TY - JOUR
AB - ance an of a services by employee physician's professional the control over the of may give employee confidentiality the latter's even when an for the disclosures, employer pays services with the intention of the sole professional being Is It Impact or Continuous Noise?\p=m-\H. L. Williams and beneficiary of such services. Other than to meet require¬ A. J. Majer ments or designed to the the wel¬ protect public's patient's Arch Environ Health 7:411 1963 (Oct) it is fare, generally sufficient and advisable to give to In numerous noise evaluations in the conducting industry, in employers only workability "placement ver¬ prognoses were sometimes uncertain as to whether the investigators nacular". noise or as should be treated as an impact continuous. An was conducted investigation using improvised impact pro¬ in Industrial Psychological Complications Injuries\p=m-\J. C. An was used to ducing equipment. oscilloscope generate Nemiah and in impulses, these were increased until read¬ frequency Arch Environ Health 7:481 (Oct) 1963 on the sound level meter and the meter ings pressure impact In the with excessive dis¬ patient dependency needs, were a the same. The of of in¬ auditory response group ability lesion be com¬ initially produced by physical may dividuals was determined. Results 
TI - Pupillary Responses During Ophthalmodynamometry
JF - JAMA
DO - 10.1001/jama.1963.03710030135079
DA - 1963-10-19
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/american-medical-association/pupillary-responses-during-ophthalmodynamometry-BstzzLprbz
SP - 215
EP - 215
VL - 186
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -