TY - JOUR
AU1 - Gong, Leilei
AU2 - Zhang, Shujin
AU3 - Cai, Meng
AU4 - Li, Junliang
AU5 - Lu, Qiuyu
AU6 - Zhang, Xiaochuan
AB - 1 Introduction With the increasing demand for oil and natural gas, the oil and gas industry has been developing rapidly, and the exploration target layer has extended from the middle and shallow layer to the deep and ultra-deep layer, and the deep layer will become one of the important development fields of the oil field industry [1]. As an important special oil and gas reservoir, volcanic rocks have been found in more than 300 basins and regions in more than 20 countries. In recent years, with the breakthrough in the exploration of volcanic gas reservoirs in Songliao Basin, Xujiaweizi fault depression has become the fault depression with the highest degree of deep exploration and the most gas reserves found in the northern Songliao Basin, and it is the fifth largest gas bearing area on land in China. Xushen Gas field has become the volcanic gas field with the largest proven reserves of natural gas in China.However, there is an important problem in the development process of natural gas. As natural gas is a compressible fluid, the pressure of wellhead and transmission line will be too high in the mining process, resulting in many safety risks. In order to solve this problem, downhole throttling technology can be adopted to achieve wellhead pressure reduction, solve hydrate freezing blockage, improve stable production capacity and reduce well construction cost. In a gas well, downhole throttling technology involves the placement of special equipment at an appropriate position in the production tubing to realize wellbore throttling and depressurization [2], thereby enabling the surface production pipeline to operate at a lower pressure. Heat formed in the gas well is utilized to compensate for the temperature drop generated by the wellbore after throttling, effectively preventing the formation of hydrate in the wellbore and surface pipeline during production. Many scholars have carried out research on downhole throttles, Hu Dan et al. [3] developed movable downhole throttles characterized by a short length, small exterior diameter, smooth delivery, reliable release, a latch and seal feature, and a high salvage success rate, which aimed to alleviate fishing difficulties and to improve the low success rate of early downhole throttles used in the western Sichuan gas field. Wang Yifei et al. [4] established a new model in which the gas-liquid mixture flowed through the nozzle, and compiled calculation software for the downhole throttling process parameters of water-bearing gas wells that improved the reliability of the process. Wu Yibo et al. [5] proposed an improved ‘V’-type cylindrical rubber structure for which a finite element analysis model was also established. Improves the sealing of the rubber cylinder. Zhou Jian [6] introduced “slippage factor K” to characterize the slippage effect between gas and liquid, optimized the pressure drop model of the gas-liquid two-phase nozzle flow, and established an method for optimizing the downhole throttling process parameters of liquid-producing horizontal wells. Yuan Hang et al. [7] analyzed the application conditions for downhole throttling technology in high-pressure shale gas wells in the south Pingqiao area of China, while also comparing variations in the gas volume and pressure in a single well before and after the application of the technology, and determining the running depth, aperture and timing of downhole throttling. Compared with the traditional surface throttling process, downhole throttling provides several advantages, including a reduction in the operating pressure of the surface pipeline, reduction of the investment cost of ground equipment, and an improvement in the rate at which the well opens. However, for some special types of high-pressure gas Wells, due to the limitations of temperature, pressure and well structure of some gas Wells, it is impossible to realize the throttling pressure reduction and inhibit hydrate formation under critical flow conditions. At present, chemical control technology is commonly used for hydrate control, both in China and abroad. Chemical hydrate prevention technology includes the application of an automatic drip device to automatically and continuously inject hydrate inhibitor into the gas well, according to specific injection intervals and amounts as calculated via the design. Hydrate inhibitor is a chemical substance that inhibits the formation of hydrate during the exploitation, transportation and treatment of natural gas. The addition of such inhibitors to gas wells can change the chemical potential of an aqueous solution or hydrate phase, so that hydrate formation conditions are shifted to a lower temperature or higher pressure range. Domestic and foreign scholars have conducted relevant studies on the action principle of hydrate inhibitors. Ng et al. [8] found that the addition of methanol and electrolyte can effectively inhibit the formation and accelerate the decomposition of hydrate through the study of hydrate. Kotkoski et al. [9] found that injection of methanol or glycerol could inhibit hydrate formation. After the experiment of injecting glycol into CH4 hydrate, Fan et al. [10] concluded that the dissociation rate of CH4 hydrate depends on the concentration and flow rate of glycol. Dong et al. [11] studied C3H8 hydrate injected with methanol and found that methanol could reduce the dissociation heat of C3H8 hydrate and increase its dissociation rate compared with pure water injection. Wan Lihua et al. [12] revealed the effect of ethylene glycol on the decomposition of CH4 hydrate. Yagasaki et al. [13] studied the mechanism of methanol inhibition by MD simulation method, and the results showed that the hydrate decomposition