TY - JOUR
AU - Edwards, B. R.
AB - Abstract The 1.43 Ga Sherman batholith, southeastern Wyoming, USA, shows extreme A-type petrochemical characteristics compared with other Mid-Proterozoic granite batholiths of North America. It consists of: (1) the Sherman granite, a coarse-grained biotite hornblende granite that locally contains fayalite and pyroxenes; (2) the Lincoln granite, a medium-grained biotite granite; (3) a porphyritic biotite hornblende granite that probably formed by interaction of granitic and mafic magmas; and (4) iron-enriched mafic dikes and pods. The ilmenite-series, metaluminous Sherman granite exhibits extreme values of FeOt/(FeOt+MgO) and is rich in K, REE, Nb and Y. It crystallized at temperatures exceeding 900°C and a pressure of ∼2.5 kbar, with water activity of 0.7 and Δlog fO2 of -0.1 to −0.5. The Lincoln granite, which is peraluminous and has less extreme A-type geochemical characteristics, crystallized at temperatures as low as 750°C and Δlog fO2 of around 0.5 units above FMQ (fayalite–magnetite–quartz). The rocks of the Sherman batholith are chemically equivalent to lavas from the Yellowstone hotspot. Like the Yellowstone magmas, the Sherman batholith probably originated by partial melting of underplated, mantle-derived mafic rocks. Introduction Granites and rhyolites with high K contents and extreme Fe enrichment are a distinctive rock type of problematic origin that are found throughout the Proterozoic ‘anorogenic’ granite provinces of the southwestern USA, Adirondacks, eastern Canada, southern Greenland and the Fennoscandian Shield (Anderson, 1983). Phanerozoic examples include Paleozoic granites of southeastern Australia (Collins et al., 1982) and of Corsica (Poitrasson et al., 1995), and the Mesozoic Nigerian Younger granites (Jacobsen et al., 1958) and the White Mountain Magma Series (Foland & Allen, 1991). ‘Anorogenic granite’ refers to plutons that are not associated with compressional structures, and that were emplaced long after any known orogenic event. Anorogenic, or ‘A-type’ granites (Loiselle & Wones, 1979) are characterized by low H2O and O2 fugacities along with high FeOt/(FeOt + MgO), K2O/Na2O and K2O contents. A-type granites typically are rich in incompatible elements, including rare earth elements (REE), Zr, Nb and Ta, but poor in Co, Sc, Cr, Ni, Ba, Sr, and Eu. Minimum magma liquidus temperatures are 900–1000°C (Clemens et al., 1986; Creaser & White, 1991). Some workers suggest these rocks are derived from melting of tonalitic or more felsic crust (Anderson & Cullers, 1978; Collins et al., 1982; Clemens et al., 1986; Creaser et al., 1991), whereas others relate the granites to mantle-derived tholeiitic magmas (Jacobsen et al., 1958; Turner et al., 1992; Frost & Frost, 1997), or favor a combination of crustal and mantle sources (Barker et al., 1975; Foland & Allen, 1991). The goal of this study is to understand the origin of the Sherman batholith of southeastern Wyoming. This intrusion, a ‘reduced, rapakivi-type granite’ (Frost & Frost, 1997), is composed of ilmenite-series metaluminous granites that commonly exhibit rapakivi texture. They have among the highest K2O and FeOt/(FeOt + MgO) contents and the lowest fO2 and fH2O of any Mid-Proterozoic, anorogenic granite in North America (Anderson, 1983; Frost & Frost, 1997), which limits possible source rocks, and restricts the tectonic environments in which it could be produced. Geologic setting of the Sherman batholith About 1300 km2 of Mid-Proterozoic Sherman batholith is exposed in the southern Laramie Mountains in southeastern Wyoming and the Front Range of northern Colorado, with smaller exposures in the southern Medicine Bow Mountains (Fig. 1). The batholith lies near the Cheyenne belt, a complexly deformed 1.76–1.78 Ga suture between Proterozoic island arc rocks and the Archean Wyoming province (Hills & Houston, 1979; Karlstrom & Houston, 1984; Duebendorfer & Houston, 1987; Chamberlain, 1998). The Cheyenne belt is exposed in the Medicine Bow Mountains, but in the Laramie Mountains its inferred trace has been obliterated by the 1.43 Ga Laramie anorthosite complex. Most of the Sherman batholith cuts Proterozoic igneous and metamorphic rocks that lie south of the inferred trace of the Cheyenne belt. Only the Mule Creek lobe, the northeasternmost exposure of the Sherman batholith, cuts Archean granitic gneiss (Fig. 1). The Laramie Mountains form an asymmetrical Laramide uplift in which Precambrian rocks have been thrust eastward over Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks and have been unconformably overlain in the west by Paleozoic rocks. The Sherman batholith cuts Early Proterozoic supracrustal rocks along its southern margins in the Laramie Mountains and the Colorado Front Range. Proterozoic country rocks are also found as a belt on the east side of the batholith that extends from Granite Village to Virginia Dale (Fig. 1). Most northern contacts cut the 1.43 Ga Laramie anorthosite complex (Scoates & Chamberlain, 1995) or the 1.76 Ga Horse Creek anorthosite complex (Scoates & Chamberlain, 1997). Lithologic Units Our study was primarily of the Sherman Mountains area of the Sherman batholith, directly east of Laramie. This small area contains fresh exposures of the rock types throughout the batholith (Fig. 2). From our work in this area and reconnaissance mapping elsewhere we have identified four major units: (1) the Sherman granite, a coarse-grained biotite hornblende granite that locally contains fayalite and pyroxenes; (2) the Lincoln granite, a medium-grained biotite granite; (3) porphyritic biotite hornblende granite; (4) iron-rich mafic rocks. Rarer are sodic granitoid rocks, such as the Pole Mountain gneiss, which we interpret as the oldest unit of the batholith. Sherman granite The dominant rock type of the Sherman batholith is coarse-grained, biotite hornblende granite. This reddish orange rock commonly weathers deeply to a thick grus. The Sherman granite is subporphyritic, with a seriate, hypidiomorphic granular texture. Locally it is an augen gneiss (Fig. 2), indicating late-stage deformation. Major phases are microcline, plagioclase, quartz, hornblende, biotite, and ilmenite. Accessory phases are zircon and apatite with rarer allanite and fluorite. Augite, pigeonite, fayalite, and magnetite are found in some samples. The more hydrous samples contain titanite, produced by Microcline is megacrystic, perthitic, and in places it is rimmed by plagioclase to create a rapakivi-textured mantle. The mafic minerals are locally glomerocrystic. The rock is a granite sensu stricto in the Sherman Mountains area (Fig. 3) but in the Virginia Dale area the Sherman granite consists of quartz syenite and quartz monzonite in addition to granite (Eggler, 1968). 7 CaFeSi2O6+ 5 SiO2+ 3 FeTiO3+ H2O =in pyroxene   quartz ilmenite    fluid2 Ca2Fe5Si8O22(OH)2+3 CaTiSiO5.in hornblende  titanite The Sherman granite locally contains fayalitic olivine or its alteration products, clinopyroxene, and (in one sample) pigeonite. Pyroxenes are typically rimmed by hornblende. Olivine is rimmed by grunerite, which in turn is rimmed by hornblende; biotite is sparse. On fresh surfaces, olivine and/or pyroxene-bearing Sherman granite is green to black. Olivine-bearing samples contain both orthoclase and microcline; the order–disorder transition in K-feldspar evidently was sluggish in these relatively dry rocks (see Vorma, 1971). The fayalite granite does not crop out boldly. We were able to sample it only in blasted roadcuts along I-80. The contact between fayalite-bearing and fayalite-absent granite appears gradational, and apparently reflects variations in water activity. In many areas the Sherman granite weathers to dark grus, suggesting fayalite-bearing granite may be more abundant than we have documented. Lincoln granite This medium-grained, red–orange to orange–gray biotite granite was named after the monument that marks the summit of the old Lincoln Highway, US 30 (Edwards, 1993). The Lincoln granite occupies much of the area directly south of the summit of the Sherman Mountains, where it crops out as sub-horizontal sheets (Fig. 2). North of the Sherman Mountains, the Lincoln granite caps hills and knolls. The granite also occurs as dikes, in which it is locally commingled with monzodiorite. It is also found as inclusions in the Sherman granite. Lineated Lincoln granite occupies a small area at the northwestern end of the Sherman Mountains, suggesting that the unit was emplaced throughout the history of the batholith. Houston & Marlatt, (1997) equated medium-grained to porphyritic facies in the eastern portion of the batholith to the Lincoln granite of Edwards, (1993). Smith, (1977) described a medium-grained granite in the Mule Creek lobe of the Sherman batholith near Iron Mountain, which our reconnaissance work indicates is the Lincoln granite. Fig. 1. Open in new tabDownload slide Geologic map of southeastern Wyoming and a portion of northern Colorado showing the extent of the Sherman batholith. Inset shows location of study area along the SE margin of the Wyoming province (WY, west of the Superior province (SP). The box outlines the Pole Mountain area shown in detail in Fig. 2. Open circles give locations of samples that occur outside the area of Fig. 2. The Lincoln granite is composed of quartz, plagioclase, microcline, perthite, biotite, apatite, zircon, and locally traces of hornblende, ilmenite, and fluorite. It contains more modal quartz than does the Sherman granite (Table 1; Fig. 3). The rock is generally equigranular, with an allotriomorphic granular texture. Some samples display isolated alkali feldspar megacrysts that rarely make up more than 1% of the rock. Porphyritic granite Orange–gray granite with 1–2 cm, orange–pink alkali feldspar phenocrysts is most abundant north of highway 210 in the Pole Mountain area. This unit was described by Harrison, (1951) as the dominant constituent of the central part of the batholith, but also resembles the Inner and Outer Cap Rock quartz monzonite of Virginia Dale (Eggler, 1968). The porphyritic granite commonly contains oblate mafic enclaves and schlieren, and xenoliths of Sherman granite, and shows gradational contacts with monzodiorite and with Lincoln granite. However, most contacts between the porphyritic granite and the Sherman granite are sharp. Fig. 2. Open in new tabDownload slide Geologic map of the Sherman Mountains showing the extent of various intrusive phases of the Sherman batholith. Open circles give the location of samples analyzed in this study. The major phases in the porphyritic granite are perthitic microcline, plagioclase, quartz, biotite, and hornblende. Titanite, ilmenite, apatite, and zircon are minor phases. Textures are porphyritic and hypidiomorphic granular, with megacrystic alkali feldspar. Modal compositions of porphyritic granite samples overlap those of the Sherman and Lincoln granites, but Eggler, (1968) showed that the porphyritic granite suite displays greater proportions of plagioclase (Table 1; Fig. 3). Mafic rocks Mafic rocks constitute less than 1% of the total area of the Sherman batholith. In the Virginia Dale area, the mafic rocks are gabbroic (Vasek & Kolker, 1999), whereas in the Sherman Mountains area ferrodiorite, monzonite and monzodiorite are present. Ferrodiorite sampled near the summit of I-80 contains plagioclase, pigeonite, magnetite and ilmenite, quartz, pigeonite and augite, biotite, and hornblende, thus resembling ferrodiorites in the Laramie anorthosite complex (Mitchell et al., 1996). Contacts are poorly exposed. Olivine- and pyroxene-bearing monzonite from the same locality occurs as a 100 m diameter, dark bluish purple enclave within Sherman granite. This rock contains fayalitic olivine, ferrohedenbergite, alkali feldspar, plagioclase, amphibole, biotite, magnetite and ilmenite, and is similar to monzonites of the Maloin Ranch and Red Mountain plutons, Laramie anorthosite complex (Kolker & Lindsley, 1989; Anderson, 1995). It is less siliceous yet has a higher FeOt/(FeOt + MgO) ratio than the Sherman granite. Table 1: Modal percentages of alkali feldspar (A), plagioclase (P) and quartz (Q) determined for representative samples of granitic rocks of the Sherman batholith Sample number . A . P . Q . Sherman granite 91SMW28 0.55 0.22 0.23 91PH1 0.54 0.19 0.27 90PH2 0.46 0.25 0.29 91SMW5 0.50 0.29 0.21 90DC2 0.37 0.36 0.27 Porphyritic granite 91PH3 0.44 0.29 0.27 91SMW7 0.47 0.28 0.25 90SME2 0.34 0.32 0.34 90SMW19 0.45 0.32 0.23 90PH4 0.34 0.42 0.24 Lincoln granite 91SMW13 0.39 0.30 0.31 90SMW1 0.40 0.29 0.31 91SMW3 0.41 0.29 0.30 91PH6 0.40 0.31 0.29 91SMW9 0.37 0.35 0.28 Sodic rocks 91SMW27 0.28 0.64 0.09 97SMW1 0.28 0.58 0.14 91SMW4 0.10 0.49 0.41 Sample number . A . P . Q . Sherman granite 91SMW28 0.55 0.22 0.23 91PH1 0.54 0.19 0.27 90PH2 0.46 0.25 0.29 91SMW5 0.50 0.29 0.21 90DC2 0.37 0.36 0.27 Porphyritic granite 91PH3 0.44 0.29 0.27 91SMW7 0.47 0.28 0.25 90SME2 0.34 0.32 0.34 90SMW19 0.45 0.32 0.23 90PH4 0.34 0.42 0.24 Lincoln granite 91SMW13 0.39 0.30 0.31 90SMW1 0.40 0.29 0.31 91SMW3 0.41 0.29 0.30 91PH6 0.40 0.31 0.29 91SMW9 0.37 0.35 0.28 Sodic rocks 91SMW27 0.28 0.64 0.09 97SMW1 0.28 0.58 0.14 91SMW4 0.10 0.49 0.41 Modal proportions determined from stained slabs; a mini-mum of 400 points counted. Open in new tab Table 1: Modal percentages of alkali feldspar (A), plagioclase (P) and quartz (Q) determined for representative samples of granitic rocks of the Sherman batholith Sample number . A . P . Q . Sherman granite 91SMW28 0.55 0.22 0.23 91PH1 0.54 0.19 0.27 90PH2 0.46 0.25 0.29 91SMW5 0.50 0.29 0.21 90DC2 0.37 0.36 0.27 Porphyritic granite 91PH3 0.44 0.29 0.27 91SMW7 0.47 0.28 0.25 90SME2 0.34 0.32 0.34 90SMW19 0.45 0.32 0.23 90PH4 0.34 0.42 0.24 Lincoln granite 91SMW13 0.39 0.30 0.31 90SMW1 0.40 0.29 0.31 91SMW3 0.41 0.29 0.30 91PH6 0.40 0.31 0.29 91SMW9 0.37 0.35 0.28 Sodic rocks 91SMW27 0.28 0.64 0.09 97SMW1 0.28 0.58 0.14 91SMW4 0.10 0.49 0.41 Sample number . A . P . Q . Sherman granite 91SMW28 0.55 0.22 0.23 91PH1 0.54 0.19 0.27 90PH2 0.46 0.25 0.29 91SMW5 0.50 0.29 0.21 90DC2 0.37 0.36 0.27 Porphyritic granite 91PH3 0.44 0.29 0.27 91SMW7 0.47 0.28 0.25 90SME2 0.34 0.32 0.34 90SMW19 0.45 0.32 0.23 90PH4 0.34 0.42 0.24 Lincoln granite 91SMW13 0.39 0.30 0.31 90SMW1 0.40 0.29 0.31 91SMW3 0.41 0.29 0.30 91PH6 0.40 0.31 0.29 91SMW9 0.37 0.35 0.28 Sodic rocks 91SMW27 0.28 0.64 0.09 97SMW1 0.28 0.58 0.14 91SMW4 0.10 0.49 0.41 Modal proportions determined from stained slabs; a mini-mum of 400 points counted. Open in new tab The most common mafic rock type in the Sherman batholith is monzodiorite. Monzodiorite samples contain plagioclase, hornblende, biotite, quartz, and orthoclase, with minor titanite, magnetite and ilmenite, apatite, and zircon. Monzodioritic dikes and pods commonly contain irregularly distributed alkali feldspar megacrysts that display thin rims of plagioclase, along with plagioclase xenocrysts, and/or rounded quartz grains rimmed by hornblende. Contact relations vary. In some areas monzodiorite bodies sharply crosscut the Lincoln granite, whereas other contacts are gradational with porphyritic granites and lobate–cuspate with the Lincoln granite. Monzodiorite locally contains enclaves of Sherman granite. We have observed commingling and hybridization relations between monzodiorite and granite within the Sherman batholith immediately south of the Sherman Mountains. Similar relationships have been reported in Virginia Dale (Eggler, 1968; Vasek & Kolker, 1999) and near Granite Village (Houston & Marlatt, 1997). Fig. 3. Open in new tabDownload slide Modal composition of rocks from the Sherman batholith in the Sherman Mountains area, compared with modes of samples from the Virginia Dale area (Eggler, 1968). Sodic rocks of the Sherman batholith Gray to pink hornblende biotite gneiss (the Pole Mountain gneiss, Harrison, 1951) makes up most of the crest of the Sherman Mountains (Fig. 2). It contains plagioclase, quartz, biotite, sodic hornblende and microcline, and consists of granodiorite and quartz monzodiorite (Fig. 3). It is more sodic than the other units of the Sherman batholith (see geochemistry section below). Foliations of the gneiss vary in orientation, and feldspars show no evidence of subsolidus deformation; we therefore interpret the foliations to be magmatic. The gneiss encloses xenoliths of amphibolite. Both the Lincoln and porphyritic granites contain enclaves of the Pole Mountain gneiss. Another member of the sodic series forms an isolated outcrop along I-80 (locality 91SMW27). This quartz monzodiorite looks like a whiter example of Sherman granite and is undeformed. However, it contains sodic hornblende and much less quartz and alkali feldspar than does the typical Sherman granite, and chemically appears to be closely related to the Pole Mountain gneiss. We interpret it as an enclave of the older, sodic rock series included in the Sherman granite. U–Pb Zircon Geochronology Previous U–Pb age determinations of zircon from the Sherman batholith exist only for porphyritic granite from a drillhole ∼5 km north of Buford. Analyses of multiple fractions of zircon yielded Pb/Pb ages of 1425–1377 Ma (Aleinikoff, 1983). Interpretation of the zircon data was complicated by inheritance and lead loss, but Aleinikoff, (1983) favored an age of 1415–1435 Ma. We selected four samples for U–Pb geochronology (Table 2): Sherman granite (91PH1), Lincoln granite (91PH6a), monzonite inclusion (90SMW4), and Pole Mountain granite gneiss (94SMW2 and 90SMW13). These samples appear to span the intrusive history of the Sherman batholith. U–Pb data for sample 91PH1 were obtained from five fractions of zircon, including two air-abraded fractions (Table 2). On a concordia diagram, these fractions range from 3 to 35% discordant, and yield an intercept age of 1433 ± 1.5 Ma (Fig. 4). Common lead was corrected based upon the Pb isotopic composition of coexisting feldspars. There is no evidence of inherited zircon or other complexities in the U–Pb systematics, which indicates that the intercept age is the crystallization age of the Sherman granite. Seven fractions of Lincoln granite sample 91PH6a were analyzed, including six air-abraded fractions (Table 2). The air-abraded fractions are nearly concordant, ranging from 0.6 to 6% discordant, whereas the unabraded fraction is 31% discordant. Together, the seven fractions yield an intercept age of 1430 ± 2.6 Ma (Fig. 4). The correction for common lead was made using the Pb isotopic composition of coexisting feldspar. Zircons from the Lincoln granite show higher U and Th/U ratios than zircons from the other samples, and contain the most common Pb of the samples. Common Pb is associated with the outer portions of the grains, because it was reduced by air-abrasion. Monzonite inclusion sample 90SMW4 was dated to limit the age of the Sherman granite that engulfs this 10 m diameter enclave. U–Pb data for six fractions of zircon from this sample yield a non-linear array on a concordia diagram, with a small range in Pb/Pb ages of 1436–1440 Ma (Table 2; Fig. 4). All of the analyses are concordant or nearly concordant, with a maximum discordance of 1.4%. The range in Pb/Pb ages reflects small amounts of inheritance, and the youngest Pb/Pb age of 1436.3 ± 1.3 Ma is a maximum age for the monzonite. Two samples of the Pole Mountain gneiss were analyzed. Sample 94SMW2 was collected from an outcrop free of enclaves of older country rock. The U–Pb systematics of this sample were reasonably simple. Four fractions of zircon are nearly concordant, ranging from 1 to 4% discordant on a U–Pb concordia diagram, and yield a linear array with an upper intercept age of 1437.8 ± 3.2 Ma (Table 2; Fig. 4). This is probably the crystallization age of the Pole Mountain gneiss. The second sample was collected from an outcrop with abundant enclaves of older rocks, including amphibolite and quartzite. Twelve fractions of zircon from this sample (90SMW13) yield Pb/Pb ages ranging from 1450 to 1689 Ma (Fig. 4). The range indicates varying proportions of inherited components in the zircon. The zircon fraction with the youngest Pb/Pb age of 1450 Ma has the least inheritance. Assuming that no fraction is completely free of inheritance, the results from this sample are consistent with those for sample 94SMW2, and imply that the Pole Mountain gneiss has a maximum age of 1438 Ma, and that the gneiss contains a component of assimilated older crust. In summary, the Pole Mountain gneiss is the oldest unit of the Sherman batholith, with a maximum age of 1439 Ma. The volumetrically dominant lithologies, the Sherman and Lincoln granites, were emplaced at 1433 ± 1.5 and 1431 ± 2.6 Ma, respectively. Geochemical Characteristics Major element geochemical data for the Sherman bathoith are available from several sources: the majority is from the Pole Mountain area (present study, Table 3 and Table 4), but additional analyses exist for rocks from Virginia Dale (Eggler, 1968), the Granite Village area, and from Sheep Mountain in the Medicine Bow Mountains (Houston & Marlatt, 1997). Because published sample descriptions did not allow us to consistently identify the lithologic units analyzed, we plot only data from the Pole Mountain area in Fig. 5Fig. 9. Most analyses form coherent arrays on major element Harker diagrams (Fig. 5). The mafic rocks and the Sherman, porphyritic and Lincoln granites decrease in TiO2, FeOt, MgO, CaO and P2O5 with increasing SiO2. Al2O3 and Na2O decrease and increase, respectively, in the most siliceous samples. K2O generally increases with silica except for Lincoln granite samples with the highest SiO2 contents. The Sherman batholith is subalkalic, and spans the metaluminous–peraluminous boundary (Fig. 6a). In contrast to calc-alkalic rocks, they exhibit extreme iron enrichment (Fig. 6b), and have large K2O values (Fig. 5). Rocks of the Sherman batholith contain abundant large ion lithophile elements (LILE; Rb, Ba, REE) and high field strength elements (HFSE; Zr, Y, and Nb), which are typical of anorogenic granites. Analyses of Sherman batholith rocks lie mostly in the within-plate granite field of Pearce et al., (1984), although Lincoln granite samples lie between the within-plate and volcanic arc fields (Fig. 6c). The older, volumetrically minor sodic rocks and the monzonite enclave do not follow the geochemical trends of the rest of the Sherman batholith. The sodic rocks (crosses in Fig. 5) show total alkali contents identical to younger units, but contain higher Na2O and lower K2O. Sodic rocks are also distinguished by much higher Al2O3 contents and lower FeOt and TiO2 contents. Analyses of the monzonite enclave lie off both these trends. Table 2: U–Pb zircon data for samples from the Sherman batholith . . . . . Corrected atomic ratios* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206Pb/204Pb . 207Pb/208Pb . 206Pb/238U . 207Pb/235U . 207Pb/206Pb . 206Pb/238Pb . 207Pb/235U . 207Pb/206Pb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sample name . Weight (mg) . U (ppm) . Pb (ppm) . comPb (ppm) . (corr.) . (rad.) . (rad.) . %err . (rad.) . %err . (rad.) . %err . Age (Ma) . Age (Ma) . Age (Ma) . ± . Rho . % discordance . 91PH1 Sherman granite 1433 ± 1.5 Ma MSWD = 1.3 d-3 0.126 35 9.6 2.60 172 7.4 0.1943 0.45 2.3766 1.69 0.0887 1.49 1144 1236 1398.4 ±28 0.56 20 d-1 −200 0.080 201 33.7 1.32 1479 13.0 0.1601 0.33 1.9723 0.35 0.0894 0.12 957 1106 1412.1 ±2.3 0.94 35 d-2 0.080 96 17.8 0.82 1230 10.8 0.1743 0.35 2.1517 0.40 0.0895 0.19 1036 1166 1415.2 ±3.6 0.88 29 d-1 aa 0.173 233 54.2 1.29 2420 11.0 0.2229 0.30 2.7713 0.30 0.0902 0.12 1297 1348 1429.1 ±2.3 0.93 10 −100 to +200 d-2 aa 0.190 77 19.2 0.11 10596 9.7 0.2412 0.33 3.0031 0.34 0.0903 0.08 1393 1408 1431.8 ±1.7 0.97 3 91PH6a Lincoln granite 1430 ± 2.6 Ma MSWD = 0.85 d-1 single 0.005 363 110 46.09 93 5.9 0.1638 0.63 1.9691 3.01 0.0872 2.68 978 1105 1364.5 ±52 0.59 31 grain nm10 aa 0.050 852 235 29.06 418 7.5 0.2302 0.43 2.8358 0.54 0.0893 0.30 1336 1365 1411.3 ±5.6 0.84 6 pink No. 1 nm10 aa 0.014 977 264 26.92 518 8.0 0.2322 0.34 2.8660 0.43 0.0895 0.24 1346 1373 1415.6 ±4.5 0.84 5 pink No. 2 m6 aa 0.070 825 233 33.21 361 8.3 0.2328 0.50 2.8778 0.79 0.0896 0.56 1349 1376 1418.0 ±11 0.71 5 small nm10 aa 0.014 860 233 20.61 602 7.9 0.2353 0.34 2.9103 0.40 0.0897 0.19 1362 1385 1419.4 ±3.6 0.88 4 pink No. 3 nm10 aa 0.040 311 82.8 6.37 703 8.4 0.2360 0.34 2.9209 0.41 0.0898 0.20 1366 1387 1420.2 ±3.8 0.87 4 colorless nm6 aa 0.040 103 26.6 0.92 1659 12.5 0.2484 0.37 3.0907 0.39 0.0903 0.12 1430 1430 1430.9 ±2.3 0.95 0 large 90SMW4 monzonite inclusion d-2 +100 0.047 204 51 0.01 43293 12.9 0.2494 0.33 3.1129 0.34 0.0905 0.07 1436 1436 1436.3 ±1.3 0.98 0 aa single No. 2 d-2 +100 0.600 116 34.7 0.01 130837 11.4 0.2483 0.33 3.0989 0.33 0.0905 0.06 1430 1432 1436.4 ±1.2 0.98 1 aa d-2 +100 0.108 138 29.2 0.03 69150 12.0 0.2485 0.33 3.1047 0.34 0.0906 0.06 1431 1434 1438.3 ±1.2 0.98 1 aa single No. 1 d-3 0.670 169 41.9 0.00 630284 13.1 0.2467 0.33 3.0825 0.33 0.0906 0.06 1421 1428 1438.9 ±1.2 0.98 1 d-1 0.560 115 28.9 0.01 220296 11.5 0.2475 0.33 3.0937 0.33 0.0907 0.06 1425 1431 1439.7 ±1.2 0.98 1 d-2 +100 0.940 127 32.1 0.04 48507 11.9 0.2492 0.37 3.1151 0.37 0.0907 0.06 1434 1436 1439.7 ±1.2 0.99 0 94SMW-2 Pole Mt gneiss 1437.8 ± 3.2 Ma MSWD =1.3 d-4 2 0.041 190 46.1 0.83 3242 14.1 0.2386 0.34 2.9696 0.35 0.0903 0.08 1379 1400 1431.3 ±1.6 0.97 4 grains nm1 0.041 414 104 2.47 2433 12.3 0.2436 0.34 3.0359 0.35 0.0904 0.08 1406 1417 1433.6 ±1.6 0.97 2 d-4 1 0.013 105 26.6 0.36 4220 11.3 0.2471 0.55 3.0808 0.63 0.0904 0.29 1423 1428 1434.7 ±5.5 0.89 1 grain d-3 0.041 311 76.6 0.63 7170 13.1 0.2434 0.33 3.0349 0.34 0.0904 0.07 1404 1416 1435.0 ±1.4 0.98 2 90SMW13 Pole Mt gneiss nm10 0.028 157 32.9 0.19 9905 14.1 0.2096 0.36 2.6343 0.38 0.0911 0.11 1227 1310 1449.5 ±2.3 0.96 17 d-2 aa 0.010 382 98.9 0.38 14623 10.3 0.2516 0.36 3.2183 0.39 0.0928 0.12 1447 1462 1483.3 ±2.3 0.95 3 No. 3 d-1 aa 0.020 356 91.7 0.12 42904 10.1 0.2508 0.34 3.2106 0.35 0.0928 0.07 1443 1460 1484.8 ±1.4 0.98 3 nm10 aa 0.014 253 64.1 0.44 8355 11.1 0.2482 0.38 3.1858 0.39 0.0931 0.09 1429 1454 1489.8 ±1.7 0.97 5 d-1 aa 0.014 415 104 0.35 16831 10.8 0.2461 0.35 3.1628 0.36 0.0932 0.07 1418 1448 1492.1 ±1.4 0.98 6 no cores d-1 0.080 332 71.9 0.47 8769 13.3 0.2146 0.33 2.8112 0.34 0.0950 0.08 1253 1359 1528.4 ±1.3 0.97 20 d-1 & d-2 0.029 487 142 11.55 665 13.2 0.2639 0.38 3.6249 0.47 0.0996 0.25 1510 1555 1617.1 ±4.6 0.85 7 aa d-3 0.040 686 191 17.86 578 15.1 0.2507 0.34 3.4979 0.37 0.1012 0.14 1442 1527 1646.4 ±2.5 0.93 14 d-2 aa 0.027 643 178 3.98 2541 13.2 0.2679 0.34 3.7481 0.44 0.1015 0.26 1530 1582 1651.4 ±4.7 0.82 8 No. 1 d-1 aa 0.027 939 252 0.67 21564 13.7 0.2650 0.31 3.7115 0.32 0.1016 0.08 1516 1574 1653.0 ±1.5 0.97 9 grains with cores d-1 0.120 339 80.5 0.33 13975 16.5 0.2366 0.33 3.3471 0.34 0.1026 0.07 1369 1492 1671.4 ±0.87 0.98 20 resorbed grains d-2 aa 0.007 291 86.1 1.64 2970 14.6 0.2859 0.56 4.0820 0.65 0.1035 0.31 1621 1651 1688.5 ±5.3 0.88 5 No. 2 . . . . . Corrected atomic ratios* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206Pb/204Pb . 