores as part of routine nursing care. Use of an algorithm would enable caregivers to respond immediately and in a structured way when they observe pain in these infants. Although this recommendation is supported by preliminary studies,results from larger randomized controlled trials are needed to decide if ventilated neonates should be routinely treated with continuous opioids.As treatment regimens evolve, consistent practices in the NICU should be developed to minimize invasive procedures that continue to hurt our newborns.What This Study AddsAs evidence about the short- and long-term harmful effects of pain in neonates accumulates, efforts should be made to decrease the number of pain experiences and to improve analgesic therapy. This study reports the number of painful procedures that neonates experience during an NICU stay. In contrast to the high incidence of painful procedures, we show the limited use of analgesic treatment, despite the awareness of nurses and physicians that most procedures are indeed painful.DPBarkerNRutterExposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1995;72:F47-F48.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7743285&dopt=AbstractCCJohnstonJMCollingeSJHendersonKJSAnandA cross-sectional survey of pain and pharmacological analgesia in Canadian neonatal intensive care units.Clin J Pain.1997;13:308-312.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9430811&dopt=AbstractMMBenisGKSureshFrequency of invasive procedures in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) [abstract].Pediatric Res.2001;49:392A. Abstract 2253.FLPorterKJSAnandEpidemiology of pain in neonates.Res Clin Forums.1998;20:9-18.LSFranckA national survey of the assessment and treatment of pain and agitation in the neonatal intensive care unit.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs.1987;16:387-393.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3694306&dopt=AbstractJTohillOMcMorrowPain relief in neonatal intensive care [letter].Lancet.1990;336:569.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1975064&dopt=AbstractHBauchnerAMayECoatesUse of analgesic agents for invasive medical procedures in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units.J Pediatr.1992;121:647-649.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1403404&dopt=AbstractCRMcLaughlinJGHullWHEdwardsCPCramerWLDeweyNeonatal pain.J Pain Symptom Manage.1993;8:7-16.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8482895&dopt=AbstractCVFernandezEPReesPain management in Canadian level 3 neonatal intensive care units.CMAJ.1994;150:499-504.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7906191&dopt=AbstractXGiannakoulopoulosJTeixeiraNFiskVGloverHuman fetal and maternal noradrenaline responses to invasive procedures.Pediatr Res.1999;45(pt 1):494-499.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10203140&dopt=AbstractRPSmithRGitauVGloverNMFiskPain and stress in the human fetus.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2000;92:161-165.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10986451&dopt=AbstractSVanhataloOvan NieuwenhuizenFetal pain?Brain Dev.2000;22:145-150.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10814894&dopt=AbstractKDCraigMFWhitfieldRVGrunauJLintonHDHadjistavropoulosPain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices.Pain.1993;52:287-299.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8460047&dopt=AbstractCCJohnstonBStevensFYangLHortonDevelopmental changes in response to heelstick in preterm infants.Dev Med Child Neurol.1996;38:438-445.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8698151&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandPain, plasticity, and premature birth.Nat Med.2000;6:971-973.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10973310&dopt=AbstractFLPorterREGrunauKJAnandLong-term effects of pain in infants.J Dev Behav Pediatr.1999;20:253-261.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10475600&dopt=AbstractMFitzgeraldKAndrwesNeurophysiological and neurobiological correlates of supraspinal pain processing measurement techniques.In: McGrath PJ, ed. Progress in Pain Research and Management. Seattle, Wash: IASP Press; 1998:21-46.KJSAnandFMScalzoCan adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development and subsequent behavior?Biol Neonate.2000;77:69-82.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10657682&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandVCoskunKVThrivikramanCBNemeroffPMPlotskyLong-term behavioral effects of repetitive pain in neonatal rat pups.Physiol Behav.1999;66:627-637.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10386907&dopt=AbstractMARudaQDLingAGHohmannYBPengTTachibanaAltered nociceptive neuronal circuits after neonatal peripheral inflammation.Science.2000;289:628-631.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10915627&dopt=AbstractREGrunauTFOberlanderMFWhitfieldCFitzgeraldSKLeeDemographic and therapeutic determinants of pain reactivity in very low birth weight neonates at 32 weeks' postconceptional age.Pediatrics.2001;107:105-112.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11134442&dopt=AbstractTFOberlanderREGrunauMFWhitfieldCFitzgeraldSPitfieldJPSaulBiobehavioral pain responses in former extremely low birth weight infants at four months' corrected age [serial online].Pediatrics.2000;105:e6. Available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/105/1/e6.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10617743&dopt=AbstractMFWhitfieldREGrunauBehavior, pain perception, and the extremely low-birth weight survivor.Clin Perinatol.2000;27:363-379.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10863655&dopt=AbstractATBhuttaMAClevesPHCaseyMMCradockKJSAnandCognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis.JAMA.2002;288:728-737.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12169077&dopt=AbstractRVGrunauMFWhitfieldJHPetrieELFryerEarly pain experience, child and family factors, as precursors of somatization.Pain.1994;56:353-359.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8022628&dopt=AbstractBSPetersonBVohrLHStaibRegional brain volume abnormalities and long-term cognitive outcome in preterm infants.JAMA.2000;284:1939-1947.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11035890&dopt=AbstractPJMiceliMCGoeke-MoreyTLWhitmanKSKolbergCMiller-LoncarRDWhiteBrief report: birth status, medical complications, and social environment.J Pediatr Psychol.2000;25:353-358.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10880066&dopt=AbstractMCherkes-JulkowskiLearning disability, attention-deficit disorder, and language impairment as outcomes of prematurity: a longitudinal descriptive study.J Learn Disabil.1998;31:294-306.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9599962&dopt=AbstractLNadeauMBoivinRTessierFLefebvrePRobaeyMediators of behavioral problems in 7-year-old children born after 24 to 28 weeks of gestation.J Dev Behav Pediatr.2001;22:1-10.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11265917&dopt=AbstractTMRusheLRifkinALStewartNeuropsychological outcome at adolescence of very preterm birth and its relation to brain structure.Dev Med Child Neurol.2001;43:226-233.