TY - JOUR
AU - Razis, Evangelia
AB - Abstract Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers. It exhibits great heterogeneity in tumor biology and treatment response. Germline mutations of DNA repair genes BRCA1/2 are the fundamental defects in hereditary ovarian cancer that expresses a distinct phenotype of high response rates to platinum agents, improved disease-free intervals and survival rates, and high-grade serous histology. The term “BRCAness” describes the phenotypic traits that some sporadic ovarian tumors share with tumors in BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers and reflects similar causative molecular abnormalities. BRCA pathway studies and molecular profiling reveal BRCA-related defects in almost half of the cases of ovarian cancer. BRCA-like tumors are particularly sensitive to DNA-damaging agents (e.g., platinum agents) because of inadequate BRCA-mediated DNA repair mechanisms, such as nucleotide-excision repair and homologous recombination (HR). Additional inhibition of other DNA repair pathways leads to synthetic lethality in HR-deficient cells; this has been employed in the treatment of BRCA-like ovarian tumors with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors with promising results. This article presents a comprehensive review of the relevant literature on the role of BRCAness in ovarian cancer with respect to BRCA function, methods of BRCA epigenetic defect detection and molecular profiling, and the implications of BRCA dysfunction in the treatment of ovarian cancer. BRCAness, BRCA1/2, Ovarian cancer, PARP inhibitors, Synthetic lethality Introduction Ovarian malignancies are a group of heterogeneous tumors that express diverse pathologic characteristics and biological behavior. Hereditary ovarian cancer comprises 10%–15% of all cases of ovarian malignancies and is mainly associated with germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 DNA repair genes [1]. Ovarian tumors in BRCA-mutated patients have relatively uniform behavior with high overall response rates to first-line platinum-based treatment [2–4], high response rates to platinum-based chemotherapy at first and subsequent relapses [2, 3], long disease-free intervals [2–4], improved overall survival rates (especially in more advanced stages) [2–5], possibly higher incidences of visceral metastases [6], and usually (but not exclusively) high-grade serous histology [5–9]. In a multivariate analysis for independent predictors of survival, BRCA status was one of three parameters (together with patient age and extent of surgery) associated with patient survival rates both in the subgroup of patients with stage III disease and in the entire study population [2]. The term “BRCAness” has been used to describe the phenotypic characteristics that some sporadic ovarian cancers share with tumors found in the setting of BRCA germline mutations. The term also reflects that this common biologic behavior comes from molecular defects in the cellular machinery similar to the ones caused by BRCA mutation [10, 11]. The notion began to form in 1996 after studies of BRCA1/2 genes in sporadic ovarian cancer showed multiple defects in the BRCA1/2 pathway that would explain a BRCA-like phenotype [12–17]. BRCA Gene and Molecular Defects in BRCAness The phenotypic traits of BRCAness are reflective of defective function of the BRCA pathway in the affected cancer cells (Table 1). The BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes are implicated in cell proliferation, DNA damage response, and DNA repair. DNA is under constant stress during replication, transcription, and exposure to harmful agents such as ionizing radiation, oxygen radicals, and genotoxic chemical compounds including antitumor drugs. When DNA damage occurs, sensory proteins, such as the kinases ATM and ATR that participate in cell cycle checkpoints, activate DNA repair pathways that vary according to the kind and extent of the damage inflicted [18]. Knowledge of DNA damage response pathways and their status in cancer facilitates prediction of the sensitivity of healthy and neoplastic tissues to chemotherapeutic agents and radiation and permits exploitation of the defects of these pathways in favor of the patient. Table 1 Some molecular defects that can lead to BRCAness Open in new tab Table 1 Some molecular defects that can lead to BRCAness Open in new tab BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations are the fundamental defect in hereditary ovarian cancer where the normal allele of the carrier is inactivated in cancer cells [17, 19]. On the contrary, BRCA1/2 somatic mutations are generally rare in the sporadic forms [12, 15, 17, 20–22] but still are a significant causative gene defect as shown in extensive genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma by the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network [23]. Higher incidence of somatic mutations is found in patients with specific