Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Clinical Importance of Microhematuria

Clinical Importance of Microhematuria How many RBCs per high-power field in a routine urinalysis are notable and warrant further investigation? Periodic review of a subject frequently taken for granted, eg, microhematuria, is not only appropriate but essential. With improvement of techniques and better understanding of various disease processes, it is important to update the clinical implications of microhematuria. Carson et al (p 149) indicate that 81% of their patients with microhematuria followed up for two years had substantial genitourinary pathological conditions. Approximately 20 years ago, one of the authors, Laurence F. Green, MD, recorded only 10% of patients with microhematuria who had a substantive pathological condition. Thirteen percent of the present group of patients who were followed up for the two years had a malignant neoplasm of the genitourinary tract. The same evaluation 20 years ago showed only 2.2% of patients with microhematuria to have a malignant neoplasm of the urinary tract. The authors http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

Clinical Importance of Microhematuria

JAMA , Volume 241 (2) – Jan 12, 1979

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/clinical-importance-of-microhematuria-8Yh4Z5Ckiu

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1979.03290280045029
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

How many RBCs per high-power field in a routine urinalysis are notable and warrant further investigation? Periodic review of a subject frequently taken for granted, eg, microhematuria, is not only appropriate but essential. With improvement of techniques and better understanding of various disease processes, it is important to update the clinical implications of microhematuria. Carson et al (p 149) indicate that 81% of their patients with microhematuria followed up for two years had substantial genitourinary pathological conditions. Approximately 20 years ago, one of the authors, Laurence F. Green, MD, recorded only 10% of patients with microhematuria who had a substantive pathological condition. Thirteen percent of the present group of patients who were followed up for the two years had a malignant neoplasm of the genitourinary tract. The same evaluation 20 years ago showed only 2.2% of patients with microhematuria to have a malignant neoplasm of the urinary tract. The authors

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jan 12, 1979

There are no references for this article.