Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Corneal-Graft Dehiscence Secondary to Suction-Cup Device Use for Contact Lens Removal

Corneal-Graft Dehiscence Secondary to Suction-Cup Device Use for Contact Lens Removal Abstract Dehiscence following penetrating keratoplasty (PK) occurs most commonly as a result of blunt trauma.1,2 We report a case of graft dehiscence associated with a suction-cup device (SCD) used to remove contact lenses (CLs). Report of a Case. —An 85-year-old man underwent repeated PK in the left eye in June 1989 for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. The postoperative course was unremarkable and all sutures were removed by July 1991. Due to irregular astigmatism, best visual acuity with eyeglasses was 20/200 OS. A rigid gas-permeable CL was prescribed and visual acuity improved to 20/60. After two instruction sessions the patient was able to insert the lens, but removal could not be mastered, and his 79-year-old wife was given instructions on use of the SCD. On the day he went home wearing his CL, the patient returned, complaining of pain and poor visual acuity. He reported that his wife had difficulty trying to References 1. Farley MK, Pettit TH. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty . Am J Ophthalmol . 1987;104:44-49. 2. Raber IM, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty . Arch Ophthalmol . 1980;98:1407-1409.Crossref 3. Mac Rae SM, Van Buskirk EM. Late wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty in association with digital massage . Am J Ophthalmol . 1986;1020:391-392. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Ophthalmology American Medical Association

Corneal-Graft Dehiscence Secondary to Suction-Cup Device Use for Contact Lens Removal

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/corneal-graft-dehiscence-secondary-to-suction-cup-device-use-for-QGSw0ZcAaS
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0003-9950
eISSN
1538-3687
DOI
10.1001/archopht.1992.01080200030012
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Dehiscence following penetrating keratoplasty (PK) occurs most commonly as a result of blunt trauma.1,2 We report a case of graft dehiscence associated with a suction-cup device (SCD) used to remove contact lenses (CLs). Report of a Case. —An 85-year-old man underwent repeated PK in the left eye in June 1989 for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. The postoperative course was unremarkable and all sutures were removed by July 1991. Due to irregular astigmatism, best visual acuity with eyeglasses was 20/200 OS. A rigid gas-permeable CL was prescribed and visual acuity improved to 20/60. After two instruction sessions the patient was able to insert the lens, but removal could not be mastered, and his 79-year-old wife was given instructions on use of the SCD. On the day he went home wearing his CL, the patient returned, complaining of pain and poor visual acuity. He reported that his wife had difficulty trying to References 1. Farley MK, Pettit TH. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty . Am J Ophthalmol . 1987;104:44-49. 2. Raber IM, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty . Arch Ophthalmol . 1980;98:1407-1409.Crossref 3. Mac Rae SM, Van Buskirk EM. Late wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty in association with digital massage . Am J Ophthalmol . 1986;1020:391-392.

Journal

Archives of OphthalmologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Aug 1, 1992

References