Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Brain-stem Auditory-Evoked Responses

Brain-stem Auditory-Evoked Responses Abstract To the Editor.— Two articles in your journal about brain-stem auditoryevoked responses (BAERs) emphasized the importance of controlling technical variables in assessing BAER normal variability and defining BAER abnormalities. As shown in Fig 1, the intrasubject "waveform variations" reported by Chiappa et al1 can occur solely as a function of varying acoustic polarity (rarefaction vs condensation) of the click stimuli used. We agree with Chiappa et al that the morphologic variations they described are not clinically important, but suggest that other laboratories beginning to collect their normative BAER data control for the effects of click polarity, since it is a determinant of BAER interwave latency and relative amplitude norms2 (Fig 1), as well as of morphology. Our general findings and conclusions about normal BAER variability2 closely agree with those of Chiappa et al and, specifically, we have long concurred about the limited diagnostic value of waves VI References 1. Chiappa KH, Gladstone KJ, Young RR: Brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Studies of waveform variation in 50 normal subjects . Arch Neurol 36:81-87, 1979.Crossref 2. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Nonpathologic factors influencing brainstem auditory-evoked potentials . Am J EEG Technol 18:177-209, 1978. 3. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Detection and localization of occult lesions with brainstem auditory responses . Mayo Clin Proc 52:761-769, 1977. 4. Hashimoto I, Ishiyama Y, Tozuka G: Bilaterally recorded brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Their asymmetric abnormalities and lesions of the brainstem . Arch Neurol 36:161-167, 1979.Crossref 5. Starr A, Achor J: Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease . Arch Neurol 32:761-768, 1975.Crossref 6. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Variation of apparent central conduction times between brainstem auditory-evoked potentials as a function of peripheral factors: Implications for neurologic application of the test . Neurology 29:597-598, 1979. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Neurology American Medical Association

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/brain-stem-auditory-evoked-responses-r8tXYViB6D
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0003-9942
eISSN
1538-3687
DOI
10.1001/archneur.1979.00500450091025
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract To the Editor.— Two articles in your journal about brain-stem auditoryevoked responses (BAERs) emphasized the importance of controlling technical variables in assessing BAER normal variability and defining BAER abnormalities. As shown in Fig 1, the intrasubject "waveform variations" reported by Chiappa et al1 can occur solely as a function of varying acoustic polarity (rarefaction vs condensation) of the click stimuli used. We agree with Chiappa et al that the morphologic variations they described are not clinically important, but suggest that other laboratories beginning to collect their normative BAER data control for the effects of click polarity, since it is a determinant of BAER interwave latency and relative amplitude norms2 (Fig 1), as well as of morphology. Our general findings and conclusions about normal BAER variability2 closely agree with those of Chiappa et al and, specifically, we have long concurred about the limited diagnostic value of waves VI References 1. Chiappa KH, Gladstone KJ, Young RR: Brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Studies of waveform variation in 50 normal subjects . Arch Neurol 36:81-87, 1979.Crossref 2. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Nonpathologic factors influencing brainstem auditory-evoked potentials . Am J EEG Technol 18:177-209, 1978. 3. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Detection and localization of occult lesions with brainstem auditory responses . Mayo Clin Proc 52:761-769, 1977. 4. Hashimoto I, Ishiyama Y, Tozuka G: Bilaterally recorded brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Their asymmetric abnormalities and lesions of the brainstem . Arch Neurol 36:161-167, 1979.Crossref 5. Starr A, Achor J: Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease . Arch Neurol 32:761-768, 1975.Crossref 6. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW: Variation of apparent central conduction times between brainstem auditory-evoked potentials as a function of peripheral factors: Implications for neurologic application of the test . Neurology 29:597-598, 1979.

Journal

Archives of NeurologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Sep 1, 1979

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month