Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
As a preliminary to reporting this case of congenital thrombopenic purpura, it seemed pertinent to review the literature in order to determine whether the criteria for a correct diagnosis had been fulfilled in every instance of so-called congenital thrombopenic purpura. Perusal of the literature revealed the fact that thirteen observers had reported cases of this disease. These cases were scrutinized carefully, observing the criteria which will be noted here. Since the advent of new procedures, in the last decade, finer methods of study in the hemorrhagic tendencies have been utilized. These include study of the megakaryocytes in the bone marrow and estimation of the prothrombin level. In all fairness to previous reports, diagnosis made by authors without benefit of bone marrow and prothrombin determinations have been accepted if the rest of the findings made the diagnosis plausible. In the future, however, much can be gained by adhering to the criteria
American journal of diseases of children – American Medical Association
Published: Aug 1, 1945
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.