Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The material gathered in this study provides a rich and diverse context for understanding Irigaray’s philosophy of natural sexual difference, her accounts of nature and sexed humanity, and the Irigarayan interval of sexual difference. The analysis presented in this paper contributes to research on Irigaray’s analysis of phallocentrism, her eroticization of philosophical language, and her confidence in sexual duality. Keywords: Irigaray; feminism; sexual difference; subjectivity; identity
Review of Contemporary Philosophy – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.