Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A CONSIDERATION OF THE VALUE OF THE ALEXANDER OPERATION COMPARED WITH THAT BY ANTERIOR FIXATION OF THE UTERUS.

A CONSIDERATION OF THE VALUE OF THE ALEXANDER OPERATION COMPARED WITH THAT BY ANTERIOR FIXATION... Alexander's operation seems from the most recent experiences to be indicated only in those cases of backward displacement that are not complicated with adhesions and pelvic contraction. When the dis placement is due to morbid processes connected with the Fallopian tubes and ovaries the Alexander operation would be for the most part contraindicated. The operation can only be resorted to with advantage in cases of mere relaxation of tissue. In cases of adhesions it is plain that the contracted parts would draw upon the bladder. In uncomplicated cases the operation would insure the uterine fundus, being held over the bladder more in accordance with its normal relation than can be secured by a resort to the other surgical procedures. Speaking from my own experiences and observations I should say that the indications for Alexander's operation are extremely limited. The operation, though a delicate one, is often quite formidable and, unless http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

A CONSIDERATION OF THE VALUE OF THE ALEXANDER OPERATION COMPARED WITH THAT BY ANTERIOR FIXATION OF THE UTERUS.

JAMA , Volume XXVI (11) – Mar 14, 1896

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/a-consideration-of-the-value-of-the-alexander-operation-compared-with-duSzVtt1oi
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1896 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1896.02430630017002e
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Alexander's operation seems from the most recent experiences to be indicated only in those cases of backward displacement that are not complicated with adhesions and pelvic contraction. When the dis placement is due to morbid processes connected with the Fallopian tubes and ovaries the Alexander operation would be for the most part contraindicated. The operation can only be resorted to with advantage in cases of mere relaxation of tissue. In cases of adhesions it is plain that the contracted parts would draw upon the bladder. In uncomplicated cases the operation would insure the uterine fundus, being held over the bladder more in accordance with its normal relation than can be secured by a resort to the other surgical procedures. Speaking from my own experiences and observations I should say that the indications for Alexander's operation are extremely limited. The operation, though a delicate one, is often quite formidable and, unless

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Mar 14, 1896

There are no references for this article.