Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE NATURE OF MODERN WAR AND THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF THE GLOBAL POLITY TODAY

THE NATURE OF MODERN WAR AND THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF THE GLOBAL POLITY TODAY Boyle remarks that the authority to organise and command defense is not the stronger authority to punish (which involves imposing further burdens on those against whom defense is mounted than defense itself implies). Rodin argues that states are constituted by their existence as sovereign entities (they have the claim-right against other states not to destroy their political independence or interfere in their territorial integrity). Lizardo writes that the apparent inability to “comprehend” terrorist actions is tied to the fact that both terrorist organizations as actors and the output of those organizations as actions and events are not considered legitimate forms of intercourse in the international arena. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Review of Contemporary Philosophy Addleton Academic Publishers

THE NATURE OF MODERN WAR AND THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF THE GLOBAL POLITY TODAY

MADALINA T. ANDREI
Review of Contemporary Philosophy , Volume 8 (1): 139-143 – Jan 1, 2009
Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/addleton-academic-publishers/the-nature-of-modern-war-and-the-interdependence-of-the-global-polity-aYNiBHKYlB
Publisher
Addleton Academic Publishers
Copyright
© 2009 Addleton Academic Publishers
ISSN
1841-5261
eISSN
2471-089X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Boyle remarks that the authority to organise and command defense is not the stronger authority to punish (which involves imposing further burdens on those against whom defense is mounted than defense itself implies). Rodin argues that states are constituted by their existence as sovereign entities (they have the claim-right against other states not to destroy their political independence or interfere in their territorial integrity). Lizardo writes that the apparent inability to “comprehend” terrorist actions is tied to the fact that both terrorist organizations as actors and the output of those organizations as actions and events are not considered legitimate forms of intercourse in the international arena.

Journal

Review of Contemporary Philosophy – Addleton Academic Publishers

Published: Jan 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.