Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
With his philosophy of science, Thomas S. Kuhn has provided a theory of stability and change that complies with sociological institutionalism in many respects. Emanating from social phenomenology, institutional theory has become one of the major theories in contemporary sociology and beyond. My argument is that Kuhn’s communitarian approach has incorporated and anticipated much institutional thinking on the occurrence, constitution and change of socially constructed reality. I outline points of convergence between the Kuhnian philosophy and institutional theory, and discuss how both would benefit from a mutual engagement. As a general result, institutionalism provides sociological arguments when it comes to understand the taken-for-grantedness of the institutional order scientists work in during “normal” periods. Conversely, institutionalism benefits from Kuhn’s approach with regard to institutional change in “revolutionary” episodes. Keywords: scientific community, Thomas S. Kuhn, institutionalism, social constructivism, phenomenology
Review of Contemporary Philosophy – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.