Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
During the first half of the 20th century Italian philosophy was dominated by the neo-idealist currents of Benedetto Croce and Giovanni Gentile and, as it is well known, these two Italian philosophers used to conceive philosophy as the queen of sciences, a kind of philosophia prima of Aristotelic memory. Their philosophical systems turned into a kind of attack to the cognitive value of science but while Gentile attributed to science its proper cognitive and theoretical value, Croce, at the opposite, used to demonize science because, according to him, it uses only pseudo-concepts that say us nothing about the world, and in this respect they are not true but rather useful. In this essay I will try to explain how Croce, in this case, was wrong and in order to do that I will use Leszek Nowak’s conceptual apparatus, that is to say the epistemological assumptions of the so-called method of idealization and gradual concretization. Keywords: abstraction; art; concretization; conventionalism; dialectics of distinct; history; idealization
Review of Contemporary Philosophy – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.