characteristics, such as Italian or Jewish origin, serous histology, and younger age [24]. Either genetic or somatic mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 are found in approximately 20% of all ovarian tumors [16]; BRCA1/2 alterations of all kinds, including mutations, have been reported in up to 82% of ovarian tumors [17]. In cases other than BRCA mutations, the BRCAness pattern of biological and clinical behavior seems to be the result of different epigenetic processes. The BRCA1 promoter aberrant methylation in cytosine residues of CpG dinucleotides has been shown to lead to decreased BRCA1 expression in 5%–30% of ovarian tumors, resulting in BRCAness [13–15, 23]. A subsequent study indicated that BRCA1 promoter methylation can be a particularly adverse prognostic factor compared to either BRCA1 germline mutation or no loss [25]. A more recent report found epigenetic silencing of BRCA1 and BRCA1/2 mutations to be mutually exclusive; patients with epigenetic BRCA1 silencing were found to have similar prognosis with wild-type carriers [23]. Although loss of heterozygosity for the BRCA locus has been noted in sporadic breast cancer [26], the importance of this mechanism has not been verified in ovarian cancer. BRCAness could also emerge from defects in genes whose function either affects or is affected by normal BRCA gene function. A typical example is the amplification of EMSY that leads to BRCA silencing. The EMSY gene is amplified in about 20% of cases of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas [27] and disrupts BRCA2 participation in DNA damage response, rendering the cell prone to genomic instability [28, 29]. BRCA cooperates with the proteins of the Fanconi anemia (FA) complex in the pathway of DNA repair and thus defects in members of the FA complex reproduce the BRCA-deficient phenotype [30]. Methylation of the FA complex gene FANCF is found in 21% of ovarian cancers and ovarian cell lines with FANCF methylation demonstrated high sensitivity to platinum agents that was reversed with FANCF demethylation [31]. Defects in proteins involved in DNA repair besides BRCA could theoretically also lead to BRCAness. In a large-scale genomic analysis of ovarian cancer cases, hypermethylation of Rad51C, a protein that locates DNA repair machinery to the damaged strand, was found in 2% of the cases. In addition, mutations of the DNA-damage sensory proteins ATM and ATR were found in 3% of the cases [23]. In the same study, PTEN was deleted or mutated in 7% of the cases [23]. PTEN is involved in transcription regulation of Rad51 and genomic integrity maintenance [32]; a BRCA-like phenotype could emerge when the function of either one of these is disrupted. BRCA Defect Detection and Molecular Profiles Screening for mutations is impractical for large populations and also not informative for other kinds of defects in the BRCA pathway that can lead to BRCAness. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) caused either by a germline mutation or an epigenetic change may be a better way to identify tumors that behave in a BRCA-like way. In one study, the presence of LOH was frequently associated with BRCA somatic or germline mutation, especially in the presence of family history [15]. In another study, immunohistochemistry for BRCA1 demonstrated a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 93%, and positive predictive value of 73% for detecting a BRCA1 mutation [33]. Of note, high BRCA1 protein expression detected with immunohistochemistry had a negative prognostic value for progression-free survival in patients with ovarian cancer and minimal residual disease [34]. BRCA1 loss was assessed in breast cancer via a comparative genomic hybridization classifier; a positive result had positive predictive value for the efficacy of DNA damage-inducing chemotherapy [35]. Certain morphologic patterns in tumor specimens may predict for a BRCA-defective genotype. More specifically, the BRCA1/2 genotype in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma was found to be associated with solid, pseudo-endometrioid, or transitional cell carcinoma-like morphology; higher mitotic indices; increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; and necrosis. In fact, these characteristics could predict its presence with 100% sensitivity and 57% specificity [36]. BRCA2-mutated tumors seem to have necrosis and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to a lesser extent than those with a BRCA1 mutation [36], although a study in a much greater population showed no statistically significant differences between BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated ovarian tumor pathology [37]. An early attempt to describe the BRCAness pathway explored the molecular profiles of nonredundant, significantly expressed genes of BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated ovarian tumors and then used them to segregate sporadic cancers in two BRCA1 or