Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Pathway Is a Major Determinant of Doxorubicin Cytotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Pathway Is a Major Determinant of Doxorubicin Cytotoxicity in... Development of drug resistance is a major challenge in cancer chemotherapy using doxorubicin. By screening the collection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains to identify doxorubicin-resistant mutants, we have discovered that the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) pathway is a major determinant of doxorubicin cytotoxicity in yeast. Mutants lacking UBA2 (SUMO activating enzyme; E1), UBC9 (conjugating enzyme; E2), and ULP1 and ULP2 (desumoylation peptidases) are all doxorubicin resistant, as are mutants lacking MLP1, UIP3 , and NUP60 , which all interact with ULP1 . Most informatively, mutants lacking the SUMO E3 ligase Siz1 are strongly doxorubicin resistant, whereas mutants of other SUMO ligases are either weakly resistant ( siz2 ) or hypersensitive ( mms21 ) to doxorubicin. These results suggest that doxorubicin cytotoxicity is regulated by Siz1-dependent sumoylation of specific proteins. Eliminating SUMO attachment to proliferating cell nuclear antigen or topoisomerase II does not affect doxorubicin cytotoxicity, whereas reducing SUMO attachment to the bud neck–associated septin proteins has a modest effect. Consistent with these results, doxorubicin resistance in the siz1 strain does not seem to involve an effect on DNA repair. Instead, siz1 cells accumulate lower intracellular levels of doxorubicin than wild-type (WT) cells, suggesting that they are defective in doxorubicin retention. Although siz1 cells are cross-resistant to daunorubicin, they are hypersensitive to cisplatin and show near WT sensitivity to other drugs, suggesting that the siz1 mutation does not cause a general multidrug resistance phenotype. Cumulatively, these results reveal that SUMO modification of proteins mediates the doxorubicin cytotoxicity in yeast, at least partially, by modification of septins and of proteins that control the intracellular drug concentration. Cancer Res 2007;67(2):765–72 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cancer Research American Association of Cancer Research

Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Pathway Is a Major Determinant of Doxorubicin Cytotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Pathway Is a Major Determinant of Doxorubicin Cytotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cancer Research , Volume 67 (2): 765 – Jan 15, 2007

Abstract

Development of drug resistance is a major challenge in cancer chemotherapy using doxorubicin. By screening the collection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains to identify doxorubicin-resistant mutants, we have discovered that the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) pathway is a major determinant of doxorubicin cytotoxicity in yeast. Mutants lacking UBA2 (SUMO activating enzyme; E1), UBC9 (conjugating enzyme; E2), and ULP1 and ULP2 (desumoylation peptidases) are all doxorubicin resistant, as are mutants lacking MLP1, UIP3 , and NUP60 , which all interact with ULP1 . Most informatively, mutants lacking the SUMO E3 ligase Siz1 are strongly doxorubicin resistant, whereas mutants of other SUMO ligases are either weakly resistant ( siz2 ) or hypersensitive ( mms21 ) to doxorubicin. These results suggest that doxorubicin cytotoxicity is regulated by Siz1-dependent sumoylation of specific proteins. Eliminating SUMO attachment to proliferating cell nuclear antigen or topoisomerase II does not affect doxorubicin cytotoxicity, whereas reducing SUMO attachment to the bud neck–associated septin proteins has a modest effect. Consistent with these results, doxorubicin resistance in the siz1 strain does not seem to involve an effect on DNA repair. Instead, siz1 cells accumulate lower intracellular levels of doxorubicin than wild-type (WT) cells, suggesting that they are defective in doxorubicin retention. Although siz1 cells are cross-resistant to daunorubicin, they are hypersensitive to cisplatin and show near WT sensitivity to other drugs, suggesting that the siz1 mutation does not cause a general multidrug resistance phenotype. Cumulatively, these results reveal that SUMO modification of proteins mediates the doxorubicin cytotoxicity in yeast, at least partially, by modification of septins and of proteins that control the intracellular drug concentration. Cancer Res 2007;67(2):765–72

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-association-of-cancer-research/small-ubiquitin-related-modifier-pathway-is-a-major-determinant-of-xl2J30E1uQ

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Association of Cancer Research
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Cancer Research.
ISSN
0008-5472
DOI
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2839
pmid
17234788
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Development of drug resistance is a major challenge in cancer chemotherapy using doxorubicin. By screening the collection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains to identify doxorubicin-resistant mutants, we have discovered that the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) pathway is a major determinant of doxorubicin cytotoxicity in yeast. Mutants lacking UBA2 (SUMO activating enzyme; E1), UBC9 (conjugating enzyme; E2), and ULP1 and ULP2 (desumoylation peptidases) are all doxorubicin resistant, as are mutants lacking MLP1, UIP3 , and NUP60 , which all interact with ULP1 . Most informatively, mutants lacking the SUMO E3 ligase Siz1 are strongly doxorubicin resistant, whereas mutants of other SUMO ligases are either weakly resistant ( siz2 ) or hypersensitive ( mms21 ) to doxorubicin. These results suggest that doxorubicin cytotoxicity is regulated by Siz1-dependent sumoylation of specific proteins. Eliminating SUMO attachment to proliferating cell nuclear antigen or topoisomerase II does not affect doxorubicin cytotoxicity, whereas reducing SUMO attachment to the bud neck–associated septin proteins has a modest effect. Consistent with these results, doxorubicin resistance in the siz1 strain does not seem to involve an effect on DNA repair. Instead, siz1 cells accumulate lower intracellular levels of doxorubicin than wild-type (WT) cells, suggesting that they are defective in doxorubicin retention. Although siz1 cells are cross-resistant to daunorubicin, they are hypersensitive to cisplatin and show near WT sensitivity to other drugs, suggesting that the siz1 mutation does not cause a general multidrug resistance phenotype. Cumulatively, these results reveal that SUMO modification of proteins mediates the doxorubicin cytotoxicity in yeast, at least partially, by modification of septins and of proteins that control the intracellular drug concentration. Cancer Res 2007;67(2):765–72

Journal

Cancer ResearchAmerican Association of Cancer Research

Published: Jan 15, 2007

There are no references for this article.