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11305398&dopt=AbstractETidemanDLeyIBjerreMForslundLongitudinal follow-up of children born preterm.Early Hum Dev.2001;61:97-110.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11223272&dopt=AbstractNBottingAPowlsRWCookeNMarlowAttention deficit hyperactivity disorders and other psychiatric outcomes in very low birthweight children at 12 years.J Child Psychol Psychiatry.1997;38:931-941.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9413793&dopt=AbstractHGTaylorNKleinMHackSchool-age consequences of birth weight less than 750 g: a review and update.Dev Neuropsychol.2000;17:289-321.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11056846&dopt=AbstractHGTaylorNKleinNMMinichMHackMiddle-school–age outcomes in children with very low birthweight.Child Dev.2000;71:1495-1511.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11194251&dopt=AbstractNAmbalavananWACarloAnalgesia for ventilated neonates: where do we stand?J Pediatr.1999;135:403-405.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10518068&dopt=AbstractKAKennedyJETysonNarcotic analgesia for ventilated newborns: are placebo-controlled trials ethical and necessary?J Pediatr.1999;134:127-129.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9931512&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandInternational Evidence-Based Group for Neonatal PainConsensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.2001;155:173-180.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11177093&dopt=AbstractCommittee on Fetus and Newborn, Committee on Drugs, Section on Anesthesiology, Section on Surgery, Fetus and Newborn CommitteePrevention and management of pain and stress in the neonate.Pediatrics.2000;105:454-461.NJBouwmeesterKJSAnandMvan DijkWCHopFBoomsmaDTibboelHormonal and metabolic stress responses after major surgery in children aged 0-3 years.Br J Anaesth.2001;87:390-399.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11517122&dopt=AbstractRAvan LingenHTDeinumCMQuakAOkkenDTibboelMultiple-dose pharmacokinetics of rectally administered acetaminophen in term infants.Clin Pharmacol Ther.1999;66:509-515.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10579478&dopt=AbstractRAvan LingenJTDeinumJMQuakPharmacokinetics and metabolism of rectally administered paracetamol in preterm neonates.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1999;80:F59-F63.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10325815&dopt=AbstractRAvan LingenCMQuakHTDeinumEffects of rectally administered paracetamol on infants delivered by vacuum extraction.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2001;94:73-78.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11134829&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkNJBouwmeesterHJDuivenvoordenEfficacy of continuous versus intermittent morphine administration after major surgery in 0–3-year-old infants: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Pain.2002;98:305-313.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12127032&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkJBde BoerHMKootDTibboelJPasschierHJDuivenvoordenThe reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument in 0 to 3-year-old infants.Pain.2000;84:367-377.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10666543&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkHMKootHHSaadDTibboelJPasschierObservational visual analog scale in pediatric pain assessment.Clin J Pain.2002;18:310-316.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12218502&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkDTibboelReview of pain assessment measures for postoperative pain in vulnerable infants.Clin Perinatol.2002;29:469-491.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12380470&dopt=AbstractRAvan LingenSHSimonsBJAndersonDTibboelThe effects of analgesia in the vulnerable infant during the perinatal period.Clin Perinatol.2002;29:511-534.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12380472&dopt=AbstractCDvan der MarelRAvan LingenMAPluimAnalgesic efficacy of rectal versus oral acetaminophen in children after major craniofacial surgery.Clin Pharmacol Ther.2001;70:82-90.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11452248&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkJWPetersNJBouwmeesterDTibboelAre postoperative pain instruments useful for specific groups of vulnerable infants?Clin Perinatol.2002;29:469-491.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12380470&dopt=AbstractJWPetersHMKootJBde BoerMajor surgery within the first 3 months of life and subsequent biobehavioral pain responses to immunization at later age: a case comparison study.Pediatrics.2003;111:129-135.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12509565&dopt=AbstractThe International Neonatal NetworkThe CRIB (Clinical Risk Index for Babies) score.Lancet.1993;342:193-198.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8100927&dopt=AbstractLCorderoMSananesLWAyersA comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants.Respir Care.2001;46:783-788.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11463368&dopt=AbstractFLPorterCMWolfJGoldDLotsoffJPMillerPain and pain management in newborn infants: a survey of physicians and nurses.Pediatrics.1997;100:626-632.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9310516&dopt=AbstractMWQuinnJBakerStaff perception of pain on a neonatal intensive care unit [letter].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.2001;85:F77.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11455944&dopt=AbstractTDebillonVBureauCSavagnerVZupan-SimunekRCarbajalPain management in French neonatal intensive care units.Acta Paediatr.2002;91:822-826.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12200910&dopt=AbstractDJKahnDKRichardsonJEGrayVariation among neonatal intensive care units in narcotic administration.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.1998;152:844-851.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9743028&dopt=AbstractATBhuttaCRovnaghiPMSimpsonJMGossettFMScalzoKJAnandInteractions of inflammatory pain and morphine in infant rats: long-term behavioral effects.Physiol Behav.2001;73:51-58.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11399294&dopt=AbstractGEHandelmannDDow-EdwardsModulation of brain development by morphine.Peptides.1985;6(suppl 2):29-34.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4080616&dopt=AbstractSHuWSShengJRLokensgardPKPetersonMorphine induces apoptosis of human microglia and neurons.Neuropharmacology.2002;42:829-836.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12015209&dopt=AbstractATempelVisualization of µ-opiate receptor downregulation following morphine treatment in neonatal rat brain.Brain Res Dev Brain Res.1991;64:19-26.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1664787&dopt=AbstractRMacGregorDEvansDSugdenTGaussenMLeveneOutcome at 5-6 years of prematurely born children who received morphine as neonates.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1998;79:F40-F43.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9797623&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandWGSippellAAynsley-GreenRandomised trial of fentanyl anaesthesia in preterm babies undergoing surgery.Lancet.1987;1:62-66.