TY - JOUR
AU - Paulhus, Delroy L.
AB - J. Millham and L. I. Jacobson's (1978) 2-factor model of socially desirable responding based on denial and attribution components is reviewed and disputed. A 2nd model distinguishing self-deception and impression management components is reviewed and shown to be related to early factor-analytic work on desirability scales. Two studies, with 511 undergraduates, were conducted to test the model. A factor analysis of commonly used desirability scales (e.g., Lie scale of the MMPI, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale) revealed that the 2 major factors were best interpreted as Self-Deception and Impression Management. A 2nd study employed confirmatory factor analysis to show that the attribution/denial model does not fit the data as well as the self-deception/impression management model. A 3rd study, with 100 Ss, compared scores on desirability scales under anonymous and public conditions. Results show that those scales that had loaded highest on the Impression Management factor showed the greatest mean increase from anonymous to public conditions. It is recommended that impression management, but not self-deception, be controlled in self-reports of personality. (54 ref)
TI - Two-component models of socially desirable responding
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
DA - 1984-03-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/american-psychological-association/two-component-models-of-socially-desirable-responding-g4XuuxUlAP
SP - 598
EP - 609
VL - 46
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -