TY - JOUR
AU - W Zdouc
AB - This paper discusses how the GATS adapts the different stages of the WTO dispute settlement procedures as foreseen by the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) to trade in services. It deals with (1) bilateral and multilateral confutations, (2) causes of action in the adjudicative stage, (3) implementation and enforcement under surveillance by the DSB, and (4) special procedures for particular service sectors. It also explains the nine violation cases that were initiated between 1995 and 1998. Taking the EC - Bananas case as an example, the paper then discusses those legal issues and problems that are also likely to arise in future cases under the GATS. A discussion of the national treatment clause follows, addressing in particular the reach of de jure and de facto discrimination under the GATS, as well as the irrelevance of the 'aims and effects' of national regulation, and evidentiary problems arising in GATS dispute settlement practice. The final section deals with the reach of de jure and de facto discrimination under the GATS MFN treatment clause. Copyright 1999 « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article J Int Economic Law (1999) 2 (2): 295-346. doi: 10.1093/jiel/2.2.295 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zdouc, W. Search for related content Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue September 2015 18 (3) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Rights & Permissions This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more Journals Career Network Impact factor: 0.938 5-Yr impact factor: 1.138 Editors-in-Chief Chris Brummer Joost Pauwelyn View full editorial board For Authors Instructions to authors Self-archiving policy Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements var taxonomies = ("LAW00270", "LAW00370", "LAW90371", "SOC00720"); Most Most Read How will TPP and TTIP Change the WTO System? Explaining China's Tripartite Strategy Toward the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges International Investment Law Between Commitment and Flexibility: A Contract Theory Analysis WTO Dispute Settlement 1995-2014--A Statistical Analysis » View all Most Read articles Most Cited Differential Pricing of Essential AIDS Drugs: Markets, Politics and Public Health Chairing a WTO Negotiation A Proposal for a Framework Convention on Global Health WTO DECISION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PARAGRAPH 6 OF THE DOHA DECLARATION ON THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH: A SOLUTION TO THE ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL MEDICINES PROBLEM? WTO Deference to National Health Policy: Toward an Interpretive Principle » View all Most Cited articles Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department. Online ISSN 1464-3758 - Print ISSN 1369-3034 Copyright © 2015 Oxford University Press Oxford Journals Oxford University Press Site Map Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal Notices Frequently Asked Questions Other Oxford University Press sites: Oxford University Press Oxford Journals China Oxford Journals Japan Academic & Professional books Children's & Schools Books Dictionaries & Reference Dictionary of National Biography Digital Reference English Language Teaching Higher Education Textbooks International Education Unit Law Medicine Music Online Products & Publishing Oxford Bibliographies Online Oxford Dictionaries Online Oxford English Dictionary Oxford Language Dictionaries Online Oxford Scholarship Online Reference Rights and Permissions Resources for Retailers & Wholesalers Resources for the Healthcare Industry Very Short Introductions World's Classics function fnc_onDomLoaded() { var query_context = getQueryContext(); PF_initOIUnderbar(query_context,":QS:default","","JRN"); PF_insertOIUnderbar(0); }; if (window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', fnc_onDomLoaded, false); } else if (window.attachEvent) { window.attachEvent('onload', fnc_onDomLoaded); } var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-189672-16"); pageTracker._setDomainName(".oxfordjournals.org"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}
TI - WTO dispute settlement practice relating to the GATS
JF - Journal of International Economic Law
DO - 10.1093/jiel/2.2.295
DA - 1999-06-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/wto-dispute-settlement-practice-relating-to-the-gats-oIdDyf8TVu
SP - 295
VL - 2
IS - 2
DP - DeepDyve
ER -