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2879174&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandPRHickeyHalothane-morphine compared with high-dose sufentanil for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in neonatal cardiac surgery.N Engl J Med.1992;326:1-9.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1530752&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandBABartonNMcIntoshAnalgesia and sedation in preterm neonates who require ventilatory support .Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.1999;153:331-338. [published correction appears in Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med1999;153:895].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10201714&dopt=AbstractMPDykeRKohanSEvansMorphine increases synchronous ventilation in preterm infants.J Paediatr Child Health.1995;31:176-179.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7669374&dopt=AbstractRFGoldsteinJEBrazyNarcotic sedation stabilizes arterial blood pressure fluctuations in sick premature infants.J Perinatol.1991;11:365-371.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1770395&dopt=AbstractESaarenmaaPHuttunenJLeppaluotoOMeretojaVFellmanAdvantages of fentanyl over morphine in analgesia for ventilated newborn infants after birth: a randomized trial.J Pediatr.1999;134:144-150.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9931520&dopt=AbstractNEOPAIN Multi-center GroupEffects of morphine therapy on neurologic outcomes in ventilated preterm neonates.Pediatric Res.2002;51:361. Abstract 2101.Corresponding author: Dick Tibboel, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC–Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr Molewaterplein 60, 3015 GJ Rotterdam, the Netherlands (e-mail: j.illsley@erasmusmc.nl).Accepted for publication June 19, 2003.This work was supported by grant MW-NWO 940-31-048 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, The Hague.We thank N. Jongeneel, RN, C. Bunkers, RN, and E. Smink, RN, for distributing the surveys among physicians and nurses; C. Hoving, MSc, for helping to collect the data from nurses and physicians who completed the survey; H. J. Duivenvoorden, PhD, for statistical advice, and J. Hagoort for his help in preparing the manuscript. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Pediatrics American Medical Association

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/do-we-still-hurt-newborn-babies-xlBD4NS0He
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
2168-6203
eISSN
2168-6211
DOI
10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1058
pmid
14609893
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

BackgroundDespite an increasing awareness regarding pain management in neonates and the availability of published guidelines for the treatment of procedural pain, preterm neonates experience pain leading to short- and long-term detrimental effects.ObjectiveTo assess the frequency of use of analgesics in invasive procedures in neonates and the associated pain burden in this population.MethodsFor 151 neonates, we prospectively recorded all painful procedures, including the number of attempts required, and analgesic therapy used during the first 14 days of neonatal intensive care unit admission. These data were linked to estimates of the pain of each procedure, obtained from the opinions of experienced clinicians.ResultsOn average, each neonate was subjected to a mean ± SD of 14 ± 4 procedures per day. The highest exposure to painful procedures occurred during the first day of admission, and most procedures (63.6%) consisted of suctioning. Many procedures (26 of 31 listed on a questionnaire) were estimated to be painful (pain scores >4 on a 10-point scale). Preemptive analgesic therapy was provided to fewer than 35% of neonates per study day, while 39.7% of the neonates did not receive any analgesic therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit.ConclusionsClinicians estimated that most neonatal intensive care unit procedures are painful, but only a third of the neonates received appropriate analgesic therapy. Despite the accumulating evidence that neonatal procedural pain is harmful, analgesic treatment for painful procedures is limited. Systematic approaches are required to reduce the occurrence of pain and to improve the analgesic treatment of repetitive pain in neonates.ADVANCES IN perinatal care have increased the survival of preterm neonates in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) worldwide. The physiological instability and underlying diseases of these infants necessitate various invasive procedures, such as endotracheal intubation, heelsticks, insertion of indwelling venous and arterial catheters, as well as nasal, tracheal, and gastric suctioning. Although previous studieshave reported the frequency of daily procedures in the NICU (Table 1), many procedures such as nasopharyngeal tube insertions and nasal suctioning were not included, and the number of failed procedures has never been evaluated, to our knowledge.Table 1. Overview of Studies Investigating the Number of Procedures in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)SourceDuration of StudyNo. of InfantsTotal ProceduresNo. of ProceduresMost Frequently PerformedBarker and Rutter,1995Total NICU stay54328360.8 per patientHeelstick (56%)Johnston et al,1997First 7 days23921342-10 per dayHeelstick (61%)Porter and Anand,1998Total NICU stay144767253.3 per patientHeelstick (87%)Benis and Suresh,2001Total NICU stay1556636 per daySuctioning (51%)Present studyFirst 14 days15119 67414 per daySuctioning (63.6%)Despite the current knowledge that low birth weight infants are able to experience pain, many daily procedures are still performed without pharmacological or nonpharmacological analgesic therapy.Indeed, preterm neonates are highly sensitive to painand amass acute responses to painful procedures.Short- and long-term effects of painful procedures in neonatesoccur as a consequence of their immature and vulnerable nervous systems, reflected in an altered pain response,possibly leading to changes in neural development. Studies in animals indicate developmental changes in the brainand in the spinal dorsal hornthat are associated with neonatal pain. A higher frequency of painful invasive procedures in low birth weight infants has been associated with a greater pain response at 32 weeks compared with controls.Although it is unknown whether these changes in pain response persist until older age,more cognitiveand psychopathologicalproblems have been reported in children who are born preterm.A growing awareness in the past several years of the importance of adequate neonatal pain management led to the discussion whether analgesia should be given to all ventilated newborns.Although there is controversy about the risks and benefits of continuous opioid administration (and as a consequence neonatologists are reluctant to prescribe them), recently published international consensus statementshave provided neonatal pain management guidelines, including those for procedural interventions. Therefore, we