207Pb/208Pb . 206Pb/238U . 207Pb/235U . 207Pb/206Pb . 206Pb/238Pb . 207Pb/235U . 207Pb/206Pb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sample name . Weight (mg) . U (ppm) . Pb (ppm) . comPb (ppm) . (corr.) . (rad.) . (rad.) . %err . (rad.) . %err . (rad.) . %err . Age (Ma) . Age (Ma) . Age (Ma) . ± . Rho . % discordance . 91PH1 Sherman granite 1433 ± 1.5 Ma MSWD = 1.3 d-3 0.126 35 9.6 2.60 172 7.4 0.1943 0.45 2.3766 1.69 0.0887 1.49 1144 1236 1398.4 ±28 0.56 20 d-1 −200 0.080 201 33.7 1.32 1479 13.0 0.1601 0.33 1.9723 0.35 0.0894 0.12 957 1106 1412.1 ±2.3 0.94 35 d-2 0.080 96 17.8 0.82 1230 10.8 0.1743 0.35 2.1517 0.40 0.0895 0.19 1036 1166 1415.2 ±3.6 0.88 29 d-1 aa 0.173 233 54.2 1.29 2420 11.0 0.2229 0.30 2.7713 0.30 0.0902 0.12 1297 1348 1429.1 ±2.3 0.93 10 −100 to +200 d-2 aa 0.190 77 19.2 0.11 10596 9.7 0.2412 0.33 3.0031 0.34 0.0903 0.08 1393 1408 1431.8 ±1.7 0.97 3 91PH6a Lincoln granite 1430 ± 2.6 Ma MSWD = 0.85 d-1 single 0.005 363 110 46.09 93 5.9 0.1638 0.63 1.9691 3.01 0.0872 2.68 978 1105 1364.5 ±52 0.59 31 grain nm10 aa 0.050 852 235 29.06 418 7.5 0.2302 0.43 2.8358 0.54 0.0893 0.30 1336 1365 1411.3 ±5.6 0.84 6 pink No. 1 nm10 aa 0.014 977 264 26.92 518 8.0 0.2322 0.34 2.8660 0.43 0.0895 0.24 1346 1373 1415.6 ±4.5 0.84 5 pink No. 2 m6 aa 0.070 825 233 33.21 361 8.3 0.2328 0.50 2.8778 0.79 0.0896 0.56 1349 1376 1418.0 ±11 0.71 5 small nm10 aa 0.014 860 233 20.61 602 7.9 0.2353 0.34 2.9103 0.40 0.0897 0.19 1362 1385 1419.4 ±3.6 0.88 4 pink No. 3 nm10 aa 0.040 311 82.8 6.37 703 8.4 0.2360 0.34 2.9209 0.41 0.0898 0.20 1366 1387 1420.2 ±3.8 0.87 4 colorless nm6 aa 0.040 103 26.6 0.92 1659 12.5 0.2484 0.37 3.0907 0.39 0.0903 0.12 1430 1430 1430.9 ±2.3 0.95 0 large 90SMW4 monzonite inclusion d-2 +100 0.047 204 51 0.01 43293 12.9 0.2494 0.33 3.1129 0.34 0.0905 0.07 1436 1436 1436.3 ±1.3 0.98 0 aa single No. 2 d-2 +100 0.600 116 34.7 0.01 130837 11.4 0.2483 0.33 3.0989 0.33 0.0905 0.06 1430 1432 1436.4 ±1.2 0.98 1 aa d-2 +100 0.108 138 29.2 0.03 69150 12.0 0.2485 0.33 3.1047 0.34 0.0906 0.06 1431 1434 1438.3 ±1.2 0.98 1 aa single No. 1 d-3 0.670 169 41.9 0.00 630284 13.1 0.2467 0.33 3.0825 0.33 0.0906 0.06 1421 1428 1438.9 ±1.2 0.98 1 d-1 0.560 115 28.9 0.01 220296 11.5 0.2475 0.33 3.0937 0.33 0.0907 0.06 1425 1431 1439.7 ±1.2 0.98 1 d-2 +100 0.940 127 32.1 0.04 48507 11.9 0.2492 0.37 3.1151 0.37 0.0907 0.06 1434 1436 1439.7 ±1.2 0.99 0 94SMW-2 Pole Mt gneiss 1437.8 ± 3.2 Ma MSWD =1.3 d-4 2 0.041 190 46.1 0.83 3242 14.1 0.2386 0.34 2.9696 0.35 0.0903 0.08 1379 1400 1431.3 ±1.6 0.97 4 grains nm1 0.041 414 104 2.47 2433 12.3 0.2436 0.34 3.0359 0.35 0.0904 0.08 1406 1417 1433.6 ±1.6 0.97 2 d-4 1 0.013 105 26.6 0.36 4220 11.3 0.2471 0.55 3.0808 0.63 0.0904 0.29 1423 1428 1434.7 ±5.5 0.89 1 grain d-3 0.041 311 76.6 0.63 7170 13.1 0.2434 0.33 3.0349 0.34 0.0904 0.07 1404 1416 1435.0 ±1.4 0.98 2 90SMW13 Pole Mt gneiss nm10 0.028 157 32.9 0.19 9905 14.1 0.2096 0.36 2.6343 0.38 0.0911 0.11 1227 1310 1449.5 ±2.3 0.96 17 d-2 aa 0.010 382 98.9 0.38 14623 10.3 0.2516 0.36 3.2183 0.39 0.0928 0.12 1447 1462 1483.3 ±2.3 0.95 3 No. 3 d-1 aa 0.020 356 91.7 0.12 42904 10.1 0.2508 0.34 3.2106 0.35 0.0928 0.07 1443 1460 1484.8 ±1.4 0.98 3 nm10 aa 0.014 253 64.1 0.44 8355 11.1 0.2482 0.38 3.1858 0.39 0.0931 0.09 1429 1454 1489.8 ±1.7 0.97 5 d-1 aa 0.014 415 104 0.35 16831 10.8 0.2461 0.35 3.1628 0.36 0.0932 0.07 1418 1448 1492.1 ±1.4 0.98 6 no cores d-1 0.080 332 71.9 0.47 8769 13.3 0.2146 0.33 2.8112 0.34 0.0950 0.08 1253 1359 1528.4 ±1.3 0.97 20 d-1 & d-2 0.029 487 142 11.55 665 13.2 0.2639 0.38 3.6249 0.47 0.0996 0.25 1510 1555 1617.1 ±4.6 0.85 7 aa d-3 0.040 686 191 17.86 578 15.1 0.2507 0.34 3.4979 0.37 0.1012 0.14 1442 1527 1646.4 ±2.5 0.93 14 d-2 aa 0.027 643 178 3.98 2541 13.2 0.2679 0.34 3.7481 0.44 0.1015 0.26 1530 1582 1651.4 ±4.7 0.82 8 No. 1 d-1 aa 0.027 939 252 0.67 21564 13.7 0.2650 0.31 3.7115 0.32 0.1016 0.08 1516 1574 1653.0 ±1.5 0.97 9 grains with cores d-1 0.120 339 80.5 0.33 13975 16.5 0.2366 0.33 3.3471 0.34 0.1026 0.07 1369 1492 1671.4 ±0.87 0.98 20 resorbed grains d-2 aa 0.007 291 86.1 1.64 2970 14.6 0.2859 0.56 4.0820 0.65 0.1035 0.31 1621 1651 1688.5 ±5.3 0.88 5 No. 2 * Ratios corrected for blank and mass discrimination. Zircon fraction: d—, nm— represent angles of diamagnetic and paramagnetic susceptibility on a barrier style Frantz separator. aa, air abraded; 100, 200, mesh size; comPb (ppm) corrected for laboratory blank of 10 pg; % err, 2σ in percent; rho, 206Pb/238U vs 207Pb/235U error correlation coefficient. Heavy minerals were concentrated from crushed samples by standard density and magnetic separation procedures. Concentrated zircon grains varied in color, cores and size. The grains selected were devoid of inclusions and each fraction was composed of a single population of distinct size and/or color. The grains were cleaned in 2 NHNO3 before dissolution in concentrated HF and HNO3 in Teflon microbombs following the procedure of Parrish (1987), and converted to chlorides. Aliquots of sample solutions were spiked with a mixed 235U/208Pb spike. Pb and U were purified on anion exchange columns using HCl chemistry modified from Krogh (1973). The total Pb blank was decreased significantly during the course of this study from 80 pg to 5 pg. The blank composition is 206Pb/204Pb = 19.09, 207Pb/204Pb =15.652, 208Pb/204Pb = 38.31. Pb and U samples were loaded onto single rhenium filaments for isotopic analysis by thermal emission mass spectrometry. The H3PO4 silica gel technique was used for Pb. U samples were loaded with H3PO4 and graphite and run as metal ions. The samples were analyzed isotopically at the University of Wyoming on a multi-collector VG Sector mass spectrometer. Mass discrimination factors for Pb and U were determined by multiple analyses of NBS SRM 983 and U-500, respectively, and were 0.048 ± 0.06% per a.m.u. for Pb and 0 ± 0.06% per a.m.u. for U. PBDAT (Ludwig, 1988) was used to reduce the raw mass spectrometer data, correct for blanks, and calculate uncertainties. Ages and uncertainties were calculated by ISOPLOT (Ludwig, 1991), and errors are quoted at 2σ. Open in new tab Table 2: U–Pb zircon data for samples from the Sherman batholith . . . . . Corrected atomic ratios* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206Pb/204Pb . 207Pb/208Pb . 206Pb/238U . 207Pb/235U . 207Pb/206Pb . 206Pb/238Pb . 207Pb/235U . 207Pb/206Pb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sample name . Weight (mg) . U (ppm) . Pb (ppm) . comPb (ppm) . (corr.) . (rad.) . (rad.) . %err . (rad.) . %err . (rad.) . %err . Age (Ma) . Age (Ma) . Age (Ma) . ± . Rho . % discordance . 91PH1 Sherman granite 1433 ± 1.5 Ma MSWD = 1.3 d-3 0.126 35 9.6 2.60 172 7.4 0.1943 0.45 2.3766 1.69 0.0887 1.49 1144 1236 1398.4 ±28 0.56 20 d-1 −200 0.080 201 33.7 1.32 1479 13.0 0.1601 0.33 1.9723 0.35 0.0894 0.12 957 1106 1412.1 ±2.3 0.94 35 d-2 0.080 96 17.8 0.82 1230 10.8 0.1743 0.35 2.1517 0.40 0.0895 0.19 1036 1166 1415.2 ±3.6 0.88 29 d-1 aa 0.173 233 54.2 1.29 2420 11.0 0.2229 0.30 2.7713 0.30 0.0902 0.12 1297 1348 1429.1 ±2.3 0.93 10 −100 to +200 d-2 aa 0.190 77 19.2 0.11 10596 9.7 0.2412 0.33 3.0031 0.34 0.0903 0.08 1393 1408 1431.8 ±1.7 0.97 3 91PH6a Lincoln granite 1430 ± 2.6 Ma MSWD = 0.85 d-1 single 0.005 363 110 46.09 93 5.9 0.1638 0.63 1.9691 3.01 0.0872 2.68 978 1105 1364.5 ±52 0.59 31 grain nm10 aa 0.050 852 235 29.06 418 7.5 0.2302 0.43 2.8358 0.54 0.0893 0.30 1336 1365 1411.3 ±5.6 0.84 6 pink No. 1 nm10 aa 0.014 977 264 26.92 518 8.0 0.2322 0.34 2.8660 0.43 0.0895 0.24 1346 1373 1415.6 ±4.5 0.84 5 pink No. 2 m6 aa 0.070 825 233 33.21 361 8.3 0.2328 0.50 2.8778 0.79 0.0896 0.56 1349 1376 1418.0 ±11 0.71 5 small nm10 aa 0.014 860 233 20.61 602 7.9 0.2353 0.34 2.9103 0.40 0.0897 0.19 1362 1385 1419.4 ±3.6 0.88 4 pink No. 3 nm10 aa 0.040 311 82.8 6.37 703 8.4 0.2360 0.34 2.9209 0.41 0.0898 0.20 1366 1387 1420.2 ±3.8 0.87 4 colorless nm6 aa 0.040 103 26.6 0.92 1659 12.5 0.2484 0.37 3.0907 0.39 0.0903 0.12 1430 1430 1430.9 ±2.3 0.95 0 large 90SMW4 monzonite inclusion d-2 +100 0.047 204 51 0.01 43293 12.9 0.2494 0.33 3.1129 0.34 0.0905 0.07 1436 1436 1436.3 ±1.3 0.98 0 aa single No. 2 d-2 +100 0.600 116 34.7 0.01 130837 11.4 0.2483 0.33 3.0989 0.33 0.0905 0.06 1430 1432 1436.4 ±1.2 0.98 1 aa d-2 +100 0.108 138 29.2 0.03 69150 12.0 0.2485 0.33 3.1047 0.34 0.0906 0.06 1431 1434 1438.3 ±1.2 0.98 1 aa single No. 1 d-3 0.670 169 41.9 0.00 630284 13.1 0.2467 0.33 3.0825 0.33 0.0906 0.06 1421 1428 1438.9 ±1.2 0.98 1 d-1 0.560 115 28.9 0.01 220296 11.5 0.2475 0.33 3.0937 0.33 0.0907 0.06 1425 1431 1439.7 ±1.2 0.98 1 d-2 +100 0.940 127 32.1 0.04 48507 11.9 0.2492 0.37 3.1151 0.37 0.0907 0.06 1434 1436 1439.7 ±1.2 0.99 0 94SMW-2 Pole Mt gneiss 1437.8 ± 3.2 Ma MSWD =1.3 d-4 2 0.041 190 46.1 0.83 3242 14.1 0.2386 0.34 2.9696 0.35 0.0903 0.08 1379 1400 1431.3 ±1.6 0.97 4 grains nm1 0.041 414 104 2.47 2433 12.3 0.2436 0.34 3.0359 0.35 0.0904 0.08 1406 1417 1433.6 ±1.6 0.97 2 d-4 1 0.013 105 26.6 0.36 4220 11.3 0.2471 0.55 3.0808 0.63 0.0904 0.29 1423 1428 1434.7 ±5.5 0.89 1 grain d-3 0.041 311 76.6 0.63 7170 13.1 0.2434 0.33 3.0349 0.34 0.0904 0.07 1404 1416 1435.0 ±1.4 0.98 2 90SMW13 Pole Mt gneiss nm10 0.028 157 32.9 0.19 9905 14.1 0.2096 0.36 2.6343 0.38 0.0911 0.11 1227 1310 1449.5 ±2.3 0.96 17 d-2 aa 0.010 382 98.9 0.38 14623 10.3 0.2516 0.36 3.2183 0.39 0.0928 0.12 1447 1462 1483.3 ±2.3 0.95 3 No. 3 d-1 aa 0.020 356 91.7 0.12 42904 10.1 0.2508 0.34 3.2106 0.35 0.0928 0.07 1443 1460 1484.8 ±1.4 0.98 3 nm10 aa 0.014 253 64.1 0.44 8355 11.1 0.2482 0.38 3.1858 0.39 0.0931 0.09 1429 1454 1489.8 ±1.7 0.97 5 d-1 aa 0.014 415 104 0.35 16831 10.8 0.2461 0.35 3.1628 0.36 0.0932 0.07 1418 1448 1492.1 ±1.4 0.98 6 no cores d-1 0.080 332 71.9 0.47 8769 13.3 0.2146 0.33 2.8112 0.34 0.0950 0.08 1253 1359 1528.4 ±1.3 0.97 20 d-1 & d-2 0.029 487 142 11.55 665 13.2 0.2639 0.38 3.6249 0.47 0.0996 0.25 1510 1555 1617.1 ±4.6 0.85 7 aa d-3 0.040 686 191 17.86 578 15.1 0.2507 0.34 3.4979 0.37 0.1012 0.14 1442 1527 1646.4 ±2.5 0.93 14 d-2 aa 0.027 643 178 3.98 2541 13.2 0.2679 0.34 3.7481 0.44 0.1015 0.26 1530 1582 1651.4 ±4.7 0.82 8 No. 1 d-1 aa 0.027 939 252 0.67 21564 13.7 0.2650 0.31 3.7115 0.32 0.1016 0.08 1516 1574 1653.0 ±1.5 0.97 9 grains with cores d-1 0.120 339 80.5 0.33 13975 16.5 0.2366 0.33 3.3471 0.34 0.1026 0.07 1369 1492 1671.4 ±0.87 0.98 20 resorbed grains d-2 aa 0.007 291 86.1 1.64 2970 14.6 0.2859 0.56 4.0820 0.65 0.1035 0.31 1621 1651 1688.5 ±5.3 0.88 5 No. 2 . . . . . Corrected atomic ratios* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206Pb/204Pb . 207Pb/208Pb . 206Pb/238U . 207Pb/235U . 207Pb/206Pb . 206Pb/238Pb . 207Pb/235U . 207Pb/206Pb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sample name . Weight (mg) . U (ppm) . Pb (ppm) . comPb (ppm) . (corr.) . (rad.) . (rad.) . %err . (rad.) . %err . (rad.) . %err . Age (Ma) . Age (Ma) . Age (Ma) . ± . Rho . % discordance . 91PH1 Sherman granite 1433 ± 1.5 Ma MSWD = 1.3 d-3 0.126 35 9.6 2.60 172 7.4 0.1943 0.45 2.3766 1.69 0.0887 1.49 1144 1236 1398.4 ±28 0.56 20 d-1 −200 0.080 201 33.7 1.32 1479 13.0 0.1601 0.33 1.9723 0.35 0.0894 0.12 957 1106 1412.1 ±2.3 0.94 35 d-2 0.080 96 17.8 0.82 1230 10.8 0.1743 0.35 2.1517 0.40 0.0895 0.19 1036 1166 1415.2 ±3.6 0.88 29 d-1 aa 0.173 233 54.2 1.29 2420 11.0 0.2229 0.30 2.7713 0.30 0.0902 0.12 1297 1348 1429.1 ±2.3 0.93 10 −100 to +200 d-2 aa 0.190 77 19.2 0.11 10596 9.7 0.2412 0.33 3.0031 0.34 0.0903 0.08 1393 1408 1431.8 ±1.7 0.97 3 91PH6a Lincoln granite 1430 ± 2.6 Ma MSWD = 0.85 d-1 single 0.005 363 110 46.09 93 5.9 0.1638 0.63 1.9691 3.01 0.0872 2.68 978 1105 1364.5 ±52 0.59 31 grain nm10 aa 0.050 852 235 29.06 418 7.5 0.2302 0.43 2.8358 0.54 0.0893 0.30 1336 1365 1411.3 ±5.6 0.84 6 pink No. 1 nm10 aa 0.014 977 264 26.92 518 8.0 0.2322 0.34 2.8660 0.43 0.0895 0.24 1346 1373 1415.6 ±4.5 0.84 5 pink No. 2 m6 aa 0.070 825 233 33.21 361 8.3 0.2328 0.50 2.8778 0.79 0.0896 0.56 1349 1376 1418.0 ±11 0.71 5 small nm10 aa 0.014 860 233 20.61 602 7.9 0.2353 0.34 2.9103 0.40 0.0897 0.19 1362 1385 1419.4 ±3.6 0.88 4 pink No. 3 nm10 aa 0.040 311 82.8 6.37 703 8.4 0.2360 0.34 2.9209 0.41 0.0898 0.20 1366 1387 1420.2 ±3.8 0.87 4 colorless nm6 aa 0.040 103 26.6 0.92 1659 12.5 0.2484 0.37 3.0907 0.39 0.0903 0.12 1430 1430 1430.9 ±2.3 0.95 0 large 90SMW4 monzonite inclusion d-2 +100 0.047 204 51 0.01 43293 12.9 0.2494 0.33 3.1129 0.34 0.0905 0.07 1436 1436 1436.3 ±1.3 0.98 0 aa single No. 2 d-2 +100 0.600 116 34.7 0.01 130837 11.4 0.2483 0.33 3.0989 0.33 0.0905 0.06 1430 1432 1436.4 ±1.2 0.98 1 aa d-2 +100 0.108 138 29.2 0.03 69150 12.0 0.2485 0.33 3.1047 0.34 0.0906 0.06 1431 1434 1438.3 ±1.2 0.98 1 aa single No. 1 d-3 0.670 169 41.9 0.00 630284 13.1 0.2467 0.33 3.0825 0.33 0.0906 0.06 1421 1428 1438.9 ±1.2 0.98 1 d-1 0.560 115 28.9 0.01 220296 11.5 0.2475 0.33 3.0937 0.33 0.0907 0.06 1425 1431 1439.7 ±1.2 0.98 1 d-2 +100 0.940 127 32.1 0.04 48507 11.9 0.2492 0.37 3.1151 0.37 0.0907 0.06 1434 1436 1439.7 ±1.2 0.99 0 94SMW-2 Pole Mt gneiss 1437.8 ± 3.2 Ma MSWD =1.3 d-4 2 0.041 190 46.1 0.83 3242 14.1 0.2386 0.34 2.9696 0.35 0.0903 0.08 1379 1400 1431.3 ±1.6 0.97 4 grains nm1 0.041 414 104 2.47 2433 12.3 0.2436 0.34 3.0359 0.35 0.0904 0.08 1406 1417 1433.6 ±1.6 0.97 2 d-4 1 0.013 105 26.6 0.36 4220 11.3 0.2471 0.55 3.0808 0.63 0.0904 0.29 1423 1428 1434.7 ±5.5 0.89 1 grain d-3 0.041 311 76.6 0.63 7170 13.1 0.2434 0.33 3.0349 0.34 0.0904 0.07 1404 1416 1435.0 ±1.4 0.98 2 90SMW13 Pole Mt gneiss nm10 0.028 157 32.9 0.19 9905 14.1 0.2096 0.36 2.6343 0.38 0.0911 0.11 1227 1310 1449.5 ±2.3 0.96 17 d-2 aa 0.010 382 98.9 0.38 14623 10.3 0.2516 0.36 3.2183 0.39 0.0928 0.12 1447 1462 1483.3 ±2.3 0.95 3 No. 3 d-1 aa 0.020 356 91.7 0.12 42904 10.1 0.2508 0.34 3.2106 0.35 0.0928 0.07 1443 1460 1484.8 ±1.4 0.98 3 nm10 aa 0.014 253 64.1 0.44 8355 11.1 0.2482 0.38 3.1858 0.39 0.0931 0.09 1429 1454 1489.8 ±1.7 0.97 5 d-1 aa 0.014 415 104 0.35 16831 10.8 0.2461 0.35 3.1628 0.36 0.0932 0.07 1418 1448 1492.1 ±1.4 0.98 6 no cores d-1 0.080 332 71.9 0.47 8769 13.3 0.2146 0.33 2.8112 0.34 0.0950 0.08 1253 1359 1528.4 ±1.3 0.97 20 d-1 & d-2 0.029 487 142 11.55 665 13.2 0.2639 0.38 3.6249 0.47 0.0996 0.25 1510 1555 1617.1 ±4.6 0.85 7 aa d-3 0.040 686 191 17.86 578 15.1 0.2507 0.34 3.4979 0.37 0.1012 0.14 1442 1527 1646.4 ±2.5 0.93 14 d-2 aa 0.027 643 178 3.98 2541 13.2 0.2679 0.34 3.7481 0.44 0.1015 0.26 1530 1582 1651.4 ±4.7 0.82 8 No. 1 d-1 aa 0.027 939 252 0.67 21564 13.7 0.2650 0.31 3.7115 0.32 0.1016 0.08 1516 1574 1653.0 ±1.5 0.97 9 grains with cores d-1 0.120 339 80.5 0.33 13975 16.5 0.2366 0.33 3.3471 0.34 0.1026 0.07 1369 1492 1671.4 ±0.87 0.98 20 resorbed grains d-2 aa 0.007 291 86.1 1.64 2970 14.6 0.2859 0.56 4.0820 0.65 0.1035 0.31 1621 1651 1688.5 ±5.3 0.88 5 No. 2 * Ratios corrected for blank and mass discrimination. Zircon fraction: d—, nm— represent angles of diamagnetic and paramagnetic susceptibility on a barrier style Frantz separator. aa, air abraded; 100, 200, mesh size; comPb (ppm) corrected for laboratory blank of 10 pg; % err, 2σ in percent; rho, 206Pb/238U vs 207Pb/235U error correlation coefficient. Heavy minerals were concentrated from crushed samples by standard density and magnetic separation procedures. Concentrated zircon grains varied in color, cores and size. The grains selected were devoid of inclusions and each fraction was composed of a single population of distinct size and/or color. The grains were cleaned in 2 NHNO3 before dissolution in concentrated HF and HNO3 in Teflon microbombs following the procedure of Parrish (1987), and converted to chlorides. Aliquots of sample solutions were spiked with a mixed 235U/208Pb spike. Pb and U were purified on anion exchange columns using HCl chemistry modified from Krogh (1973). The total Pb blank was decreased significantly during the course of this study from 80 pg to 5 pg. The blank composition is 206Pb/204Pb = 19.09, 207Pb/204Pb =15.652, 208Pb/204Pb = 38.31. Pb and U samples were loaded onto single rhenium filaments for isotopic analysis by thermal emission mass spectrometry. The H3PO4 silica gel technique was used for Pb. U samples were loaded with H3PO4 and graphite and run as metal ions. The samples were analyzed isotopically at the University of Wyoming on a multi-collector VG Sector mass spectrometer. Mass discrimination factors for Pb and U were determined by multiple analyses of NBS SRM 983 and U-500, respectively, and were 0.048 ± 0.06% per a.m.u. for Pb and 0 ± 0.06% per a.m.u. for U. PBDAT (Ludwig, 1988) was used to reduce the raw mass spectrometer data, correct for blanks, and calculate uncertainties. Ages and uncertainties were calculated by ISOPLOT (Ludwig, 1991), and errors are quoted at 2σ. Open in new tab Fig. 4. Open in new tabDownload slide U–Pb concordia diagrams for zircons from samples of the Sherman batholith. Mafic rocks The mafic rocks of the Sherman batholith display high Ti, P, Fe, Zr, Ba, Ga and Nb contents relative to calc-alkalic basalts (Table 3). An MgO-rich group (MgO > 3.0 wt %), which contains biotite as the main mafic mineral, is found in the western Sherman Mountains. An MgO-poor group (MgO < 3.0 wt %) consists of pyroxene-bearing ferrodiorite and monzodiorite with subequal amounts of hornblende and biotite. The MgO-poor monzodiorites occur as dikes and commingled bodies in the eastern portion of the Sherman Mountains area. Sherman granite The SiO2 contents of Sherman granite samples range from 64.4 to 71.3 wt %. The Sherman granite has the highest K2O content of any unit in the batholith, along with the highest Nb and Y contents (Fig. 6c), as well as Zr and Ga contents as high as those in the mafic rocks (Table 3). The light REE (LREE) contents of Sherman granite sample (Ce = 282 ppm) are the highest of any of the rocks analyzed from the Pole Mountain area, and its heavy REE (HREE) contents are exceeded only by those of the monzodiorite sample (91SMW20; Fig. 7). TiO2, MnO, P2O5, and Rb are low compared with porphyritic granites with the same SiO2 contents. For these elements, the Sherman granites lie slightly below the trends defined by the monzodiorites, porphyritic granites, and Lincoln granites (Fig. 5). In the Sherman Mountains area, all Sherman granite samples are metaluminous (Fig. 6a). However, those exposed in the Sheep Mountain area of the Medicine Bow Mountains are peraluminous (Houston & Marlatt, 1997). Although there is a 4 wt % difference in SiO2 content of the least siliceous Sherman granite and the most siliceous monzodiorite, the two groups are geochemically similar. Both are metaluminous and rich in Zr, Nb and Y, and of low Rb/Ba (Fig. 8). Table 3: Major and trace element analyses of the Sherman batholith . Mafic rocks . Sherman granite . . . . Sample no.: . 90smw17 . 91smw6 . 91smw11 . 91smw30 . 91VD1 . 91smw17 . 91smw20 . 90smw9 . 90dc2 . 90smw5 . 91smw28 . 91smw5 . 90ph2 . 91ph1 . 90ph1 . Description: . Mg-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . Mg-mzdi . summ fdi . Mg-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . px-Sherman . Sherman . px-Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . SiO2 51.68 52.94 53.28 54.70 55.85 55.90 60.36 64.42 65.80 68.20 68.95 69.04 70.62 70.97 71.3 TiO2 2.52 2.39 2.5 1.71 1.79 1.99 1.60 0.80 0.92 0.42 0.44 0.36 0.27 0.33 0.29 Al2O3 14.06 13.44 14.92 16.34 14.29 13.55 13.49 14.68 13.61 14.70 14.54 14.69 13.22 13.72 13.60 FeOt 11.22 12.43 11.00 11.58 10.97 11.25 9.26 6.36 6.21 4.33 3.81 2.82 3.00 3.11 3.67 MnO 0.15 0.22 0.14 0.24 0.16 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 MgO 3.68 2.29 3.88 2.36 3.24 2.05 1.62 0.69 0.95 0.41 0.40 0.34 0.17 0.32 0.20 CaO 6.46 5.69 6.59 6.75 6.09 5.03 4.06 2.98 3.05 1.82 1.94 1.53 1.30 1.50 1.33 Na2O 3.45 3.79 3.71 4.14 3.3 3.37 3.25 4.06 3.64 3.96 3.76 3.97 3.41 3.67 3.76 K2O 2.66 3.38 2.44 1.47 2.1 3.45 3.86 4.77 4.28 5.75 5.50 5.99 5.61 5.22 5.76 P2O5 1.64 1.52 1.14 0.71 0.44 1.14 0.90 0.25 0.26 0.09 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.04 LOI 0.92 0.71 0.51 0.00 0.14 1.08 0.14 0.18 0.28 0.47 0.41 0.28 0.93 0.39 Total 98.44 98.8 100.11 100.00 98.36 99.00 98.70 99.31 99.08 100.22 99.94 99.17 97.69 99.89 100.39 Na2O+K2O 6.11 7.17 6.15 5.61 5.4 6.82 7.11 8.83 7.92 9.71 9.26 9.96 9.02 8.89 9.52 FeOt/ 0.753 0.844 0.739 0.831 0.772 0.846 0.851 0.902 0.867 0.914 0.905 0.892 0.946 0.907 0.948 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.693 0.664 0.720 0.790 0.761 0.735 0.798 0.850 0.842 0.916 0.928 0.930 0.941 0.952 0.916 Y 49 68 43 39 42 75 72 80 114 45 50 50 117 94 140 Rb 73 181 88 22 60 126 150 95 107 117 114 162 174 186 185 Sr 1008 378 796 528 335 345 269 229 176 185 182 165 103 124 106 Ba 3855 2406 2000 1627 881 2568 1766 1707 1197 1400 1355 1283 992 896 1100 Zr 623 599 520 213 240 734 621 653 515 430 468 383 572 476 540 Nb 44 35 35 13 11 47 40 37 53 27 33 23 67 53 63 Ni 37 11 30 20 35 7 8 8 8 4 4 10 6 Cr 39 19 62 40 53 7 7 10 7 6 6 27 8 Cu 27 6 15 19 27 17 8 8 10 6 3 4 2 Zn 177 246 170 143 122 192 138 125 116 78 54 113 78 Ga 25 24 24 25 21 25 26 25 24 23 23 26 23 La 203 119 142 20 56 179 67 151 102 136 80 170 128 Th 11 3 7 1 5 11 19 18 7 20 15 20 27 U 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 4 5 4 4 6 6 Pb 18 11 13 6 10 18 19 21 17 24 20 25 21 . Mafic rocks . Sherman granite . . . . Sample no.: . 90smw17 . 91smw6 . 91smw11 . 91smw30 . 91VD1 . 91smw17 . 91smw20 . 90smw9 . 90dc2 . 90smw5 . 91smw28 . 91smw5 . 90ph2 . 91ph1 . 90ph1 . Description: . Mg-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . Mg-mzdi . summ fdi . Mg-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . px-Sherman . Sherman . px-Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . SiO2 51.68 52.94 53.28 54.70 55.85 55.90 60.36 64.42 65.80 68.20 68.95 69.04 70.62 70.97 71.3 TiO2 2.52 2.39 2.5 1.71 1.79 1.99 1.60 0.80 0.92 0.42 0.44 0.36 0.27 0.33 0.29 Al2O3 14.06 13.44 14.92 16.34 14.29 13.55 13.49 14.68 13.61 14.70 14.54 14.69 13.22 13.72 13.60 FeOt 11.22 12.43 11.00 11.58 10.97 11.25 9.26 6.36 6.21 4.33 3.81 2.82 3.00 3.11 3.67 MnO 0.15 0.22 0.14 0.24 0.16 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 MgO 3.68 2.29 3.88 2.36 3.24 2.05 1.62 0.69 0.95 0.41 0.40 0.34 0.17 0.32 0.20 CaO 6.46 5.69 6.59 6.75 6.09 5.03 4.06 2.98 3.05 1.82 1.94 1.53 1.30 1.50 1.33 Na2O 3.45 3.79 3.71 4.14 3.3 3.37 3.25 4.06 3.64 3.96 3.76 3.97 3.41 3.67 3.76 K2O 2.66 3.38 2.44 1.47 2.1 3.45 3.86 4.77 4.28 5.75 5.50 5.99 5.61 5.22 5.76 P2O5 1.64 1.52 1.14 0.71 0.44 1.14 0.90 0.25 0.26 0.09 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.04 LOI 0.92 0.71 0.51 0.00 0.14 1.08 0.14 0.18 0.28 0.47 0.41 0.28 0.93 0.39 Total 98.44 98.8 100.11 100.00 98.36 99.00 98.70 99.31 99.08 100.22 99.94 99.17 97.69 99.89 100.39 Na2O+K2O 6.11 7.17 6.15 5.61 5.4 6.82 7.11 8.83 7.92 9.71 9.26 9.96 9.02 8.89 9.52 FeOt/ 0.753 0.844 0.739 0.831 0.772 0.846 0.851 0.902 0.867 0.914 0.905 0.892 0.946 0.907 0.948 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.693 0.664 0.720 0.790 0.761 0.735 0.798 0.850 0.842 0.916 0.928 0.930 0.941 0.952 0.916 Y 49 68 43 39 42 75 72 80 114 45 50 50 117 94 140 Rb 73 181 88 22 60 126 150 95 107 117 114 162 174 186 185 Sr 1008 378 796 528 335 345 269 229 176 185 182 165 103 124 106 Ba 3855 2406 2000 1627 881 2568 1766 1707 1197 1400 1355 1283 992 896 1100 Zr 623 599 520 213 240 734 621 653 515 430 468 383 572 476 540 Nb 44 35 35 13 11 47 40 37 53 27 33 23 67 53 63 Ni 37 11 30 20 35 7 8 8 8 4 4 10 6 Cr 39 19 62 40 53 7 7 10 7 6 6 27 8 Cu 27 6 15 19 27 17 8 8 10 6 3 4 2 Zn 177 246 170 143 122 192 138 125 116 78 54 113 78 Ga 25 24 24 25 21 25 26 25 24 23 23 26 23 La 203 119 142 20 56 179 67 151 102 136 80 170 128 Th 11 3 7 1 5 11 19 18 7 20 15 20 27 U 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 4 5 4 4 6 6 Pb 18 11 13 6 10 18 19 21 17 24 20 25 21 . Porphyritic granite . . . Sample no.: . 