rate was not a constant value. The addition of methanol increased the decomposition rate of CH4 hydrate, and the role of methanol molecules was to help generate bubbles to carry away CH4 molecules. However, the chemical control method of hydrate alone can not reduce the wellbore pressure, so it is necessary to use high pressure wellhead and high pressure pipeline, which has high cost of well construction and low economic benefit of high pressure and low gas production Wells. In view of the limitations of the two existing technologies for hydrate control in deep high pressure and low gas production Wells, this paper proposes a hydrate combination control technology, which combines downhole throttling technology and hydrate chemical control technology. Downhole throttling technology can reduce throttling pressure, hydrate chemical control can inhibit hydrate formation, reduce oil pressure and prevent hydrate freezing blockage in special high-pressure gas Wells at the same time, and improve the opening rate and stable production capacity of such gas Wells. 2 Mechanism of hydrate formation Hydrate generation in gas wells is mainly affected by the temperature and pressure distribution of the fluid and fluid composition, among other factors [14]. Hasan et al. [15] and Wang et al. [16] proposed models through which to calculate changes in the temperature and pressure fields in the wellbores of gas wells, while the Chen-Guo model [17] is widely used to calculate the temperature and pressure during gas hydrate phase equilibrium under multi-component conditions. A curve diagram can be generated to show the effect of temperature and pressure on hydrate generation at each position in the wellbore, as shown in Fig 1, in which it is evident that the conditions for hydrate generation are satisfied either when the fluid temperature is lower than the temperature of the phase equilibrium point or when the pressure is higher than the phase equilibrium point. The intersecting area between the flow temperature pressure curve and the hydrate phase equilibrium curve in Fig 1 is the hydrate generation area, and the transverse width of this area represents the degree of undercooling for hydrate generation. The greater the degree of undercooling, the greater the probability and, thus, risk of hydrate generation. Since the formation of hydrate is influenced by the temperature and pressure inside the wellbore, these two factors in the wellbore environment must be managed to inhibit the formation of hydrate. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 1. Phase equilibrium curve of hydrate. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g001 While the temperature of fluid in a gas well gradually decreases, water vapor in various positions in the wellbore changes simultaneously from a saturated to an unsaturated state, continuously condensing and resulting in the precipitation of free water on the wall of the radial cold pipe and, thus, a source for the formation and deposition of hydrate. The transient wellbore temperature distribution in the phase of decreasing fluid temperature can be calculated as follows [18]: (1) Where Tf is wellbore fluid temperature, K; Tf0 is wellbore fluid temperature at initial shut-in time, K; Tei is ambient temperature, K; t is off-time, s; L’R is shut-in relaxation parameters, kg/(m·s); m is mass of fluid per unit length, kg/m; CT is coefficient of wellbore heat storage. When the temperature and pressure conditions of hydrate formation are satisfied in the wellbore, the free water precipitated from condensation on the pipe wall is converted into hydrate. Since the tube wall exerts a strong adhesive force on the hydrate generated upon its surface, with no external force influencing the adhesion process, all the hydrate generated by condensate water will remain deposited on the tube wall, so that the hydrate deposition rate is equal to rate of its formation. The rate of free water precipitation generated from oversaturation while both fluid temperature and radial temperature are gradually decreasing can be obtained by calculating the change in natural gas water saturation at different times and positions during the shut-in period. According to the law of conservation of mass, the hydrate formation and deposition rates in the radial temperature drop stage can be obtained as follows [19]: (2) (3) Where Rdh is hydrate deposition rate, kg/s; Mh is molar mass of hydrate, kg/mol;Mw is molar mass of water, kg/mol; Cws is natural gas water saturation, kg/m3; Ve is active volume, m3; Z is natural gas compression factor; T0 is reduced temperature, 288.15 K; p is system pressure, MPa; T is natural gas water dew point temperature, K; p0 is barometric pressure, 0.101MPa; a,b is solution coefficient of natural gas water saturation. When the fluid temperature in the wellbore reaches that of the formation temperature outside, the concentration of saturated water molecules at various positions will be different due to the difference in axial temperature and pressure in the wellbore. Under the action of molecular diffusion force, water molecules will diffuse from the high concentration area to the low concentration area in a mass transfer process [20], causing water molecules in the low concentration zone to change from a saturated to an unsaturated state and then condensing into free water. This provides a free water source for the formation of hydrate, which is deposited on the tube wall and forms a hydrate layer. According to the law of mass conservation, the hydrate formation and deposition rate in this case can be obtained as follows [21]: (4) (5) Where DAB is diffusion coefficient between water molecules and methane, m2/s; is axial water molecular concentration gradient, kg/m4; Ae is effective flow area, m2; MA,MB is molar mass, kg/mol; pa is