Brain-stem Auditory-Evoked Responses
Stockard, James J.;Stockard, Janet E.;Sharbrough, Frank W.
1979-09-01 00:00:00
Abstract To the Editor.— Two articles in your journal about brain-stem auditoryevoked responses (BAERs) emphasized the importance of controlling technical variables in assessing BAER normal variability and defining BAER abnormalities. As shown in Fig 1, the intrasubject "waveform variations" reported by Chiappa et al1 can occur solely as a function of varying acoustic polarity (rarefaction vs condensation) of the click stimuli used. We agree with Chiappa et al that the morphologic variations they described are not clinically important, but suggest that other laboratories beginning to collect their normative BAER data control for the effects of click polarity, since it is a determinant of BAER interwave latency and relative amplitude norms2 (Fig 1), as well as of morphology. Our general findings and conclusions about normal BAER variability2 closely agree with those of Chiappa et al and, specifically, we have long concurred about the limited diagnostic value of waves VI References 1. Chiappa KH, Gladstone KJ, Young RR: Brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Studies of waveform variation in 50 normal subjects . Arch Neurol 36:81-87, 1979.Crossref 2. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Nonpathologic factors influencing brainstem auditory-evoked potentials . Am J EEG Technol 18:177-209, 1978. 3. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Detection and localization of occult lesions with brainstem auditory responses . Mayo Clin Proc 52:761-769, 1977. 4. Hashimoto I, Ishiyama Y, Tozuka G: Bilaterally recorded brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Their asymmetric abnormalities and lesions of the brainstem . Arch Neurol 36:161-167, 1979.Crossref 5. Starr A, Achor J: Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease . Arch Neurol 32:761-768, 1975.Crossref 6. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Variation of apparent central conduction times between brainstem auditory-evoked potentials as a function of peripheral factors: Implications for neurologic application of the test . Neurology 29:597-598, 1979.
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngArchives of NeurologyAmerican Medical Associationhttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/american-medical-association/brain-stem-auditory-evoked-responses-r8tXYViB6D
Abstract To the Editor.— Two articles in your journal about brain-stem auditoryevoked responses (BAERs) emphasized the importance of controlling technical variables in assessing BAER normal variability and defining BAER abnormalities. As shown in Fig 1, the intrasubject "waveform variations" reported by Chiappa et al1 can occur solely as a function of varying acoustic polarity (rarefaction vs condensation) of the click stimuli used. We agree with Chiappa et al that the morphologic variations they described are not clinically important, but suggest that other laboratories beginning to collect their normative BAER data control for the effects of click polarity, since it is a determinant of BAER interwave latency and relative amplitude norms2 (Fig 1), as well as of morphology. Our general findings and conclusions about normal BAER variability2 closely agree with those of Chiappa et al and, specifically, we have long concurred about the limited diagnostic value of waves VI References 1. Chiappa KH, Gladstone KJ, Young RR: Brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Studies of waveform variation in 50 normal subjects . Arch Neurol 36:81-87, 1979.Crossref 2. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Nonpathologic factors influencing brainstem auditory-evoked potentials . Am J EEG Technol 18:177-209, 1978. 3. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Detection and localization of occult lesions with brainstem auditory responses . Mayo Clin Proc 52:761-769, 1977. 4. Hashimoto I, Ishiyama Y, Tozuka G: Bilaterally recorded brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Their asymmetric abnormalities and lesions of the brainstem . Arch Neurol 36:161-167, 1979.Crossref 5. Starr A, Achor J: Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease . Arch Neurol 32:761-768, 1975.Crossref 6. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Variation of apparent central conduction times between brainstem auditory-evoked potentials as a function of peripheral factors: Implications for neurologic application of the test . Neurology 29:597-598, 1979.
Journal
Archives of Neurology
– American Medical Association
Published: Sep 1, 1979
Recommended Articles
Loading...
References
Brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Studies of waveform variation in 50 normal subjects
Detection and localization of occult lesions with brainstem auditory responses
Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW
Bilaterally recorded brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Their asymmetric abnormalities and lesions of the brainstem
Hashimoto I, Ishiyama Y, Tozuka G
Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease
Starr A, Achor J
Variation of apparent central conduction times between brainstem auditory-evoked potentials as a function of peripheral factors: Implications for neurologic application of the test
Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW
You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”
Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”
@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”
@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Our policy towards the use of cookies
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.