Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Orend claims that in just war theory there is a robust set of rules for resorting to war (jus ad bellum) and for conduct during war (jus in bello) but not for the termination phase of war. On Rigstad’s reading, JWT (Just War Theory) is the discursive practice of systematic public reflection and argument about how best to distinguish between ethically justifiable and unjustifiable warfare. Mooney says that waging war against overwhelming odds that will cause severe suffering to innocents is deemed to be practically unreasonable.
Review of Contemporary Philosophy – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.