Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
There are many case reports in the literature on the congenital absence of one or more of the genital and urinary organs. They include interesting and valuable discussions on the subject of maldevelopment to which I am unable to add anything of interest. There is a congenital association between the genital and urinary systems in anomalous as well as normal development, and if there are external signs of a congenital anomaly, suspicion should arise as to a possible internal anomaly. This case is reported and illustrated owing to the marked maldevelopment. REPORT OF CASE A woman, aged 24, single, a postal clerk, 5 feet, 4 inches (163 cm.) in height, weighing 110 pounds (50 kg.), complained of amenorrhea and pain in the region of a mass long noticed in the right lower abdomen. The father and mother were well; three brothers and one sister were well, and one sister had
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Mar 7, 1925
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.