hypothesized that analgesic therapy is frequently used and that procedural pain is minimal in neonates admitted to the NICU. Prospectively, we collected bedside data on the number and type of daily painful procedures performed in 151 neonates during their stay in a tertiary care NICU, including failed procedures (eg, multiple attempts to insert peripheral venous catheters). These data were integrated with the results of a questionnaire evaluating the opinions of experienced clinicians about the pain of different procedures. Furthermore, the analgesic therapy used was evaluated and compared with current guidelines.METHODSPROCEDURESA pain research team (including a neonatologist [D.R.], pediatric intensivist [D.T.], research nurse, and psychologist [M. van D.]) with extensive researchand clinical experience compiled a checklist containing all daily painful procedures, invasive and noninvasive, including multiple attempts. The checklist designed for this study was tested and refined during a pilot study in December 2000 and January 2001, and 34 procedures were included in the final version.From February 1, 2001, to July 31, 2001, we documented all procedures performed in all neonates during the first 14 days of admission in a tertiary care NICU. The unit is part of the biggest children's hospital in the Netherlands, which comprises a perinatal center and pediatric surgery setting. Patients older than 3 days at admission and infants discharged or transferred within 24 hours after admission were excluded from the study. Nurses and physicians noted all procedures performed in real time each day, including the number of attempts for each procedure. The recorded procedures were cross-checked by the researchers every day to ensure accuracy. Background variables and mode of respiratory support were noted daily, and the Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB)was scored as a measure of severity of illness.In addition, all administered analgesics were noted during the study days. Standardized pharmacological analgesic therapy for procedural pain in our NICU is limited to a morphine loading dose (100 µg/kg of body weight) before tracheal intubation (unless intubation occurs in the delivery room) and before the insertion of thoracostomy tubes. Infants with indwelling thoracostomy tubes receive a continuous morphine infusion (10 µg/kg per hour) until the tube is removed.To estimate the pain of NICU procedures, we developed a questionnaire listing all invasive procedures from our checklist, with 2 noninvasive procedures (diaper change and cranial ultrasound) included as control variables. The questionnaire was distributed among the nurses and physicians of (1) the NICU, where the procedures were also counted, (2) a pediatric surgical intensive care unit present in the same hospital where newborns with major congenital anomalies are admitted, and (3) the level III NICU of another, nonuniversity, hospital (Isala Clinics). Participants were asked to estimate a rating from 0 (not painful) to 10 (most painful) for each procedure, without taking specific circumstances into account.STATISTICAL ANALYSISProcedures were counted per calendar day. Because the first and last study days are usually shorter than 24 hours, the numbers of procedures were corrected for the actual length of stay on these days.Random regression modeling (PROC MIXED; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to simultaneously estimate the effect of the time-varying covariates respiratory support (no support, nasal oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and mechanical ventilation), postnatal age, gestational age, and length of study on the number of procedures performed. Because a procedural volume difference on the first study day compared with the other days was expected, the study days were dichotomized into 2 variables: 0 (1 day) and 1 (2-14 days). The outcome variable, ie, frequency of procedures, was log-transformed (base 10) to achieve a normal distribution. The model incorporated random intercepts and random slopes.Multiple regression analysis was performed to estimate the effect of background variables (profession, sex, age, unit, hospital [Erasmus MC–Sophia Children's Hospital or Isala Clinics], parent [yes or no], and years of NICU experience) on the pain scoring of the participants.Data are presented as mean ± SD.RESULTSPATIENTSOne hundred fifty-one neonates were included in the study; 89 other newborns who were discharged within 24 hours were excluded. Table 2lists the study subjects' background characteristics and primary diagnoses. Most neonates (n = 129) were admitted and enrolled on the first postnatal day. Gestational ages ranged from 25.3 to 42.0 weeks, with a mean age of 32.4 ± 4.5 weeks. The CRIBscores ranged from 0 to 16, with a mean score of 3.9 ± 3.3. Study subjects required respiratory support consisting of mechanical ventilation on 49.6% of study days (one third high-frequency oscillation and two thirds conventional ventilation), continuous positive airway pressure on 22.5% of study days, nasal oxygen on 15.6% of study days, and subjects required no respiratory support on 12.2% of study days. During 55.2% of the study days, patients had an arterial line (42.8% peripheral arterial lines and 12.3% umbilical arterial lines).Table 2. Background Characteristics and Primary Diagnoses in 151 InfantsBackground CharacteristicValueMale/female82/69Gestational age, mean ± SD (range), wk32.4 ± 4.5 (25.3-42.0)Birth weight, mean ± SD, g1734 ± 979Clinical Risk Index for Babies score, mean ± SD (range)3.9 ± 3.3 (0-16)Duration of admission, mean ± SD, d9.2 ± 4.4Respiratory support, % of total daysNo support12.2Nasal oxygen15.6Continuous positive airway pressure22.5Conventional ventilation32.9High-frequency oscillation ventilation16.7Primary diagnosis, No.Prematurity104Small for gestational age (>2 SDs under mean birth weight)23Asphyxia15Respiratory insufficiency93Respiratory distress syndrome55Wet lung17Meconium aspiration syndrome5Pneumothorax9Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn7Infections20Sepsis42Meningitis2Necrotizing enterocolitis5Hyperbilirubinemia47Interventricular hemorrhage12Other cerebral abnormalities19Patent ductus arteriosus28Indomethacin sodium therapy25Surgical closure1No therapy2Congenital cardiac defects8FREQUENCYDuring 1375 patient-days, 19 674 procedures were performed, with a mean NICU stay of 9.1 ± 4.4 days per patient. Table 3gives the procedures rank-ordered by their frequency. Suctioning of nasal, endotracheal, and nasopharyngeal tubes constituted 63.6% of the performed procedures. The mean number of procedures per neonate per day was 14.3 ± 4, with a range of 0 to 53 procedures per day. Almost one third (30.9%) of the 1076 insertions of intravenous cannulae were not successful. Procedures for placement of central venous catheters, peripheral arterial catheters, and umbilical catheters were not successful in 45.6%, 37.5%, and 34.6% of attempts, respectively. Failure rates for venipunctures and lumbar punctures were 21.0% and 17.5%, respectively (Figure 1).Table 3. Incidence of Procedures, With Frequencies per Infant per DayProcedure% of Total ProceduresFrequency per Infant per Day, Mean ± SDNasal suctioning31.24.5 ± 2.3Endotracheal suctioning23.03.3 ± 4.0NPT suctioning9.41.3 ± 2.4Heelstick7.11.0 ± 1.6IV cannula insertion3.80.5 ± 0.6Nasogastric tube insertion3.80.5 ± 0.6IV cannula removal3.20.5 ± 0.7Nasogastric tube removal3.10.4 ± 0.5X-ray2.90.4 ± 0.9NPT insertion2.40.3 ± 0.6Attempt IV cannula insertion1.70.2 ± 0.9Laxative or enema1.20.2 ± 0.5Nasal oxygen cannula insertion1.00.2 ± 0.4Intubation0.90.1 ± 0.4Peripheral arterial line insertion0.80.1 ± 0.3TCPO2sticker removal0.80.1 ± 0.6Extubation0.70.1 ± 0.3Peripheral arterial line removal0.6<0.1 ± 0.3Attempt arterial line insertion0.5<0.1 ± 0.5Venipuncture0.4<0.1 ± 0.3Insertion umbilical line0.4<0.1 ± 0.2Lumbar puncture0.3<0.1 ± 0.2Changing central line sticker0.3<0.1 ± 0.2Removal umbilical line0.3<0.1 ± 0.2Bladder puncture0.2<0.1 ± 0.2Attempt umbilical line insertion0.2<0.1 ± 0.2Insertion central line0.2<0.1 ± 0.2Insertion chest tube0.1<0.1 ± 0.2Attempt central line insertion0.1<0.1 ± 0.2Venipuncture attempt0.1<0.1 ± 0.2Removal central line0.1<0.1 ± 0.1Removal chest tube0.1<0.1 ± 0.1Lumbar puncture attempt0.1<0.1 ± 0.1Intramuscular injection<0.1<0.1 ± 0.1Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; NPT, nasopharyngeal tube; TCPO2sticker, transcutaneous oxygen pressure sticker.Figure 1.Percentages of failed and successful procedures.Random regression modeling (Table 4) showed significantly higher frequencies of procedures during the first study day compared with days 2 to 14 (P<.001). The frequency of procedures was not predicted by gestational age (P= .51), day of admission (P= .50), or postnatal age (P= .72).Table 4. Random Regression Model for Predicting the Frequency of ProceduresVariable*βSE of βtPValueNasal oxygen†.18.028.57<.001Continuous positive airway pressure†.40.0219.40<.001Ventilation†.42.0222.38<.001Gestational age−.001.002−0.65.51Postnatal age−.00003.00008−0.35.72Day of admission.001.0020.67.50Day 1 vs days 2-14‡−.21.03−8.18<.001Length of stay.02.00113.81<.001*The outcome variable was the frequency of procedures. Boldface indicates significant predictor variables (P<.05).†Dummy coding was used, with no respiratory support as the reference group.‡Day of admission was dichotomized as 0 (day 1) vs 1 (days 2-14).Procedures were performed with significantly higher frequencies in patients receiving nasal oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and ventilation (P<.001 for all) compared with those without respiratory support.PAIN OF PROCEDURESTwo hundred forty-seven questionnaires were distributed, with a response rate of 59.9% (n = 148), which was similar for nurses and physicians (Table 5gives their background characteristics). The mean pain score, across all respondents and all procedures, on the 10-point scale was 5.2 ± 1.3. The mean pain score per procedure varied from 1.7 ± 1.6 for diaper change to 8.9 ± 1.4 for intubation. Pain ratings given by the nurses and physicians are shown in Figure 2.Table 5. Background Characteristics of 148 Questionnaire RespondentsCharacteristicNurses (n = 119)Physicians (n = 29)ParticipantsNICU Rotterdam, the Netherlands499PSICU Rotterdam316NICU Zwolle, the Netherlands3914Age, mean ± SD, y37 ± 734 ± 7Male/female7/11212/17Parent/not parent64/5512/17NICU experience, mean ± SD, y7.9 ± 6.24.2 ± 6.6Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PSICU, pediatric surgical intensive care unit.Figure 2.Questionnaire results per procedure are shown by median scores of physicians (triangles) and nurses (squares) and their interquartile ranges.Because procedures were scored on a 10-point scale, results of this questionnaire can be compared with a frequently used pain score, the visual analog scale. A visual analog scale score above 4 is generally used as a criterion for administration of extra analgesic therapy.Therefore, procedures with pain scores above 4 can be considered as moderately painful. Procedures that received lower scores included the control variables, diaper change and cranial ultrasound, as well as insertion of nasal cannulae, X-rays, and the removal of nasogastric tubes. All other procedures were considered moderately to severely painful.Multiple regression analyses (Table 6) showed that nurses scored various procedures as more painful than physicians (β = .30, P= .001), caregivers who were parents themselves scored procedures lower than persons without children (β = .27, P= .002), and ratings between the 2 hospitals were somewhat different (β = .20, P= .03). The multiple regression coefficient (R= 0.43) explained about 15% of the variance in the model.Table 6. Multiple Regression Model for Pain Scores of 148 RespondentsVariable*β (95% Confidence Interval)tPValueNurse vs physician−.30 (−.91 to .31)−3.30.001Sex.02 (−.67 to .71)0.17.87Age−.01 (−.05 to .03)−0.12.91Parent, no vs yes−.27 (−.70 to .16)−3.12.002NICU experience, y.10 (.06 to .14)0.91.36Hospital.20 (−.26 to .66)2.2.03Unit, NICU vs PSICU.17 (−.33 to .67)1.9.06Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PSICU, pediatric surgical intensive care unit.*The outcome variable was the mean pain score. Boldface indicates significant predictor variables (P<.05).ANALGESIC TREATMENTPharmacological analgesic treatment was studied in 126 patients (Figure 3); 25 neonates were excluded because they were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing morphine with placebo. Fifty patients (39.7%) did not receive any analgesic therapy during the study. Analgesic treatment regimens consisted of a morphine loading dose (given before intubation in 67.8% of administrations), continuous morphine infusion, or morphine in combination with vecuronium bromide, midazolam hydrochloride, or acetaminophen supplements. Fewer than 35% of newborns received analgesic therapy each day. Most therapy was administered during the first day, when 41 infants (32.5%) received analgesics, and decreased within 2 weeks to 12.2% and 14.6% of infants receiving analgesics on days 13 and 14, respectively.Figure 3.Pharmacological analgesic treatment per day of admission.Analgesic therapy, pharmacological and nonpharmacological, was rarely applied before invasive procedures. Analgesics were generally used only before tracheal intubation or insertion of a chest tube and usually were not given in association with other procedures with high pain scores. Although some nurses used pacifiers and tried to comfort infants during and after procedures by handling, nonpharmacological analgesic treatment was not given routinely for any of the procedures.COMMENTIn sharp contrast to the accumulating evidence that repetitive pain is harmful in newborns, and despite major clinical advances over the past 10 years, neonates experience up to 14 painful procedures per day, and, remarkably, more than 65% of the patients in this study did not receive appropriate analgesic therapy.We report a higher number of painful procedures in this study compared with previous studies, perhaps because we used a more extensive list of procedures and accounted for failed procedures (Table 1). For instance, Benis and Sureshreported a mean of 6 procedures per day during the entire NICU stay of 15 neonates. Barker and Rutterreported an increased number of procedures in infants younger