Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Current Medical Literature.

Current Medical Literature. of The to an of the Section 10,181, Laws of 1897. within Compiled Michigan thority employ assistant, any provisions in nature and there can be of the statute. court below took the that an proceedings were their The ground judicial, the had rules which the of the no doubt that to arose other legislature power prescribe emergency justified employment which the defendant's to observe. The statute in the of the neither it was physician. But, Court, duty opinion Supreme for the of to sufficient to hold the is one sole se¬ substituted nor was passed purpose enabling persons agency emergency cure aid without of confidence. Did the defendant for the of the assistant medical liable physician. betrayal charges the which a rule the when he in statute, it was legislature, passing prescribes Presumptively, says, plaintiff, employed, a and of of evidence to be observed in intend assumed that he was physician capable judicial proceedings, competent to confidence to be care of the case for without this in which he was permit betrayed any judicial taking employed pro¬ that assistance be¬ which it had to To assistance. If he concluded was ceedings the power impute required, regulate? if such to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

Current Medical Literature.

JAMA , Volume XLIV (3) – Jan 21, 1905

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/current-medical-literature-u8NnKK6lyU
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1905 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1905.02500300076028
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

of The to an of the Section 10,181, Laws of 1897. within Compiled Michigan thority employ assistant, any provisions in nature and there can be of the statute. court below took the that an proceedings were their The ground judicial, the had rules which the of the no doubt that to arose other legislature power prescribe emergency justified employment which the defendant's to observe. The statute in the of the neither it was physician. But, Court, duty opinion Supreme for the of to sufficient to hold the is one sole se¬ substituted nor was passed purpose enabling persons agency emergency cure aid without of confidence. Did the defendant for the of the assistant medical liable physician. betrayal charges the which a rule the when he in statute, it was legislature, passing prescribes Presumptively, says, plaintiff, employed, a and of of evidence to be observed in intend assumed that he was physician capable judicial proceedings, competent to confidence to be care of the case for without this in which he was permit betrayed any judicial taking employed pro¬ that assistance be¬ which it had to To assistance. If he concluded was ceedings the power impute required, regulate? if such to

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jan 21, 1905

There are no references for this article.