Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
How many RBCs per high-power field in a routine urinalysis are notable and warrant further investigation? Periodic review of a subject frequently taken for granted, eg, microhematuria, is not only appropriate but essential. With improvement of techniques and better understanding of various disease processes, it is important to update the clinical implications of microhematuria. Carson et al (p 149) indicate that 81% of their patients with microhematuria followed up for two years had substantial genitourinary pathological conditions. Approximately 20 years ago, one of the authors, Laurence F. Green, MD, recorded only 10% of patients with microhematuria who had a substantive pathological condition. Thirteen percent of the present group of patients who were followed up for the two years had a malignant neoplasm of the genitourinary tract. The same evaluation 20 years ago showed only 2.2% of patients with microhematuria to have a malignant neoplasm of the urinary tract. The authors
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Jan 12, 1979
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.