90smw19 . 91smw22 . 91smw14 . 91smw10 . 90smw20 . 90ph4 . 91smw2 . 90ph5 . 91smw16 . 91ph3 . 90sme2 . 91smw7 . 91smw19 . 91ph2 . Description: . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . Buford pg . porphyritic . Buford pg . porphyritic . SiO2 66.78 67.35 67.48 67.86 68.14 68.5 69.16 69.90 70.09 70.65 71.00 71.68 72.88 74.39 TiO2 0.78 0.73 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.61 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.46 0.32 0.36 0.22 0.11 Al2O3 13.77 13.69 13.60 13.77 13.59 14.10 14.34 14.10 13.33 13.68 14.10 13.18 14.06 13.37 FeOt 5.74 5.39 5.14 5.00 4.66 4.93 3.46 3.59 4.04 3.36 3.20 3.28 1.60 1.07 MnO 0.10 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.03 MgO 0.75 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.73 0.93 0.59 0.62 0.43 0.57 0.54 0.33 0.42 0.16 CaO 2.50 2.26 2.14 2.23 1.73 2.34 1.90 1.83 1.54 1.51 1.54 1.09 1.23 0.76 Na2O 3.27 3.23 3.48 3.55 3.47 3.61 3.49 3.60 3.30 3.43 3.70 3.57 3.23 3.23 K2O 4.83 4.73 4.79 4.97 4.55 4.51 5.25 4.82 5.18 5.12 5.15 5.25 5.17 5.77 P2O5 0.33 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.18 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.10 0.06 0.03 LOI 0.35 0.56 0.79 0.64 1.59 0.93 0.58 1.00 0.79 0.43 0.77 0.74 0.66 0.46 Total 99.21 99.07 99.14 99.72 99.48 100.73 99.49 100.10 99.42 99.42 100.46 99.66 99.57 99.38 Na2O+K2O 8.1 7.96 8.27 8.52 8.02 8.12 8.74 8.42 8.48 8.55 8.85 8.82 8.4 9 FeOt/ 0.884 0.882 0.886 0.883 0.864 0.841 0.854 0.853 0.904 0.855 0.856 0.909 0.792 0.870 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.909 0.941 0.919 0.902 0.986 0.935 0.964 0.975 0.963 0.982 0.975 0.974 1.060 1.033 Y 80 76 74 72 69 68 51 57 86 60 72 101 16 28 Rb 247 205 178 207 183 193 184 197 202 196 220 244 203 175 Sr 189 167 166 166 137 212 202 209 129 167 160 97 217 165 Ba 1426 1121 1111 1091 1097 910 1006 1000 854 866 910 667 1015 986 Zr 620 564 544 517 532 340 351 280 452 406 260 385 190 148 Nb 42 37 36 35 37 20 28 18 42 39 27 38 22 19 Ni 8 5 4 8 6 7 8 6 5 4 2 Cr 10 6 6 14 11 10 12 8 6 6 6 Cu 3 5 8 6 6 3 2 3 2 2 6 Zn 114 119 99 92 91 62 83 75 82 44 19 Ga 23 23 23 22 22 21 24 21 23 16 17 La 146 117 132 107 101 145 162 153 153 59 37 Th 22 24 26 26 26 41 45 39 54 29 19 U 9 6 8 8 11 7 6 6 11 5 4 Pb 24 24 24 23 22 20 26 24 28 28 21 . Porphyritic granite . . . Sample no.: . 90smw19 . 91smw22 . 91smw14 . 91smw10 . 90smw20 . 90ph4 . 91smw2 . 90ph5 . 91smw16 . 91ph3 . 90sme2 . 91smw7 . 91smw19 . 91ph2 . Description: . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . Buford pg . porphyritic . Buford pg . porphyritic . SiO2 66.78 67.35 67.48 67.86 68.14 68.5 69.16 69.90 70.09 70.65 71.00 71.68 72.88 74.39 TiO2 0.78 0.73 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.61 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.46 0.32 0.36 0.22 0.11 Al2O3 13.77 13.69 13.60 13.77 13.59 14.10 14.34 14.10 13.33 13.68 14.10 13.18 14.06 13.37 FeOt 5.74 5.39 5.14 5.00 4.66 4.93 3.46 3.59 4.04 3.36 3.20 3.28 1.60 1.07 MnO 0.10 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.03 MgO 0.75 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.73 0.93 0.59 0.62 0.43 0.57 0.54 0.33 0.42 0.16 CaO 2.50 2.26 2.14 2.23 1.73 2.34 1.90 1.83 1.54 1.51 1.54 1.09 1.23 0.76 Na2O 3.27 3.23 3.48 3.55 3.47 3.61 3.49 3.60 3.30 3.43 3.70 3.57 3.23 3.23 K2O 4.83 4.73 4.79 4.97 4.55 4.51 5.25 4.82 5.18 5.12 5.15 5.25 5.17 5.77 P2O5 0.33 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.18 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.10 0.06 0.03 LOI 0.35 0.56 0.79 0.64 1.59 0.93 0.58 1.00 0.79 0.43 0.77 0.74 0.66 0.46 Total 99.21 99.07 99.14 99.72 99.48 100.73 99.49 100.10 99.42 99.42 100.46 99.66 99.57 99.38 Na2O+K2O 8.1 7.96 8.27 8.52 8.02 8.12 8.74 8.42 8.48 8.55 8.85 8.82 8.4 9 FeOt/ 0.884 0.882 0.886 0.883 0.864 0.841 0.854 0.853 0.904 0.855 0.856 0.909 0.792 0.870 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.909 0.941 0.919 0.902 0.986 0.935 0.964 0.975 0.963 0.982 0.975 0.974 1.060 1.033 Y 80 76 74 72 69 68 51 57 86 60 72 101 16 28 Rb 247 205 178 207 183 193 184 197 202 196 220 244 203 175 Sr 189 167 166 166 137 212 202 209 129 167 160 97 217 165 Ba 1426 1121 1111 1091 1097 910 1006 1000 854 866 910 667 1015 986 Zr 620 564 544 517 532 340 351 280 452 406 260 385 190 148 Nb 42 37 36 35 37 20 28 18 42 39 27 38 22 19 Ni 8 5 4 8 6 7 8 6 5 4 2 Cr 10 6 6 14 11 10 12 8 6 6 6 Cu 3 5 8 6 6 3 2 3 2 2 6 Zn 114 119 99 92 91 62 83 75 82 44 19 Ga 23 23 23 22 22 21 24 21 23 16 17 La 146 117 132 107 101 145 162 153 153 59 37 Th 22 24 26 26 26 41 45 39 54 29 19 U 9 6 8 8 11 7 6 6 11 5 4 Pb 24 24 24 23 22 20 26 24 28 28 21 . Lincoln granite . . . Sample no.: . 90smw1 . 91smw3 . 90smw3 . 91ph6 . 90smw6 . 91smw26 . 91smw12 . 91smw25 . 91smw21 . 91smw23 . 91smw18 . 91smw15 . 91smw13 . 91ph5 . 91smw9 . 91smw8 . Description: . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . SiO2 72.00 72.15 72.60 73.53 73.70 74.79 75.02 75.18 75.33 75.54 75.57 75.66 75.68 75.83 76.07 76.18 TiO2 0.30 0.23 0.26 0.20 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.09 0.02 0.07 Al2O3 13.90 13.77 14.10 13.71 13.70 13.33 13.41 13.30 13.45 13.29 13.08 12.96 13.41 13.14 13.37 13.01 FeOt 2.51 2.10 2.43 1.73 1.40 1.40 1.79 1.20 0.85 1.08 0.86 1.06 1.48 0.92 0.20 0.73 MnO 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 MgO 0.39 0.32 0.40 0.29 0.19 0.15 0.25 0.18 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.04 0.09 CaO 1.12 1.08 1.07 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.98 0.70 0.45 0.58 0.50 0.60 0.57 0.33 0.32 0.68 Na2O 3.46 3.43 3.50 3.33 4.21 3.49 3.81 3.71 3.26 3.99 3.47 4.37 3.76 3.91 4.75 3.84 K2O 5.18 5.53 5.28 5.17 5.26 5.35 4.81 4.97 5.46 4.69 5.39 4.30 5.21 5.04 4.89 4.95 P2O5 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.01 LOI 0.62 0.61 0.77 0.89 0.62 0.51 0.56 0.57 0.62 0.43 0.66 0.76 0.66 0.69 0.43 0.51 Total 99.58 99.31 100.50 99.87 100.40 100.00 100.90 99.97 99.64 99.87 99.77 99.94 101.19 100.07 103.10 100.09 Na2O+K2O 8.64 8.96 8.78 8.50 9.47 8.84 8.62 8.68 8.72 8.68 8.86 8.67 8.97 8.95 9.64 8.79 FeOt/ 0.866 0.868 0.859 0.856 0.881 0.903 0.877 0.870 0.885 0.893 0.869 0.914 0.881 0.902 0.833 0.890 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 1.042 1.013 1.051 1.076 0.975 1.028 1.012 1.043 1.112 1.047 1.050 1.002 1.043 1.052 0.977 1.008 Y 15 31 30 31 11 23 31 22 20 20 27 30 27 33 65 21 Rb 197 216 208 225 235 192 181 215 204 237 202 248 281 236 325 211 Sr 216 118 209 146 105 94 114 99 74 64 87 58 86 74 15 75 Ba 1200 585 1300 830 570 423 478 445 365 269 458 202 428 266 65 281 Zr 220 233 220 191 110 126 189 103 110 113 71 121 152 104 92 74 Nb 20 16 14 15 21 22 27 12 21 27 11 29 18 32 35 21 Ni 4 3 3 1 2 1 3 3 1 5 2 0 3 Cr 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 12 6 5 6 Cu 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 0 Zn 45 39 37 44 34 19 34 20 46 16 11 18 Ga 18 18 17 20 19 18 18 18 21 20 25 20 La 71 59 29 50 24 9 20 17 8 41 12 3 7 Th 38 26 44 36 33 27 42 22 25 29 16 26 U 10 8 12 9 8 9 12 6 13 10 9 6 Pb 30 31 31 26 30 19 34 25 37 24 41 29 . Lincoln granite . . . Sample no.: . 90smw1 . 91smw3 . 90smw3 . 91ph6 . 90smw6 . 91smw26 . 91smw12 . 91smw25 . 91smw21 . 91smw23 . 91smw18 . 91smw15 . 91smw13 . 91ph5 . 91smw9 . 91smw8 . Description: . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . SiO2 72.00 72.15 72.60 73.53 73.70 74.79 75.02 75.18 75.33 75.54 75.57 75.66 75.68 75.83 76.07 76.18 TiO2 0.30 0.23 0.26 0.20 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.09 0.02 0.07 Al2O3 13.90 13.77 14.10 13.71 13.70 13.33 13.41 13.30 13.45 13.29 13.08 12.96 13.41 13.14 13.37 13.01 FeOt 2.51 2.10 2.43 1.73 1.40 1.40 1.79 1.20 0.85 1.08 0.86 1.06 1.48 0.92 0.20 0.73 MnO 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 MgO 0.39 0.32 0.40 0.29 0.19 0.15 0.25 0.18 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.04 0.09 CaO 1.12 1.08 1.07 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.98 0.70 0.45 0.58 0.50 0.60 0.57 0.33 0.32 0.68 Na2O 3.46 3.43 3.50 3.33 4.21 3.49 3.81 3.71 3.26 3.99 3.47 4.37 3.76 3.91 4.75 3.84 K2O 5.18 5.53 5.28 5.17 5.26 5.35 4.81 4.97 5.46 4.69 5.39 4.30 5.21 5.04 4.89 4.95 P2O5 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.01 LOI 0.62 0.61 0.77 0.89 0.62 0.51 0.56 0.57 0.62 0.43 0.66 0.76 0.66 0.69 0.43 0.51 Total 99.58 99.31 100.50 99.87 100.40 100.00 100.90 99.97 99.64 99.87 99.77 99.94 101.19 100.07 103.10 100.09 Na2O+K2O 8.64 8.96 8.78 8.50 9.47 8.84 8.62 8.68 8.72 8.68 8.86 8.67 8.97 8.95 9.64 8.79 FeOt/ 0.866 0.868 0.859 0.856 0.881 0.903 0.877 0.870 0.885 0.893 0.869 0.914 0.881 0.902 0.833 0.890 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 1.042 1.013 1.051 1.076 0.975 1.028 1.012 1.043 1.112 1.047 1.050 1.002 1.043 1.052 0.977 1.008 Y 15 31 30 31 11 23 31 22 20 20 27 30 27 33 65 21 Rb 197 216 208 225 235 192 181 215 204 237 202 248 281 236 325 211 Sr 216 118 209 146 105 94 114 99 74 64 87 58 86 74 15 75 Ba 1200 585 1300 830 570 423 478 445 365 269 458 202 428 266 65 281 Zr 220 233 220 191 110 126 189 103 110 113 71 121 152 104 92 74 Nb 20 16 14 15 21 22 27 12 21 27 11 29 18 32 35 21 Ni 4 3 3 1 2 1 3 3 1 5 2 0 3 Cr 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 12 6 5 6 Cu 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 0 Zn 45 39 37 44 34 19 34 20 46 16 11 18 Ga 18 18 17 20 19 18 18 18 21 20 25 20 La 71 59 29 50 24 9 20 17 8 41 12 3 7 Th 38 26 44 36 33 27 42 22 25 29 16 26 U 10 8 12 9 8 9 12 6 13 10 9 6 Pb 30 31 31 26 30 19 34 25 37 24 41 29 . Older rocks . . . Sample no.: . 90smw4 . 91smw27 . 97smw1 . 91smw4 . Description: . monzonite . sodic group . sodic group . sodic group . SiO2 60.06 62.91 67.66 70.89 TiO2 0.83 0.41 0.25 0.16 Al2O3 16.51 19.56 17.70 15.93 FeOt 7.68 3.20 1.90 1.40 MnO 0.17 0.06 0.04 0.03 MgO 0.38 0.37 0.71 0.58 CaO 3.14 4.36 2.83 2.80 Na2O 4.57 6.61 5.80 6.07 K2O 5.58 2.28 3.26 1.50 P2O5 0.25 0.19 0.084 0.04 LOI 0.33 0.09 0.24 0.47 Total 99.49 100.04 100.46 99.87 Na2O+K2O 10.15 8.89 9.06 7.57 FeOt/ 0.953 0.896 0.728 0.707 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.857 0.920 0.972 0.954 Y 37 68 8 12 Rb 77 49 47 Sr 159 286 1104 432 Ba 4933 324 1636 637 Zr 651 356 141 74 Nb 12 21 13 Ni 14 4 7 4 Cr 38 6 8 10 Cu 12 6 236 6 Zn 98 74 29 28 Ga 35 34 16 La 31 67 7 Th 1 11 1 U 1 2 1 Pb 10 17 9 . Older rocks . . . Sample no.: . 90smw4 . 91smw27 . 97smw1 . 91smw4 . Description: . monzonite . sodic group . sodic group . sodic group . SiO2 60.06 62.91 67.66 70.89 TiO2 0.83 0.41 0.25 0.16 Al2O3 16.51 19.56 17.70 15.93 FeOt 7.68 3.20 1.90 1.40 MnO 0.17 0.06 0.04 0.03 MgO 0.38 0.37 0.71 0.58 CaO 3.14 4.36 2.83 2.80 Na2O 4.57 6.61 5.80 6.07 K2O 5.58 2.28 3.26 1.50 P2O5 0.25 0.19 0.084 0.04 LOI 0.33 0.09 0.24 0.47 Total 99.49 100.04 100.46 99.87 Na2O+K2O 10.15 8.89 9.06 7.57 FeOt/ 0.953 0.896 0.728 0.707 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.857 0.920 0.972 0.954 Y 37 68 8 12 Rb 77 49 47 Sr 159 286 1104 432 Ba 4933 324 1636 637 Zr 651 356 141 74 Nb 12 21 13 Ni 14 4 7 4 Cr 38 6 8 10 Cu 12 6 236 6 Zn 98 74 29 28 Ga 35 34 16 La 31 67 7 Th 1 11 1 U 1 2 1 Pb 10 17 9 Samples were analyzed by X-ray fluroescence spectrometry at the University of Southern California, except sample 97SMW1, which was analyzed by XRAL Activation Services,Inc. Open in new tab Table 3: Major and trace element analyses of the Sherman batholith . Mafic rocks . Sherman granite . . . . Sample no.: . 90smw17 . 91smw6 . 91smw11 . 91smw30 . 91VD1 . 91smw17 . 91smw20 . 90smw9 . 90dc2 . 90smw5 . 91smw28 . 91smw5 . 90ph2 . 91ph1 . 90ph1 . Description: . Mg-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . Mg-mzdi . summ fdi . Mg-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . px-Sherman . Sherman . px-Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . SiO2 51.68 52.94 53.28 54.70 55.85 55.90 60.36 64.42 65.80 68.20 68.95 69.04 70.62 70.97 71.3 TiO2 2.52 2.39 2.5 1.71 1.79 1.99 1.60 0.80 0.92 0.42 0.44 0.36 0.27 0.33 0.29 Al2O3 14.06 13.44 14.92 16.34 14.29 13.55 13.49 14.68 13.61 14.70 14.54 14.69 13.22 13.72 13.60 FeOt 11.22 12.43 11.00 11.58 10.97 11.25 9.26 6.36 6.21 4.33 3.81 2.82 3.00 3.11 3.67 MnO 0.15 0.22 0.14 0.24 0.16 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 MgO 3.68 2.29 3.88 2.36 3.24 2.05 1.62 0.69 0.95 0.41 0.40 0.34 0.17 0.32 0.20 CaO 6.46 5.69 6.59 6.75 6.09 5.03 4.06 2.98 3.05 1.82 1.94 1.53 1.30 1.50 1.33 Na2O 3.45 3.79 3.71 4.14 3.3 3.37 3.25 4.06 3.64 3.96 3.76 3.97 3.41 3.67 3.76 K2O 2.66 3.38 2.44 1.47 2.1 3.45 3.86 4.77 4.28 5.75 5.50 5.99 5.61 5.22 5.76 P2O5 1.64 1.52 1.14 0.71 0.44 1.14 0.90 0.25 0.26 0.09 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.04 LOI 0.92 0.71 0.51 0.00 0.14 1.08 0.14 0.18 0.28 0.47 0.41 0.28 0.93 0.39 Total 98.44 98.8 100.11 100.00 98.36 99.00 98.70 99.31 99.08 100.22 99.94 99.17 97.69 99.89 100.39 Na2O+K2O 6.11 7.17 6.15 5.61 5.4 6.82 7.11 8.83 7.92 9.71 9.26 9.96 9.02 8.89 9.52 FeOt/ 0.753 0.844 0.739 0.831 0.772 0.846 0.851 0.902 0.867 0.914 0.905 0.892 0.946 0.907 0.948 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.693 0.664 0.720 0.790 0.761 0.735 0.798 0.850 0.842 0.916 0.928 0.930 0.941 0.952 0.916 Y 49 68 43 39 42 75 72 80 114 45 50 50 117 94 140 Rb 73 181 88 22 60 126 150 95 107 117 114 162 174 186 185 Sr 1008 378 796 528 335 345 269 229 176 185 182 165 103 124 106 Ba 3855 2406 2000 1627 881 2568 1766 1707 1197 1400 1355 1283 992 896 1100 Zr 623 599 520 213 240 734 621 653 515 430 468 383 572 476 540 Nb 44 35 35 13 11 47 40 37 53 27 33 23 67 53 63 Ni 37 11 30 20 35 7 8 8 8 4 4 10 6 Cr 39 19 62 40 53 7 7 10 7 6 6 27 8 Cu 27 6 15 19 27 17 8 8 10 6 3 4 2 Zn 177 246 170 143 122 192 138 125 116 78 54 113 78 Ga 25 24 24 25 21 25 26 25 24 23 23 26 23 La 203 119 142 20 56 179 67 151 102 136 80 170 128 Th 11 3 7 1 5 11 19 18 7 20 15 20 27 U 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 4 5 4 4 6 6 Pb 18 11 13 6 10 18 19 21 17 24 20 25 21 . Mafic rocks . Sherman granite . . . . Sample no.: . 90smw17 . 91smw6 . 91smw11 . 91smw30 . 91VD1 . 91smw17 . 91smw20 . 90smw9 . 90dc2 . 90smw5 . 91smw28 . 91smw5 . 90ph2 . 91ph1 . 90ph1 . Description: . Mg-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . Mg-mzdi . summ fdi . Mg-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . Fe-mzdi . px-Sherman . Sherman . px-Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . Sherman . SiO2 51.68 52.94 53.28 54.70 55.85 55.90 60.36 64.42 65.80 68.20 68.95 69.04 70.62 70.97 71.3 TiO2 2.52 2.39 2.5 1.71 1.79 1.99 1.60 0.80 0.92 0.42 0.44 0.36 0.27 0.33 0.29 Al2O3 14.06 13.44 14.92 16.34 14.29 13.55 13.49 14.68 13.61 14.70 14.54 14.69 13.22 13.72 13.60 FeOt 11.22 12.43 11.00 11.58 10.97 11.25 9.26 6.36 6.21 4.33 3.81 2.82 3.00 3.11 3.67 MnO 0.15 0.22 0.14 0.24 0.16 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 MgO 3.68 2.29 3.88 2.36 3.24 2.05 1.62 0.69 0.95 0.41 0.40 0.34 0.17 0.32 0.20 CaO 6.46 5.69 6.59 6.75 6.09 5.03 4.06 2.98 3.05 1.82 1.94 1.53 1.30 1.50 1.33 Na2O 3.45 3.79 3.71 4.14 3.3 3.37 3.25 4.06 3.64 3.96 3.76 3.97 3.41 3.67 3.76 K2O 2.66 3.38 2.44 1.47 2.1 3.45 3.86 4.77 4.28 5.75 5.50 5.99 5.61 5.22 5.76 P2O5 1.64 1.52 1.14 0.71 0.44 1.14 0.90 0.25 0.26 0.09 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.04 LOI 0.92 0.71 0.51 0.00 0.14 1.08 0.14 0.18 0.28 0.47 0.41 0.28 0.93 0.39 Total 98.44 98.8 100.11 100.00 98.36 99.00 98.70 99.31 99.08 100.22 99.94 99.17 97.69 99.89 100.39 Na2O+K2O 6.11 7.17 6.15 5.61 5.4 6.82 7.11 8.83 7.92 9.71 9.26 9.96 9.02 8.89 9.52 FeOt/ 0.753 0.844 0.739 0.831 0.772 0.846 0.851 0.902 0.867 0.914 0.905 0.892 0.946 0.907 0.948 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.693 0.664 0.720 0.790 0.761 0.735 0.798 0.850 0.842 0.916 0.928 0.930 0.941 0.952 0.916 Y 49 68 43 39 42 75 72 80 114 45 50 50 117 94 140 Rb 73 181 88 22 60 126 150 95 107 117 114 162 174 186 185 Sr 1008 378 796 528 335 345 269 229 176 185 182 165 103 124 106 Ba 3855 2406 2000 1627 881 2568 1766 1707 1197 1400 1355 1283 992 896 1100 Zr 623 599 520 213 240 734 621 653 515 430 468 383 572 476 540 Nb 44 35 35 13 11 47 40 37 53 27 33 23 67 53 63 Ni 37 11 30 20 35 7 8 8 8 4 4 10 6 Cr 39 19 62 40 53 7 7 10 7 6 6 27 8 Cu 27 6 15 19 27 17 8 8 10 6 3 4 2 Zn 177 246 170 143 122 192 138 125 116 78 54 113 78 Ga 25 24 24 25 21 25 26 25 24 23 23 26 23 La 203 119 142 20 56 179 67 151 102 136 80 170 128 Th 11 3 7 1 5 11 19 18 7 20 15 20 27 U 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 4 5 4 4 6 6 Pb 18 11 13 6 10 18 19 21 17 24 20 25 21 . Porphyritic granite . . . Sample no.: . 90smw19 . 91smw22 . 91smw14 . 91smw10 . 90smw20 . 90ph4 . 91smw2 . 90ph5 . 91smw16 . 91ph3 . 90sme2 . 91smw7 . 91smw19 . 91ph2 . Description: . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . Buford pg . porphyritic . Buford pg . porphyritic . SiO2 66.78 67.35 67.48 67.86 68.14 68.5 69.16 69.90 70.09 70.65 71.00 71.68 72.88 74.39 TiO2 0.78 0.73 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.61 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.46 0.32 0.36 0.22 0.11 Al2O3 13.77 13.69 13.60 13.77 13.59 14.10 14.34 14.10 13.33 13.68 14.10 13.18 14.06 13.37 FeOt 5.74 5.39 5.14 5.00 4.66 4.93 3.46 3.59 4.04 3.36 3.20 3.28 1.60 1.07 MnO 0.10 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.03 MgO 0.75 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.73 0.93 0.59 0.62 0.43 0.57 0.54 0.33 0.42 0.16 CaO 2.50 2.26 2.14 2.23 1.73 2.34 1.90 1.83 1.54 1.51 1.54 1.09 1.23 0.76 Na2O 3.27 3.23 3.48 3.55 3.47 3.61 3.49 3.60 3.30 3.43 3.70 3.57 3.23 3.23 K2O 4.83 4.73 4.79 4.97 4.55 4.51 5.25 4.82 5.18 5.12 5.15 5.25 5.17 5.77 P2O5 0.33 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.18 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.10 0.06 0.03 LOI 0.35 0.56 0.79 0.64 1.59 0.93 0.58 1.00 0.79 0.43 0.77 0.74 0.66 0.46 Total 99.21 99.07 99.14 99.72 99.48 100.73 99.49 100.10 99.42 99.42 100.46 99.66 99.57 99.38 Na2O+K2O 8.1 7.96 8.27 8.52 8.02 8.12 8.74 8.42 8.48 8.55 8.85 8.82 8.4 9 FeOt/ 0.884 0.882 0.886 0.883 0.864 0.841 0.854 0.853 0.904 0.855 0.856 0.909 0.792 0.870 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.909 0.941 0.919 0.902 0.986 0.935 0.964 0.975 0.963 0.982 0.975 0.974 1.060 1.033 Y 80 76 74 72 69 68 51 57 86 60 72 101 16 28 Rb 247 205 178 207 183 193 184 197 202 196 220 244 203 175 Sr 189 167 166 166 137 212 202 209 129 167 160 97 217 165 Ba 1426 1121 1111 1091 1097 910 1006 1000 854 866 910 667 1015 986 Zr 620 564 544 517 532 340 351 280 452 406 260 385 190 148 Nb 42 37 36 35 37 20 28 18 42 39 27 38 22 19 Ni 8 5 4 8 6 7 8 6 5 4 2 Cr 10 6 6 14 11 10 12 8 6 6 6 Cu 3 5 8 6 6 3 2 3 2 2 6 Zn 114 119 99 92 91 62 83 75 82 44 19 Ga 23 23 23 22 22 21 24 21 23 16 17 La 146 117 132 107 101 145 162 153 153 59 37 Th 22 24 26 26 26 41 45 39 54 29 19 U 9 6 8 8 11 7 6 6 11 5 4 Pb 24 24 24 23 22 20 26 24 28 28 21 . Porphyritic granite . . . Sample no.: . 90smw19 . 91smw22 . 91smw14 . 91smw10 . 90smw20 . 90ph4 . 91smw2 . 90ph5 . 91smw16 . 91ph3 . 90sme2 . 91smw7 . 91smw19 . 91ph2 . Description: . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . porphyritic . Buford pg . porphyritic . Buford pg . porphyritic . SiO2 66.78 67.35 67.48 67.86 68.14 68.5 69.16 69.90 70.09 70.65 71.00 71.68 72.88 74.39 TiO2 0.78 0.73 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.61 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.46 0.32 0.36 0.22 0.11 Al2O3 13.77 13.69 13.60 13.77 13.59 14.10 14.34 14.10 13.33 13.68 14.10 13.18 14.06 13.37 FeOt 5.74 5.39 5.14 5.00 4.66 4.93 3.46 3.59 4.04 3.36 3.20 3.28 1.60 1.07 MnO 0.10 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.03 MgO 0.75 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.73 0.93 0.59 0.62 0.43 0.57 0.54 0.33 0.42 0.16 CaO 2.50 2.26 2.14 2.23 1.73 2.34 1.90 1.83 1.54 1.51 1.54 1.09 1.23 0.76 Na2O 3.27 3.23 3.48 3.55 3.47 3.61 3.49 3.60 3.30 3.43 3.70 3.57 3.23 3.23 K2O 4.83 4.73 4.79 4.97 4.55 4.51 5.25 4.82 5.18 5.12 5.15 5.25 5.17 5.77 P2O5 0.33 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.18 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.10 0.06 0.03 LOI 0.35 0.56 0.79 0.64 1.59 0.93 0.58 1.00 0.79 0.43 0.77 0.74 0.66 0.46 Total 99.21 99.07 99.14 99.72 99.48 100.73 99.49 100.10 99.42 99.42 100.46 99.66 99.57 99.38 Na2O+K2O 8.1 7.96 8.27 8.52 8.02 8.12 8.74 8.42 8.48 8.55 8.85 8.82 8.4 9 FeOt/ 0.884 0.882 0.886 0.883 0.864 0.841 0.854 0.853 0.904 0.855 0.856 0.909 0.792 0.870 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.909 0.941 0.919 0.902 0.986 0.935 0.964 0.975 0.963 0.982 0.975 0.974 1.060 1.033 Y 80 76 74 72 69 68 51 57 86 60 72 101 16 28 Rb 247 205 178 207 183 193 184 197 202 196 220 244 203 175 Sr 189 167 166 166 137 212 202 209 129 167 160 97 217 165 Ba 1426 1121 1111 1091 1097 910 1006 1000 854 866 910 667 1015 986 Zr 620 564 544 517 532 340 351 280 452 406 260 385 190 148 Nb 42 37 36 35 37 20 28 18 42 39 27 38 22 19 Ni 8 5 4 8 6 7 8 6 5 4 2 Cr 10 6 6 14 11 10 12 8 6 6 6 Cu 3 5 8 6 6 3 2 3 2 2 6 Zn 114 119 99 92 91 62 83 75 82 44 19 Ga 23 23 23 22 22 21 24 21 23 16 17 La 146 117 132 107 101 145 162 153 153 59 37 Th 22 24 26 26 26 41 45 39 54 29 19 U 9 6 8 8 11 7 6 6 11 5 4 Pb 24 24 24 23 22 20 26 24 28 28 21 . Lincoln granite . . . Sample no.: . 90smw1 . 91smw3 . 90smw3 . 91ph6 . 90smw6 . 91smw26 . 91smw12 . 91smw25 . 91smw21 . 91smw23 . 91smw18 . 91smw15 . 91smw13 . 91ph5 . 91smw9 . 91smw8 . Description: . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . SiO2 72.00 72.15 72.60 73.53 73.70 74.79 75.02 75.18 75.33 75.54 75.57 75.66 75.68 75.83 76.07 76.18 TiO2 0.30 0.23 0.26 0.20 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.09 0.02 0.07 Al2O3 13.90 13.77 14.10 13.71 13.70 13.33 13.41 13.30 13.45 13.29 13.08 12.96 13.41 13.14 13.37 13.01 FeOt 2.51 2.10 2.43 1.73 1.40 1.40 1.79 1.20 0.85 1.08 0.86 1.06 1.48 0.92 0.20 0.73 MnO 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 MgO 0.39 0.32 0.40 0.29 0.19 0.15 0.25 0.18 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.04 0.09 CaO 1.12 1.08 1.07 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.98 0.70 0.45 0.58 0.50 0.60 0.57 0.33 0.32 0.68 Na2O 3.46 3.43 3.50 3.33 4.21 3.49 3.81 3.71 3.26 3.99 3.47 4.37 3.76 3.91 4.75 3.84 K2O 5.18 5.53 5.28 5.17 5.26 5.35 4.81 4.97 5.46 4.69 5.39 4.30 5.21 5.04 4.89 4.95 P2O5 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.01 LOI 0.62 0.61 0.77 0.89 0.62 0.51 0.56 0.57 0.62 0.43 0.66 0.76 0.66 0.69 0.43 0.51 Total 99.58 99.31 100.50 99.87 100.40 100.00 100.90 99.97 99.64 99.87 99.77 99.94 101.19 100.07 103.10 100.09 Na2O+K2O 8.64 8.96 8.78 8.50 9.47 8.84 8.62 8.68 8.72 8.68 8.86 8.67 8.97 8.95 9.64 8.79 FeOt/ 0.866 0.868 0.859 0.856 0.881 0.903 0.877 0.870 0.885 0.893 0.869 0.914 0.881 0.902 0.833 0.890 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 1.042 1.013 1.051 1.076 0.975 1.028 1.012 1.043 1.112 1.047 1.050 1.002 1.043 1.052 0.977 1.008 Y 15 31 30 31 11 23 31 22 20 20 27 30 27 33 65 21 Rb 197 216 208 225 235 192 181 215 204 237 202 248 281 236 325 211 Sr 216 118 209 146 105 94 114 99 74 64 87 58 86 74 15 75 Ba 1200 585 1300 830 570 423 478 445 365 269 458 202 428 266 65 281 Zr 220 233 220 191 110 126 189 103 110 113 71 121 152 104 92 74 Nb 20 16 14 15 21 22 27 12 21 27 11 29 18 32 35 21 Ni 4 3 3 1 2 1 3 3 1 5 2 0 3 Cr 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 12 6 5 6 Cu 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 0 Zn 45 39 37 44 34 19 34 20 46 16 11 18 Ga 18 18 17 20 19 18 18 18 21 20 25 20 La 71 59 29 50 24 9 20 17 8 41 12 3 7 Th 38 26 44 36 33 27 42 22 25 29 16 26 U 10 8 12 9 8 9 12 6 13 10 9 6 Pb 30 31 31 26 30 19 34 25 37 24 41 29 . Lincoln granite . . . Sample no.: . 90smw1 . 91smw3 . 90smw3 . 91ph6 . 90smw6 . 91smw26 . 91smw12 . 91smw25 . 91smw21 . 91smw23 . 91smw18 . 91smw15 . 91smw13 . 91ph5 . 91smw9 . 91smw8 . Description: . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . Lincoln . SiO2 72.00 72.15 72.60 73.53 73.70 74.79 75.02 75.18 75.33 75.54 75.57 75.66 75.68 75.83 76.07 76.18 TiO2 0.30 0.23 0.26 0.20 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.09 0.02 0.07 Al2O3 13.90 13.77 14.10 13.71 13.70 13.33 13.41 13.30 13.45 13.29 13.08 12.96 13.41 13.14 13.37 13.01 FeOt 2.51 2.10 2.43 1.73 1.40 1.40 1.79 1.20 0.85 1.08 0.86 1.06 1.48 0.92 0.20 0.73 MnO 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 MgO 0.39 0.32 0.40 0.29 0.19 0.15 0.25 0.18 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.04 0.09 CaO 1.12 1.08 1.07 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.98 0.70 0.45 0.58 0.50 0.60 0.57 0.33 0.32 0.68 Na2O 3.46 3.43 3.50 3.33 4.21 3.49 3.81 3.71 3.26 3.99 3.47 4.37 3.76 3.91 4.75 3.84 K2O 5.18 5.53 5.28 5.17 5.26 5.35 4.81 4.97 5.46 4.69 5.39 4.30 5.21 5.04 4.89 4.95 P2O5 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.01 LOI 0.62 0.61 0.77 0.89 0.62 0.51 0.56 0.57 0.62 0.43 0.66 0.76 0.66 0.69 0.43 0.51 Total 99.58 99.31 100.50 99.87 100.40 100.00 100.90 99.97 99.64 99.87 99.77 99.94 101.19 100.07 103.10 100.09 Na2O+K2O 8.64 8.96 8.78 8.50 9.47 8.84 8.62 8.68 8.72 8.68 8.86 8.67 8.97 8.95 9.64 8.79 FeOt/ 0.866 0.868 0.859 0.856 0.881 0.903 0.877 0.870 0.885 0.893 0.869 0.914 0.881 0.902 0.833 0.890 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 1.042 1.013 1.051 1.076 0.975 1.028 1.012 1.043 1.112 1.047 1.050 1.002 1.043 1.052 0.977 1.008 Y 15 31 30 31 11 23 31 22 20 20 27 30 27 33 65 21 Rb 197 216 208 225 235 192 181 215 204 237 202 248 281 236 325 211 Sr 216 118 209 146 105 94 114 99 74 64 87 58 86 74 15 75 Ba 1200 585 1300 830 570 423 478 445 365 269 458 202 428 266 65 281 Zr 220 233 220 191 110 126 189 103 110 113 71 121 152 104 92 74 Nb 20 16 14 15 21 22 27 12 21 27 11 29 18 32 35 21 Ni 4 3 3 1 2 1 3 3 1 5 2 0 3 Cr 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 12 6 5 6 Cu 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 0 Zn 45 39 37 44 34 19 34 20 46 16 11 18 Ga 18 18 17 20 19 18 18 18 21 20 25 20 La 71 59 29 50 24 9 20 17 8 41 12 3 7 Th 38 26 44 36 33 27 42 22 25 29 16 26 U 10 8 12 9 8 9 12 6 13 10 9 6 Pb 30 31 31 26 30 19 34 25 37 24 41 29 . Older rocks . . . Sample no.: . 