TY - JOUR
AU - Murray, Brian
AB - Letters ealizing an optimal and sustainable future state of phar- the most extreme was the idea of program specialization Rmacy residency training will require acknowledging chal- or individualization. While I do not advocate for or against lenges that are both complex and variable. There may not exist this approach and agree that there are significant potential a simple one-size-fits-all solution that addresses all issues for downsides that must be considered, I also want to acknow- the many unique training programs around the country. An ledge some aspects of the current state: not every pharma- earnest dialogue is critical, and I am thankful to Drs. Emery cist performs (or has a desire to perform) every activity that and Nei for adding their invaluable insights and perspective. I a pharmacist is able to perform, and offering low-quality, wholeheartedly agree with the view that postresidency growth insufficiently resourced, poorly mentored experiences in the and early or mid-career professional development must be name of “exposure” may only serve to establish an associ- encouraged and enabled for the benefit not just of individuals ation with failure, frustration, and burnout that dissuades but also of the profession of pharmacy. However, I believe that residents from 
TI - Response to Emery and Nei
JO - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
DO - 10.1093/ajhp/zxaf066
DA - 2025-03-10
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/response-to-emery-and-nei-uc2y0dUHSk
SP - 866
EP - 867
VL - 82
IS - 16
DP - DeepDyve
ER -