Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Assessment of a Study of Continuous vs Repeat-Spot Electroencephalography in Patients With Critical Illness—Reply

Assessment of a Study of Continuous vs Repeat-Spot Electroencephalography in Patients With... Letters COMMENT & RESPONSE Author Affiliations: Service de Neurologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles– Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium (Gaspard); Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Gaspard, Hirsch); Assessment of a Study of Continuous Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Westover). vs Repeat-Spot Electroencephalography Corresponding Author: Nicolas Gaspard, MD, PhD, Service de Neurologie, in Patients With Critical Illness Université Libre de Bruxelles–Hôpital Erasme, Route de Lennik, 808, To the Editor Rossetti et al report findings of a trial of continuous 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium (nicolas.gaspard@erasme.ulb.ac.be). electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring vs repeat-spot elec- Published Online: February 1, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5348 troencephalography (rEEG) in patients with critical illness, sug- Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Gaspard received funding from the Fonds Erasme pour le Recherche Médicale and the Daniel Raymond Wong Neurology gesting that cEEG does not improve the outcome (mortality at 6 Research Fund at Yale University; consultation fees for advising from Marinus; months)comparedwithrEEG.Whilewecongratulatetheauthors and honoraria for speaking from UCB. Dr Westover received funding from the on this trial, the delayed manner in which cEEG recording and re- National Institutes of Health (grants 1R01NS102190, 1R01NS102574, view was carried out, the lack of any prespecified intervention, 1R01NS107291, and 1RF1AG064312), the National http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Neurology American Medical Association

Assessment of a Study of Continuous vs Repeat-Spot Electroencephalography in Patients With Critical Illness—Reply

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/assessment-of-a-study-of-continuous-vs-repeat-spot-qjpMZuCsX0
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2021 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
2168-6149
eISSN
2168-6157
DOI
10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5343
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Letters COMMENT & RESPONSE Author Affiliations: Service de Neurologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles– Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium (Gaspard); Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Gaspard, Hirsch); Assessment of a Study of Continuous Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Westover). vs Repeat-Spot Electroencephalography Corresponding Author: Nicolas Gaspard, MD, PhD, Service de Neurologie, in Patients With Critical Illness Université Libre de Bruxelles–Hôpital Erasme, Route de Lennik, 808, To the Editor Rossetti et al report findings of a trial of continuous 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium (nicolas.gaspard@erasme.ulb.ac.be). electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring vs repeat-spot elec- Published Online: February 1, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5348 troencephalography (rEEG) in patients with critical illness, sug- Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Gaspard received funding from the Fonds Erasme pour le Recherche Médicale and the Daniel Raymond Wong Neurology gesting that cEEG does not improve the outcome (mortality at 6 Research Fund at Yale University; consultation fees for advising from Marinus; months)comparedwithrEEG.Whilewecongratulatetheauthors and honoraria for speaking from UCB. Dr Westover received funding from the on this trial, the delayed manner in which cEEG recording and re- National Institutes of Health (grants 1R01NS102190, 1R01NS102574, view was carried out, the lack of any prespecified intervention, 1R01NS107291, and 1RF1AG064312), the National

Journal

JAMA NeurologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Mar 1, 2021

References