90smw4 . 91smw27 . 97smw1 . 91smw4 . Description: . monzonite . sodic group . sodic group . sodic group . SiO2 60.06 62.91 67.66 70.89 TiO2 0.83 0.41 0.25 0.16 Al2O3 16.51 19.56 17.70 15.93 FeOt 7.68 3.20 1.90 1.40 MnO 0.17 0.06 0.04 0.03 MgO 0.38 0.37 0.71 0.58 CaO 3.14 4.36 2.83 2.80 Na2O 4.57 6.61 5.80 6.07 K2O 5.58 2.28 3.26 1.50 P2O5 0.25 0.19 0.084 0.04 LOI 0.33 0.09 0.24 0.47 Total 99.49 100.04 100.46 99.87 Na2O+K2O 10.15 8.89 9.06 7.57 FeOt/ 0.953 0.896 0.728 0.707 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.857 0.920 0.972 0.954 Y 37 68 8 12 Rb 77 49 47 Sr 159 286 1104 432 Ba 4933 324 1636 637 Zr 651 356 141 74 Nb 12 21 13 Ni 14 4 7 4 Cr 38 6 8 10 Cu 12 6 236 6 Zn 98 74 29 28 Ga 35 34 16 La 31 67 7 Th 1 11 1 U 1 2 1 Pb 10 17 9 . Older rocks . . . Sample no.: . 90smw4 . 91smw27 . 97smw1 . 91smw4 . Description: . monzonite . sodic group . sodic group . sodic group . SiO2 60.06 62.91 67.66 70.89 TiO2 0.83 0.41 0.25 0.16 Al2O3 16.51 19.56 17.70 15.93 FeOt 7.68 3.20 1.90 1.40 MnO 0.17 0.06 0.04 0.03 MgO 0.38 0.37 0.71 0.58 CaO 3.14 4.36 2.83 2.80 Na2O 4.57 6.61 5.80 6.07 K2O 5.58 2.28 3.26 1.50 P2O5 0.25 0.19 0.084 0.04 LOI 0.33 0.09 0.24 0.47 Total 99.49 100.04 100.46 99.87 Na2O+K2O 10.15 8.89 9.06 7.57 FeOt/ 0.953 0.896 0.728 0.707 (FeOt+MgO) A/CNK 0.857 0.920 0.972 0.954 Y 37 68 8 12 Rb 77 49 47 Sr 159 286 1104 432 Ba 4933 324 1636 637 Zr 651 356 141 74 Nb 12 21 13 Ni 14 4 7 4 Cr 38 6 8 10 Cu 12 6 236 6 Zn 98 74 29 28 Ga 35 34 16 La 31 67 7 Th 1 11 1 U 1 2 1 Pb 10 17 9 Samples were analyzed by X-ray fluroescence spectrometry at the University of Southern California, except sample 97SMW1, which was analyzed by XRAL Activation Services,Inc. Open in new tab Lincoln granite Samples of Lincoln granite vary from 72.0 to 76.2 wt % SiO2, the highest for any rock type in the Sherman batholith. Fourteen of 16 samples are peraluminous. The normative Ab–An–Or values for Lincoln granite samples lie along cotectics calculated by Nekvasil & Lindsley, (1990) for the system Ab–An–Or–H2O (Fig. 9), and trend to higher Na2O and lower K2O values in the most SiO2-rich samples. Rb/Ba increases dramatically with increasing SiO2 (Fig. 8), a feature consistent with crystallization of feldspar. Zr, Y and REE contents are lower than for the other granites in the batholith; these are probably controlled by the accessory phases zircon, allanite and apatite (Fig. 7 and 10). The low Zr, REE and Y values in the Lincoln granite samples may result because the Lincoln granite is (1) a partial melt in which the accessory minerals were left in the residua, or (2) a differentiate that separated from an assemblage that contained these accessory minerals (i.e. monzodiorite and Sherman granite). The lowest REE contents are also found in the most siliceous units of the zoned monzonite-to-granite Red Mountain pluton of the Laramie anorthosite complex, in which it was demonstrated that REEs were sequestered in allanite and zircon during differentiation of a monzonitic magma (Anderson, 1995). Porphyritic granite Porphyritic granite samples range from 66.8 to 74.4 wt % SiO2, the largest variation in the granites of the Sherman batholith. They occupy intermediate major and trace element compositions between Lincoln, mafic rock and Sherman units. The REE pattern of porphyritic granite sample 91SMW2 lies between Sherman sample 91SMW28 and Lincoln sample 91PH6 (Fig. 7), but is also LREE enriched with a negative Eu anomaly. Porphyritic granite samples lie between the MgO-poor monzodiorite and the Lincoln granite (Fig. 5 and 10). These geochemical features, along with petrographic and field evidence, indicate that porphyritic granite is probably a product of magma mixing or interaction of magmas and feldspar-rich crystal mush. Mineral Chemistry Mineral compositions were determined on the JEOL Superprobe using natural and synthetic minerals for standards (Table 6Table 9). Oxygen abundance in silicate minerals was based upon stoichiometry. Fe–Ti oxide minerals were analyzed as weight per cent elements, but oxygen was analyzed along with the cations. For these Fe–Ti oxide minerals, ferric iron was calculated assuming that all elements apart from Fe have fixed valence. Olivine We analyzed fayalitic olivine from a fayalite monzonite inclusion in the Sherman granite (90SMW4) and two samples of the Sherman granite (90SMW5, 90SMW9; Table 5). The olivine in the fayalite monzonite sample is richer in iron (Fa95Tp3Fo2) than that from the Sherman granite (Fa92Tp2Fo6) (Table 6; Fig. 11). The olivine from the fayalite monzonite is similar in composition to that from the monzosyenitic plutons of the Laramie anorthosite complex (Fuhrman et al., 1988; Kolker & Lindsley, 1989; Anderson, 1995). Table 4: Rare earth element contents of selected Sherman batholith samples . 91SMW20 . 91SMW30 . 91SMW28 . 91SMW2 . 91PH6 . 91SMW4 . . monzodiorite . ferrodiorite . Sherman . porphyritic . Lincoln . sodic series . SiO2 60.4 54.7 68.95 69.2 73.5 70.9 La 66.9 20.3 136 145 59.1 6.98 Ce 133 48.3 282 270 95.3 14.1 Nd 66.9 32.1 113 94.0 40.9 6.76 Sm 13.8 7.77 18.2 15.9 7.64 1.48 Eu 3.19 4.2 3.0 2.4 1.15 0.362 Gd 16.5 8.49 15.6 12.6 6.31 1.36 Dy 13.2 7.97 11.5 9.77 5.11 1.34 Er 6.64 3.96 5.61 4.64 2.52 0.813 Yb 5.89 3.67 4.36 4.44 2.59 0.89 Lu 0.86 0.562 0.783 0.735 0.401 0.17 . 91SMW20 . 91SMW30 . 91SMW28 . 91SMW2 . 91PH6 . 91SMW4 . . monzodiorite . ferrodiorite . Sherman . porphyritic . Lincoln . sodic series . SiO2 60.4 54.7 68.95 69.2 73.5 70.9 La 66.9 20.3 136 145 59.1 6.98 Ce 133 48.3 282 270 95.3 14.1 Nd 66.9 32.1 113 94.0 40.9 6.76 Sm 13.8 7.77 18.2 15.9 7.64 1.48 Eu 3.19 4.2 3.0 2.4 1.15 0.362 Gd 16.5 8.49 15.6 12.6 6.31 1.36 Dy 13.2 7.97 11.5 9.77 5.11 1.34 Er 6.64 3.96 5.61 4.64 2.52 0.813 Yb 5.89 3.67 4.36 4.44 2.59 0.89 Lu 0.86 0.562 0.783 0.735 0.401 0.17 Rare earth elements were determined by ICP-MS at the University of Nebraska. Errors estimated from replicate analyses are less than 8% for La–Gd, 12% for Dy, and 20-25% for Er, Yb and Lu. Open in new tab Table 4: Rare earth element contents of selected Sherman batholith samples . 91SMW20 . 91SMW30 . 91SMW28 . 91SMW2 . 91PH6 . 91SMW4 . . monzodiorite . ferrodiorite . Sherman . porphyritic . Lincoln . sodic series . SiO2 60.4 54.7 68.95 69.2 73.5 70.9 La 66.9 20.3 136 145 59.1 6.98 Ce 133 48.3 282 270 95.3 14.1 Nd 66.9 32.1 113 94.0 40.9 6.76 Sm 13.8 7.77 18.2 15.9 7.64 1.48 Eu 3.19 4.2 3.0 2.4 1.15 0.362 Gd 16.5 8.49 15.6 12.6 6.31 1.36 Dy 13.2 7.97 11.5 9.77 5.11 1.34 Er 6.64 3.96 5.61 4.64 2.52 0.813 Yb 5.89 3.67 4.36 4.44 2.59 0.89 Lu 0.86 0.562 0.783 0.735 0.401 0.17 . 91SMW20 . 91SMW30 . 91SMW28 . 91SMW2 . 91PH6 . 91SMW4 . . monzodiorite . ferrodiorite . Sherman . porphyritic . Lincoln . sodic series . SiO2 60.4 54.7 68.95 69.2 73.5 70.9 La 66.9 20.3 136 145 59.1 6.98 Ce 133 48.3 282 270 95.3 14.1 Nd 66.9 32.1 113 94.0 40.9 6.76 Sm 13.8 7.77 18.2 15.9 7.64 1.48 Eu 3.19 4.2 3.0 2.4 1.15 0.362 Gd 16.5 8.49 15.6 12.6 6.31 1.36 Dy 13.2 7.97 11.5 9.77 5.11 1.34 Er 6.64 3.96 5.61 4.64 2.52 0.813 Yb 5.89 3.67 4.36 4.44 2.59 0.89 Lu 0.86 0.562 0.783 0.735 0.401 0.17 Rare earth elements were determined by ICP-MS at the University of Nebraska. Errors estimated from replicate analyses are less than 8% for La–Gd, 12% for Dy, and 20-25% for Er, Yb and Lu. Open in new tab Fig. 5. Open in new tabDownload slide Variation of major element contents of rocks from the Sherman batholith. Fig. 6. Open in new tabDownload slide (a) Plot of Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) calculated on a molecular basis against SiO2. (b) Plot of FeOt/(FeOt + MgO) against SiO2. The Sherman batholith lies within the tholeiite field. Calc-alkalic–tholeiitic (CA–TH) boundary from Miyashiro, (1974). (c) Plot of Nb against Y showing how the Sherman granite plots well within the within-plate granites field, whereas the Lincoln and a few of the porphyritic granites trend into the field for volcanic arc granites. This could reflect either a different source for the Lincoln or the effect of Y depletion during differentiation. ORG, ocean ridge granites; VAG + syn-COLG, volcanic arc granites and syn-collisional granites; WPG, within-plate granites. Fields from Pearce et al., (1984). Fig. 7. Open in new tabDownload slide Diagram showing the variation in normalized rare earth abundance for various units of the Sherman batholith. Normalizing values from Hanson, (1980). Fig. 8. Open in new tabDownload slide Plot of Rb/Ba against SiO2 for rocks of the Sherman batholith. The extreme enrichment in Rb/Ba in the Lincoln granites is indicative of feldspar fractionation. Pyroxene We analyzed augite from a sample of ferrodiorite (90SMW30) and of fayalite monzonite (90SMW4), and two samples of the Sherman granite (90SMW4; 90SMW9) (Table 3; Fig. 11). Inverted pigeonite occurs in the ferrodiorite and in 90SWM9; the latter sample also contains primary orthopyroxene that displays few augite lamellae. The orthopyroxene composition was obtained directly from the microprobe analyses. In contrast, compositions of highly exsolved pigeonite and augite were reconstructed using image analysis. Fig. 9. Open in new tabDownload slide Plot showing variation of normative Ab–An–Or in the Sherman batholith. It should be noted that the Lincoln granite lies along the cotectics for this system as determined by Nekvasil & Lindsley, (1990). Amphibole There are two types of amphibole in the Sherman granite. All rocks, apart from most of the Lincoln granites, contain hornblende. Fayalite-bearing Sherman granite also contains minor grunerite that has replaced fayalite. Hornblende contains 1.8 atoms p.f.u. of total Al in all rock types of the Sherman granite (Table 7). Samples that contain grunerite (and also fayalite) display hornblende compositions that extend to lower values of total Al and (Na + K). This probably reflects reaction of fayalite with feldspar to produce hornblende, and suggests that, like the grunerite, at least some hornblende in the fayalite-bearing Sherman granite samples formed under subsolidus conditions. Fig. 10. Open in new tabDownload slide Harker diagrams comparing the Sherman batholith with evolved rocks of the Laramie anorthosite complex for critical elements. Scoates et al., (1996) interpreted the LAC monzonitic rocks as differentiates of ferrodiorite. The high Ba and Zr in some monzodiorites and in some of the Sybille pluton is the result of accumulation of feldspar and zircon. The geochemical similarities of Sherman and LAC dioritic rocks extend to REE characteristics. The REE pattern of a Sherman ferrodiorite sample is similar to LAC ferrodiorites that Mitchell et al., (1996) suggested had accumulated plagioclase, and the REE pattern of an MgO-poor monzodiorite sample resembles REE patterns for more evolved diorites at Virginia Dale (Vasek & Kolker, 1999). Data from Anderson, (1995), Mitchell et al., (1996), Scoates et al., (1996) and this study. Table 5: Mineral assemblages of samples for which mineral chemistry was obtained Sample . Rock type . Q . Ksp . Plag . Bio . Hb . Aug . Pig . Ol . Ti . Flu . Zir . Ilm . Mag . 91SMW30 ferrodiorite O X L L X X X X 90SMW4 monzonite X O,M X L L X X X X 90SMW5 Sherman granite X O,M X L L X X X X X X 90SMW9 Sherman granite X O,M X L L X X X X X X 91SMW5 Sherman granite X M X X X X X X 90PH1 Sherman granite X M X X X X X X 90PH4 porphyritic granite X M X X X X X X 90SME2 porphyritic granite X O,M X X X X X 90SMW19 porphyritic granite X O,M X X X X X X 90SMW1 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X 91SMW12 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X X 91SMW26 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X Sample . Rock type . Q . Ksp . Plag . Bio . Hb . Aug . Pig . Ol . Ti . Flu . Zir . Ilm . Mag . 91SMW30 ferrodiorite O X L L X X X X 90SMW4 monzonite X O,M X L L X X X X 90SMW5 Sherman granite X O,M X L L X X X X X X 90SMW9 Sherman granite X O,M X L L X X X X X X 91SMW5 Sherman granite X M X X X X X X 90PH1 Sherman granite X M X X X X X X 90PH4 porphyritic granite X M X X X X X X 90SME2 porphyritic granite X O,M X X X X X 90SMW19 porphyritic granite X O,M X X X X X X 90SMW1 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X 91SMW12 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X X 91SMW26 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X Ksp, alkali feldspar; Plag, plagioclase; Bio, biotite; Hb, hornblende; Aug, augite; Pig, pigeonite; Ol, olivine; Ti, titanite; Flu, fluorite; Zir, zircon; Ilm, ilmenite; Mag, magnetite; O, orthoclase; M, microcline; L, late magmatic. Open in new tab Table 5: Mineral assemblages of samples for which mineral chemistry was obtained Sample . Rock type . Q . Ksp . Plag . Bio . Hb . Aug . Pig . Ol . Ti . Flu . Zir . Ilm . Mag . 91SMW30 ferrodiorite O X L L X X X X 90SMW4 monzonite X O,M X L L X X X X 90SMW5 Sherman granite X O,M X L L X X X X X X 90SMW9 Sherman granite X O,M X L L X X X X X X 91SMW5 Sherman granite X M X X X X X X 90PH1 Sherman granite X M X X X X X X 90PH4 porphyritic granite X M X X X X X X 90SME2 porphyritic granite X O,M X X X X X 90SMW19 porphyritic granite X O,M X X X X X X 90SMW1 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X 91SMW12 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X X 91SMW26 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X Sample . Rock type . Q . Ksp . Plag . Bio . Hb . Aug . Pig . Ol . Ti . Flu . Zir . Ilm . Mag . 91SMW30 ferrodiorite O X L L X X X X 90SMW4 monzonite X O,M X L L X X X X 90SMW5 Sherman granite X O,M X L L X X X X X X 90SMW9 Sherman granite X O,M X L L X X X X X X 91SMW5 Sherman granite X M X X X X X X 90PH1 Sherman granite X M X X X X X X 90PH4 porphyritic granite X M X X X X X X 90SME2 porphyritic granite X O,M X X X X X 90SMW19 porphyritic granite X O,M X X X X X X 90SMW1 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X 91SMW12 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X X 91SMW26 Lincoln granite X M X X X X X Ksp, alkali feldspar; Plag, plagioclase; Bio, biotite; Hb, hornblende; Aug, augite; Pig, pigeonite; Ol, olivine; Ti, titanite; Flu, fluorite; Zir, zircon; Ilm, ilmenite; Mag, magnetite; O, orthoclase; M, microcline; L, late magmatic. Open in new tab Table 6: Representative pyroxene and olivine analyses from the Sherman batholith . Opx 90SMW9 Sherman . Pigeonite 90SMW9 Sherman . Pigeonite 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . Augite 90SMW4 monzonite . Augite 90SMW5 Sherman . Augite 90SMW9 Sherman . Augite 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . . Olivine 90SMW4 monzonite . Olivine 90SMW9 Sherman . SiO2 47.60 47.85 48.73 49.49 49.93 48.91 50.88 30.04 29.86 Al2O3 0.18 0.23 0.49 0.79 1.28 0.82 0.90 — — TiO2 0.11 0.07 0.13 0.20 0.23 0.19 0.19 — — FeO 42.82 40.61 35.38 27.68 24.51 24.64 19.80 67.02 65.79 MnO 1.41 1.28 0.86 0.77 0.63 0.70 0.48 2.34 1.56 MgO 5.91 5.75 8.86 3.44 4.73 5.42 7.87 0.78 2.19 CaO 1.54 3.70 5.48 17.55 18.34 18.49 19.50 0.03 0.02 Na2O 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.30 0.51 0.29 0.23 — — Total 99.61 99.57 100.03 100.24 100.17 99.45 99.85 100.22 99.43 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 6 oxygens for pyroxenes and 4 oxygens for olivine Si 1.995 1.995 1.975 1.997 1.988 1.971 1.989 1.007 1.001 Al 0.009 0.011 0.023 0.038 0.060 0.039 0.042 — — Ti 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.006 — — Fe 1.500 1.418 1.205 0.935 0.816 0.833 0.648 1.880 1.844 Mn 0.050 0.045 0.030 0.026 0.021 0.024 0.016 0.067 0.044 Mg 0.369 0.358 0.536 0.207 0.281 0.326 0.459 0.039 0.110 Ca 0.069 0.164 0.232 0.758 0.782 0.795 0.816 0.001 0.001 Na 0.002 0.006 0.006 0.024 0.040 0.022 0.018 — — Wo 0.036 0.085 0.118 0.399 0.416 0.407 0.424 Fa 0.947 0.923 En 0.190 0.184 0.272 0.109 0.149 0.167 0.238 Tp 0.034 0.022 Fs 0.774 0.731 0.111 0.492 0.434 0.426 0.337 Fo 0.020 0.055 XFe 0.803 0.799 0.692 0.819 0.744 0.719 0.586 XFe 0.980 0.944 . Opx 90SMW9 Sherman . Pigeonite 90SMW9 Sherman . Pigeonite 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . Augite 90SMW4 monzonite . Augite 90SMW5 Sherman . Augite 90SMW9 Sherman . Augite 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . . Olivine 90SMW4 monzonite . Olivine 90SMW9 Sherman . SiO2 47.60 47.85 48.73 49.49 49.93 48.91 50.88 30.04 29.86 Al2O3 0.18 0.23 0.49 0.79 1.28 0.82 0.90 — — TiO2 0.11 0.07 0.13 0.20 0.23 0.19 0.19 — — FeO 42.82 40.61 35.38 27.68 24.51 24.64 19.80 67.02 65.79 MnO 1.41 1.28 0.86 0.77 0.63 0.70 0.48 2.34 1.56 MgO 5.91 5.75 8.86 3.44 4.73 5.42 7.87 0.78 2.19 CaO 1.54 3.70 5.48 17.55 18.34 18.49 19.50 0.03 0.02 Na2O 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.30 0.51 0.29 0.23 — — Total 99.61 99.57 100.03 100.24 100.17 99.45 99.85 100.22 99.43 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 6 oxygens for pyroxenes and 4 oxygens for olivine Si 1.995 1.995 1.975 1.997 1.988 1.971 1.989 1.007 1.001 Al 0.009 0.011 0.023 0.038 0.060 0.039 0.042 — — Ti 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.006 — — Fe 1.500 1.418 1.205 0.935 0.816 0.833 0.648 1.880 1.844 Mn 0.050 0.045 0.030 0.026 0.021 0.024 0.016 0.067 0.044 Mg 0.369 0.358 0.536 0.207 0.281 0.326 0.459 0.039 0.110 Ca 0.069 0.164 0.232 0.758 0.782 0.795 0.816 0.001 0.001 Na 0.002 0.006 0.006 0.024 0.040 0.022 0.018 — — Wo 0.036 0.085 0.118 0.399 0.416 0.407 0.424 Fa 0.947 0.923 En 0.190 0.184 0.272 0.109 0.149 0.167 0.238 Tp 0.034 0.022 Fs 0.774 0.731 0.111 0.492 0.434 0.426 0.337 Fo 0.020 0.055 XFe 0.803 0.799 0.692 0.819 0.744 0.719 0.586 XFe 0.980 0.944 Open in new tab Table 6: Representative pyroxene and olivine analyses from the Sherman batholith . Opx 90SMW9 Sherman . Pigeonite 90SMW9 Sherman . Pigeonite 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . Augite 90SMW4 monzonite . Augite 90SMW5 Sherman . Augite 90SMW9 Sherman . Augite 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . . Olivine 90SMW4 monzonite . Olivine 90SMW9 Sherman . SiO2 47.60 47.85 48.73 49.49 49.93 48.91 50.88 30.04 29.86 Al2O3 0.18 0.23 0.49 0.79 1.28 0.82 0.90 — — TiO2 0.11 0.07 0.13 0.20 0.23 0.19 0.19 — — FeO 42.82 40.61 35.38 27.68 24.51 24.64 19.80 67.02 65.79 MnO 1.41 1.28 0.86 0.77 0.63 0.70 0.48 2.34 1.56 MgO 5.91 5.75 8.86 3.44 4.73 5.42 7.87 0.78 2.19 CaO 1.54 3.70 5.48 17.55 18.34 18.49 19.50 0.03 0.02 Na2O 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.30 0.51 0.29 0.23 — — Total 99.61 99.57 100.03 100.24 100.17 99.45 99.85 100.22 99.43 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 6 oxygens for pyroxenes and 4 oxygens for olivine Si 1.995 1.995 1.975 1.997 1.988 1.971 1.989 1.007 1.001 Al 0.009 0.011 0.023 0.038 0.060 0.039 0.042 — — Ti 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.006 — — Fe 1.500 1.418 1.205 0.935 0.816 0.833 0.648 1.880 1.844 Mn 0.050 0.045 0.030 0.026 0.021 0.024 0.016 0.067 0.044 Mg 0.369 0.358 0.536 0.207 0.281 0.326 0.459 0.039 0.110 Ca 0.069 0.164 0.232 0.758 0.782 0.795 0.816 0.001 0.001 Na 0.002 0.006 0.006 0.024 0.040 0.022 0.018 — — Wo 0.036 0.085 0.118 0.399 0.416 0.407 0.424 Fa 0.947 0.923 En 0.190 0.184 0.272 0.109 0.149 0.167 0.238 Tp 0.034 0.022 Fs 0.774 0.731 0.111 0.492 0.434 0.426 0.337 Fo 0.020 0.055 XFe 0.803 0.799 0.692 0.819 0.744 0.719 0.586 XFe 0.980 0.944 . Opx 90SMW9 Sherman . Pigeonite 90SMW9 Sherman . Pigeonite 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . Augite 90SMW4 monzonite . Augite 90SMW5 Sherman . Augite 90SMW9 Sherman . Augite 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . . Olivine 90SMW4 monzonite . Olivine 90SMW9 Sherman . SiO2 47.60 47.85 48.73 49.49 49.93 48.91 50.88 30.04 29.86 Al2O3 0.18 0.23 0.49 0.79 1.28 0.82 0.90 — — TiO2 0.11 0.07 0.13 0.20 0.23 0.19 0.19 — — FeO 42.82 40.61 35.38 27.68 24.51 24.64 19.80 67.02 65.79 MnO 1.41 1.28 0.86 0.77 0.63 0.70 0.48 2.34 1.56 MgO 5.91 5.75 8.86 3.44 4.73 5.42 7.87 0.78 2.19 CaO 1.54 3.70 5.48 17.55 18.34 18.49 19.50 0.03 0.02 Na2O 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.30 0.51 0.29 0.23 — — Total 99.61 99.57 100.03 100.24 100.17 99.45 99.85 100.22 99.43 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 6 oxygens for pyroxenes and 4 oxygens for olivine Si 1.995 1.995 1.975 1.997 1.988 1.971 1.989 1.007 1.001 Al 0.009 0.011 0.023 0.038 0.060 0.039 0.042 — — Ti 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.006 — — Fe 1.500 1.418 1.205 0.935 0.816 0.833 0.648 1.880 1.844 Mn 0.050 0.045 0.030 0.026 0.021 0.024 0.016 0.067 0.044 Mg 0.369 0.358 0.536 0.207 0.281 0.326 0.459 0.039 0.110 Ca 0.069 0.164 0.232 0.758 0.782 0.795 0.816 0.001 0.001 Na 0.002 0.006 0.006 0.024 0.040 0.022 0.018 — — Wo 0.036 0.085 0.118 0.399 0.416 0.407 0.424 Fa 0.947 0.923 En 0.190 0.184 0.272 0.109 0.149 0.167 0.238 Tp 0.034 0.022 Fs 0.774 0.731 0.111 0.492 0.434 0.426 0.337 Fo 0.020 0.055 XFe 0.803 0.799 0.692 0.819 0.744 0.719 0.586 XFe 0.980 0.944 Open in new tab Application of the Al-in-hornblende barometer (Anderson & Smith, 1995) to samples with the limiting assemblage yields 1.8 kbar at 850°C. Because the temperature uncertainty is ±50°C, the uncertainty in the pressure estimate is ±1.8 kbar. Although the hornblende composition does not constrain pressure, its composition resembles that of hornblendes that have crystallized from high temperature, and low-pressure magmas (see Anderson & Smith, 1995). Biotite Biotite from the Sherman batholith shows textures indicating both primary and secondary formation. The Ti contents of both generations of biotite are identical, suggesting that formation of biotite from olivine and ilmenite was a late-stage magmatic reaction. Both are rich in iron (XFe = 0.75–0.90; Table 8; Fig. 12). The iron contents of biotite correlate with the FeOt/(FeOt + MgO) ratio of whole rocks: the most iron-rich biotite is from the fayalite monzonite, whereas the most magnesian biotite is from porphyritic granite. The Al content of biotite also reflects the whole-rock composition. Biotite with low Al contents comes from the low-SiO2 Sherman granite samples that contain pigeonite and fayalite, and hence are saturated in annite by the equilibrium. 3 Fe2SiO4+ 2 KAlSi3O8+ H2O =  fayalite  kspar      fluid2 KFe3AlSi3O10(OH)2+3 SiO2. biotite     quartz The most aluminous biotite comes from the Lincoln and porphyritic granites, both of which show higher Al/(Ca + Na + K) than the Sherman granite. Fig. 11. Open in new tabDownload slide Pyroxene quadrilateral showing the compositions of pyroxenes and olivine from the Sherman batholith. Table 7: Representative hornblende analyses from Sherman batholith . 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90SMW5 Sherman . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 91SMW5 Sherman . 90PH4 porphyritic . . SiO2 41.15 40.96 40.53 41.13 40.46 40.71 40.90 Al2O3 10.65 9.07 9.06 8.97 9.89 9.51 9.43 TiO2 1.72 1.11 2.21 2.05 1.35 2.17 1.58 FeO 25.57 31.42 28.70 27.73 28.67 27.93 26.29 MnO 0.21 0.57 0.29 0.36 0.66 0.65 0.74 MgO 5.59 2.45 3.55 4.07 3.06 3.24 4.31 CaO 10.98 10.54 10.68 10.50 11.10 11.59 11.32 Na2O 1.20 1.44 1.87 1.80 1.42 1.70 1.33 K2O 1.46 1.13 1.29 1.18 1.55 1.16 1.36 H2O 1.81 1.76 1.58 1.61 1.65 1.62 1.72 F 0.01 0.02 0.44 0.42 0.34 0.32 0.27 Cl 0.41 0.39 0.35 0.31 0.24 0.46 0.13 F,Cl=O −0.10 −0.10 −0.26 −0.25 −0.20 −0.24 −0.14 Total 100.68 100.77 100.28 99.87 100.19 100.81 99.24 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 23 oxygens Si 6.418 6.566 6.473 6.547 6.472 6.456 6.525 Al 1.958 1.715 1.705 1.682 1.865 1.778 1.773 AlIV 1.582 1.434 1.527 1.453 1.528 1.545 1.475 AlVI 0.375 0.281 0.178 0.229 0.337 0.233 0.298 Ti 0.202 0.134 0.266 0.245 0.162 0.259 0.190 Fe 3.335 4.213 3.833 3.691 3.835 3.704 3.506 Mn 0.027 0.078 0.039 0.049 0.089 0.088 0.100 Mg 1.300 0.586 0.844 0.965 0.729 0.766 1.025 Ca 1.835 1.810 1.827 1.790 1.903 1.969 1.935 Na 0.363 0.449 0.580 0.556 0.439 0.524 0.411 K 0.291 0.232 0.263 0.240 0.316 0.235 0.278 H 1.885 1.882 1.683 1.706 1.765 1.717 1.830 F 0.007 0.012 0.221 0.211 0.170 0.160 0.135 Cl 0.109 0.106 0.096 0.083 0.064 0.123 0.034 XFe 0.720 0.878 0.820 0.793 0.840 0.829 0.774 . 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90SMW5 Sherman . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 91SMW5 Sherman . 90PH4 porphyritic . . SiO2 41.15 40.96 40.53 41.13 40.46 40.71 40.90 Al2O3 10.65 9.07 9.06 8.97 9.89 9.51 9.43 TiO2 1.72 1.11 2.21 2.05 1.35 2.17 1.58 FeO 25.57 31.42 28.70 27.73 28.67 27.93 26.29 MnO 0.21 0.57 0.29 0.36 0.66 0.65 0.74 MgO 5.59 2.45 3.55 4.07 3.06 3.24 4.31 CaO 10.98 10.54 10.68 10.50 11.10 11.59 11.32 Na2O 1.20 1.44 1.87 1.80 1.42 1.70 1.33 K2O 1.46 1.13 1.29 1.18 1.55 1.16 1.36 H2O 1.81 1.76 1.58 1.61 1.65 1.62 1.72 F 0.01 0.02 0.44 0.42 0.34 0.32 0.27 Cl 0.41 0.39 0.35 0.31 0.24 0.46 0.13 F,Cl=O −0.10 −0.10 −0.26 −0.25 −0.20 −0.24 −0.14 Total 100.68 100.77 100.28 99.87 100.19 100.81 99.24 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 23 oxygens Si 6.418 6.566 6.473 6.547 6.472 6.456 6.525 Al 1.958 1.715 1.705 1.682 1.865 1.778 1.773 AlIV 1.582 1.434 1.527 1.453 1.528 1.545 1.475 AlVI 0.375 0.281 0.178 0.229 0.337 0.233 0.298 Ti 0.202 0.134 0.266 0.245 0.162 0.259 0.190 Fe 3.335 4.213 3.833 3.691 3.835 3.704 3.506 Mn 0.027 0.078 0.039 0.049 0.089 0.088 0.100 Mg 1.300 0.586 0.844 0.965 0.729 0.766 1.025 Ca 1.835 1.810 1.827 1.790 1.903 1.969 1.935 Na 0.363 0.449 0.580 0.556 0.439 0.524 0.411 K 0.291 0.232 0.263 0.240 0.316 0.235 0.278 H 1.885 1.882 1.683 1.706 1.765 1.717 1.830 F 0.007 0.012 0.221 0.211 0.170 0.160 0.135 Cl 0.109 0.106 0.096 0.083 0.064 0.123 0.034 XFe 0.720 0.878 0.820 0.793 0.840 0.829 0.774 Open in new tab Table 7: Representative hornblende analyses from Sherman batholith . 