pressure, MPa; is diffusion volume of components A and B, cm3/mol. By contrast, when the temperature of fluid at different positions in the wellbore of a gas well increases until the stability of the hydrate can no longer be maintained, any previously formed hydrate sedimentary layer deposited on the wall of the pipe will gradually decompose into gas and water, thereby reducing the hydrate in the wellbore. Due to the differences in temperatures as well as in the thickness of the hydrate deposition layers around the wellbore, the rate of hydrate decomposition changes dynamically depending on time and location. The hydrate decomposition rate can be calculated via the following formula proposed by Goel et al. [22]: (6) Where Kd is hydrate decomposition constant, mol/(m2·Pa·s); fe is three-phase equilibrium fugacity, Pa; fg is gas fugacity, Pa; δ is thickness of hydrate deposit, m; rti is initial string bore, m. The critical pressure of gas hydrate formation can be calculated according to the fluid temperature under different working conditions. When T≤273.15K, the critical pressure of hydrate formation decreases with the increase of critical temperature. When T > 273.15K, the critical pressure of hydrate formation increases with the increase of critical temperature [23]. When T>273.15K (7) When T≤273.15K (8) Where p is Natural gas pressure, MPa;T is the temperature of natural gas, K; B and B1 are dimensionless constants. 3. Combination hydrate control technology research and application 3.1 Application limits and modeling methods of hydrate combination control process The main parameters of the combined hydrate control process include the depth of throttle, the diameter of the throttle nozzle and the amount of hydrate inhibitor injected. First, the minimum running depth of the throttle must be calculated using the formula for the minimum running depth (Formula 9, below). This measurement is then combined with those relevant to the well structure and the actual depth of the well, from which a preliminary judgment is made as to whether the running depth of the downhole throttle is sufficient the minimum running depth of the throttle. If so, the downhole throttling process can be adopted, but if not then the combined hydrate control technology would be the more suitable approach. On this basis, OLGA multiphase flow simulator software was used in this study to calculate different throttle diameters. Based on both critical flow theory and hydrate growth trend, the size of throttle diameters and the amount of hydrate inhibitors were finally determined. Formula for minimum running depth of downhole choke: (9) Where Lmin is minimum running depth of choke, m; M0 is earth temperature increase rate, m/°C; th is hydrate formation temperature,°C; t0 is mean surface temperature,°C; βk is critical pressure ratio; k is adiabatic coefficient of natural gas. OLGA software can simulate the production dynamics of the gas well, obtain the temperature and pressure profile of the entire gas well wellbore before and after throttling and the trend of hydrate growth, and calculate the process parameters of hydrate combination prevention and control, which can effectively guide the on-site construction of the process. The modeling process is as follows: Step 1: Input well structure parameters, including surface casing, technical casing, production casing, tubing and downhole choke size specifications, running depth; Step 2: Establish the well model according to the input well structure parameters, as shown in Fig 2; Step 3: Input formation parameters, including bottom hole temperature and pressure, reservoir parameters, wellhead temperature and pressure, wellbore static temperature and static pressure, etc., to form a calculation model. As shown in Fig 3; Step 4: Perform dynamic simulation calculation of gas well production, simulate the real gas well production coefficient, and then obtain the temperature and pressure profile of the gas well shaft and the trend of hydrate growth. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 2. Schematic diagram of well structure. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g002 Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 3. Schematic diagram of calculation model. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g003 3.2 Determination of process parameters of hydrate combination control Taking well H as an example, the minimum running depth Formula (9) is applied to calculate that the minimum running depth of the choke in this well is 1496m. Since there is a landing nipple in well H at 1300m, it is determined that the hydrate combination control technology should be adopted. In the OLGA software, after simulating the establishment of the gas well production system, the running depth was set to 1300m, and according to the gas well production allocation and a large number of numerical calculations, the calculation examples of throttle diameter 1 to 5 were set to 2.4mm, 3mm, 3.6mm, 4.2mm and 4.8mm respectively, as shown in Table 1. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Table 1. Examples of downhole throttling parameters. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.t001 When the ratio of pressure between the outlet orifice and the inlet face of the throttling device is less than 0.55, the throttle is in a critical flow state and the fluctuation of pressure from behind does not affect the front of the throttle. At this time, the gas flow through the throttle is at its maximum [24], as shown in Fig 4. Therefore, it is necessary to achieve throttling pressure reduction under critical flow conditions. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 4. Relational diagram of volume flow rate and pressure ratio of throttle nozzle. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g004 The calculation results are shown in Fig 5., in which, for example, in example 3 (where the throttle nozzle diameter is 3.6 mm), the pressure behind the throttle is 5.1MPa, the pressure before the throttle is 9.4MPa, the ratio is 0.542 less than 0.55, and the wellhead pressure can be reduced to 4.7MPa. The smaller the throttle diameter, the smaller the ratio between the pressure behind and before the throttle nozzle. However, the lower the temperature behind the throttle and the lower the temperature at the wellhead, the more readily hydrate is generated under the same pressure condition. Thus, combined with the critical flow theory, the diameter of the throttle was determined to be 3.6 mm. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 5. Pressure and temperature curves of choke with different nozzle diameters. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g005 As can be seen in Figs 6 and 7, the temperature difference between the hydrate and the inner tubing section, and the pressure difference between the inner tubing section and the hydrate, respectively, were found to be greater than 0 within the range from wellhead to 148 m, indicating that hydrate will be generated within that depth range. Thus, when a downhole throttle with a nozzle diameter of 3.6 mm is lowered to the depth of the inner tubing of the gas well (1300 m), the wellhead oil pressure can be reduced, however, the formation of hydrate cannot be inhibited and, therefore, the addition of hydrate inhibitors would be necessary to reduce the temperature and, thus, inhibit the formation of hydrate. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 6. Temperature difference between hydrate and inner tubing section. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g006 Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 7. Pressure difference between hydrate and inner tubing section. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g007 In general, the methanol content of hydrate inhibitors is greater than 30%, and methanol consumption is huge. Moreover, the use of hydrate inhibitors is affected by factors such as weather, personnel and equipment, and they cannot be continuously injected, which hinders the start-up rate of gas wells. Therefore, based on the downhole throttling process design results, the combination hydrate prevention and control process in this study was applied to optimize the filling concentration of hydrate inhibitors. According to the upper limit of 30% methanol content commonly used in gas Wells, hydrate inhibitors with a concentration of 30%, 25%, 20%, 15% and 5% methanol were used for simulation calculation, and the calculation results showed that the hydrate inhibitor with a concentration of 5% methanol could be used to effectively solve the problem of hydrate generation. As can be seen from Figs 8 and 9, after the addition of hydrate inhibitors with a 5% methanol concentration under the same conditions of depth and throttle nozzle diameter, the temperature difference between the hydrate and the inner tubing section, and the pressure difference between hydrate and the inner tubing section, were both less than 0 in the whole wellbore. Thus, when the downhole throttle with a 3.6 mm throttle nozzle was lowered to the depth of the gas well tubing at 1300 m, followed by the addition of the 5% methanol hydrate inhibitor, the wellhead oil pressure was reduced and the hydrate generation problem was solved. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 8. Temperature difference between hydrate and inner tubing section. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g008 Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 9. Pressure difference between hydrate and inner tubing section. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g009 3.3 Application effect of hydrate combination control process Using the design results of the combination hydrate control process parameters, this process was subsequently applied to Well H in the exploration of a new combined application, downhole throttling and surface hydrate inhibitor automatic drip device. The downhole throttling device was lowered into the gas well while the hydrate inhibitor automatic drip device was simultaneously installed at the wellhead, as shown in Fig 10. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 10. Schematic diagram of combination application of downhole choke and automatic drip device. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g010 Fig 11 shows the production curve of Well H after the application of the combination hydrate control process. It was found that the downhole throttling process alone could reduce the wellhead oil pressure to an average of 5 MPa, however, a large amount of methanol (400–800 kg) had to be manually injected in order to maintain normal production. The combination approach of hydrate control technology, with downhole choke and the surface hydrate inhibitor automatic drip device, reduced the wellhead oil pressure to an average of 5 MPa and the methanol injection required from a maximum of 1750 kg to just 60 kg, thereby simultaneously achieving the reduction of oil pressure and inhibiting hydrate generation in the well. In addition, the automatic drip device of the hydrate inhibitor could automatically and continuously inject hydrate inhibitor without the need for manual maintenance under the normal production state of the gas well. In addition, the hydrate inhibitor automatic drip device can automatically and continuously inject hydrate inhibitors without manual maintenance under normal gas well production conditions, reducing manual maintenance workload by 80%, and increasing the rate of well opening from 45% to 100%. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 11. Production curve before and after well H test. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g011 3.1 Application limits and modeling methods of hydrate combination control process The main parameters of the combined hydrate control process include the depth of throttle, the diameter of the throttle nozzle and the amount of hydrate inhibitor injected. First, the minimum running depth of the throttle must be calculated using the formula for the minimum running depth (Formula 9, below). This measurement is then combined with those relevant to the well structure and the actual depth of the well, from which a preliminary judgment is made as to whether the running depth of the downhole throttle is sufficient the minimum running depth of the throttle. If so, the downhole throttling process can be adopted, but if not then the combined hydrate control technology would be the more suitable approach. On this basis, OLGA multiphase flow simulator software was used in this study to calculate different throttle diameters. Based on both critical flow theory and hydrate growth trend, the size of throttle diameters and the amount of hydrate inhibitors were finally determined. Formula for minimum running depth of downhole choke: (9) Where Lmin is minimum running depth of choke, m; M0 is earth temperature increase rate, m/°C; th is hydrate formation temperature,°C; t0 is mean surface temperature,°C; βk is critical pressure ratio; k is adiabatic coefficient of natural gas. OLGA software can simulate the production dynamics of the gas well, obtain the temperature and pressure profile of the entire gas well wellbore before and after throttling and the trend of hydrate growth, and calculate the process parameters of hydrate combination prevention and control, which can effectively guide the on-site construction of the process. The modeling process is as follows: Step 1: Input well structure parameters, including surface casing, technical casing, production casing, tubing and downhole choke size specifications, running depth; Step 2: Establish the well model according to the input well structure parameters, as shown in Fig 2; Step 3: Input formation parameters, including bottom hole temperature and pressure, reservoir parameters, wellhead temperature and pressure, wellbore static temperature and static pressure, etc., to form a calculation model. As shown in Fig 3; Step 4: Perform dynamic simulation calculation of gas well production, simulate the real gas well production coefficient, and then obtain the temperature and pressure profile of the gas well shaft and the trend of hydrate growth. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 2. Schematic diagram of well structure. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g002 Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 3. Schematic diagram of calculation model. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g003 3.2 Determination of process parameters of hydrate combination control Taking well H as an example, the minimum running depth Formula (9) is applied to calculate that the minimum running depth of the choke in this well is 1496m. Since there is a landing nipple in well H at 1300m, it is determined that the hydrate combination control technology should be adopted. In the OLGA software, after simulating the establishment of the gas well production system, the running depth was set to 1300m, and according to the gas well production allocation and a large number of numerical calculations, the calculation examples of throttle diameter 1 to 5 were set to 2.4mm, 3mm, 3.6mm, 4.2mm and 4.8mm respectively, as shown in Table 1. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Table 1. Examples of downhole throttling parameters. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.t001 When the ratio of pressure between the outlet orifice and the inlet face of the throttling device is less than 0.55, the throttle is in a critical flow state and the fluctuation of pressure from behind does not affect the front of the throttle. At this time, the gas flow through the throttle is at its maximum [24], as shown in Fig 4. Therefore, it is necessary to achieve throttling pressure reduction under critical flow conditions. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 4. Relational diagram of volume flow rate and pressure ratio of throttle nozzle. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g004 The calculation results are shown in Fig 5., in which, for example, in example 3 (where the throttle nozzle diameter is 3.6 mm), the pressure behind the throttle is 5.1MPa, the pressure before the throttle is 9.4MPa, the ratio is 0.542 less than 0.55, and the wellhead pressure can be reduced to 4.7MPa. The smaller the throttle diameter, the smaller the ratio between the pressure behind and before the throttle nozzle. However, the lower the temperature behind the throttle and the lower the temperature at the wellhead, the more readily hydrate is generated under the same pressure condition. Thus, combined with the critical flow theory, the diameter of the throttle was determined to be 3.6 mm. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 5. Pressure and temperature curves of choke with different nozzle diameters. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g005 As can be seen in Figs 6 and 7, the temperature difference between the hydrate and the inner tubing section, and the pressure difference between the inner tubing section and the hydrate, respectively, were found to be greater than 0 within the range from wellhead to 148 m, indicating that hydrate will be generated within that depth range. Thus, when a downhole throttle with a nozzle diameter of 3.6 mm is lowered to the depth of the inner tubing of the gas well (1300 m), the wellhead oil pressure can be reduced, however, the formation of hydrate cannot be inhibited and, therefore, the addition of hydrate inhibitors would be necessary to reduce the temperature and, thus, inhibit the formation of hydrate. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 6. Temperature difference between hydrate and inner tubing section. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g006 Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 7. Pressure difference between hydrate and inner tubing section. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g007 In general, the methanol content of hydrate inhibitors is greater than 30%, and methanol consumption is huge. Moreover, the use of hydrate inhibitors is affected by factors such as weather, personnel and equipment, and they cannot be continuously injected, which hinders the start-up rate of gas wells. Therefore, based on the downhole throttling process design results, the combination hydrate prevention and control process in this study was applied to optimize the filling concentration of hydrate inhibitors. According to the upper limit of 30% methanol content commonly used in gas Wells, hydrate inhibitors with a concentration of 30%, 25%, 20%, 15% and 5% methanol were used for simulation calculation, and the calculation results showed that the hydrate inhibitor with a concentration of 5% methanol could be used to effectively solve the problem of hydrate generation. As can be seen from Figs 8 and 9, after the addition of hydrate inhibitors with a 5% methanol concentration under the same conditions of depth and throttle nozzle diameter, the temperature difference between the hydrate and the inner tubing section, and the pressure difference between hydrate and the inner tubing section, were both less than 0 in the whole wellbore. Thus, when the downhole throttle with a 3.6 mm throttle nozzle was lowered to the depth of the gas well tubing at 1300 m, followed by the addition of the 5% methanol hydrate inhibitor, the wellhead oil pressure was reduced and the hydrate generation problem was solved. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 8. Temperature difference between hydrate and inner tubing section. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g008 Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 9. Pressure difference between hydrate and inner tubing section. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g009 3.3 Application effect of hydrate combination control process Using the design results of the combination hydrate control process parameters, this process was subsequently applied to Well H in the exploration of a new combined application, downhole throttling and surface hydrate inhibitor automatic drip device. The downhole throttling device was lowered into the gas well while the hydrate inhibitor automatic drip device was simultaneously installed at the wellhead, as shown in Fig 10. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 10. Schematic diagram of combination application of downhole choke and automatic drip device. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g010 Fig 11 shows the production curve of Well H after the application of the combination hydrate control process. It was found that the downhole throttling process alone could reduce the wellhead oil pressure to an average of 5 MPa, however, a large amount of methanol (400–800 kg) had to be manually injected in order to maintain normal production. The combination approach of hydrate control technology, with downhole choke and the surface hydrate inhibitor automatic drip device, reduced the wellhead oil pressure to an average of 5 MPa and the methanol injection required from a maximum of 1750 kg to just 60 kg, thereby simultaneously achieving the reduction of oil pressure and inhibiting hydrate generation in the well. In addition, the automatic drip device of the hydrate inhibitor could automatically and continuously inject hydrate inhibitor without the need for manual maintenance under the normal production state of the gas well. In addition, the hydrate inhibitor automatic drip device can automatically and continuously inject hydrate inhibitors without manual maintenance under normal gas well production conditions, reducing manual maintenance workload by 80%, and increasing the rate of well opening from 45% to 100%. Download: PPT PowerPoint slide PNG larger image TIFF original image Fig 11. Production curve before and after well H test. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.g011 4 Conclusions Hydrate generation is affected mainly by wellbore temperature and pressure. The combined hydrate prevention and control technology proposed in this paper effectively solves the problem of wellbore throttling and depressurizing that leads to hydrate freezing and plugging in some wells. The management of temperature, pressure and well structure limitations, thus, provides technical means that contribute to the long-term stable and, even, increased production of such gas wells, as well as the reduction of well construction costs. By using the novel combination hydrate control technology, the methanol injection volume was reduced in this study’s simulation from the maximum 1750 kg to just 60 kg, and the hydrate inhibitor could be automatically and continuously injected without manual maintenance, thereby significantly reducing methanol consumption and daily maintenance costs. Supporting information S1 Data. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295356.s001 (XLSX)
TI - Combined gas well hydrate prevention and control technology and its application
JF - PLoS ONE
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0295356
DA - 2023-12-07
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/public-library-of-science-plos-journal/combined-gas-well-hydrate-prevention-and-control-technology-and-its-z80SnWPUMU
SP - e0295356
VL - 18
IS - 12
DP - DeepDyve
ER -