than 31 weeks' gestation compared with older infants, but did not mention the length of NICU stay, which may explain the exposure to a greater number of invasive procedures. In the present study, however, the frequency of procedures per day was not related to gestational age, perhaps because term neonates admitted to the NICU may have a severity of illness comparable to that of preterm neonates.To our knowledge, we are the first to report prospective data on a substantial number of failed procedures in the NICU. Although attempts by even the most experienced clinicians may be unsuccessful, the relative inexperience of trainees may partly explain the high proportion of failed procedures in this study. These findings may, therefore, be applicable to NICUs located in other academic centers.Efforts should be aimed at minimizing the number of invasive procedures, as stated in recent consensus guidelines.Our study showed that the number of procedures is significantly higher in neonates requiring nasal oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, or ventilation and that procedures occur mostly on the first day of admission, because of initial stabilization, monitoring, and diagnostic evaluation. Furthermore, the number of heelsticks and venipunctures is subsequently decreased in patients having arterial lines. Our nursing protocols require tracheal suctioning every 4 hours and as needed for ventilated neonates, whereas a recent studyshowed comparable ventilatory outcomes when the frequency of routine suctioning was decreased to every 8 hours.Nurses and physicians agreed that most neonatal procedures cause moderate or severe pain,with pain scores above 4 estimated for 26 of the 31 procedures. Physicians ascribed lower pain scores; because they are mostly responsible for prescribing analgesics, this may contribute to the limited use of analgesic therapy in neonates.Others have reported comparable significant differences in pain scores of invasive procedures between nurses and physicians.The clinicians not returning the questionnaire might have been unmotivated and not interested in pain management in the NICU. However, a formal analysis of their motives was not undertaken. This lack of interest is probably related to their belief that these daily procedures are not that painful. As the response rate was not very high, the results of our questionnaire might show some overestimation of clinicians' overall opinion about the pain level of these procedures.In our NICU, nurses tried to cluster procedures during routine nursing care, after which they comforted patients by touch, pacifiers, or positioning (eg, swaddling), whereas other behavioral and environmental approaches were used irregularly. Similar to our results, a multicenter studyin France also showed minimal use of analgesics and a lack of standardization in the pharmacological regimens used in the NICU. Kahn et alreported a 28.6-fold variation in the use of opioids among 6 NICUs. Variations in attitude toward pain may limit the generalizability of our study findings to other centers around the world.Restrained use of opioids by neonatologists can be explained by the fact that there is wide disagreement as to whether the evidence base is sufficient to justify prolonged exposure to opioids in this vulnerable population. There is some evidence, from studies in rats, that neonatal morphine exposure causes specific long-term behavioral effectsand might cause retarded growth and motor development.Underlying pathologic mechanisms have been demonstrated by morphine-induced apoptosis in human fetal cell culturesand by µ-opiate receptor down-regulation following morphine treatment in neonatal rat brain.Prolonged use of high doses of opioids in animal and in vitro models complicates extrapolation of these findings to daily NICU practice. The only studyinvestigating long-term effects of human neonatal morphine treatment showed no effects in 5- to 6-year-olds. Anand and colleaguesreported decreased mortality with the use of postoperative analgesia in premature infants. However, a similar benefit of routine use of morphine has not been reported in this population without a surgical operation. Grunau et alfound that altered pain responses in preterm neonates were predicted by the number of previous painful procedures and were normalized by the early use of morphine analgesia. Although accumulating data suggest that analgesic therapy with morphine might be useful to prevent some of the long-term effects of repetitive neonatal pain, further evidence about the safety of prolonged use of opioids is needed.CONCLUSIONSWe recommend that a continuous intravenous infusion of opioids should be considered for infants requiring respiratory support during the first 24 hours of admission, in combination with well validated pain scores as part of routine nursing care. Use of an algorithm would enable caregivers to respond immediately and in a structured way when they observe pain in these infants. Although this recommendation is supported by preliminary studies,results from larger randomized controlled trials are needed to decide if ventilated neonates should be routinely treated with continuous opioids.As treatment regimens evolve, consistent practices in the NICU should be developed to minimize invasive procedures that continue to hurt our newborns.What This Study AddsAs evidence about the short- and long-term harmful effects of pain in neonates accumulates, efforts should be made to decrease the number of pain experiences and to improve analgesic therapy. This study reports the number of painful procedures that neonates experience during an NICU stay. In contrast to the high incidence of painful procedures, we show the limited use of analgesic treatment, despite the awareness of nurses and physicians that most procedures are indeed painful.DPBarkerNRutterExposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1995;72:F47-F48.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7743285&dopt=AbstractCCJohnstonJMCollingeSJHendersonKJSAnandA cross-sectional survey of pain and pharmacological analgesia in Canadian neonatal intensive care units.Clin J Pain.1997;13:308-312.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9430811&dopt=AbstractMMBenisGKSureshFrequency of invasive procedures in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) [abstract].Pediatric Res.2001;49:392A. Abstract 2253.FLPorterKJSAnandEpidemiology of pain in neonates.Res Clin Forums.1998;20:9-18.LSFranckA national survey of the assessment and treatment of pain and agitation in the neonatal intensive care unit.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs.1987;16:387-393.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3694306&dopt=AbstractJTohillOMcMorrowPain relief in neonatal intensive care [letter].Lancet.1990;336:569.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1975064&dopt=AbstractHBauchnerAMayECoatesUse of analgesic agents for invasive medical procedures in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units.J Pediatr.1992;121:647-649.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1403404&dopt=AbstractCRMcLaughlinJGHullWHEdwardsCPCramerWLDeweyNeonatal pain.J Pain Symptom Manage.1993;8:7-16.