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90SMW5 Sherman . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 91SMW5 Sherman . 90PH4 porphyritic . . SiO2 41.15 40.96 40.53 41.13 40.46 40.71 40.90 Al2O3 10.65 9.07 9.06 8.97 9.89 9.51 9.43 TiO2 1.72 1.11 2.21 2.05 1.35 2.17 1.58 FeO 25.57 31.42 28.70 27.73 28.67 27.93 26.29 MnO 0.21 0.57 0.29 0.36 0.66 0.65 0.74 MgO 5.59 2.45 3.55 4.07 3.06 3.24 4.31 CaO 10.98 10.54 10.68 10.50 11.10 11.59 11.32 Na2O 1.20 1.44 1.87 1.80 1.42 1.70 1.33 K2O 1.46 1.13 1.29 1.18 1.55 1.16 1.36 H2O 1.81 1.76 1.58 1.61 1.65 1.62 1.72 F 0.01 0.02 0.44 0.42 0.34 0.32 0.27 Cl 0.41 0.39 0.35 0.31 0.24 0.46 0.13 F,Cl=O −0.10 −0.10 −0.26 −0.25 −0.20 −0.24 −0.14 Total 100.68 100.77 100.28 99.87 100.19 100.81 99.24 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 23 oxygens Si 6.418 6.566 6.473 6.547 6.472 6.456 6.525 Al 1.958 1.715 1.705 1.682 1.865 1.778 1.773 AlIV 1.582 1.434 1.527 1.453 1.528 1.545 1.475 AlVI 0.375 0.281 0.178 0.229 0.337 0.233 0.298 Ti 0.202 0.134 0.266 0.245 0.162 0.259 0.190 Fe 3.335 4.213 3.833 3.691 3.835 3.704 3.506 Mn 0.027 0.078 0.039 0.049 0.089 0.088 0.100 Mg 1.300 0.586 0.844 0.965 0.729 0.766 1.025 Ca 1.835 1.810 1.827 1.790 1.903 1.969 1.935 Na 0.363 0.449 0.580 0.556 0.439 0.524 0.411 K 0.291 0.232 0.263 0.240 0.316 0.235 0.278 H 1.885 1.882 1.683 1.706 1.765 1.717 1.830 F 0.007 0.012 0.221 0.211 0.170 0.160 0.135 Cl 0.109 0.106 0.096 0.083 0.064 0.123 0.034 XFe 0.720 0.878 0.820 0.793 0.840 0.829 0.774 . 90SMW30 ferrodiorite . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90SMW5 Sherman . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 91SMW5 Sherman . 90PH4 porphyritic . . SiO2 41.15 40.96 40.53 41.13 40.46 40.71 40.90 Al2O3 10.65 9.07 9.06 8.97 9.89 9.51 9.43 TiO2 1.72 1.11 2.21 2.05 1.35 2.17 1.58 FeO 25.57 31.42 28.70 27.73 28.67 27.93 26.29 MnO 0.21 0.57 0.29 0.36 0.66 0.65 0.74 MgO 5.59 2.45 3.55 4.07 3.06 3.24 4.31 CaO 10.98 10.54 10.68 10.50 11.10 11.59 11.32 Na2O 1.20 1.44 1.87 1.80 1.42 1.70 1.33 K2O 1.46 1.13 1.29 1.18 1.55 1.16 1.36 H2O 1.81 1.76 1.58 1.61 1.65 1.62 1.72 F 0.01 0.02 0.44 0.42 0.34 0.32 0.27 Cl 0.41 0.39 0.35 0.31 0.24 0.46 0.13 F,Cl=O −0.10 −0.10 −0.26 −0.25 −0.20 −0.24 −0.14 Total 100.68 100.77 100.28 99.87 100.19 100.81 99.24 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 23 oxygens Si 6.418 6.566 6.473 6.547 6.472 6.456 6.525 Al 1.958 1.715 1.705 1.682 1.865 1.778 1.773 AlIV 1.582 1.434 1.527 1.453 1.528 1.545 1.475 AlVI 0.375 0.281 0.178 0.229 0.337 0.233 0.298 Ti 0.202 0.134 0.266 0.245 0.162 0.259 0.190 Fe 3.335 4.213 3.833 3.691 3.835 3.704 3.506 Mn 0.027 0.078 0.039 0.049 0.089 0.088 0.100 Mg 1.300 0.586 0.844 0.965 0.729 0.766 1.025 Ca 1.835 1.810 1.827 1.790 1.903 1.969 1.935 Na 0.363 0.449 0.580 0.556 0.439 0.524 0.411 K 0.291 0.232 0.263 0.240 0.316 0.235 0.278 H 1.885 1.882 1.683 1.706 1.765 1.717 1.830 F 0.007 0.012 0.221 0.211 0.170 0.160 0.135 Cl 0.109 0.106 0.096 0.083 0.064 0.123 0.034 XFe 0.720 0.878 0.820 0.793 0.840 0.829 0.774 Open in new tab Table 8: Representative biotite analyses from the Sherman batholith . 90SMW5 Sherman . 90SMW1 Lincoln . 91SMW5 Sherman . 90PH1 Sherman . 91SMW12 Lincoln . 90PH4 porphyritic . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SME2 porphyritic . 91SMW26 Lincoln . SiO2 34.05 35.18 34.78 34.91 34.89 35.72 35.47 34.00 35.00 35.53 34.83 Al2O3 13.10 15.07 13.55 13.30 13.70 13.95 13.46 13.26 13.73 14.37 14.42 TiO2 3.80 3.56 3.06 3.42 2.75 3.25 2.85 3.61 3.24 2.39 3.33 FeO 32.85 27.10 31.45 31.54 30.61 27.44 29.65 33.95 30.09 28.18 30.88 MnO 0.15 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.39 0.12 0.38 0.45 0.49 MgO 2.38 4.40 2.99 2.86 4.23 5.35 4.54 2.15 3.82 4.97 2.53 K2O 8.66 9.34 8.95 9.08 8.94 8.98 9.17 8.69 9.02 9.18 9.01 Na2O 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.04 H2O 3.59 3.57 3.53 3.41 3.64 3.60 3.24 3.59 3.23 3.27 3.55 Cl 0.19 0.14 0.24 0.23 0.07 0.06 0.23 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.29 F 0.00 0.14 0.18 0.46 0.12 0.32 0.91 0.08 0.30 0.41 0.17 O=F,Cl −0.04 −0.09 −0.13 −0.25 −0.07 −0.15 −0.44 −0.06 −0.17 −0.21 −0.14 Total 98.77 98.85 99.05 99.47 99.36 99.01 99.52 99.54 98.86 98.77 99.40 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 24 oxygens Si 5.604 5.611 5.669 5.675 5.638 5.692 5.703 5.576 5.660 5.692 5.635 Al 2.541 2.832 2.604 2.548 2.610 2.619 2.552 2.563 2.513 2.713 2.751 AlIV 2.396 2.389 2.331 2.325 2.362 2.308 2.297 2.424 2.340 2.308 2.365 AlVI 0.145 0.444 0.273 0.223 0.248 0.311 0.255 0.139 0.173 0.405 0.386 Ti 0.471 0.428 0.375 0.418 0.334 0.389 0.345 0.445 0.404 0.288 0.405 Fe 4.521 3.615 4.287 4.287 4.137 3.657 3.987 4.657 4.161 3.776 4.179 Mn 0.020 0.052 0.056 0.060 0.058 0.060 0.053 0.016 0.020 0.060 0.067 Mg 0.584 1.047 0.727 0.694 1.019 1.271 1.088 0.527 1.024 1.187 0.609 K 1.818 1.900 1.861 1.883 1.843 1.826 3.882 1.819 1.788 1.876 1.860 Na 0.012 0.019 0.010 0.018 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.008 0.009 0.022 0.013 H 3.948 3.894 3.842 3.699 3.919 3.822 3.474 3.924 3.538 3.744 3.833 Cl 0.053 0.037 0.066 0.064 0.019 0.017 0.062 0.036 0.057 0.048 0.079 F 0.000 0.069 0.092 0.237 0.062 0.161 0.464 0.040 0.405 0.209 0.088 XFe 0.886 0.775 0.855 0.861 0.802 0.742 0.786 0.898 0.803 0.761 0.873 . 90SMW5 Sherman . 90SMW1 Lincoln . 91SMW5 Sherman . 90PH1 Sherman . 91SMW12 Lincoln . 90PH4 porphyritic . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SME2 porphyritic . 91SMW26 Lincoln . SiO2 34.05 35.18 34.78 34.91 34.89 35.72 35.47 34.00 35.00 35.53 34.83 Al2O3 13.10 15.07 13.55 13.30 13.70 13.95 13.46 13.26 13.73 14.37 14.42 TiO2 3.80 3.56 3.06 3.42 2.75 3.25 2.85 3.61 3.24 2.39 3.33 FeO 32.85 27.10 31.45 31.54 30.61 27.44 29.65 33.95 30.09 28.18 30.88 MnO 0.15 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.39 0.12 0.38 0.45 0.49 MgO 2.38 4.40 2.99 2.86 4.23 5.35 4.54 2.15 3.82 4.97 2.53 K2O 8.66 9.34 8.95 9.08 8.94 8.98 9.17 8.69 9.02 9.18 9.01 Na2O 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.04 H2O 3.59 3.57 3.53 3.41 3.64 3.60 3.24 3.59 3.23 3.27 3.55 Cl 0.19 0.14 0.24 0.23 0.07 0.06 0.23 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.29 F 0.00 0.14 0.18 0.46 0.12 0.32 0.91 0.08 0.30 0.41 0.17 O=F,Cl −0.04 −0.09 −0.13 −0.25 −0.07 −0.15 −0.44 −0.06 −0.17 −0.21 −0.14 Total 98.77 98.85 99.05 99.47 99.36 99.01 99.52 99.54 98.86 98.77 99.40 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 24 oxygens Si 5.604 5.611 5.669 5.675 5.638 5.692 5.703 5.576 5.660 5.692 5.635 Al 2.541 2.832 2.604 2.548 2.610 2.619 2.552 2.563 2.513 2.713 2.751 AlIV 2.396 2.389 2.331 2.325 2.362 2.308 2.297 2.424 2.340 2.308 2.365 AlVI 0.145 0.444 0.273 0.223 0.248 0.311 0.255 0.139 0.173 0.405 0.386 Ti 0.471 0.428 0.375 0.418 0.334 0.389 0.345 0.445 0.404 0.288 0.405 Fe 4.521 3.615 4.287 4.287 4.137 3.657 3.987 4.657 4.161 3.776 4.179 Mn 0.020 0.052 0.056 0.060 0.058 0.060 0.053 0.016 0.020 0.060 0.067 Mg 0.584 1.047 0.727 0.694 1.019 1.271 1.088 0.527 1.024 1.187 0.609 K 1.818 1.900 1.861 1.883 1.843 1.826 3.882 1.819 1.788 1.876 1.860 Na 0.012 0.019 0.010 0.018 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.008 0.009 0.022 0.013 H 3.948 3.894 3.842 3.699 3.919 3.822 3.474 3.924 3.538 3.744 3.833 Cl 0.053 0.037 0.066 0.064 0.019 0.017 0.062 0.036 0.057 0.048 0.079 F 0.000 0.069 0.092 0.237 0.062 0.161 0.464 0.040 0.405 0.209 0.088 XFe 0.886 0.775 0.855 0.861 0.802 0.742 0.786 0.898 0.803 0.761 0.873 Open in new tab Table 8: Representative biotite analyses from the Sherman batholith . 90SMW5 Sherman . 90SMW1 Lincoln . 91SMW5 Sherman . 90PH1 Sherman . 91SMW12 Lincoln . 90PH4 porphyritic . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SME2 porphyritic . 91SMW26 Lincoln . SiO2 34.05 35.18 34.78 34.91 34.89 35.72 35.47 34.00 35.00 35.53 34.83 Al2O3 13.10 15.07 13.55 13.30 13.70 13.95 13.46 13.26 13.73 14.37 14.42 TiO2 3.80 3.56 3.06 3.42 2.75 3.25 2.85 3.61 3.24 2.39 3.33 FeO 32.85 27.10 31.45 31.54 30.61 27.44 29.65 33.95 30.09 28.18 30.88 MnO 0.15 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.39 0.12 0.38 0.45 0.49 MgO 2.38 4.40 2.99 2.86 4.23 5.35 4.54 2.15 3.82 4.97 2.53 K2O 8.66 9.34 8.95 9.08 8.94 8.98 9.17 8.69 9.02 9.18 9.01 Na2O 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.04 H2O 3.59 3.57 3.53 3.41 3.64 3.60 3.24 3.59 3.23 3.27 3.55 Cl 0.19 0.14 0.24 0.23 0.07 0.06 0.23 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.29 F 0.00 0.14 0.18 0.46 0.12 0.32 0.91 0.08 0.30 0.41 0.17 O=F,Cl −0.04 −0.09 −0.13 −0.25 −0.07 −0.15 −0.44 −0.06 −0.17 −0.21 −0.14 Total 98.77 98.85 99.05 99.47 99.36 99.01 99.52 99.54 98.86 98.77 99.40 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 24 oxygens Si 5.604 5.611 5.669 5.675 5.638 5.692 5.703 5.576 5.660 5.692 5.635 Al 2.541 2.832 2.604 2.548 2.610 2.619 2.552 2.563 2.513 2.713 2.751 AlIV 2.396 2.389 2.331 2.325 2.362 2.308 2.297 2.424 2.340 2.308 2.365 AlVI 0.145 0.444 0.273 0.223 0.248 0.311 0.255 0.139 0.173 0.405 0.386 Ti 0.471 0.428 0.375 0.418 0.334 0.389 0.345 0.445 0.404 0.288 0.405 Fe 4.521 3.615 4.287 4.287 4.137 3.657 3.987 4.657 4.161 3.776 4.179 Mn 0.020 0.052 0.056 0.060 0.058 0.060 0.053 0.016 0.020 0.060 0.067 Mg 0.584 1.047 0.727 0.694 1.019 1.271 1.088 0.527 1.024 1.187 0.609 K 1.818 1.900 1.861 1.883 1.843 1.826 3.882 1.819 1.788 1.876 1.860 Na 0.012 0.019 0.010 0.018 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.008 0.009 0.022 0.013 H 3.948 3.894 3.842 3.699 3.919 3.822 3.474 3.924 3.538 3.744 3.833 Cl 0.053 0.037 0.066 0.064 0.019 0.017 0.062 0.036 0.057 0.048 0.079 F 0.000 0.069 0.092 0.237 0.062 0.161 0.464 0.040 0.405 0.209 0.088 XFe 0.886 0.775 0.855 0.861 0.802 0.742 0.786 0.898 0.803 0.761 0.873 . 90SMW5 Sherman . 90SMW1 Lincoln . 91SMW5 Sherman . 90PH1 Sherman . 91SMW12 Lincoln . 90PH4 porphyritic . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SME2 porphyritic . 91SMW26 Lincoln . SiO2 34.05 35.18 34.78 34.91 34.89 35.72 35.47 34.00 35.00 35.53 34.83 Al2O3 13.10 15.07 13.55 13.30 13.70 13.95 13.46 13.26 13.73 14.37 14.42 TiO2 3.80 3.56 3.06 3.42 2.75 3.25 2.85 3.61 3.24 2.39 3.33 FeO 32.85 27.10 31.45 31.54 30.61 27.44 29.65 33.95 30.09 28.18 30.88 MnO 0.15 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.39 0.12 0.38 0.45 0.49 MgO 2.38 4.40 2.99 2.86 4.23 5.35 4.54 2.15 3.82 4.97 2.53 K2O 8.66 9.34 8.95 9.08 8.94 8.98 9.17 8.69 9.02 9.18 9.01 Na2O 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.04 H2O 3.59 3.57 3.53 3.41 3.64 3.60 3.24 3.59 3.23 3.27 3.55 Cl 0.19 0.14 0.24 0.23 0.07 0.06 0.23 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.29 F 0.00 0.14 0.18 0.46 0.12 0.32 0.91 0.08 0.30 0.41 0.17 O=F,Cl −0.04 −0.09 −0.13 −0.25 −0.07 −0.15 −0.44 −0.06 −0.17 −0.21 −0.14 Total 98.77 98.85 99.05 99.47 99.36 99.01 99.52 99.54 98.86 98.77 99.40 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 24 oxygens Si 5.604 5.611 5.669 5.675 5.638 5.692 5.703 5.576 5.660 5.692 5.635 Al 2.541 2.832 2.604 2.548 2.610 2.619 2.552 2.563 2.513 2.713 2.751 AlIV 2.396 2.389 2.331 2.325 2.362 2.308 2.297 2.424 2.340 2.308 2.365 AlVI 0.145 0.444 0.273 0.223 0.248 0.311 0.255 0.139 0.173 0.405 0.386 Ti 0.471 0.428 0.375 0.418 0.334 0.389 0.345 0.445 0.404 0.288 0.405 Fe 4.521 3.615 4.287 4.287 4.137 3.657 3.987 4.657 4.161 3.776 4.179 Mn 0.020 0.052 0.056 0.060 0.058 0.060 0.053 0.016 0.020 0.060 0.067 Mg 0.584 1.047 0.727 0.694 1.019 1.271 1.088 0.527 1.024 1.187 0.609 K 1.818 1.900 1.861 1.883 1.843 1.826 3.882 1.819 1.788 1.876 1.860 Na 0.012 0.019 0.010 0.018 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.008 0.009 0.022 0.013 H 3.948 3.894 3.842 3.699 3.919 3.822 3.474 3.924 3.538 3.744 3.833 Cl 0.053 0.037 0.066 0.064 0.019 0.017 0.062 0.036 0.057 0.048 0.079 F 0.000 0.069 0.092 0.237 0.062 0.161 0.464 0.040 0.405 0.209 0.088 XFe 0.886 0.775 0.855 0.861 0.802 0.742 0.786 0.898 0.803 0.761 0.873 Open in new tab Biotite compositions from Sherman batholith samples lie on the iron-rich end of a trend of biotite compositions from 1.4 Ga granites in the SW USA (Anderson & Bender, 1989; Fig. 12), although they are less iron rich than biotite from the 1.1 Ga Pikes Peak batholith. This indicates that the Sherman batholith is both the most iron rich and the most reduced of the 1.4 Ga anorogenic granite batholiths in the SW USA. Fe–Ti oxide minerals Back-scattered electron images show that most ilmenite grains are altered to a cryptocrystalline mixture of phases, probably magnetite and rutile. Only a few grains preserve the oxygen to cation ratio typical of ilmenite. These had hematite contents of 0.04–0.06 (Table 9), values typical of ilmenite from fayalite granites (Frost et al., 1988). Mn contents of ilmenite from the Sherman granite range from <1 wt % to >16%; much of this range may be displayed within a single sample. Because olivine in these rocks is not rich in MnO, the Mn contents of ilmenite probably result from the oxidation of ilmenite to magnetite + rutile, in which Mn released by this reaction was sequestered in residual ilmenite. Magnetite shows typical oxyexsolution lamellae ofilmenite, as well as low-temperature oxidation (probably to maghemite). Using the ilmenite composition in the rock, assuming the magnetite was stoichiometric magnetite, and taking into account the abundance of the ilmenite lamella in magnetite, the primary titanomagnetite composition from sample 90SMW9 was calculated to be Usp45. Despite uncertainties in this calculation, this composition is consistent with the silicate assemblage of the rock. Usp45 titanomagnetite, fayalite and quartz equilibrated at ∼800°C, consistent with the other thermometers applied to this sample. Fig. 12. Open in new tabDownload slide Plot comparing the composition of biotite from the Sherman batholith with biotite from other Mid-Proterozoic A-type granites in southwestern USA. Data from Barker et al., (1975) and Anderson & Bender, (1989). Intensive Factors Pressure The assemblage olivine–pigeonite–augite–quartz present in sample 90SMW9 (Table 5) is both a geothermometer, because temperature can be determined from the pyroxene solvus or from the low-T limit of pigeonite, and a geobarometer, because the iron contents of ferromagnesian silicates increase with pressure. The olivine and pyroxene in 90SMW9 (Table 6) equilibrated at 624 ± 15°C and 3130 ± 720 bar, as determined from the QUILF program (Andersen et al., 1993). This temperature reflects subsolidus re-equilibration. The uncertainties given from the QUILF expression are the calculated precision of the various equilibria involved. Where only a single equilibrium is used there is no uncertainty given. The accuracy of the thermometer is probably ±30°C or less. In these samples, mineral compositions changed in four ways during cooling: (1) by exchange of Ca and (Fe + Mg) between augite and pigeonite; (2) by inversion of pigeonite to orthopyroxene; (3) by redistribution of Fe and Mg among olivine, orthopyroxene and augite, which probably continued after Ca ceased to exchange between pyroxenes; (4) during late hydration reactions by which hornblende, biotite, and grunerite were produced. By analyzing the effect of exchange or hydration reactions on the XFe of minerals in a given rock, one can qualitatively estimate the changes in mineral compositions as the rock cools. Fe–Mg exchange should cause the phases with high XFe to become progressively richer in iron, and those with low XFe to become more magnesian because Fe–Mg distribution is more extreme at lower temperatures. As a hydration reaction progresses, the parent will be enriched in Fe if it has a higher XFe than the hydrated product; it will be enriched in Mg if it has a lower XFe (see Thompson, 1976). In order of decreasing XFe, the minerals in 90SMW9 are: fayalite > orthopyroxene > biotite > hornblende > grunerite > augite (if a melt were present, it would have XFe > fayalite). During cooling, ion exchange reactions will make olivine and orthopyroxene richer in Fe, as augite and hornblende become richer in Mg. Hydration of olivine to grunerite and orthopyroxene to biotite will enrich the remaining olivine and orthopyroxene in iron. Because the weighted XFe of Opx + Cpx resembles that of hornblende, hydration of pyroxenes to hornblende only slightly changes XFe of the minerals. Table 9: Representative ilmenite analyses from the Sherman batholith . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90PH1 Sherman . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 90SMW1 Lincoln . Ti 30.10 29.73 30.46 30.31 30.61 Al 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 Cr 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0 Fe 37.57 29.09 36.99 22.39 33.08 Mn 0.87 8.43 1.12 16.03 4.50 Zn 0.03 1.80 0.01 0.47 0.11 Mg 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 O 31.71 31.75 31.79 31.97 31.71 Total 100.35 100.85 100.46 101.29 100.04 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 3 oxygens Ti 0.951 0.938 0.960 0.950 0.968 Al 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 Cr 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Fe 1.018 0.787 1.000 0.602 0.897 Fe3± 0.100 0.118 0.088 0.086 0.074 Fe2± 0.918 0.669 0.912 0.516 0.823 Mn 0.024 0.232 0.031 0.438 0.124 Zn 0.001 0.042 0.000 0.011 0.002 Mg 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.004 0.000 O 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 Sum cations 1.998 2.002 1.995 2.006 1.994 MnTiO3 0.024 0.232 0.031 0.438 0.124 ZnTiO3 0.001 0.042 0.000 0.011 0.002 FeTiO3 0.918 0.669 0.912 0.516 0.823 Fe2O3 0.050 0.059 0.044 0.043 0.037 Al2O3 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 TiO2 0.009 −0.005 0.017 −0.015 0.018 Sum oxides 1.002 0.998 1.005 0.994 1.006 . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90PH1 Sherman . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 90SMW1 Lincoln . Ti 30.10 29.73 30.46 30.31 30.61 Al 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 Cr 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0 Fe 37.57 29.09 36.99 22.39 33.08 Mn 0.87 8.43 1.12 16.03 4.50 Zn 0.03 1.80 0.01 0.47 0.11 Mg 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 O 31.71 31.75 31.79 31.97 31.71 Total 100.35 100.85 100.46 101.29 100.04 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 3 oxygens Ti 0.951 0.938 0.960 0.950 0.968 Al 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 Cr 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Fe 1.018 0.787 1.000 0.602 0.897 Fe3± 0.100 0.118 0.088 0.086 0.074 Fe2± 0.918 0.669 0.912 0.516 0.823 Mn 0.024 0.232 0.031 0.438 0.124 Zn 0.001 0.042 0.000 0.011 0.002 Mg 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.004 0.000 O 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 Sum cations 1.998 2.002 1.995 2.006 1.994 MnTiO3 0.024 0.232 0.031 0.438 0.124 ZnTiO3 0.001 0.042 0.000 0.011 0.002 FeTiO3 0.918 0.669 0.912 0.516 0.823 Fe2O3 0.050 0.059 0.044 0.043 0.037 Al2O3 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 TiO2 0.009 −0.005 0.017 −0.015 0.018 Sum oxides 1.002 0.998 1.005 0.994 1.006 Open in new tab Table 9: Representative ilmenite analyses from the Sherman batholith . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90PH1 Sherman . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 90SMW1 Lincoln . Ti 30.10 29.73 30.46 30.31 30.61 Al 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 Cr 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0 Fe 37.57 29.09 36.99 22.39 33.08 Mn 0.87 8.43 1.12 16.03 4.50 Zn 0.03 1.80 0.01 0.47 0.11 Mg 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 O 31.71 31.75 31.79 31.97 31.71 Total 100.35 100.85 100.46 101.29 100.04 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 3 oxygens Ti 0.951 0.938 0.960 0.950 0.968 Al 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 Cr 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Fe 1.018 0.787 1.000 0.602 0.897 Fe3± 0.100 0.118 0.088 0.086 0.074 Fe2± 0.918 0.669 0.912 0.516 0.823 Mn 0.024 0.232 0.031 0.438 0.124 Zn 0.001 0.042 0.000 0.011 0.002 Mg 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.004 0.000 O 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 Sum cations 1.998 2.002 1.995 2.006 1.994 MnTiO3 0.024 0.232 0.031 0.438 0.124 ZnTiO3 0.001 0.042 0.000 0.011 0.002 FeTiO3 0.918 0.669 0.912 0.516 0.823 Fe2O3 0.050 0.059 0.044 0.043 0.037 Al2O3 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 TiO2 0.009 −0.005 0.017 −0.015 0.018 Sum oxides 1.002 0.998 1.005 0.994 1.006 . 90SMW4 monzonite . 90PH1 Sherman . 90SMW9 Sherman . 90SMW19 porphyritic . 90SMW1 Lincoln . Ti 30.10 29.73 30.46 30.31 30.61 Al 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 Cr 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0 Fe 37.57 29.09 36.99 22.39 33.08 Mn 0.87 8.43 1.12 16.03 4.50 Zn 0.03 1.80 0.01 0.47 0.11 Mg 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 O 31.71 31.75 31.79 31.97 31.71 Total 100.35 100.85 100.46 101.29 100.04 Cation proportions calculated on the basis of 3 oxygens Ti 0.951 0.938 0.960 0.950 0.968 Al 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 Cr 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 Fe 1.018 0.787 1.000 0.602 0.897 Fe3± 0.100 0.118 0.088 0.086 0.074 Fe2± 0.918 0.669 0.912 0.516 0.823 Mn 0.024 0.232 0.031 0.438 0.124 Zn 0.001 0.042 0.000 0.011 0.002 Mg 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.004 0.000 O 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 Sum cations 1.998 2.002 1.995 2.006 1.994 MnTiO3 0.024 0.232 0.031 0.438 0.124 ZnTiO3 0.001 0.042 0.000 0.011 0.002 FeTiO3 0.918 0.669 0.912 0.516 0.823 Fe2O3 0.050 0.059 0.044 0.043 0.037 Al2O3 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 TiO2 0.009 −0.005 0.017 −0.015 0.018 Sum oxides 1.002 0.998 1.005 0.994 1.006 Open in new tab Mineral compositions in the assemblage olivine-orthopyroxene–quartz are governed by two reactions: the Fe–Mg reaction between olivine and orthopyroxene, and the mass transfer reaction orthopyroxene =olivine + quartz There is no textural evidence for the mass transfer reaction, indicating that during cooling the relative abundances of olivine and orthopyroxene remained the same, and that Fe–Mg exchange predominated. Fig. 13. Open in new tabDownload slide Pyroxene quadrilateral plot showing the composition of pyroxenes and olivine analyzed from 90SMW9 (filled circles) with calculated compositions. Ruled circles give presumed high-T compositions as dictated by the Fe/Mg ratios of orthopyroxene and pigeonite; shaded circles give the compositions if re-equilibration continued to the temperature of hydration (665°C). (See text for discussion.) During cooling, the minerals in 90SMW9 followed reaction (1) to higher XFe (Lindsley & Frost, 1992). Thus, pressure estimates for sample 90SMW9 depend on the temperatures at which Fe–Mg exchange ceased. If the Fe/Mg of orthopyroxene was fixed when pigeonite inverted to orthopyroxene, the pressure estimate is 3000 bar. If cooling continued down to 665°C (when hydration ceased), then the estimate is 1700 bar (Fig. 13). Because Fe–Mg exchange probably ceased before the texturally latest hydration reactions, the Sherman granite probably was emplaced at 2500 bar ± 500 bar. Temperature and water activity Geothermometers record a range of temperatures during the crystallization and cooling of the Sherman batholith. The highest temperature, 968°C, comes from the composition of reconstructed pigeonite in ferrodiorite sample 90SMW30 [as determined by the QUILF program of Andersen et al., (1993)]. This temperature critically depends on how closely the reconstructed pigeonite composition represents the original pigeonite composition. However, the temperature at which pigeonite inverts is a robust thermometer that depends only on the XFe of the pyroxenes (Lindsley & Frost, 1992). The pigeonite in 90SMW30 inverted at 874°C, and Fe–Mg exchange between pigeonite and augite continued down to 789°C. The small ferrodiorite body from which 90SMW30 was sampled is surrounded by the far more voluminous Sherman granite, and therefore 874°C is also the minimum temperature of the granite. Fig. 14. Open in new tabDownload slide Crystallization history of fayalite granite from the Sherman batholith, sample 90SMW9. QUILF surface calculated from Andersen et al., (1993), biotite-bearing equilibria from TWQ program of Berman, (1991), and the low oxygen fugacity limits of titanite from Xirouchakis & Lindsley, (1998). Reconstructed pigeonite compositions from fayalite granite sample 90SMW9 record a T of 869°C; it inverted to orthopyroxene at 806°C (Fig. 14). These temperatures are based on exsolution textures of the pigeonite, which probably formed late in the crystallization history of the rock. Because orthopyroxene also occurs in 90SMW9, crystallization of this sample continued to temperatures at least as low as 800°C. Because the Ca content of orthopyroxene is nearly what would be predicted for orthopyroxene in equilibrium