The polyphasic analysis of two native Raphidiopsis isolates supports the unification of the genera Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria)

The polyphasic analysis of two native Raphidiopsis isolates supports the unification of the... Abstract: Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis are planktic, freshwater bloom-forming cyanobacteria of great concern to human health due to the production of potent cyanotoxins. The presence (in Cylindrospermopsis) or absence (in Raphidiopsis) of heterocytes is the traditional character used to distinguish them. This has led to misidentifications and to questions about the validity of the genus Raphidiopsis. We studied two strains of R. mediterranea isolated from Argentinean shallow lakes using a polyphasic approach that included the morphological description of the natural populations and their ultrastructural, physiological and molecular characterisation. Heterocyte differentiation was not observed in the field or in cultures of R. mediterranea submitted to nitrogen deprivation. These results support the occurrence of stable native populations of R. mediterranea without heterocytes, which would not be a part of the Cylindrospermopsis complex life cycle. Based on 16S rRNA, 16S23S ITS, and cpcBA-IGS sequences, these two genera are virtually identical. Thus, strains of Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis make up a monophyletic lineage in all phylogenetic reconstructions. Furthermore, the 16S23S ITS secondary structure provided further evidence that these two genera cannot be separated. The intermixed position in the trees points to several losses of heterocytes during the evolution of these cyanobacteria. We conclude that these two genera should not be regarded as separate and distinct generic units and propose their unification under the name Raphidiopsis, respecting the principle of priority. Accordingly, we revisited and emended the description of Raphidiopsis. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Phycologia Allen Press

The polyphasic analysis of two native Raphidiopsis isolates supports the unification of the genera Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/allen_press/the-polyphasic-analysis-of-two-native-raphidiopsis-isolates-supports-xdcUmuZBN0
Publisher
Allen Press
Copyright
2018 International Phycological Society
ISSN
0031-8884
D.O.I.
10.2216/17-2.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract: Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis are planktic, freshwater bloom-forming cyanobacteria of great concern to human health due to the production of potent cyanotoxins. The presence (in Cylindrospermopsis) or absence (in Raphidiopsis) of heterocytes is the traditional character used to distinguish them. This has led to misidentifications and to questions about the validity of the genus Raphidiopsis. We studied two strains of R. mediterranea isolated from Argentinean shallow lakes using a polyphasic approach that included the morphological description of the natural populations and their ultrastructural, physiological and molecular characterisation. Heterocyte differentiation was not observed in the field or in cultures of R. mediterranea submitted to nitrogen deprivation. These results support the occurrence of stable native populations of R. mediterranea without heterocytes, which would not be a part of the Cylindrospermopsis complex life cycle. Based on 16S rRNA, 16S23S ITS, and cpcBA-IGS sequences, these two genera are virtually identical. Thus, strains of Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis make up a monophyletic lineage in all phylogenetic reconstructions. Furthermore, the 16S23S ITS secondary structure provided further evidence that these two genera cannot be separated. The intermixed position in the trees points to several losses of heterocytes during the evolution of these cyanobacteria. We conclude that these two genera should not be regarded as separate and distinct generic units and propose their unification under the name Raphidiopsis, respecting the principle of priority. Accordingly, we revisited and emended the description of Raphidiopsis.

Journal

PhycologiaAllen Press

Published: Mar 11, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off