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8482895&dopt=AbstractCVFernandezEPReesPain management in Canadian level 3 neonatal intensive care units.CMAJ.1994;150:499-504.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7906191&dopt=AbstractXGiannakoulopoulosJTeixeiraNFiskVGloverHuman fetal and maternal noradrenaline responses to invasive procedures.Pediatr Res.1999;45(pt 1):494-499.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10203140&dopt=AbstractRPSmithRGitauVGloverNMFiskPain and stress in the human fetus.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2000;92:161-165.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10986451&dopt=AbstractSVanhataloOvan NieuwenhuizenFetal pain?Brain Dev.2000;22:145-150.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10814894&dopt=AbstractKDCraigMFWhitfieldRVGrunauJLintonHDHadjistavropoulosPain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices.Pain.1993;52:287-299.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8460047&dopt=AbstractCCJohnstonBStevensFYangLHortonDevelopmental changes in response to heelstick in preterm infants.Dev Med Child Neurol.1996;38:438-445.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8698151&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandPain, plasticity, and premature birth.Nat Med.2000;6:971-973.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10973310&dopt=AbstractFLPorterREGrunauKJAnandLong-term effects of pain in infants.J Dev Behav Pediatr.1999;20:253-261.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10475600&dopt=AbstractMFitzgeraldKAndrwesNeurophysiological and neurobiological correlates of supraspinal pain processing measurement techniques.In: McGrath PJ, ed. Progress in Pain Research and Management. Seattle, Wash: IASP Press; 1998:21-46.KJSAnandFMScalzoCan adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development and subsequent behavior?Biol Neonate.2000;77:69-82.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10657682&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandVCoskunKVThrivikramanCBNemeroffPMPlotskyLong-term behavioral effects of repetitive pain in neonatal rat pups.Physiol Behav.1999;66:627-637.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10386907&dopt=AbstractMARudaQDLingAGHohmannYBPengTTachibanaAltered nociceptive neuronal circuits after neonatal peripheral inflammation.Science.2000;289:628-631.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10915627&dopt=AbstractREGrunauTFOberlanderMFWhitfieldCFitzgeraldSKLeeDemographic and therapeutic determinants of pain reactivity in very low birth weight neonates at 32 weeks' postconceptional age.Pediatrics.2001;107:105-112.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11134442&dopt=AbstractTFOberlanderREGrunauMFWhitfieldCFitzgeraldSPitfieldJPSaulBiobehavioral pain responses in former extremely low birth weight infants at four months' corrected age [serial online].Pediatrics.2000;105:e6. Available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/105/1/e6.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10617743&dopt=AbstractMFWhitfieldREGrunauBehavior, pain perception, and the extremely low-birth weight survivor.Clin Perinatol.2000;27:363-379.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10863655&dopt=AbstractATBhuttaMAClevesPHCaseyMMCradockKJSAnandCognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis.JAMA.2002;288:728-737.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12169077&dopt=AbstractRVGrunauMFWhitfieldJHPetrieELFryerEarly pain experience, child and family factors, as precursors of somatization.Pain.1994;56:353-359.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8022628&dopt=AbstractBSPetersonBVohrLHStaibRegional brain volume abnormalities and long-term cognitive outcome in preterm infants.JAMA.2000;284:1939-1947.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11035890&dopt=AbstractPJMiceliMCGoeke-MoreyTLWhitmanKSKolbergCMiller-LoncarRDWhiteBrief report: birth status, medical complications, and social environment.J Pediatr Psychol.2000;25:353-358.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10880066&dopt=AbstractMCherkes-JulkowskiLearning disability, attention-deficit disorder, and language impairment as outcomes of prematurity: a longitudinal descriptive study.J Learn Disabil.1998;31:294-306.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9599962&dopt=AbstractLNadeauMBoivinRTessierFLefebvrePRobaeyMediators of behavioral problems in 7-year-old children born after 24 to 28 weeks of gestation.J Dev Behav Pediatr.2001;22:1-10.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11265917&dopt=AbstractTMRusheLRifkinALStewartNeuropsychological outcome at adolescence of very preterm birth and its relation to brain structure.Dev Med Child Neurol.2001;43:226-233.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11305398&dopt=AbstractETidemanDLeyIBjerreMForslundLongitudinal follow-up of children born preterm.Early Hum Dev.2001;61:97-110.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11223272&dopt=AbstractNBottingAPowlsRWCookeNMarlowAttention deficit hyperactivity disorders and other psychiatric outcomes in very low birthweight children at 12 years.J Child Psychol Psychiatry.1997;38:931-941.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9413793&dopt=AbstractHGTaylorNKleinMHackSchool-age consequences of birth weight less than 750 g: a review and update.Dev Neuropsychol.2000;17:289-321.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11056846&dopt=AbstractHGTaylorNKleinNMMinichMHackMiddle-school–age outcomes in children with very low birthweight.Child Dev.2000;71:1495-1511.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11194251&dopt=AbstractNAmbalavananWACarloAnalgesia for ventilated neonates: where do we stand?J Pediatr.1999;135:403-405.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10518068&dopt=AbstractKAKennedyJETysonNarcotic analgesia for ventilated newborns: are placebo-controlled trials ethical and necessary?J Pediatr.1999;134:127-129.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9931512&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandInternational Evidence-Based Group for Neonatal PainConsensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.2001;155:173-180.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11177093&dopt=AbstractCommittee on Fetus and Newborn, Committee on Drugs, Section on Anesthesiology, Section on Surgery, Fetus and Newborn CommitteePrevention and management of pain and stress in the neonate.Pediatrics.2000;105:454-461.NJBouwmeesterKJSAnandMvan DijkWCHopFBoomsmaDTibboelHormonal and metabolic stress responses after major surgery in children aged 0-3 years.Br J Anaesth.2001;87:390-399.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11517122&dopt=AbstractRAvan LingenHTDeinumCMQuakAOkkenDTibboelMultiple-dose pharmacokinetics of rectally administered acetaminophen in term infants.Clin Pharmacol Ther.1999;66:509-515.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10579478&dopt=AbstractRAvan LingenJTDeinumJMQuakPharmacokinetics and metabolism of rectally administered paracetamol in preterm neonates.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1999;80:F59-F63.