Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. Jelić, F. Marsiglio (2012)
The double-well potential in quantum mechanics: a simple, numerically exact formulationEuropean Journal of Physics, 33
R. Kronig, W. Penney (1931)
Quantum Mechanics of Electrons in Crystal LatticesProceedings of The Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 130
C. Herring (1940)
A New Method for Calculating Wave Functions in CrystalsPhysical Review, 57
(2015)
Analytical solutions are possible also in the case of a finitewidth square potential in an infinite square well (see, for
E. Antončík (1959)
Approximate formulation of the orthogonalized plane-wave methodJournal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 10
(2000)
A good slightly more advanced text is G
F. Bloch (1929)
Über die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in KristallgitternZeitschrift für Physik, 52
J. Phillips, L. Kleinman (1959)
New Method for Calculating Wave Functions in Crystals and MoleculesPhysical Review, 116
(2017)
The most significant deviations are the change in boundary conditions, where in the appearance of two independent solution sets for values of k that give the alternating even and odd solutions
E. Wigner, F. Seitz (1933)
On the Constitution of Metallic Sodium. IIPhysical Review, 43
J. Slater (1937)
Wave Functions in a Periodic PotentialPhysical Review, 51
P. Garrido, S. Goldstein, J. Lukkarinen, R. Tumulka (2008)
Paradoxical reflection in quantum mechanicsAmerican Journal of Physics, 79
F. Bloch (1980)
Memories of electrons in crystalsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 371
Although of course castle-builders always shored up the "moat-barrier" with a "wall-barrier
Upon discussing some of this work with Don Page, he instantly coined the term
The solution to a problem in quantum mechanics is generally a linear superposition of states. The solutions for double well potentials epitomize this property, and go even further than this: they can often be described by an effective model whose low energy features can be described by two states—one in which the particle is on one side of the barrier, and a second where the particle is on the other side. Then the ground state remains a linear superposition of these two macroscopic-like states. In this paper, we illustrate that this property is achieved similarly with an attractive potential that separates two regions of space, as opposed to the traditionally repulsive one. In explaining how this comes about we revisit the concept of “orthogonalized plane waves,” first discussed in 1940 to understand electronic band structure in solids, along with the accompanying concept of a pseudopotential. We show how these ideas manifest themselves in a simple double well potential, whose “barrier” consists of a moat instead of the conventional wall.
American Journal of Physics – American Association of Physics Teachers
Published: Mar 8, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.