Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
This paper begins by considering the concept of European modernity and claims made for it by Göran Therborn who argues, following Habermas, that it consists in learning to break from the prejudices of its religious past. From this starting point the paper explores the growing political differences between “Europe” and the “United States of America” reviewing the combined position of Habermas and Derrida in defining a “core” Europe against a neoconservative US. The argument of the paper, against Habermas and Derrida, is that it is too early and historically selfserving to place one’s hope in “the rebirth of Europe” and an Enlightenment attitude that releases us from immaturity of religious bigotry and ethnonationalism, especially in light of the Holocaust and the current encounter with Islam.
Review of Contemporary Philosophy – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.