with pigeonite, Ca exchange among the pyroxenes must have ceased at temperatures of ∼800°C. The temperature of hydration from sample 90SMW9 was calculated from the equilibria  3 Fe2Si2O6+ 2 KAlSi3O8 + 2 H2O=orthopyroxene         kspar   fluid2 KFe3AlSi3O8(OH)2+6SiO2 biotite     quartz7 Fe2SiO4 + 9 SiO2+ 2 H2O =2Fe7Si8O22(OH)2.olivine   quartz     fluid grunerite Using the TWQ program and biotite model of Berman, (1991, , 1992; version 2.02), the feldspar solution model of Elkins & Grove, (1990), the program SOLVCALC (Wen & Nekvasil, 1994), and the grunerite thermodynamic data of Evans & Ghiorso, (1995) and Ghiorso et al., (1995), we calculate a sanidine activity of 0.76, a water activity of 0.7, and that hydration occurred at 665°C. Two other thermometers are available, the zircon-saturation temperature (Watson & Harrison, 1983) and the apatite-saturation temperature (Harrison & Watson, 1984). These thermometers yield temperatures at which a melt of a given composition would become saturated with each of these two accessory minerals, and are valid only if the rock represents a liquid composition. If zircon and apatite both crystallize from a magma early in its history but do not accumulate, their saturation temperatures should be nearly identical. This is the case with the Lincoln granite, but not for the rest of the Sherman batholith (Fig. 15). Samples of the Lincoln granite that have the lowest zircon and apatite saturation temperatures lie along the lowest temperature portions of the An–Ab–Or cotectic (Fig. 9). These zircon and apatite saturation temperatures, 750–875°C, are similar to the liquidus temperatures determined for haplogranite melts of the same composition at 5 kbar water pressure (Nekvasil & Lindsley, 1990). The lower crystallization temperature of the Lincoln granite compared with the Sherman granite and ferrodiorite reflects its more siliceous bulk composition (Nekvasil & Lindsley, 1990) and greater water activity than the Sherman granite. Fig. 15. Open in new tabDownload slide Plot comparing the zircon saturation temperature and apatite saturation temperature of rocks from the Sherman batholith using the models of Watson & Harrison, (1983) and Harrison & Watson, (1984). Samples for which zircon saturation temperatures equal apatite saturation temperatures lie along dashed line. Oxygen fugacity Because the Fe–Ti oxide minerals in the Sherman granite are altered, its oxygen fugacity is difficult to characterize. The oxygen fugacity of the two samples of Sherman granite that contain fayalite + quartz can be determined because these rocks must have crystallized along the QUILF surface (Frost et al., 1988). Their final oxygen fugacities lay between 0.1 and 0.5 log units below those of the fayalite–magnetite–quartz (FMQ) buffer (Fig. 16). Oxygen fugacity also can be determined for sample 90SMW1 of Lincoln granite that contains biotite–orthoclase–plagioclase–magnetite–ilmenite. The ilmenite and magnetite in this rock are both altered, but because the magnetite is saturated in Ti, the location of reaction (3) can be calculated using the TWQ program: 2 Fe3O4 + 2 KAlSi3O8 + 2 H2O =magnetite   sanidine     fluid2 KFe3AlSi3O10(OH)2+O2.in biotite These calculations were made using the composition of biotite in 90SMW1 and assuming the activity of water as 1.0, which yields the highest oxygen fugacity likely for the assemblage, 0.5 log units above the FMQ buffer. The range of input temperatures varied from 750 to 665°C, which encompasses the likely range of solidus temperatures. Fig. 16. Open in new tabDownload slide Plot of the deviation of the log of the oxygen fugacity from that of the FMQ buffer (ΔlogfO2) against T for the Sherman batholith and other A-type granites of North America. Also shown for comparison is the oxygen fugacity of melts generated in the experiments of Skjerlie & Johnston, (1993). Data are from this study, Anderson, (1983), Frost et al., (1988), and Anderson & Bender, (1989). Pb, Nd AND Sr ISOTOPIC COMPOSITIONS Initial Pb, Nd and Sr isotopic compositions of samples from each unit of the Sherman batholith constrain possible magma sources (Fig. 17). Initial Pb isotopic compositions were estimated by the least radiogenic fraction of stepwise dissolved feldspars (Table 9); Nd and Sr initial isotopic ratios were calculated from present-day whole-rock values, corrected for radiogenic growth since 1.43 Ga (Table 10). Except for the Pole Mountain gneiss, different rock units of the Sherman batholith cannot be distinguished by their initial Pb isotopic compositions (Fig. 17a). The only variation outside of error is in the 206Pb/204Pb ratio, which could reflect modest radiogenic growth after 1.43 Ga, rather than true variation in initial composition. The Pb isotopic data from Sherman batholith feldspars plot above the model mantle evolution curve but below the model upper-crust evolution curve of Zartman & Doe, (1981). The Sherman batholith feldspar compositions have much less radiogenic 207Pb/204Pb ratios than Archean rocks from the Wyoming province at 1.43 Ga (Laramie Mts, Verts et al., 1996; Wind River Range, Frost et al., 1998; Beartooth Mts, Wooden & Mueller, 1988). Initial Pb isotopic compositions of feldspars from the Sherman batholith also have distinctly less radiogenic 207Pb/204Pb ratios than the 1.76 Ga Horse Creek anorthosite complex immediately to the north (Chamberlain, 1998), and display slightly less radiogenic to similar 207Pb/204Pb ratios compared with the ∼1.78 Ga granitoids of the Colorado province that lie 25–100 km to the south (Aleinikoff et al., 1993; Fig. 17a). In contrast to their initial Pb isotopic compositions, initial Nd and Sr isotopic ratios vary outside of error (Fig. 17b). ɛNd values for Sherman batholith samples at 1.43 Ga vary from 1.1 to -1.5; the range of initial 87Sr/86Sr is larger, from 0.701 to 0.731 (Table 11). Samples of the Pole Mountain gneiss, mafic rocks, and Sherman granite define the tightest cluster, with ɛNd -0.4 to 1.1 and initial Sr of 0.7024–0.7126. The variation in Sr and Nd initial compositions of the Lincoln and porphyritic granites is larger, and includes the most negative ɛNd values and the most radiogenic initial Sr isotope ratios (Fig. 17b). Table 10: Alkali feldspar Pb analytical results from the Sherman batholith Sample . Rock type . 206Pb/204Pb . 207Pb/204Pb . 208Pb/204Pb . 91PH6 step 4 Lincoln 16.656 15.429 35.762 91SMW9 step 4 Lincoln 16.993 15.478 36.021 91SMW28 step 5 Sherman 16.790 15.444 35.852 91PH1 step 5 Sherman 16.796 15.455 35.859 90SMW9 step 4 Sherman px gr 16.759 15.427 35.810 90PH5 step 3 porphyritic granite 16.650 15.437 35.912 90PH5meg step 4 porphyritic granite 16.710 15.439 35.944 91SMW10 step 3 porphyritic granite 16.761 15.436 35.833 91SMW10meg step 3 porphyritic granite 16.775 15.441 35.863 91SMW11 step 3 Mg-mzdi 16.790 15.415 36.035 GM15a* Mzdi Maloin 16.834 15.478 35.853 90SMW4 step 3 Summit monz 17.188 15.506 36.064 91SMW4 step 5 Pole Mtn gneiss 16.661 15.390 35.660 Sample . Rock type . 206Pb/204Pb . 207Pb/204Pb . 208Pb/204Pb . 91PH6 step 4 Lincoln 16.656 15.429 35.762 91SMW9 step 4 Lincoln 16.993 15.478 36.021 91SMW28 step 5 Sherman 16.790 15.444 35.852 91PH1 step 5 Sherman 16.796 15.455 35.859 90SMW9 step 4 Sherman px gr 16.759 15.427 35.810 90PH5 step 3 porphyritic granite 16.650 15.437 35.912 90PH5meg step 4 porphyritic granite 16.710 15.439 35.944 91SMW10 step 3 porphyritic granite 16.761 15.436 35.833 91SMW10meg step 3 porphyritic granite 16.775 15.441 35.863 91SMW11 step 3 Mg-mzdi 16.790 15.415 36.035 GM15a* Mzdi Maloin 16.834 15.478 35.853 90SMW4 step 3 Summit monz 17.188 15.506 36.064 91SMW4 step 5 Pole Mtn gneiss 16.661 15.390 35.660 * GM15a data from Kolker et al.(1991). meg, K-feldspar megacryst. Isotopic compositions of feldspar come from analyses of the least radiogenic dissolution step dissolved in 5% HF after Ludwig & Silver (1977). Lead was purified in the feldspar and whole-rock samples using HCl–HBr chemistry, modified from Tilton (1973). Mass spec-trometry was performed as described in Table 1 Uncertainties on 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb are 0.12%, 0.18% and 0.24%, respectively. Open in new tab Table 10: Alkali feldspar Pb analytical results from the Sherman batholith Sample . Rock type . 206Pb/204Pb . 207Pb/204Pb . 208Pb/204Pb . 91PH6 step 4 Lincoln 16.656 15.429 35.762 91SMW9 step 4 Lincoln 16.993 15.478 36.021 91SMW28 step 5 Sherman 16.790 15.444 35.852 91PH1 step 5 Sherman 16.796 15.455 35.859 90SMW9 step 4 Sherman px gr 16.759 15.427 35.810 90PH5 step 3 porphyritic granite 16.650 15.437 35.912 90PH5meg step 4 porphyritic granite 16.710 15.439 35.944 91SMW10 step 3 porphyritic granite 16.761 15.436 35.833 91SMW10meg step 3 porphyritic granite 16.775 15.441 35.863 91SMW11 step 3 Mg-mzdi 16.790 15.415 36.035 GM15a* Mzdi Maloin 16.834 15.478 35.853 90SMW4 step 3 Summit monz 17.188 15.506 36.064 91SMW4 step 5 Pole Mtn gneiss 16.661 15.390 35.660 Sample . Rock type . 206Pb/204Pb . 207Pb/204Pb . 208Pb/204Pb . 91PH6 step 4 Lincoln 16.656 15.429 35.762 91SMW9 step 4 Lincoln 16.993 15.478 36.021 91SMW28 step 5 Sherman 16.790 15.444 35.852 91PH1 step 5 Sherman 16.796 15.455 35.859 90SMW9 step 4 Sherman px gr 16.759 15.427 35.810 90PH5 step 3 porphyritic granite 16.650 15.437 35.912 90PH5meg step 4 porphyritic granite 16.710 15.439 35.944 91SMW10 step 3 porphyritic granite 16.761 15.436 35.833 91SMW10meg step 3 porphyritic granite 16.775 15.441 35.863 91SMW11 step 3 Mg-mzdi 16.790 15.415 36.035 GM15a* Mzdi Maloin 16.834 15.478 35.853 90SMW4 step 3 Summit monz 17.188 15.506 36.064 91SMW4 step 5 Pole Mtn gneiss 16.661 15.390 35.660 * GM15a data from Kolker et al.(1991). meg, K-feldspar megacryst. Isotopic compositions of feldspar come from analyses of the least radiogenic dissolution step dissolved in 5% HF after Ludwig & Silver (1977). Lead was purified in the feldspar and whole-rock samples using HCl–HBr chemistry, modified from Tilton (1973). Mass spec-trometry was performed as described in Table 1 Uncertainties on 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb are 0.12%, 0.18% and 0.24%, respectively. Open in new tab Discussion and Conclusions Petrogenesis of the Sherman batholith The Sherman batholith (1430–1438 Ma) and the Laramie anorthosite complex (1431–1436 Ma; Scoates & Chamberlain, 1995; Verts et al., 1996) are part of a widespread magmatic event that affected much of the southwestern USA. The Sherman batholith and Laramie anorthosite complex crystallized at similar levels in the crust: the apparent pressure at which the Sherman batholith was emplaced, ∼2.5 kbar, is close to pressures of 3–4 kbar determined for the Laramie anorthosite complex (Fuhrman et al., 1988; Kolker & Lindsley, 1989; Grant & Frost, 1990; Spicuzza, 1990). Crystallization temperatures for the Sherman batholith (>900°C to 750°C) are only slightly lower than those for the monzosyenitic plutons of the Laramie anorthosite complex of ∼950°C (Fuhrman et al., 1988; Kolker & Lindsley, 1989; Anderson, 1995). The range of oxygen fugacities determined for the Sherman batholith, from ΔlogfO2 of -0.5 to+0.5, also are similar to oxygen fugacities calculated for the Laramie anorthosite complex (ΔlogfO2 = 0 to -2; Frost et al., 1996). As is typical of reduced, rapakivi-type granite batholiths and coeval, proximal anorthosite intrusions worldwide, the initial Pb, Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of rocks from the Sherman batholith and the Laramie anorthosite complex are comparable. Both have initial ɛNd near zero, and initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios mostly between 0.703 and 0.710. Initial Pb isotopic compositions of the Sherman batholith and Laramie anorthosite complex range from 207Pb/204Pb ratios slightly above the model mantle curve (for the Sherman batholith and southern Laramie anorthosite complex) to ratios more like those of the Archean Wyoming province (for rocks of the northern Laramie anorthosite complex; this study; Geist et al., 1989, , 1990; Kolker et al., 1991; Mitchell et al., 1995, , 1996; Scoates & Frost, 1996). Fig. 17. Open in new tabDownload slide (a) Pb isotopic compositions of alkali feldspar from the Sherman batholith and of potential sources at 1.43 Ga. Upper-crust and mantle model curves are from Zartman & Doe, (1981). Fields of nearby crust are growth curve projections to 1.43 Ga from measured feldspar Pb isotopic compositions (see text for references). Typical felsic rocks have 238U/204Pb (µ) values of 8–16. Symbols for different phases of the Sherman batholith follow Fig. 3 and Fig. 5Fig. 12. The Pb data from the Sherman batholith are consistent with derivation from mafic, mantle-derived rocks mixed to varying degrees with Proterozoic crustal sources similar to the Horse Creek anorthosite complex (HCAC) that crops out immediately to the north or the ∼1.78 Ga Colorado Province to the south. Archean Wyoming Province sources probably did not contribute significantly to these samples. (b) Plot comparing the ɛNd and 87Sr/86Sr at 1430 Ma for whole-rock samples from the Sherman batholith, along with Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of possible source rocks. Northern Colorado province metasedimentary rocks are from the Idaho Springs formation north of Ft Collins. Symbols for different phases of the Sherman batholith follow Fig. 3 and Fig. 5Fig. 12. Data are from Hedge et al., (1967), Peterman et al., (1968), DePaolo, (1981), Zielinski et al., (1981), Nelson & DePaolo, (1984), Vasek, (1999), and our unpublished data. Table 11: Nd and Sr isotopic data for the Sherman batholith Sample . Unit . Rb (ppm) . Sr (ppm) . 87Rb/86Sr . 87Sr/86Sr . Initial Sr . Sm (ppm) . Nd (ppm) . 147Sm/144Nd . 143Nd/144Nd . Initial Nd . Initial ɛNd . 90SMW3 Lincoln granite 160.3 173.7 2.688 0.77401 0.71887 14.69 90.60 0.09802 0.511649 0.510728 −1.21 91PH6 Lincoln granite 102.8 88.3 3.399 0.79448 0.72377 8.877 50.79 0.10566 0.511729 0.510736 −1.06 91SMW9 Lincoln granite 303.3 13.5 65.40 2.21949 0.87786 3.165 6.454 0.29668 0.513669 0.510881 1.79 91PH1 Sherman granite 166.4 119.4 4.057 0.79150 0.70827 19.82 109.2 0.10968 0.511848 0.510817 0.53 91SMW28 Sherman granite 102.7 180.0 1.661 0.74054 0.70646 15.66 89.02 0.10640 0.511795 0.510795 0.11 90SMW5 Sherman granite 112.5 212.0 1.549 0.74434 0.71257 17.66 99.36 0.10749 0.511846 0.510836 0.91 90SMW9 Sherman granite 84.2 214.2 1.144 0.72764 0.70417 21.61 121.5 0.10750 0.511853 0.510843 1.04 90PH4 porphyritic granite 193 212 2.650 0.76864 0.71426 27.18 151.9 0.10822 0.511789 0.510796 0.13 90PH4meg megacryst 189.6 330.9 1.668 0.76052 0.72631 0.318 1.880 0.10230 0.511691 0.510730 −1.18 90SME2 porphyritic granite 167.8 128.5 3.816 0.80915 0.73087 13.54 76.25 0.10738 0.511771 0.510762 −0.55 91SMW2 porphyritic granite 198.2 278.6 2.069 0.75857 0.71613 16.98 117.2 0.08756 0.511652 0.510827 0.82 91SMW2meg megacryst 241.7 333.2 2.110 0.74892 0.70564 91SMW10 porphyritic granite 207 166 3.630 0.77697 0.70077 16.48 91.23 0.10921 0.511830 0.510804 0.28 91SMW10meg megacryst 228.6 225.7 2.948 0.76916 0.70869 91SMW11 monzodiorite 65.20 740.4 0.256 0.70948 0.70422 16.33 98.08 0.10066 0.511733 0.510787 −0.05 90SMW17 monzodiorite 89.62 1065 0.245 0.70744 0.70242 20.10 126.14 0.09634 0.511678 0.510773 −0.33 91SMW30 ferrodiorite 19.82 515.9 0.112 0.70925 0.70696 6.998 29.81 0.14194 0.512104 0.510770 −0.38 90SMW4 monzonite 65.70 160.3 1.193 0.73463 0.71015 7.20 34.17 0.12735 0.511979 0.510783 −0.13 91SMW4 Pole Mt gneiss 43.10 418.6 0.300 0.70935 0.70320 1.329 6.49 0.12390 0.512000 0.510846 1.10 Sample . Unit . Rb (ppm) . Sr (ppm) . 87Rb/86Sr . 87Sr/86Sr . Initial Sr . Sm (ppm) . Nd (ppm) . 147Sm/144Nd . 143Nd/144Nd . Initial Nd . Initial ɛNd . 90SMW3 Lincoln granite 160.3 173.7 2.688 0.77401 0.71887 14.69 90.60 0.09802 0.511649 0.510728 −1.21 91PH6 Lincoln granite 102.8 88.3 3.399 0.79448 0.72377 8.877 50.79 0.10566 0.511729 0.510736 −1.06 91SMW9 Lincoln granite 303.3 13.5 65.40 2.21949 0.87786 3.165 6.454 0.29668 0.513669 0.510881 1.79 91PH1 Sherman granite 166.4 119.4 4.057 0.79150 0.70827 19.82 109.2 0.10968 0.511848 0.510817 0.53 91SMW28 Sherman granite 102.7 180.0 1.661 0.74054 0.70646 15.66 89.02 0.10640 0.511795 0.510795 0.11 90SMW5 Sherman granite 112.5 212.0 1.549 0.74434 0.71257 17.66 99.36 0.10749 0.511846 0.510836 0.91 90SMW9 Sherman granite 84.2 214.2 1.144 0.72764 0.70417 21.61 121.5 0.10750 0.511853 0.510843 1.04 90PH4 porphyritic granite 193 212 2.650 0.76864 0.71426 27.18 151.9 0.10822 0.511789 0.510796 0.13 90PH4meg megacryst 189.6 330.9 1.668 0.76052 0.72631 0.318 1.880 0.10230 0.511691 0.510730 −1.18 90SME2 porphyritic granite 167.8 128.5 3.816 0.80915 0.73087 13.54 76.25 0.10738 0.511771 0.510762 −0.55 91SMW2 porphyritic granite 198.2 278.6 2.069 0.75857 0.71613 16.98 117.2 0.08756 0.511652 0.510827 0.82 91SMW2meg megacryst 241.7 333.2 2.110 0.74892 0.70564 91SMW10 porphyritic granite 207 166 3.630 0.77697 0.70077 16.48 91.23 0.10921 0.511830 0.510804 0.28 91SMW10meg megacryst 228.6 225.7 2.948 0.76916 0.70869 91SMW11 monzodiorite 65.20 740.4 0.256 0.70948 0.70422 16.33 98.08 0.10066 0.511733 0.510787 −0.05 90SMW17 monzodiorite 89.62 1065 0.245 0.70744 0.70242 20.10 126.14 0.09634 0.511678 0.510773 −0.33 91SMW30 ferrodiorite 19.82 515.9 0.112 0.70925 0.70696 6.998 29.81 0.14194 0.512104 0.510770 −0.38 90SMW4 monzonite 65.70 160.3 1.193 0.73463 0.71015 7.20 34.17 0.12735 0.511979 0.510783 −0.13 91SMW4 Pole Mt gneiss 43.10 418.6 0.300 0.70935 0.70320 1.329 6.49 0.12390 0.512000 0.510846 1.10 Analytical details:∼80 mg of sample were dissolved in HF–HNO3 After conversion to chlorides, one-third of the sample was spiked with 87Rb, 84Sr,149Sm, and 146Nd. Rb, Sr, and REE were separated by conventional cation-exchange procedures. Sm and Nd were further separated in di-ethyl-hexyl orthophosphoric acid columns. All isotopic measurements were made on a VG Sector multi-collector mass spectrometer at the University of Wyoming. An average 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratio of 0.710246 ± 23 (2σ) was measured for NBS987 Sr, and an average 143Nd/144Nd ratio of 0.511846 ± 11 (2σ) normalized to 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219 was measured for the La Jolla Nd standard. Uncertainties in Sr isotopic ratio measurements are ±0.00002 and uncertainties in Nd isotopic ratio measurements are ±0.00001(2σ). Blanks are <50 pg for Rb, Sr, Nd, Sr, and no blank correction was made. Uncertainties in Rb, Sr, Sm and Nd concentrations are ±2% of the measured value; uncertainties on initial ɛNd = ±0.5 epsilon units. Initial Sr and Nd isotopic ratios and initial ɛNd values are calculated for 1.43 Ga. Open in new tab Table 11: Nd and Sr isotopic data for the Sherman batholith Sample . Unit . Rb (ppm) . Sr (ppm) . 87Rb/86Sr . 87Sr/86Sr . Initial Sr . Sm (ppm) . Nd (ppm) . 147Sm/144Nd . 143Nd/144Nd . Initial Nd . Initial ɛNd . 90SMW3 Lincoln granite 160.3 173.7 2.688 0.77401 0.71887 14.69 90.60 0.09802 0.511649 0.510728 −1.21 91PH6 Lincoln granite 102.8 88.3 3.399 0.79448 0.72377 8.877 50.79 0.10566 0.511729 0.510736 −1.06 91SMW9 Lincoln granite 303.3 13.5 65.40 2.21949 0.87786 3.165 6.454 0.29668 0.513669 0.510881 1.79 91PH1 Sherman granite 166.4 119.4 4.057 0.79150 0.70827 19.82 109.2 0.10968 0.511848 0.510817 0.53 91SMW28 Sherman granite 102.7 180.0 1.661 0.74054 0.70646 15.66 89.02 0.10640 0.511795 0.510795 0.11 90SMW5 Sherman granite 112.5 212.0 1.549 0.74434 0.71257 17.66 99.36 0.10749 0.511846 0.510836 0.91 90SMW9 Sherman granite 84.2 214.2 1.144 0.72764 0.70417 21.61 121.5 0.10750 0.511853 0.510843 1.04 90PH4 porphyritic granite 193 212 2.650 0.76864 0.71426 27.18 151.9 0.10822 0.511789 0.510796 0.13 90PH4meg megacryst 189.6 330.9 1.668 0.76052 0.72631 0.318 1.880 0.10230 0.511691 0.510730 −1.18 90SME2 porphyritic granite 167.8 128.5 3.816 0.80915 0.73087 13.54 76.25 0.10738 0.511771 0.510762 −0.55 91SMW2 porphyritic granite 198.2 278.6 2.069 0.75857 0.71613 16.98 117.2 0.08756 0.511652 0.510827 0.82 91SMW2meg megacryst 241.7 333.2 2.110 0.74892 0.70564 91SMW10 porphyritic granite 207 166 3.630 0.77697 0.70077 16.48 91.23 0.10921 0.511830 0.510804 0.28 91SMW10meg megacryst 228.6 225.7 2.948 0.76916 0.70869 91SMW11 monzodiorite 65.20 740.4 0.256 0.70948 0.70422 16.33 98.08 0.10066 0.511733 0.510787 −0.05 90SMW17 monzodiorite 89.62 1065 0.245 0.70744 0.70242 20.10 126.14 0.09634 0.511678 0.510773 −0.33 91SMW30 ferrodiorite 19.82 515.9 0.112 0.70925 0.70696 6.998 29.81 0.14194 0.512104 0.510770 −0.38 90SMW4 monzonite 65.70 160.3 1.193 0.73463 0.71015 7.20 34.17 0.12735 0.511979 0.510783 −0.13 91SMW4 Pole Mt gneiss 43.10 418.6 0.300 0.70935 0.70320 1.329 6.49 0.12390 0.512000 0.510846 1.10 Sample . Unit . Rb (ppm) . Sr (ppm) . 87Rb/86Sr . 87Sr/86Sr . Initial Sr . Sm (ppm) . Nd (ppm) . 147Sm/144Nd . 143Nd/144Nd . Initial Nd . Initial ɛNd . 90SMW3 Lincoln granite 160.3 173.7 2.688 0.77401 0.71887 14.69 90.60 0.09802 0.511649 0.510728 −1.21 91PH6 Lincoln granite 102.8 88.3 3.399 0.79448 0.72377 8.877 50.79 0.10566 0.511729 0.510736 −1.06 91SMW9 Lincoln granite 303.3 13.5 65.40 2.21949 0.87786 3.165 6.454 0.29668 0.513669 0.510881 1.79 91PH1 Sherman granite 166.4 119.4 4.057 0.79150 0.70827 19.82 109.2 0.10968 0.511848 0.510817 0.53 91SMW28 Sherman granite 102.7 180.0 1.661 0.74054 0.70646 15.66 89.02 0.10640 0.511795 0.510795 0.11 90SMW5 Sherman granite 112.5 212.0 1.549 0.74434 0.71257 17.66 99.36 0.10749 0.511846 0.510836 0.91 90SMW9 Sherman granite 84.2 214.2 1.144 0.72764 0.70417 21.61 121.5 0.10750 0.511853 0.510843 1.04 90PH4 porphyritic granite 193 212 2.650 0.76864 0.71426 27.18 151.9 0.10822 0.511789 0.510796 0.13 90PH4meg megacryst 189.6 330.9 1.668 0.76052 0.72631 0.318 1.880 0.10230 0.511691 0.510730 −1.18 90SME2 porphyritic granite 167.8 128.5 3.816 0.80915 0.73087 13.54 76.25 0.10738 0.511771 0.510762 −0.55 91SMW2 porphyritic granite 198.2 278.6 2.069 0.75857 0.71613 16.98 117.2 0.08756 0.511652 0.510827 0.82 91SMW2meg megacryst 241.7 333.2 2.110 0.74892 0.70564 91SMW10 porphyritic granite 207 166 3.630 0.77697 0.70077 16.48 91.23 0.10921 0.511830 0.510804 0.28 91SMW10meg megacryst 228.6 225.7 2.948 0.76916 0.70869 91SMW11 monzodiorite 65.20 740.4 0.256 0.70948 0.70422 16.33 98.08 0.10066 0.511733 0.510787 −0.05 90SMW17 monzodiorite 89.62 1065 0.245 0.70744 0.70242 20.10 126.14 0.09634 0.511678 0.510773 −0.33 91SMW30 ferrodiorite 19.82 515.9 0.112 0.70925 0.70696 6.998 29.81 0.14194 0.512104 0.510770 −0.38 90SMW4 monzonite 65.70 160.3 1.193 0.73463 0.71015 7.20 34.17 0.12735 0.511979 0.510783 −0.13 91SMW4 Pole Mt gneiss 43.10 418.6 0.300 0.70935 0.70320 1.329 6.49 0.12390 0.512000 0.510846 1.10 Analytical details:∼80 mg of sample were dissolved in HF–HNO3 After conversion to chlorides, one-third of the sample was spiked with 87Rb, 84Sr,149Sm, and 146Nd. Rb, Sr, and REE were separated by conventional cation-exchange procedures. Sm and Nd were further separated in di-ethyl-hexyl orthophosphoric acid columns. All isotopic measurements were made on a VG Sector multi-collector mass spectrometer at the University of Wyoming. An average 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratio of 0.710246 ± 23 (2σ) was measured for NBS987 Sr, and an average 143Nd/144Nd ratio of 0.511846 ± 11 (2σ) normalized to 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219 was measured for the La Jolla Nd standard. Uncertainties in Sr isotopic ratio measurements are ±0.00002 and uncertainties in Nd isotopic ratio measurements are ±0.00001(2σ). Blanks are <50 pg for Rb, Sr, Nd, Sr, and no blank correction was made. Uncertainties in Rb, Sr, Sm and Nd concentrations are ±2% of the measured value; uncertainties on initial ɛNd = ±0.5 epsilon units. Initial Sr and Nd isotopic ratios and initial ɛNd values are calculated for 1.43 Ga. Open in new tab The Pb, Nd and Sr isotopic compositions of theSherman batholith rule out some potential mantle and crustal sources. Archean crust, which is present at depth beneath northern portions of the Sherman batholith (Chamberlain, 1998), has ɛNd ∼ -15, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.74–0.80, and 207Pb/204Pb = 15.7 for 206Pb/204Pb = 16.5, and cannot be a major component of the Sherman magmas (see Fig. 17). Model depleted mantle, with ɛNd = +4 to +6 at 1433 Ma, 87Sr/86Sr of ∼0.701, and a less radiogenic Pb isotopic composition than Sherman granitoid rocks, cannot be the sole source of Sherman batholith magmas. Neither the Laramie anorthosite complex nor the Sherman batholith has these model mantle isotopic compositions, not even the high-alumina gabbros and anorthosites interpreted as mantle-derived melts (Mitchell et al., 1995). Perhaps the mantle beneath the Sherman batholith has less extreme isotopic compositions: a mantle with ɛNd = ∼+2 and 87Sr/86Sr = 0.703 best describes the source of the Laramie anorthosite complex gabbros and anorthosites, and could also have been a source for the Sherman batholith. Although a slightly depleted mantle or mafic lower-crustal source is compatible with the isotopic data, the isotopic data also permit a Proterozoic-age felsic crustal source. The samples display less radiogenic 207Pb/204Pb ratios than the Horse Creek anorthosite complex immediately to the north and lie only slightly below a 1.78–1.43 Ga reference isochron that originates in the field of ∼1.78 Ga Colorado province granitoids (Fig. 17a). The samples also exhibit Nd and Sr isotopic compositions indistinguishable