Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A STUDY OF LATE RADIATION NECROSIS FOLLOWING THERAPY OF SKIN CANCER

A STUDY OF LATE RADIATION NECROSIS FOLLOWING THERAPY OF SKIN CANCER This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract To the Editor: Dr. Hollander's remarks concerning air dose do not apply. All of the dose figures we used were tissue doses calculated at the surface to include backscatter. This was clearly indicated in Table 1 in my paper. Likewise, the quality of the radiation employed is given specifically in the same table. The correspondent appears to have misunderstood the paragraph on field size. For reasons stated in the text no figures on "incidence" of necrosis according to field size were given. The figures which do appear in this paragraph only refer to absolute numbers of cases. Thus, the statement in the letter "geometric progression in the incidence" is erroneous. It is astonishing to read Dr. Hollander's refutation of the fundamental and generally accepted concept that tissue tolerance for roentgen rays is lowered with increase in field size. In reply, any text on radiation therapy can be used as a http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png A.M.A. Archives of Dermatology American Medical Association

A STUDY OF LATE RADIATION NECROSIS FOLLOWING THERAPY OF SKIN CANCER

A.M.A. Archives of Dermatology , Volume 73 (6) – Jun 1, 1956

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/a-study-of-late-radiation-necrosis-following-therapy-of-skin-cancer-j1mys0Sbtn

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0096-5359
DOI
10.1001/archderm.1956.01550060057013
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract To the Editor: Dr. Hollander's remarks concerning air dose do not apply. All of the dose figures we used were tissue doses calculated at the surface to include backscatter. This was clearly indicated in Table 1 in my paper. Likewise, the quality of the radiation employed is given specifically in the same table. The correspondent appears to have misunderstood the paragraph on field size. For reasons stated in the text no figures on "incidence" of necrosis according to field size were given. The figures which do appear in this paragraph only refer to absolute numbers of cases. Thus, the statement in the letter "geometric progression in the incidence" is erroneous. It is astonishing to read Dr. Hollander's refutation of the fundamental and generally accepted concept that tissue tolerance for roentgen rays is lowered with increase in field size. In reply, any text on radiation therapy can be used as a

Journal

A.M.A. Archives of DermatologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jun 1, 1956

There are no references for this article.