Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Maria Ttofi, D. Farrington (2011)
Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic reviewJournal of Experimental Criminology, 7
Superfine (2016)
573American Educational Research Journal, 53
BM Superfine, AR Thompson (2016)
Interest groups, the courts, and educational equality: a policy regimes approach to Vergara v. CaliforniaAmerican Educational Research Journal, 53
(2006)
Bullying in schools: a plea for measure of human rights.
Diane Holben, P. Zirkel (2014)
School Bullying Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of the Case LawAkron law review, 47
W. Hall (2017)
The Effectiveness of Policy Interventions for School Bullying: A Systematic ReviewJournal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 8
M. Hatzenbuehler, Sarah McKetta, R. Kim, S. Leung, S. Prins, S. Russell (2021)
Evaluating Litigation as a Structural Strategy for Addressing Bias-Based Bullying Among Youth.JAMA pediatrics
Holben (2014)
299Akron Law Review, 47
Hall (2017)
45J Soc Social Work Res, 8
B. Superfine, A. Thompson (2016)
Interest Groups, the Courts, and Educational EqualityAmerican Educational Research Journal, 53
Iaals (2009)
Civil Case Processing the the Federal District Courts: A 21st Century Analysis
Ttofi (2011)
27J Exp Criminol, 7
Greene (2006)
63J Soc Issues, 62
Peter Smith (2019)
Making an Impact on School Bullying
Marla Eisenberg, Amy Gower, Camille Brown, Yoon-Sung Nam, M. Ramirez (2021)
School-Based Diversity Education Activities and Bias-Based Bullying Among Secondary School StudentsJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 37
Opinion EDITORIAL Jonathan Todres, JD Though many now reject the notion that bullying is a rite of the outcome favored the plaintiff (student), there was a non- passage, bullying persists as part of life in the way that pov- significant 4% reduction in homophobic bullying in the years erty does—it is widespread, inflicts immediate and long-term during the case and a 23% reduction in homophobic bullying in the years after the case was decided. adverse consequences, and often disproportionately affects In other words, al- marginalized children. From though filing a case may put schools on notice, significant educational disruptions to changes in homophobic bullying seemed to occur only after Related article page 52 mental health harms, the im- the case was decided. As litigation can sometimes take years 1 9,10 pact of bullying can alter life trajectories of young people. to resolve, the positive impact of a plaintiff-friendly out- A variety of interventions have been developed, tested, and come might come too late to prevent harm to many students. 2,3 implemented in school settings. While some interventions Second, litigation is primarily a post hoc remedy. In some have resulted in substantial improvements in the school cases, the children who
JAMA Pediatrics – American Medical Association
Published: Jan 11, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.