TY - JOUR
AU - Tang, Walter Z.
AB - Membrane treatment technologiesMansour, Abdel‐Shafy, and Mehaya (2018) used hot water to extract by‐products from onion, lemon, and orange wastes, which were source‐separated from solid waste. They found that the hybrid molecularly imprinted membrane (HMIM) process was efficient in recovering polyphenols from these wastes with varying degrees of extraction efficiency.De Almeida, Martins, Quinta‐Ferreira, and Gando‐Ferreira (2018) evaluated the performance of an integrated membrane system to treat and valorize olive mill wastewater (OWM) from a traditional extraction press and noted that a combination of ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) was effective in treating OMW wastewater.Zhu, Li, Ma, and Chen (2018) used an anaerobic–anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic membrane bioreactor (A3‐MBR) system to treat food waste fermentation wastewater. Conventional pollutants like Cod, total N, ammonia, and total P were removed. The polar fraction of the effluent contained SMPs that with genotoxic effects. The mid‐polar and aromatic fraction of the effluent did not contribute as much to the genotoxicity.Castro‐Muñoz, Barragán‐Huerta, Fíla, Denis, and Ruby‐Figueroa (2018) compared various micro‐, ultra‐, and nanofiltration membrane technologies used by the agro‐food industry and reported that solute recovery derived from treatment of aqueous wastes was a significant byproduct recovered from the process. The authors present the engineering aspects of using integrated systems 
TI - Food‐processing wastes
JF - Water Environment Research
DO - 10.1002/wer.1428
DA - 2020-10-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/wiley/food-processing-wastes-uvsTw00jHW
SP - 1726
EP - 1740
VL - 92
IS - 10
DP - DeepDyve
ER -