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10325815&dopt=AbstractRAvan LingenCMQuakHTDeinumEffects of rectally administered paracetamol on infants delivered by vacuum extraction.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2001;94:73-78.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11134829&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkNJBouwmeesterHJDuivenvoordenEfficacy of continuous versus intermittent morphine administration after major surgery in 0–3-year-old infants: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Pain.2002;98:305-313.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12127032&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkJBde BoerHMKootDTibboelJPasschierHJDuivenvoordenThe reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument in 0 to 3-year-old infants.Pain.2000;84:367-377.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10666543&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkHMKootHHSaadDTibboelJPasschierObservational visual analog scale in pediatric pain assessment.Clin J Pain.2002;18:310-316.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12218502&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkDTibboelReview of pain assessment measures for postoperative pain in vulnerable infants.Clin Perinatol.2002;29:469-491.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12380470&dopt=AbstractRAvan LingenSHSimonsBJAndersonDTibboelThe effects of analgesia in the vulnerable infant during the perinatal period.Clin Perinatol.2002;29:511-534.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12380472&dopt=AbstractCDvan der MarelRAvan LingenMAPluimAnalgesic efficacy of rectal versus oral acetaminophen in children after major craniofacial surgery.Clin Pharmacol Ther.2001;70:82-90.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11452248&dopt=AbstractMvan DijkJWPetersNJBouwmeesterDTibboelAre postoperative pain instruments useful for specific groups of vulnerable infants?Clin Perinatol.2002;29:469-491.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12380470&dopt=AbstractJWPetersHMKootJBde BoerMajor surgery within the first 3 months of life and subsequent biobehavioral pain responses to immunization at later age: a case comparison study.Pediatrics.2003;111:129-135.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12509565&dopt=AbstractThe International Neonatal NetworkThe CRIB (Clinical Risk Index for Babies) score.Lancet.1993;342:193-198.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8100927&dopt=AbstractLCorderoMSananesLWAyersA comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants.Respir Care.2001;46:783-788.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11463368&dopt=AbstractFLPorterCMWolfJGoldDLotsoffJPMillerPain and pain management in newborn infants: a survey of physicians and nurses.Pediatrics.1997;100:626-632.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9310516&dopt=AbstractMWQuinnJBakerStaff perception of pain on a neonatal intensive care unit [letter].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.2001;85:F77.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11455944&dopt=AbstractTDebillonVBureauCSavagnerVZupan-SimunekRCarbajalPain management in French neonatal intensive care units.Acta Paediatr.2002;91:822-826.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12200910&dopt=AbstractDJKahnDKRichardsonJEGrayVariation among neonatal intensive care units in narcotic administration.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.1998;152:844-851.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9743028&dopt=AbstractATBhuttaCRovnaghiPMSimpsonJMGossettFMScalzoKJAnandInteractions of inflammatory pain and morphine in infant rats: long-term behavioral effects.Physiol Behav.2001;73:51-58.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11399294&dopt=AbstractGEHandelmannDDow-EdwardsModulation of brain development by morphine.Peptides.1985;6(suppl 2):29-34.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4080616&dopt=AbstractSHuWSShengJRLokensgardPKPetersonMorphine induces apoptosis of human microglia and neurons.Neuropharmacology.2002;42:829-836.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12015209&dopt=AbstractATempelVisualization of µ-opiate receptor downregulation following morphine treatment in neonatal rat brain.Brain Res Dev Brain Res.1991;64:19-26.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1664787&dopt=AbstractRMacGregorDEvansDSugdenTGaussenMLeveneOutcome at 5-6 years of prematurely born children who received morphine as neonates.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1998;79:F40-F43.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9797623&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandWGSippellAAynsley-GreenRandomised trial of fentanyl anaesthesia in preterm babies undergoing surgery.Lancet.1987;1:62-66.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2879174&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandPRHickeyHalothane-morphine compared with high-dose sufentanil for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in neonatal cardiac surgery.N Engl J Med.1992;326:1-9.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1530752&dopt=AbstractKJSAnandBABartonNMcIntoshAnalgesia and sedation in preterm neonates who require ventilatory support .Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.1999;153:331-338. [published correction appears in Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med1999;153:895].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10201714&dopt=AbstractMPDykeRKohanSEvansMorphine increases synchronous ventilation in preterm infants.J Paediatr Child Health.1995;31:176-179.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7669374&dopt=AbstractRFGoldsteinJEBrazyNarcotic sedation stabilizes arterial blood pressure fluctuations in sick premature infants.J Perinatol.1991;11:365-371.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1770395&dopt=AbstractESaarenmaaPHuttunenJLeppaluotoOMeretojaVFellmanAdvantages of fentanyl over morphine in analgesia for ventilated newborn infants after birth: a randomized trial.J Pediatr.1999;134:144-150.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9931520&dopt=AbstractNEOPAIN Multi-center GroupEffects of morphine therapy on neurologic outcomes in ventilated preterm neonates.Pediatric Res.2002;51:361. Abstract 2101.Corresponding author: Dick Tibboel, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC–Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr Molewaterplein 60, 3015 GJ Rotterdam, the Netherlands (e-mail: j.illsley@erasmusmc.nl).Accepted for publication June 19, 2003.This work was supported by grant MW-NWO 940-31-048 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, The Hague.We thank N. Jongeneel, RN, C. Bunkers, RN, and E. Smink, RN, for distributing the surveys among physicians and nurses; C. Hoving, MSc, for helping to collect the data from nurses and physicians who completed the survey; H. J. Duivenvoorden, PhD, for statistical advice, and J. Hagoort for his help in preparing the manuscript.

Journal

JAMA PediatricsAmerican Medical Association

Published: Nov 1, 2003

References