Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

CORRECTION

CORRECTION This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract Errors in Table and in Reference. —In the article entitled "Accuracy of Ultrasound Intraocular Lens Calculation," published in the October Archives (1981;99:1819-1823), in the Table on page 1820, in the columns entitled "Sanders and Kraff20" and "Total ±2.00-D Error, %," the numbers should have been 84%, 89%, and 96%, respectively, instead of 74%, 77%, and 83%, respectively.Also, the year, volume number, and inclusive page numbers were erroneously given in reference 20 on page 1823 of the same article. They should have read 1980;6:263-267 instead of 1978:4:222-224. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Ophthalmology American Medical Association

CORRECTION

Abstract

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract Errors in Table and in Reference. —In the article entitled "Accuracy of Ultrasound Intraocular Lens Calculation," published in the October Archives (1981;99:1819-1823), in the Table on page 1820, in the columns entitled "Sanders and Kraff20" and "Total ±2.00-D Error, %," the numbers should have been 84%, 89%,...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/correction-jvjflf4Uqm
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0003-9950
eISSN
1538-3687
DOI
10.1001/archopht.1982.01030040070011
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract Errors in Table and in Reference. —In the article entitled "Accuracy of Ultrasound Intraocular Lens Calculation," published in the October Archives (1981;99:1819-1823), in the Table on page 1820, in the columns entitled "Sanders and Kraff20" and "Total ±2.00-D Error, %," the numbers should have been 84%, 89%, and 96%, respectively, instead of 74%, 77%, and 83%, respectively.Also, the year, volume number, and inclusive page numbers were erroneously given in reference 20 on page 1823 of the same article. They should have read 1980;6:263-267 instead of 1978:4:222-224.

Journal

Archives of OphthalmologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jul 1, 1982

There are no references for this article.