Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
As Freud argued that the practices of education might represent an important future for psychoanalysis beyond the clinic, he also proposed a psychoanalytic paradox with such a future: the educator’s obligation to inhibit the drives while having to lean on them. This essay elaborates a conceptual geography for a psychology of education through Freud’s three experimental models for education: Auflärung (Enlightenment as a question of knowledge); Bildung (the bringing up of culture and life as a problem of affect); and, Nacherziehung (after-education, as a problem of narration). Each model of knowledge, affect, and narration takes instruction from the psychical consequences of self/other relations and the difficulties of symbolizing education as a human condition. Education’s entanglement with the historicity of the human’s prolonged immaturity, dependency, and helplessness affects the limits of psychology, learning, and pedagogy while the laboratory of education provokes new thoughts for a psychology of education. Keywords: Freud; psychology; education; psychoanalysis; teacher; pedagogy; enlightenment
Knowledge Cultures – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.