from Colorado province volcanic rocks (Fig. 17b). However, the high liquidus temperatures of the magmas, the geochemical composition and mineralogy of the rocks, and, most importantly, oxygen fugacity near or below FMQ rule out both typical felsic calc-alkalic and pelitic rocks as sole sources of reduced, rapakivi-type granites (see Frost & Frost, 1997). These oxygen fugacities are distinctly lower than those of other A-type granites and calc-alkalic granites in general (Fig. 16; Frost & Lindsley, 1992). The relatively low oxygen fugacity is important because the fO2 of a magma probably reflects that of its source (Carmichael, 1991). The low fO2 of the Sherman granite and other reduced, rapakivi-type granites is evidence for their derivation from a tholeiitic source, because calc-alkalic sources are more oxidized and pelitic sources, although appropriately reduced, produce peraluminous, not metaluminous melts (Frost & Frost, 1997). Although partial melts of tonalite or granodiorite mimic the bulk compositions of reduced, rapakivi-type granites, such sources are not likely to have appropriately lowfO2: calc-alkalic rocks typically have ΔlogfO2 in the range of +1 to +3 (Frost & Lindsley, 1991). For example, the A-type granite melt produced by melting of tonalite in Skjerlie & Johnston's, (1993) experiments had fO2 > 1 log unit above FMQ (Fig. 16). Melting of magnetite-free tonalite could produce magmas of appropriately low oxygen fugacities, but such magmas appear to be uncommon. Only some of the tonalites from the Sierra Nevada are ilmenite-series (Ague & Brimhall, 1988), but those from the Japanese arc are magnetite-series (Ishihara, 1979). Experimental results indicate that A-type granite can be produced by differentiation or by partial melting of ferrodiorite (Scoates et al., 1996). Although the Sherman granite could have been produced by extreme differentiation of a tholeiitic magma as has been proposed for the Sybille monzosyenite of the Laramie anorthosite complex (Scoates et al., 1996), this is not likely for several reasons. First, the volume of Sherman granite is large compared with the amount of mafic and monzonitic rocks in the Sherman batholith. The opposite is true in the Laramie anorthosite complex and other batholiths for which this model has been proposed. The batholith lacks the continuum of rock types observed in the Laramie anorthosite complex, and is instead bimodal. The vicinity of the Sherman batholith lacks gravity anomalies that might indicate the presence of a large mass of mafic cumulates (see Scoates et al., 1996). Instead, the Sherman batholith was probably derived from partial melting of pre-existing tholeiites or their differentiates. Tholeiite-series rocks have low fO2 and fH2O, and evolved compositions have iron and LILE enrichment that are typical of reduced rapakivi-type granites. Sherman ferrodiorite and monzodiorite resemble dioritic rocks of the Laramie anorthosite complex (Mitchell et al., 1996) in their geochemistry (Fig. 10). They are typical of iron-rich diorites found in many anorogenic batholiths, often mingled with granite (Wiebe, 1980; Noblett & Staub, 1990; Eklund et al., 1994; Salonsaari & Haapala, 1994; Vasek & Kolker, 1999). The mafic rocks intruded the Sherman batholith while some granitic magmas were still molten. We suggest that, as with dioritic rocks of the Laramie anorthosite complex, the mafic rocks of the Sherman batholith represent samples of mantle-derived mafic magmas and their differentiates that were variably contaminated by continental crust during ascent (see Mitchell et al., 1996). In the Sherman batholith, Lincoln granite records incorporation of felsic continental crust. Lincoln granite is more oxidized than Sherman granite, is peraluminous whereas the Sherman granite is metaluminous, and has biotite richer in Mg than that of the Sherman granite. In addition, Lincoln samples exhibit radiogenic initial Sr isotopic compositions (87Sr/86Sr > 0.710). The only known sources with such radiogenic Sr isotopic compositions are Proterozoic and Archean metasedimentary rocks, which had 87Sr/86Sr of 0.715 and higher at 1.43 Ga (Fig. 17b). Although their Sr isotopic compositions are uniformly high, the ɛNd of the metasedimentary rocks appears to correspond to distance from the edge of the Archean Wyoming province: pelitic rocks at the south edge of the Wyoming province have ɛNd of -16, metasedimentary rocks 25 km south of this boundary have ɛNd of -8, and metasedimentary rocks along the Colorado Front Range have ɛNd of 0 to +3, all at 1.43 Ga. Interpolating these data, metasedimentary rocks near the Sherman batholith probably had ɛNd of -3 or -4 at 1.43 Ga. A component with an isotopic composition similar to that of such metasedimentary rocks is present in the Lincoln granite. Lincoln granite is very similar to the 1.4 Ga Silver Plume and St Vrain batholiths of the Colorado Front Range in mineralogy, geochemistry, crystallization conditions and radiogenic Sr isotopic compositions (Anderson & Thomas, 1985). Much of the porphyritic granite may have formed by the interaction of mafic and felsic magmas. Feldspar megacrysts are not in textural equilibrium with the host rock, as evidenced by plagioclase rims on K-feldspar megacrysts, and K-feldspar with euhedral cores and inclusion-rich rims. Clots and schlieren of mafic material are present in the groundmass of some porphyritic granites. On Harker diagrams, the porphyritic granites invariably lie between the mafic rocks and the Lincoln granite, and the Sr isotopic compositions of porphyritic granite samples vary from the least to the most radiogenic, both of which also suggest magma mixing. To search for isotopic evidence of disequilibrium, we obtained Rb–Sr isotopic data for three samples of porphyritic granite, and for feldspar megacrysts separated from these samples. In two samples the megacryst is more radiogenic Sr than the bulk rock, and in the third the megacryst is less radiogenic (Table 10). One megacryst for which we also obtained Sm-Nd isotopic data has an initial ɛNd that is slightly more than one ɛ unit lower than that of the bulk rock. These data corroborate the field, petrographic and geochemical evidence for magma mixing. Petrogenetic model for A-type granitoids Our petrogenetic model for the Sherman batholith begins with the emplacement of mantle-derived mafic magmas at or near the base of the crust. This basaltic melt underwent differentiation along a tholeiitic trend at low fO2, producing ferrodiorite with high FeOt/(FeOt + MgO) and rich in REE and Zr. These underplated gabbroic to ferrodioritic rocks represent newly formed mafic lower continental crust. The presence of such mafic material beneath southeastern Wyoming is suggested by the seismic wide-angle studies of Gohl & Smithson, (1994). Those workers interpreted alternating low- and high-velocity layers in the lower crust beneath the Sherman batholith as evidence of mafic and ultramafic rocks interlayered with more felsic crust. This mafic lower crust may have been formed during 2.0 Ga rifting (Cox et al., 1999), at 1.76 Ga in association with the Horse Creek anorthosite complex (Frost et al., 1999), or at 1.43 Ga when the Laramie anorthosite complex and Sherman batholith formed. Partial melting of anhydrous underplated mafic material can produce granitic melt with extreme A-type compositions (Frost & Frost, 1997). We suggest that ferrodioritic portions of this underplated material are the most appropriate source rock: a ferrodiorite source will yield larger volumes of granitic melt than basalt, and ferrodiorite also has a lower melting point than its basalt parent. Such a melt can form the Sherman granite, the unit with the lowest oxygen and water activities, highest temperatures, and highest incompatible element contents in the batholith. The composition of this granitic magma may be altered by assimilation of crustal wall rocks. Assimilation of metasedimentary rocks could produce the peraluminous Lincoln granite, for example. Coeval mafic magmas that commingled with the granitic magmas could yield the hybrid porphyritic granites. The Sherman batholith contains both potassic and sodic granitoids, as does the 1.1 Ga Pikes Peak batholith of Colorado (Barker et al., 1975), the classic rapakivi terrane of southern Finland and the Ragunda massif of Sweden (Rämö & Haapala, 1995). Alkalic basalt and its differentiates are potential sources for the sodic rocks (Barker et al., 1975). Like tholeiites, alkali basalts evolve residual melts that have low oxygen fugacity, but these magmas have higher Na/K ratios than potassic A-type granites (Frost & Lindsley, 1991). The Sherman batholith is the most reduced of the ∼1.4 Ga A-type granitoids in the southwestern USA. Its magmas may have ascended via fundamental crustal structures related to the Cheyenne belt, which marks the suture between Archean and Proterozoic crust. Moreover, Archean crust traversed by Sherman magmas was probably more refractory than Proterozoic crust, so that A-type granitoids farther south were more contaminated with oxidized, felsic crust than were magmas of the Sherman batholith. Phanerozoic analogs to Proterozoic anorogenic granites Phanerozoic A-type granites and rhyolites occur in three different tectonic settings: (1) they are associated with mantle plumes, such as the fayalite rhyolites of the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain province; (2) they occur in rifted continental settings, such as granite complexes associated with the opening of the Atlantic Ocean in Africa, South America and New England; (3) they are found in areas of large-scale continental extension, such as the Basin and Range province. (1) Mantle plumes: the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain province The lavas of the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain province exhibit remarkable petrochemical similarities to reduced, rapakivi-type granites. The fayalite rhyolites of the main caldera show extreme high iron and K2O contents, low fO2 and high incompatible contents, just like the Sherman granite (Hildreth et al., 1991; Frost & Frost, 1997). The lavas of the Snake River plain include abundant tholeiitic basalts and small volumes of differentiated lavas—icelandites—the eruptive equivalents of ferrodiorites (Leeman et al., 1976). The tectonic setting of the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain is clearly extensional, related to a propagating mantle plume (Smith & Braile, 1993). Hildreth et al., (1991) concluded that the Yellowstone lavas were produced by partial melting of slightly older Cenozoic basalt, which generated the large volumes of fayalite rhyolite that erupted from the main caldera. The isotopic composition of these rhyolites limited the role of Archean crust to <15 wt %. Outside the main caldera, the rhyolites are poorer in iron, and show greater degrees of assimilation of Archean crust. This model is very similar to the one we propose for the Sherman batholith and for other reduced, rapakivi-type granites (Frost & Frost, 1997). (2) Continental rifting: the opening of the Atlantic Ocean Anorogenic magmatism is associated with the break-up of Gondwanaland, during which bimodal magmatism was focused along older lineaments or other major zones of weakness. In Africa, such anorogenic magmatism took place throughout the Phanerozoic, peaking during the Mesozoic opening of the Atlantic Ocean (Kinnaird & Bowden, 1987; Bowden et al., 1990). The similarity of the Jurassic Nigerian–Niger province to Proterozoic anorogenic granites was noted by Kisvarsanyi, (1981) and Van Schmus et al., (1993). Both suites contain alkaline to subalkaline granitic and rhyolitic rocks, with or without fayalite and Fe-rich pyroxene. The ∼410 Ma Aïr complex of Niger consists of ∼30 ring complexes. In seven of these, granite is associated with anorthosite and ferrodioritic rocks (Demaiffe et al., 1991). Moreau et al., (1994) concluded that the emplacement of the Aïr ring complexes was controlled by pre-existing lineaments. Their tectonic model links a transtensional tectonic regime with anorogenic magmatism. (3) Continental extension: Basin and Range province, western USA In the Basin and Range province, broadly distributed extensional deformation began in earliest Oligocene time, and continues today (Eaton, 1982). Extension-related magmas include tholeiitic and alkali basalts, basaltic andesite, and high-silica rhyolite (Eaton, 1982). Many of the rhyolites are fayalite bearing and reduced (ΔlogfO2 near or below the FMQ buffer; Frost et al., 1988). These fayalite-bearing rhyolites typically contain K2O > Na2O and K2O > 5 wt %, and include, for example, the Kane Spring Wash rhyolite, Nevada (Novak & Mahood, 1986), the Twin Peaks rhyolite, Utah (Crecraft et al., 1981), lavas of the McDermitt Caldera, Nevada–Oregon (Conrad, 1984) and the Coso volcanic field (Bacon et al., 1981). Tectonic environment for A-type granites Three extant tectonic models for the generation of Mid-Proterozoic anorogenic granites are: (1) large-scale mantle upwelling beneath a Mid-Proterozoic supercontinent (Hoffman, 1989); (2) extension and fragmentation of a Mid-Proterozoic supercontinent (Windley, 1993); (3) synorogenic gravitational collapse of the hinterland of a contractional orogeny (Nyman et al., 1994). Hoffman, (1989) concluded that bimodal intraplate magmatism could result from mantle upwelling, and that the resultant doming would explain the lack of syn-plutonic alluvial and lacustrine sediments. He suggested that a Middle Proterozoic supercontinent effectively insulated the underlying mantle, leading to a very large area of mantle upwelling and partial melting that he termed a 'superswell’. Although a mantle plume of such large scale may be a unique Proterozoic phenomenon, we maintain that a smaller-scale version of this upwelling is represented by the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain province, which is sourced by a mantle hotspot. The rhyolites and icelandites of this province are petrochemically equivalent to A-type granites. Mantle upwelling events such as the one Hoffman, (1989) described should also produce magmas with A-type characteristics. Windley, (1993) postulated that Mid-Proterozoic anorogenic granites were generated during extensional collapse of thickened crust after the assembly of Laurentia. In this model, Laurentia split to form a southern continent, which was reattached to Laurentia by the Grenvillian orogeny. Such intracontinental rifting may lead to magmatism across a broad area (e.g. the Basin and Range) or in narrow belts (such as in Africa). A-type granite compositions are found in both environments. However, Hoffman, (1989) noted that stretched continental lithosphere subsides upon cooling and that thick sedimentary deposits, such as those in the Basin and Range, should be found in regions of extensional collapse. Such contemporaneous sediments are not found in the southwestern USA, but their absence may reflect current levels of exposure. Several Mid-Proterozoic granite plutons in the southwestern USA record syn-intrusive or post-intrusive deformation (Nyman et al., 1994). Although some of this deformation may reflect local strain related to emplacement of the plutons, part has been interpreted as reflecting regional stress fields. Nyman et al., (1994) proposed that deformation associated with ∼1.4 Ga plutons resulted from intraplate strains associated with a distant contractional orogeny along the southern margin of Proterozoic North America. Their model is somewhat analogous to the tectonics of the Tibetan plateau, in which extension and crustal thinning are taking place at the same time as convergence (Inger, 1994). The Tibetan plateau is roughly similar in size to the Mid-Proterozoic anorogenic granite province of the southwestern USA. However, the magmas associated with extension in Tibet are a calc-alkaline continental margin series (Coulon et al., 1986; Arnaud et al., 1992). Nyman et al., (1994) observed that most ∼1.4 Ga granitoids in the southwestern USA were emplaced along or near pre-existing shear zones. The Sherman batholith lies immediately south of the Cheyenne belt, which marks the suture between the Archean Wyoming province and Proterozoic arc terranes to the south. In a number of cases, Mid-Proterozoic plutonism is synkinematic, with reverse motion on these reactivated shear zones (e.g. the Beer Bottle Pass pluton, Duebendorfer & Christensen, 1995; the Lawler Peak and Signal batholiths, Nyman & Karlstrom, 1994; the Mt Evans batholith, Graubard, 1991). This observation led Nyman et al., (1994) to infer a regional transpressive tectonic regime. However, normal motions are also observed (Mummy Range, Moeglin & Plymate, 1992; Mt Ethel, T. Foster & K. Chamberlain, personal communication, 1998; Sandia, Kirby et al., 1995). Thus, it is not clear whether these shear zones reflect the overall stress field during pluton emplacement or represent a late structural response following emplacement. An important feature associated with 1.4 Ga plutonism in the southwestern USA is a broad thermal anomaly. K–Ar and 40Ar/39Ar muscovite and hornblende ages of 1.4–1.3 Ga have been obtained from Early Proterozoic rocks in northern New Mexico (Karlstrom et al., 1997), in Arizona (Van Schmus et al., 1993; Wendlandt et al., 1996), and Colorado (Selverstone et al., 1995). In southern Wyoming, K–Ar and Rb–Sr mineral ages of Archean rocks were reset at 1.4–1.5 Ga (Peterman & Hildreth, 1978). These ages reflect a regional thermal event rather than local heating related to emplacement of 1.4 Ga granitoids, because the reset area is broader than that affected by plutonism. Indeed, the 1.4–1.5 Ga mineral ages in southern Wyoming extend more than 50 km north and 200 km northwest of the nearest 1.4 Ga intrusions, delineating an area in which temperatures reached at least 325°C (the blocking temperature for Ar in biotite). The regional scale of this reheating and isotopic resetting, the widespread and voluminous A-type magmatism that occurs throughout the southwestern and central USA south of the Wyoming craton, and the presence of an extensive ∼1.4 Ga mafic dike swarm in northern Colorado and southern Wyoming (Braddock & Peterman, 1989; Chamberlain & Frost, 1995) together suggest the heat was supplied by the mantle. The broad thermal perturbation at 1.4 Ga in the western USA provides strong supporting evidence for a mantle origin of anorogenic magmatism. Reduced, rapakivi-type granites, such as those described here from the Sherman batholith, and their extrusive equivalents, such as the fayalite rhyolites and icelandites of the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain province, require a source of tholeiitic-series rocks emplaced at or near the base of the continental crust. Large-scale mantle upwelling can provide the heat for partial melting of tholeiitic lower crust. Ascent along pre-existing structures will bring these magmas to the level of emplacement with minimal crustal contamination. In other areas, reduced granitic magmas may interact with felsic continental crust, producing more oxidized or peraluminous members of the A-type granite suite. Acknowledgements We thank J. L. Anderson and O. T. Rämö for helpful reviews, and editor S. Sorensen for detailed constructive suggestions. This research was supported by NSF Grant EAR9706237 to C. D. Frost and B. R. Frost. References Ague J. J. , Brimhall G. H. . Regional variations in bulk chemistry, mineralogy and the composition of mafic and accessory minerals in the batholiths of California , Geological Society of America Bulletin , 1988 , vol. 100 (pg. 891 - 911 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Aleinikoff J. N. . U–Th–Pb systematics of zircon inclusions in rock-forming minerals: a study of armoring against isotopic loss using the Sherman granite of Colorado–Wyoming, USA , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1983 , vol. 83 (pg. 259 - 269 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Aleinikoff J. N. , Reed J. C. Jr , Wooden J. L. . Lead isotopic evidence for the origin of Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic rocks of the Colorado province, U.S.A , Precambrian Research , 1993 , vol. 63 (pg. 97 - 122 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Andersen D. J. , Lindsley D. H. , Davidson P. M. . QUILF: a Pascal program to assess equilibria among Fe–Mg–Ti oxides, pyroxenes, olivine, and quartz , Computers in Geosciences , 1993 , vol. 19 (pg. 1333 - 1350 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Anderson I. C. . Petrology and geochemistry of the Red Mountain pluton, Laramie Anorthosite Complex, Wyoming , 1995 Laramie University of Wyoming pg. 164 Ph.D. Thesis Anderson J. L. . Proterozoic anorogenic granite plutonism of North America , Geological Society of America, Memoir , 1983 , vol. 161 (pg. 133 - 154 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Anderson J. L. , Bender E. E. . Nature and origin of Proterozoic A-type granitic magmatism in the southwestern United States of America , Lithos , 1989 , vol. 23 (pg. 19 - 52 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Anderson J. L. , Cullers R. L. . Geochemistry and evolution of the Wolf River batholith, a late Precambrian rapakivi massif in north Wisconsin, U.S.A , Precambrian Research , 1978 , vol. 7 (pg. 287 - 324 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Anderson J. L. , Smith D. R. . The effects of temperature and fO2 on the Al-in-hornblende barometry , American Mineralogist , 1995 , vol. 80 (pg. 549 - 559 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Anderson J. L. , Thomas W. M. . Proterozoic anorogenic two-mica granites: Silver Plume and St. Vrain batholiths of Colorado , Geology , 1985 , vol. 13 (pg. 177 - 180 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Arnaud N. O. , Vidal Ph. , Tapponnier P. , Matte Ph. , Deng W. M. . The high K2O volcanism of northwestern Tibet: geochemistry and tectonic implications , Earth and Planetary Science Letters , 1992 , vol. 111 (pg. 351 - 367 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Bacon C. R. , Macdonald R. , Smith R. L. , Baedecker P. A. . Pleistocene high-silica rhyolites of the Coso volcanic field, Inyo County, California , Journal of Geophysical Research , 1981 , vol. 86 (pg. 10223 - 10241 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Barker F. , Wones D. R. , Sharp W. N. , Desborough G. A. . The Pikes Peak batholith, Colorado Front Range, and a model for the origin of the gabbro–anorthosite–syenite–potassic granite suite , Precambrian Research , 1975 , vol. 2 (pg. 97 - 160 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Berman R. G. . Thermobarometry using multiequilibrium calculations: a new technique with petrological applications , Canadian Mineralogist , 1991 , vol. 29 (pg. 833 - 856 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Berman R. G. . Thermobarometry with estimation of equilibration state (TWEEQU): an IBM-compatible software package , Geological Survey of Canada Open File Report , 1992 pg. 2534 Google Scholar Google Preview OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat COPAC Bowden P. , Kinnaird J. A. , Diehl M. , Pirajno F. . Anorogenic granite evolution in Namibia—a fluid contribution , Geological Journal , 1990 , vol. 25 (pg. 381 - 390 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Braddock W. A. , Peterman Z. E. . The age of the Iron Dike—a distinctive Middle Proterozoic intrusion in the northern Front Range of Colorado , Mountain Geologist , 1989 , vol. 26 (pg. 97 - 99 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Carmichael I. S. E. . The redox states of basic and silicic magmas: a reflection of their source regions? , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1991 , vol. 106 (pg. 129 - 141 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Chamberlain K. R. . Medicine Bow orogeny: timing of deformation and model of crustal structure produced during continent–arc collision, ca , Rocky Mountain Geology , 1998 , vol. 33 (pg. 259 - 277 ) 1.78 Ga, southeastern Wyoming Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Chamberlain K. R. , Frost B. R. . Mid-Proterozoic mafic dikes in the central Wyoming province: evidence for Belt-age extension and supercontinent breakup , Geological Association of Canada–Mineralogical Association of Canada, Final Program and Abstracts , 1995 , vol. 20, pg. A-15 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Clemens J. D. , Holloway J. R. , White A. J. R. . Origin of an A-type granite: experimental constraints , American Mineralogist , 1986 , vol. 71 (pg. 317 - 324 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Collins W. J. , Beams S. D. , White A. J. R. , Chappell B. W. . Nature and origin of A-type granites with particular reference to southeastern Australia , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1982 , vol. 80 (pg. 189 - 200 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Conrad W. K. . The mineralogy and petrology of compositionally zoned ash flow tuffs, and related silicic rocks, from the McDermitt Caldera Complex, Nevada–Oregon , Journal of Geophysical Research , 1984 , vol. 89 (pg. 8639 - 8664 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Coulon C. , Maluski H. , Bollinger C. , Wang S. . Mesozoic and Cenozoic volcanic rocks from central and southern Tibet: 39Ar-40Ar dating, petrological characteristics and geodynamical significance , Earth and Planetary Science Letters , 1986 , vol. 79 (pg. 281 - 302 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Cox D. M. , Frost C. D. , Chamberlain K. R. . 