Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Clinical Experiences with Griseofulvin

Clinical Experiences with Griseofulvin Abstract The advent of griseofulvin in December, 1958, stimulated general interest in the diagnosis and treatment of Trichophyton rubrum infections of hands and feet and also of Microsporum infections of the scalp. For the past 20 years we had been bombarded by so-called "cures" of T. rubrum infections of nails, palms, and soles, all of which proved to be useless in my hands. I saw such patients with a feeling of frustration and had come to the point where I advised that therapy was a waste of time and a needless expense to them. Since griseofulvin has received some acclaim in the popular press, many patients have presented themselves for treatment. This is not a true increase in the number of patients infected with T. rubrum. However, it is my opinion that T. rubrum infections have been on the increase since World War II. If this is true, it is indeed References 1. Wrong, N. M.; Rosset, M.; Hudson, A. L., and Rogers, S.: Griseofulvin in the Treatment of Superficial Fungous Infections , Canad. M.A.J. 81: 167-173 ( (Aug. 1) ) 1959. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png A.M.A. Archives of Dermatology American Medical Association

Clinical Experiences with Griseofulvin

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/clinical-experiences-with-griseofulvin-uI8EJfpHqZ
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0096-5359
DOI
10.1001/archderm.1960.03730050132024
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The advent of griseofulvin in December, 1958, stimulated general interest in the diagnosis and treatment of Trichophyton rubrum infections of hands and feet and also of Microsporum infections of the scalp. For the past 20 years we had been bombarded by so-called "cures" of T. rubrum infections of nails, palms, and soles, all of which proved to be useless in my hands. I saw such patients with a feeling of frustration and had come to the point where I advised that therapy was a waste of time and a needless expense to them. Since griseofulvin has received some acclaim in the popular press, many patients have presented themselves for treatment. This is not a true increase in the number of patients infected with T. rubrum. However, it is my opinion that T. rubrum infections have been on the increase since World War II. If this is true, it is indeed References 1. Wrong, N. M.; Rosset, M.; Hudson, A. L., and Rogers, S.: Griseofulvin in the Treatment of Superficial Fungous Infections , Canad. M.A.J. 81: 167-173 ( (Aug. 1) ) 1959.

Journal

A.M.A. Archives of DermatologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: May 1, 1960

References