Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Supravital Cytodiagnostic Stain For Urinary Sediments

A Supravital Cytodiagnostic Stain For Urinary Sediments To the Editor.— Time magazine's report (April 28,1975, p 78) of my paper (231:826, 1975) contained inaccuracies that confused those reading both publications. Three points must be made to set the record straight: (1) The stain was devised as an overall stain for urinary sediments. (2) Our experience with malignant neoplasia was incidental and so far has been limited to 12 cases. (3) The results of such diagnosis of cancer, by evaluating nuclear abnormalities, need verification on a large scale. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

A Supravital Cytodiagnostic Stain For Urinary Sediments

Sternheimer, Richard
JAMA , Volume 234 (3) – Oct 20, 1975
Download PDF
1 page

A Supravital Cytodiagnostic Stain For Urinary Sediments

Abstract



To the Editor.—
Time magazine's report (April 28,1975, p 78) of my paper (231:826, 1975) contained inaccuracies that confused those reading both publications. Three points must be made to set the record straight: (1) The stain was devised as an overall stain for urinary sediments. (2) Our experience with malignant neoplasia was incidental and so far has been limited to 12 cases. (3) The results of such diagnosis of cancer, by evaluating nuclear abnormalities, need verification on...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/a-supravital-cytodiagnostic-stain-for-urinary-sediments-HoO02TURak

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1975.03260160022006
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To the Editor.— Time magazine's report (April 28,1975, p 78) of my paper (231:826, 1975) contained inaccuracies that confused those reading both publications. Three points must be made to set the record straight: (1) The stain was devised as an overall stain for urinary sediments. (2) Our experience with malignant neoplasia was incidental and so far has been limited to 12 cases. (3) The results of such diagnosis of cancer, by evaluating nuclear abnormalities, need verification on a large scale.

Journal

JAMA – American Medical Association

Published: Oct 20, 1975

There are no references for this article.