TY - JOUR AU1 - Dang, Jasmine AU2 - Figueroa, Ivonne AU3 - Helton, William AB - The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) has been widely used in psychological literature as a measure of vigilance (the ability to sustain attention over a prolonged period of time). This task uses a Go/No-Go paradigm and requires the participants to repetitively respond to the stimuli as quickly and as accurately as possible. Previous literature indicates that performance in SART is subjected to a “speed–accuracy trade-off” (SATO) resulting from strategy choices and from the failures of controlling motor reflexes. In this study, 36 participants (n = 36) performed a series of four SARTs. The results support the perspective of strategy choice in SART and suggest that within-subjects SATO in SART should also be acknowledged in attempting to explain SART performance. The implications of the speed–accuracy trade-off should be fully understood when the SART is being used as a measure or tool. TI - You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention JF - Experimental Brain Research DO - 10.1007/s00221-018-5291-6 DA - 2018-05-30 UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/you-are-measuring-the-decision-to-be-fast-not-inattention-the-xOajK0EWHa SP - 2255 EP - 2262 VL - 236 IS - 8 DP - DeepDyve ER -