Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Barnato, M. Mcclellan, C. Kagay, A. Garber (2004)
Trends in inpatient treatment intensity among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life.Health services research, 39 2
E. Emanuel, A. Ash, Wei Yu, G. Gazelle, N. Levinsky, O. Saynina, M. Mcclellan, M. Moskowitz (2002)
Managed care, hospice use, site of death, and medical expenditures in the last year of life.Archives of internal medicine, 162 15
T. Nasca, I. Philibert, T. Brigham, T. Flynn (2012)
The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.The New England journal of medicine, 366 11
J. Mack, J. Weeks, A. Wright, S. Block, H. Prigerson (2010)
End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 28 7
Baohui Zhang, A. Wright, H. Huskamp, M. Nilsson, M. Maciejewski, C. Earle, S. Block, P. Maciejewski, H. Prigerson (2009)
Health care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life conversations.Archives of internal medicine, 169 5
H. Meyer (2011)
Changing the conversation in California about care near the end of life.Health affairs, 30 3
Improving America's hospitals: the Joint Commission's annual report on quality and safety.
J. Temel, J. Greer, A. Muzikansky, E. Gallagher, S. Admane, V. Jackson, C. Dahlin, C. Blinderman, J. Jacobsen, W. Pirl, J. Billings, T. Lynch (2010)
Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.The New England journal of medicine, 363 8
VIEWPOINT Improving Value by Emphasizing Patient-Centered Care at the End of Life EDICAL CARE ate Medical Education will phase in Isakson, and which enjoyed bipar- during life’s fi- implementation of the Next Accredi- tisan support, were derided as so- nal stages is of- tation System. It aims “to enhance called death panels and hastily re- ten poorly coor- the ability of the peer-review sys- moved from discussion in the public dinated and tem to prepare physicians for prac- sphere. Given the disproportionate 1-3 inattentive to patient preferences, tice in the 21st century, to acceler- cost of care at the very end of life, typically owing to a failure to ascer- ate the [Accreditation Council for the issue should be revisited. Ad- tain each individual’s goals. End-of- Graduate Medical Education’s] dressing goals of care, not to deny life care also consumes substantial movement toward accreditation on aggressive care to those who want health care dollars. For example, the basis of educational outcomes, it but to ensure that we deliver ag- 30% of Medicare resources are ex- and to reduce the burden associ- gressive care only to those who do, pended on the 5% of beneficiaries ated with the current structure
JAMA Surgery – American Medical Association
Published: Mar 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.