Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces

Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces By JIANPING MEI AND MICHAEL MOSES* to those traditional financial assets, such as stocks and bonds. The larger data set also permits us to test two propotions frequently advanced by art dealers and economists. The first one states that art investors should buy only the top works established artists (masterpieces) or buy the most expenve artwork they can afford. The empirical evidence on the return performance masterpieces is mixed. Pesando (1993) presented strong evidence underperformance while Goetzmann (1996) found no such evidence. Our study will extend their analys with a new testing procedure based on repeated-sales regreson (RSR). The second propotion states that prices realized for identical paintings at different locations at the same time should be the same. Pesando (1993) compared prices alternate copies the same prints sold at Sotheby’s and Christie’s in New York and found substantial evidence violation the “law one price” during the 1977–1992 period. While no art piece in our data has ever been sold multaneously in both auction houses, we will conduct a test the “law one price” by examining return differentials for artworks sold at different auction houses over much longer time periods. If there is systematic pricing bias from one http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Economic Review American Economic Association

Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-economic-association/art-as-an-investment-and-the-underperformance-of-masterpieces-p7UeNVweF6
Publisher
American Economic Association
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by the American Economic Association
ISSN
0002-8282
D.O.I.
10.1257/000282802762024719
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

By JIANPING MEI AND MICHAEL MOSES* to those traditional financial assets, such as stocks and bonds. The larger data set also permits us to test two propotions frequently advanced by art dealers and economists. The first one states that art investors should buy only the top works established artists (masterpieces) or buy the most expenve artwork they can afford. The empirical evidence on the return performance masterpieces is mixed. Pesando (1993) presented strong evidence underperformance while Goetzmann (1996) found no such evidence. Our study will extend their analys with a new testing procedure based on repeated-sales regreson (RSR). The second propotion states that prices realized for identical paintings at different locations at the same time should be the same. Pesando (1993) compared prices alternate copies the same prints sold at Sotheby’s and Christie’s in New York and found substantial evidence violation the “law one price” during the 1977–1992 period. While no art piece in our data has ever been sold multaneously in both auction houses, we will conduct a test the “law one price” by examining return differentials for artworks sold at different auction houses over much longer time periods. If there is systematic pricing bias from one

Journal

American Economic ReviewAmerican Economic Association

Published: Dec 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off