Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Affordable Care Act Litigation

Affordable Care Act Litigation VIEWPOINT The Supreme Court and the Future of Health Care Reform Lawrence O. Gostin, JD Figure. Cases for Which Parties Requested Supreme Court Review Kelli K. Garcia, JD, PhD US District Court Appellate Court Supreme Court will review EARLY 30 YEARS AFTER PRESIDENT NIXON PROPOSED Florida v Department of Health and Human Services the first major overhaul of the health care system, Individual purchase Unconstitutional Unconstitutional mandate Mandate not authorized under Upheld district court’s comprehensive reform became a reality when Presi- Congress’ power to regulate interstate holding, but found that Ndent Obama signed the Patient Protection and Af- commerce; mandate not severable mandate could be separated from the rest of the act, requires the from the rest of the law, fordable Care Act (ACA) on March 23, 2010. The ACA is ex- whole law to be struck down which could stand pected to cover 32 million currently uninsured people by Medicaid expansion Constitutional Constitutional Medicaid expansion not unduly Upheld district court’s decision expanding Medicaid, offering subsidies to purchase insur- coercive to the states ance, and prohibiting preexisting condition exclusions. Like Supreme Court will not review Presidents Carter and Clinton before him, Barack Obama cam- Thomas More v Barack Obama http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

Affordable Care Act Litigation

Gostin, Lawrence O.; Garcia, Kelli K.
JAMA , Volume 307 (4) – Jan 25, 2012
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/affordable-care-act-litigation-wNqooAkMpL

References (11)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2012 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.2012.16
pmid
22274682
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

VIEWPOINT The Supreme Court and the Future of Health Care Reform Lawrence O. Gostin, JD Figure. Cases for Which Parties Requested Supreme Court Review Kelli K. Garcia, JD, PhD US District Court Appellate Court Supreme Court will review EARLY 30 YEARS AFTER PRESIDENT NIXON PROPOSED Florida v Department of Health and Human Services the first major overhaul of the health care system, Individual purchase Unconstitutional Unconstitutional mandate Mandate not authorized under Upheld district court’s comprehensive reform became a reality when Presi- Congress’ power to regulate interstate holding, but found that Ndent Obama signed the Patient Protection and Af- commerce; mandate not severable mandate could be separated from the rest of the act, requires the from the rest of the law, fordable Care Act (ACA) on March 23, 2010. The ACA is ex- whole law to be struck down which could stand pected to cover 32 million currently uninsured people by Medicaid expansion Constitutional Constitutional Medicaid expansion not unduly Upheld district court’s decision expanding Medicaid, offering subsidies to purchase insur- coercive to the states ance, and prohibiting preexisting condition exclusions. Like Supreme Court will not review Presidents Carter and Clinton before him, Barack Obama cam- Thomas More v Barack Obama

Journal

JAMA – American Medical Association

Published: Jan 25, 2012

There are no references for this article.