TY - JOUR
AU1 - ADRIAN CONSTANTINESCU
AB - Gami et al. observe that author self-citations may misrepresent
the importance of individual articles, skew the calculation of journal impact
factors and bias perceptions of the importance of a publication. Kurmis
contend that direct comparison between journals on the basis of the total
number of citations alone is influenced by a number of factors, such as
journal format and content, appropriateness of article classification, and
discipline-specific citation tendencies. Pöschl and Koop point out that collaborative
peer review facilitates and enhances quality assurance. Grazia
Ietto-Gillies observes that we need a system for evaluating the worth of a
work and for assessing whether it is good enough to be put into the public
domain.
TI - PUBLISHING IN PEER-REVIEWED JOURNALS AS THE MAJOR MECHANISM FOR THE DISSEMINATION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
JF - Review of Contemporary Philosophy
DA - 2009-01-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/addleton-academic-publishers/publishing-in-peer-reviewed-journals-as-the-major-mechanism-for-the-vs8AhhQhLj
SP - 124
EP - 128
VL - 8
IS - 1
DP - DeepDyve
ER -