TY - JOUR
AU - Kelly, B.
AB - a of its This is written and work. contents summary clearly scholarly My has to Brown’s fairness in failed do to Father inevitably scrupulous justice invite re-examination of some evidence. Even if his conclusions weighing of the one feels that he has traditional theses of Christology, provided much of the to enrich our of Christ as material with which knowledge God and Man. truly B. KELLY, C.S.Sp. CHRIST AND ORIGINAL Peter De SIN, Rosa; Geoffrey Chapman, by London 138. Price 25s. 1967; pp. Father De Rosa’s wish in this book was ’... that the like reader, writing should witness the of scholars at work myself, thrilling sight exploring our faith in substance which, although unchanging, continually opens up insistent the new avenues for The areas enquirer 1). investigation’ (p. are the Sin. related ones of the Incarnation and explored closely Original Father De Rosa writes with enthusiasm and obvious desire to make an the faith more to modem he man. acceptable Unfortunately, however, substitutes this concern for an standard of personal pastoral objective theological scholarship. his attitude to of an earlier is one Thus, general generation theologians of sheer to be brushed St Thomas is mentioned incomprehension. only aside 
TI - Book Review: CHRIST AND ORIGINAL SIN, by Peter De Rosa; Geoffrey Chapman, London 1967; pp. 138. Price 25s
JO - Irish Theological Quarterly
DO - 10.1177/002114006803500209
DA - 1968-06-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/book-review-christ-and-original-sin-by-peter-de-rosa-geoffrey-chapman-nG52xuzzGX
SP - 197
EP - 197
VL - 35
IS - 2
DP - DeepDyve
ER -