2.01 Ga mafic Kennedy dike swarm, SE Wyoming: record of a rifted margin along the southern Wyoming province , Rocky Mountain Geology , 1999 , vol. 35 in press Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Creaser R. A. , White A. J. R. . Yardea dacite—large volume, high temperature felsic volcanism from the Middle Proterozoic of Australia , Geology , 1991 , vol. 19 (pg. 48 - 51 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Creaser R. A. , Price R. C. , Wormald R. J. . A-type granites revisited: assessment of a residual-source model , Geology , 1991 , vol. 19 (pg. 163 - 166 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Crecraft H. R. , Nash W. P. , Evans S. H. Jr . Late Cenozoic volcanism at Twin Peaks, Utah: geology and petrology , Journal of Geophysical Research , 1981 , vol. 86 (pg. 10303 - 10320 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Demaiffe D. , Moreau C. , Brown W. L. , Weis D. . Geochemical and isotopic (Sr, Nd and Pb) evidence on the origin of the anorthosite-bearing anorogenic complexes of the Aïr province, Niger , Earth and Planetary Science Letters , 1991 , vol. 105 (pg. 28 - 46 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat DePaolo D. J. . Neodymium isotopes in the Colorado Front Range and crust–mantle evolution in the Proterozoic , Nature , 1981 , vol. 291 (pg. 193 - 196 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Duebendorfer E. M. , Christensen C. . Synkinematic (?) intrusion of the ‘anorogenic’ 1425 Ma Beer Bottle Pass pluton, southern Nevada , Tectonics , 1995 , vol. 14 (pg. 168 - 184 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Duebendorfer E. M. , Houston R. S. . Proterozoic accretionary tectonics at the southern margin of the Archean Wyoming craton , Geological Society of America Bulletin , 1987 , vol. 98 (pg. 554 - 568 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Eaton G. P. . The Basin and Range Province: origin and tectonic significance , Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences , 1982 , vol. 10 (pg. 409 - 440 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Edwards B. R. . A field, geochemical and isotopic investigation of the igneous rocks in the Pole Mountain area of the Sherman batholith, southern Laramie Mountains, Wyoming, U.S.A , 1993 University of Wyoming pg. 164 Laramie: M.S. Thesis Eggler D. H. . Virginia Dale Precambrian Ring-Dike Complex, Colorado–Wyoming , Geological Society of America Bulletin , 1968 , vol. 79 (pg. 1545 - 1564 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Eklund O. , Fröjdö S. , Lindberg B. . Magma mixing, the petrogenetic link between anorthosite suites and rapakivi granites, Åland, SW Finland , Mineralogy and Petrology , 1994 , vol. 50 (pg. 3 - 19 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Elkins L. T. , Grove T. L. . Ternary feldspar experiments and thermodynamic models , American Mineralogist , 1990 , vol. 75 (pg. 544 - 559 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Evans B. W. , Ghiorso M. S. . Thermodynamics and petrology of cummingtonite , American Mineralogist , 1995 , vol. 80 (pg. 649 - 663 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Foland K. A. , Allen J. C. . Magma sources for Mesozoic anorogenic granites of the White Mountain magma series, New England, USA , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1991 , vol. 109 (pg. 195 - 211 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Frost B. R. , Lindsley D. H. . Lindsley D. H. . Occurrence of iron–titanium oxides in igneous rocks , Oxide Minerals: Petrologic and Magnetic Significance. Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy , 1991 , vol. 25 (pg. 433 - 468 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Frost B. R. , Lindsley D. H. . Equilibria among Fe–Ti oxides, pyroxenes, olivine, and quartz: Part II. Application , American Mineralogist , 1992 , vol. 77 (pg. 1004 - 1020 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Frost B. R. , Lindsley D. H. , Andersen D. J. . Fe–Ti oxide–silicate equilibria: assemblages with fayalitic olivine , American Mineralogist , 1988 , vol. 73 (pg. 727 - 740 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Frost B. R. , Frost C. D. , Chamberlain K. R. , Scoates J. S. , Lindsley D. H. . Thompson R. A. , Hudson M. R. , Pillmore C. L. . A field guide to the Proterozoic anorthositic, monzonitic, and granitic plutons, Laramie Range, southeastern Wyoming , Geological Excursions to the Rocky Mountains and Beyond. Colorado Geological Survey Special Publication , 1996 , vol. 44 (CD-ROM) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Frost C. D. , Frost B. R. . Reduced rapakivi-type granites: the tholeiite connection , Geology , 1997 , vol. 25 (pg. 647 - 650 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Frost C. D. , Frost B. R. , Chamberlain K. R. , Hulsebosch T. P. . The Late Archean history of the Wyoming province as recorded by granitic magmatism in the Wind River Range, Wyoming , Precambrian Research , 1998 , vol. 89 (pg. 145 - 173 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Frost C. D. , Chamberlain K. R. , Frost B. R. . The 1.76 Ga Horse Creek anorthosite complex, Wyoming: a massif anorthosite emplaced late in the Medicine Bow orogeny , Rocky Mountain Geology , 1999 , vol. 35 in press Google Scholar Google Preview OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat COPAC Fuhrman M. L. , Frost B. R. , Lindsley D. H. . Crystallization conditions of the Sybille monzosyenite, Laramie Anorthosite Complex, Wyoming , Journal of Petrology , 1988 , vol. 29 (pg. 699 - 729 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Geist D. J. , Frost C. D. , Kolker A. , Frost B. R. . A geochemical study of magmatism across a major terrane boundary: Sr and Nd isotopes in Proterozoic granitoids of the southern Laramie Range, Wyoming , Journal of Geology , 1989 , vol. 97 (pg. 331 - 342 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Geist D. J. , Frost C. D. , Kolker A. . Sr and Nd isotopic constraints on the origin of the Laramie Anorthosite Complex, Wyoming , American Mineralogist , 1990 , vol. 75 (pg. 13 - 20 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Ghiorso M. S. , Evans B. W. , Hirschmann M. M. , Yang H. . Thermodynamics of amphiboles: Fe–Mg cummingtonite solid solutions , American Mineralogist , 1995 , vol. 80 (pg. 502 - 519 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Gohl K. , Smithson S. B. . Seismic wide-angle study of accreted Proterozoic crust in southeastern Wyoming , Earth and Planetary Science Letters , 1994 , vol. 125 (pg. 293 - 305 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Grant J. A. , Frost B. R. . Contact metamorphism and partial melting of pelitic rocks in the aureole of the Laramie Anorthosite Complex, Morton Pass, Wyoming , American Journal of Science , 1990 , vol. 290 (pg. 425 - 472 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Graubard C. M. . Extension in a transpressional setting: emplacement of the Mid-Proterozoic Mt. Evans batholith, central Front Range, Colorado , Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs , 1991 , vol. 23 pg. 27 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Hanson G. N. . Rare earth elements in petrogenetic studies of igneous systems , Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences , 1980 , vol. 8 (pg. 371 - 406 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Harrison J. E. . Relationship between structure and mineralogy of the Sherman granite, southern part of the Laramie Range, Wyoming–Colorado , 1951 Urbana University of Illinois pg. 79 Ph.D. Thesis Harrison T. M. , Watson E. B. . The behavior of apatite during crustal anatexis: equilibrium and kinetic considerations , Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta , 1984 , vol. 48 (pg. 1467 - 1477 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Hedge C. E. , Peterman Z. E. , Braddock W. A. . Age of the major Precambrian regional metamorphism in the northern Front Range, Colorado , Geological Society of America Bulletin , 1967 , vol. 78 (pg. 551 - 557 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Hildreth W. , Halliday A. N. , Christiansen R. L. . Isotopic and chemical evidence concerning the genesis and contamination of basaltic and rhyolitic magma beneath the Yellowstone plateau volcanic field , Journal of Petrology , 1991 , vol. 32 (pg. 63 - 138 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Hills F. A. , Houston R. S. . Early Proterozoic tectonics of the central Rocky Mountains, North America , University of Wyoming Contributions to Geology , 1979 , vol. 17 (pg. 89 - 109 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Hoffman P. F. . Speculations on Laurentia's first gigayear (2.0 to 1.0 Ga) , Geology , 1989 , vol. 17 (pg. 135 - 138 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Houston R. S. , Marlatt G. . Proterozoic geology of the Granite Village area, Albany and Laramie Counties, Wyoming, compared with that of the Sierra Madre and Medicine Bow Mountains of southeastern Wyoming , US Geological Survey Bulletin , 1997 , vol. 2159 pg. 25 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Inger S. . Magmagenesis associated with extension in orogenic belts: examples from the Himalaya and Tibet , Tectonophysics , 1994 , vol. 238 (pg. 183 - 197 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Ishihara S. . Lateral variation of magnetic susceptibility of the Japanese granitoids , Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , 1979 , vol. 85 (pg. 509 - 523 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Jacobsen R. R. E. , Mcleod W. N. , Black R. . Ring-complexes in the younger granite province of northern Nigeria , Geological Society of London Memoir , 1958 , vol. 1 pg. 72 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Karlstrom K. E. , Houston R. S. . The Cheyenne belt: analysis of a Proterozoic suture in southern Wyoming , Precambrian Research , 1984 , vol. 25 (pg. 415 - 446 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Karlstrom K. E. , Dallmeyer R. D. , Grambling J. A. . 40Ar/39Ar evidence for 1.4 Ga regional metamorphism in New Mexico: implications for thermal evolution of lithosphere in the southwestern U.S.A , Journal of Geology , 1997 , vol. 105 (pg. 205 - 223 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Kinnaird J. , Bowden P. . African anorogenic alkaline magmatism and mineralization—a discussion with reference to the Niger–Nigerian province , Geological Journal , 1987 , vol. 22 (pg. 297 - 340 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Kirby E. , Karlstrom K. E. , Andronicos C. L. , Dallmeyer R. D. . Tectonic setting of the Sandia pluton: an orogenic 1.4 Ga granite in New Mexico , Tectonics , 1995 , vol. 14 (pg. 185 - 201 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Kisvarsanyi E. B. . Geology of the Precambrian St. Francois terrane, southeastern Missouri , Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Surveys, Contributions to Precambrian Geology Report of Investigations , 1981 , vol. 64 pg. 58 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Kolker A. , Lindsley D. H. . Geochemical evolution of the Maloin Ranch pluton, Laramie Anorthosite Complex, Wyoming: petrology and mixing relations , American Mineralogist , 1989 , vol. 74 (pg. 307 - 324 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Kolker A. , Frost C. D. , Hanson G. N. , Geist D. J. . Neodymium, strontium, and lead isotopes in the Maloin Ranch pluton, Wyoming: implications for the origin of evolved rocks at anorthosite margins , Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta , 1991 , vol. 55 (pg. 2285 - 2297 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Krogh T. E. . A low-contamination method for hydrothermal decomposition of zircon and extraction of U and Pb for isotopic age determination , Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta , 1973 , vol. 37 (pg. 485 - 494 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Leeman W. P. , Vitaliano C. J. , Prinz M. . Evolved lavas from the Snake River PlaCraters of the Moon National Monument, Idaho , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1976 , vol. 56 (pg. 35 - 60 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Lindsley D. H. , Frost B. R. . Equilibria among Fe–Ti oxides, pyroxenes, olivine, and quartz. Part I. Theory , American Mineralogist , 1992 , vol. 77 (pg. 987 - 1003 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Loiselle M. C. , Wones D. R. . Characteristics and origin of anorogenic granites , Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs , 1979 , vol. 11 pg. 468 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Ludwig K. R. . PBDAT for MS-DOS, a computer program for IBM-PC compatibles for processing raw Pb–U–Th isotope data, revised June, 1993 , US Geological Survey Open-File Report , 1988 , vol. 88–542. Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Ludwig K. R. . ISOPLOT for MS-DOS, a plotting and regression program for radiogenic isotope data, for IBM-PC compatible computers, revised October, 1994 , US Geological Survey Open-File Report , 1991 , vol. 91–445 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Ludwig K. R. , Silver L. T. . Lead isotope inhomogeneity in Precambrian K-feldspars , Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta , 1977 , vol. 41 (pg. 1457 - 1471 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Mitchell J. N. , Scoates J. S. , Frost C. D. . High-Al gabbros in the Laramie Anorthosite Complex, Wyoming: implications for the composition of melts parental to Proterozoic anorthosite , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1995 , vol. 119 (pg. 166 - 180 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Mitchell J. N. , Scoates J. S. , Frost C. D. , Kolker A. . The geochemical evolution of anorthosite residual magmas in the Laramie Anorthosite Complex, Wyoming , Journal of Petrology , 1996 , vol. 37 (pg. 637 - 660 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Miyashiro A. . Volcanic rock series in island arcs and active continental margins , American Journal of Science , 1974 , vol. 274 (pg. 321 - 355 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Moeglin T. D. , Plymate T. G. . Precambrian structural geology of the northern Mummy Range, north–central Colorado , Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs , 1992 , vol. 24 pg. 53 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Moreau C. , Demaiffe D. , Bellion Y. , Boullier A.-M. . A tectonic model for the location of Palaeozoic ring complexes in Aïr (Niger, West Africa) , Tectonophysics , 1994 , vol. 234 (pg. 129 - 146 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Nekvasil H. , Lindsley D. H. . Termination of the two-feldspar + liquid curve in the system Ab–Or–An–H2O at low H2O contents , American Mineralogist , 1990 , vol. 75 (pg. 1071 - 1079 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Nelson B. K. , DePaolo D. J. . 1700-Myr greenstone volcanic successions in southwestern North America and isotopic evolution of the Proterozoic mantle , Nature , 1984 , vol. 312 (pg. 143 - 146 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Noblett J. B. , Staub M. W. . Mid-Proterozoic lamprophyre commingled with late-stage granitic dikes of the anorogenic San Isabel batholith, Wet Mountains, Colorado , Geology , 1990 , vol. 18 (pg. 120 - 123 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Novak S. W. , Mahood G. A. . Rise and fall of a basalt–trachyte–rhyolite magma system at the Kane Springs Wash Caldera, Nevada , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1986 , vol. 94 (pg. 352 - 373 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Nyman M. W. , Karlstrom K. E. . Emplacement of 1.4 Ga plutons during transpression along Early Proterozoic boundaries , Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs , 1994 , vol. 26 pg. 57 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Nyman M. W. , Karlstrom K. E. , Kirby E. , Graubard C. M. . Mesoproterozoic contractional orogeny in western North America: evidence from ca. 1.4 Ga plutons , Geology , 1994 , vol. 22 (pg. 901 - 904 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Parrish R. R. . An improved micro-capsule for zircon dissolution in U–Pb geochronology , Isotope Geoscience , 1987 , vol. 66 (pg. 99 - 102 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Pearce J. A. , Harris N. B. W. , Tindle A. G. . Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks , Journal of Petrology , 1984 , vol. 25 (pg. 956 - 983 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Peterman Z. E. , Hildreth R. A. . Reconnaissance geology and geochronology of the Precambrian of the Granite Mountains , US Geological Survey, Professional Papers , 1978 , vol. 1055 pg. 22 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Peterman Z. E. , Hedge C. E. , Braddock W. A. . Age of Precambrian events in the northeastern Front Range, Colorado , Journal of Geophysical Research , 1968 , vol. 73 (pg. 2277 - 2296 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Poitrasson F. , Duthou J.-L. , Pin C. . The relationship between petrology and Nd isotopes as evidence for contrasting anorogenic granite genesis: example of the Corsican province (SE France) , Journal of Petrology , 1995 , vol. 36 (pg. 1251 - 1274 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Rämö O. T. , Haapala I. . One hundred years of rapakivi granite , Mineralogy and Petrology , 1995 , vol. 52 (pg. 129 - 185 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Salonsaari P. T. , Haapala I. . The Jaala–Iitti rapakivi complex. An example of bimodal magmatism and hybridization in the Wiborg rapakivi batholith, southeastern Finland , Mineralogy and Petrology , 1994 , vol. 50 (pg. 21 - 34 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Scoates J. S. , Chamberlain K. R. . Baddeleyite (ZrO2) and zircon (ZrSiO4) from anorthositic rocks of the Laramie anorthosite complex, Wyoming: petrologic consequences and U–Pb ages , American Mineralogist , 1995 , vol. 80 (pg. 1317 - 1327 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Scoates J. S. , Chamberlain K. R. . Orogenic to post-orogenic origin for the 1.76 Ga Horse Creek anorthosite complex, Wyoming, USA , Journal of Geology , 1997 , vol. 105 (pg. 331 - 343 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Scoates J. S. , Frost C. D. . A strontium and neodymium isotopic investigation of the Laramie anorthosites, Wyoming, USA: implications for magma chamber processes and the evolution of magma conduits in Proterozoic anorthosites , Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta , 1996 , vol. 60 (pg. 95 - 107 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Scoates J. S. , Frost C. D. , Mitchell J. N. , Lindsley D. H. , Frost B. R. . Residual liquid origin for a monzonitic intrusion in a Mid-Proterozoic anorthosite complex: the Sybille intrusion, Laramie anorthosite complex, Wyoming , Geological Society of America Bulletin , 1996 , vol. 108 (pg. 1357 - 1371 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Selverstone J. , Hodgins M. , Shaw C. . 1.4 versus 1.7 Ga metamorphism in the northern Colorado Front Range: a repeated history of post-accretion mid-crustal heating , Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs , 1995 , vol. 27 pg. A-49 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Skjerlie K. P. , Johnston A. D. . Fluid-absent melting behavior of an F-rich tonalite gneiss at mid-crustal pressures: implications for the generation of anorogenic granites , Journal of Petrology , 1993 , vol. 34 (pg. 785 - 815 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Smith C. B. . Kimberlite and mantle derived xenoliths at Iron Mountain, Wyoming , 1977 Fort Collins Colorado State University pg. 218 Ph.D. Thesis Smith R. B. , Braile L. W. . Snoke A. W. , Steidtmann J. R. , Roberts S. M. . Topographic signature, space–time evolution, and physical properties of the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain volcanic system: the Yellowstone hotspot , Geology of Wyoming. Geological Survey of Wyoming Memoir , 1993 , vol. 5 (pg. 694 - 754 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Spicuzza M. J. . High-grade metamorphism and partial melting in the Bluegrass Creek suite, central Laramie Mountains, Wyoming , 1990 Duluth University of Minnesota pg. 155 M.S. Thesis Thompson A. B. . Mineral reactions in pelitic rocks: I. Prediction of P–T–X(Fe–Mg) phase relations , American Journal of Science , 1976 , vol. 276 (pg. 401 - 424 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Tilton G. R. . Isotopic lead ages of chondritic meteorites , Earth and Planetary Science Letters , 1973 , vol. 19 (pg. 321 - 329 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Turner S. P. , Foden J. D. , Morrison R. S. . Derivation of some A-type magmas by fractionation of basaltic magma: an example from the Padthaway Ridge, South Australia , Lithos , 1992 , vol. 28 (pg. 151 - 179 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Van Schmus W. R. , Bickford M. E. , Anderson J. L. , Bender E. E. , Anderson R. R. , Bauer P. W. , et al. , Precambrian: Conterminous U.S. The Geology of North America , vol. C-2 (pg. 171 - 334 ) Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America Google Scholar Google Preview OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat COPAC Vasek R. W. , Kolker A. . Virginia Dale intrusion, Colorado and Wyoming: magma mixing and hybridization in the margins of a Proterozoic volcanic edifice , Rocky Mountain Geology , 1999 , vol. 34 in press Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Verts L. A. , Chamberlain K. R. , Frost C. D. . U–Pb sphene dating of metamorphism: the importance of sphene growth in the contact aureole of the Red Mountain pluton, Laramie Mountains, Wyoming , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1996 , vol. 125 (pg. 186 - 199 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Vorma A. . Alkali feldspars of the Wiborg rapakivi massif in southeastern Finland , Bulletin, Commission Géologique de Finlande , 1971 , vol. 246 (pg. 1 - 72 ) Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat Watson E. M. , Harrison T. M. . Zircon saturation revisited: temperature and compositional effects in a variety of crustal magma types , Earth and Planetary Science Letters , 1983 , vol. 64 (pg. 295 - 304 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Wen S. , Nekvasil H. . SOLVCALC: an interactive graphics program package for calculating the ternary feldspar solvus for two-feldspar geothermometry , Computers and Geosciences , 1994 , vol. 20 (pg. 1025 - 1040 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Wendlandt E. , DePaolo D. J. , Baldridge W. S. . Thermal history of Colorado Plateau lithosphere from Sm–Nd mineral geochronology of xenoliths , Geological Society of America Bulletin , 1996 , vol. 108 (pg. 757 - 767 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Wiebe R. A. . Commingling of contrasted magmas in the plutonic environment: examples from the Nain anorthosite complex , Journal of Geology , 1980 , vol. 88 (pg. 197 - 209 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Windley B. F. . Proterozoic anorogenic magmatism and its orogenic connections , Journal of the Geological Society, London , 1993 , vol. 150 (pg. 39 - 50 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Wooden J. L. , Mueller P. A. . Pb, Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of a suite of Late Archean igneous rocks, eastern Beartooth Mountains: implications for crust–mantle evolution , Earth and Planetary Science Letters , 1988 , vol. 87 (pg. 59 - 72 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Xirouchakis D. , Lindsley D. H. . Equilibria among titanite, hedenbergite, gayalite, quartz, ilmenite and magnetite: experiments and internally consistent thermodynamic data for titanite , American Mineralogist , 1998 , vol. 83 (pg. 712 - 725 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Zartman Z. E. , Doe B. R. . Plumbotectonics—the model , Tectonophysics , 1981 , vol. 75 (pg. 135 - 162 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Zielinski R. A. , Peterman Z. E. , Stuckless J. S. , Rosholt J. N. , Nkomo I. T. . The chemical and isotopic record of rock–water interaction in the Sherman granite, Wyoming and Colorado , Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology , 1981 , vol. 78 (pg. 209 - 219 ) Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Author notes † Present address:Department of Geology,Grand Valley State University, Allendale,MI 49401, USA. © Oxford University Press 1999 © Oxford University Press 1999
TI - Petrogenesis of the 1.43 Ga Sherman Batholith, SE Wyoming, USA: a Reduced, Rapakivi-type Anorogenic Granite
JF - Journal of Petrology
DO - 10.1093/petroj/40.12.1771
DA - 1999-12-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/petrogenesis-of-the-1-43-ga-sherman-batholith-se-wyoming-usa-a-reduced-UacNqeJS3S
SP - 1771
EP - 1802
VL - 40
IS - 12
DP - DeepDyve
ER -