BRCA2-like groups [38], suggesting that BRCA1-like and BRCA2-like molecular profiles are expressed in some sporadic ovarian tumors. More recently, a BRCAness gene signature was developed from samples of BRCA1/2-mutated tumors, which successfully predicted platinum responsiveness in tumor specimens. The presence of a BRCAness profile also carried strong independent prognostic value for patients with sporadic ovarian cancers [39]. Interestingly, in these studies the gene signatures of sporadic BRCA-like tumors were much more like those of BRCA tumors than non-BRCA-like sporadic cancers. Additionally, a BRCA-like profile was associated with longer survival times. In fact, there were some hereditary BRCA tumors that expressed a signature similar to the nonhereditary, non-BRCA-like tumors, whereas the BRCA-like tumors clustered with most hereditary BRCA tumors. Furthermore, there were more similarities between BRCA1 and BRCA1-like tumors and between BRCA2 and BRCA2-like tumors, respectively, than between BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors [39]. Of note, the primary BRCA defect in BRCA-deficient tumors may correlate with alterations of the molecular profile. BRCA genetic loss relates to decreased PTEN mRNA levels, whereas epigenetic loss of BRCA1 is related to copy number gain of PIK3CA [40]. It is well known that both of these defects lead to the activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Also, accumulation of mutated p53 protein, which is the most common somatic genetic event in ovarian cancer, was found in the same frequency in BRCA1/2 mutated and nonmutated cases [41]. However, overexpression of p53 with loss of p21 expression is significantly more frequent in high-grade serous carcinomas with epigenetic loss of BRCA1 compared with high-grade serous tumors without loss of BRCA1 or with BRCA1 somatic and germline mutations [40]. BRCAness in Treatment BRCA1 and BRCA2 are mainly involved in the path of homologous recombination (HR) that repairs DNA interstrand crosslinks and double-strand breaks [42]. BRCA1 also participates in nonhomologous end joining of double-strand breaks and nucleotide excision repair of DNA adducts [43]. Double-strand breaks and DNA adducts are the typical DNA damage caused by DNA alkylating agents such as cisplatin and mitomycin. BRCA-deficient cells are highly sensitive to these agents in vitro [44, 45]. Many clinical studies in patients with BRCA-deficient ovarian cancer have demonstrated high sensitivity of these tumors to platinum-based therapy [3, 11, 46] that leads to long disease-free intervals and improved overall survival rates [2–5, 9]. A recent study of women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer revealed significant chemosensitivity and survival benefit only in BRCA2 mutation carriers compared with BRCA1 mutations and BRCA1/2 wild types [47], but the study received strong criticism for its low statistical power. Nonetheless, these conflicting results stress the need for evaluation of BRCAness status as a stratification factor in large phase III studies, especially in light of new targeted therapies. BRCA status also appears to affect the efficacy of mitotic spindle poisons, such as the taxanes. BRCA1 participates in the mitotic checkpoint at the metaphase-anaphase transition and controls the proper segregation of chromosomes between daughter cells [48, 49]. Spindle disruption leads to apoptotic cell death that involves the JNK pathway [50]. BRCA1 activates the JNK pathway [51]; in BRCA-deficient breast cancer cells, paclitaxel treatment led to reduced JNK activation and lower apoptosis [50]. These findings suggest that BRCA1 directs cells towards apoptotic death after spindle poison-based treatment, in contrast to its protective role in DNA repair and cell survival after treatment with DNA-damaging treatment. Studies in breast cancer cell lines showed that loss of BRCA1 function leads to taxane resistance [52, 53], but a clinical study showed that decreased expression of BRCA2 mRNA predicted a favorable response to docetaxel in breast cancer [54]. PI3K/Akt activation in BRCA-deficient ovarian cancer [40] could also contribute to taxane-resistance as overexpression of activated AKT has been shown to decrease apoptosis induced by paclitaxel in ovarian cancer cells [55]. Overall, there have been conflicting reports on the role of BRCA in taxane-sensitivity in ovarian cell lines [56–58] with the latest showing that inhibition of endogenous BRCA1 expression results in increased sensitivity to platinum therapy and decreased sensitivity to spindle poisons. In the same report, high BRCA1 mRNA expression levels were associated with increased overall survival rates for ovarian cancer after taxane-containing chemotherapy. This BRCA-related binary behavior could be used in treatment planning for ovarian cancer. Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors BRCA-deficient cells have defective HR capacities and are thus dependent on other pathways to repair DNA damage. The interruption of those pathways is likely to be deleterious for those cells, while leaving cells with adequate HR function unaffected. This is the thinking behind synthetic lethality—a term referring to the targeted exploitation of genes relating to functions that are already defective in a particular cell. The two insults together are lethal for the cell, whereas cells with one or the other defect remain unaffected [59, 60]. The term was first used in 1946 by Dobzhansky in Drosophila studies [61]. BRCA-deficient cancers are ideal targets for synthetic lethality, which has been accomplished by targeting another DNA repair pathway called base excision repair (BER) through poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. PARPs are a family of enzymes that play a key role in the repair of single-strand breaks through BER. PARP1 is the most abundant member of this family and is the main target of a novel category of molecules called PARP inhibitors [62]. PARP inhibition causes accumulation of DNA single-strand breaks, which, when left unrepaired, lead to potentially lethal double-strand breaks. In normal cells, the latter can be repaired through HR. However, in BRCA-deficient cells, the combined inadequacy of HR and BER leads to cell death—a typical example of synthetic lethality [63, 64]. In a very impressive example of translational research, PARP inhibitors were rapidly taken to phase I studies demonstrating considerable antitumor activity against BRCA1/2-related tumors of ovarian, breast, and prostate origin with acceptable toxicity [65, 66]. The following proof-of-concept phase II studies of the PARP1 inhibitor olaparib [67] in BRCA1/2-mutated patients with advanced chemorefractory breast cancer and recurrent platinum-treated ovarian cancer [68, 69] showed dose-related response rates and good tolerability. In concordance with the BRCAness theory, PARP inhibition proved to be synthetically lethal for cells lacking other proteins involved in homologous recombination besides BRCA1/2, such as RAD51, ATR, ATM, CHK1, and FANCA or FANCC [70]. This is important because homologous recombination seems to be defective in almost half of ovarian cancers [23]. Olaparib was tested as monotherapy in a phase 2 study in patients with high-grade serous and/or undifferentiated ovarian cancer or triple-negative breast cancer. Patients were stratified according to BRCA status; high response rates in both BRCA-mutated and nonmutated ovarian tumors were observed. However, the same study failed to show any benefit for patients with triple-negative breast cancer [71]. Similar outcomes were reported for a phase III study of the addition of iniparib to gemcitabine and carboplatin treatment for patients with triple-negative breast cancer. That study failed to show significant improvement in the coprimary endpoints of overall and progression-free survival rates, although patients receiving iniparib as second- or third-line treatment had a modest but still not significant benefit [72]. However, the results of this study could be misleading; iniparib's primary mechanism of action may be the modification of cysteine-containing proteins and not PARP inhibition [73]. Furthermore, iniparib failed to kill homologous recombination-deficient cells or inhibit PARP activity in vitro compared with better characterized PARP inhibitors such as olaparib in a recent study [74]. Most recently, olaparib was found to have equivalent efficacy with liposomal doxorubicin in patients with recurrent BRCA1/2 mutated ovarian tumors [75]. It must be noted that the outcome in the liposomal doxorubicin arm of this study was significantly superior to what would be anticipated based on historical data; this may be coincidental, but it could also be due to the increased sensitivity of BRCA-mutated tumors to DNA poisons. The first explanation for the conflicting results of PARP inhibition between breast and ovarian BRCA-mutated tumors that comes to mind is that “triple negativity” is not an appropriate surrogate marker for BRCAness [76] in breast cancer. On the other hand, BRCAness seems to be fairly well defined and convincingly documented in ovarian cancer. However, better markers of BRCAness are still needed, especially in the light of potential therapeutic gain from PARP inhibition. A list of ongoing trials of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer can be found on the site www.clinicaltrials.gov. Searching for the terms “PARP inhibitors” and “ovarian cancer” recalls 28 studies, of which six are completed. Results have been published for four of the completed studies [65, 69, 71, 75]. The other two completed trials of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer are a single-arm study of iniparib in patients with BRCA1/2-associated ovarian cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00677079) and a phase I study of the PARP inhibitor veliparib in combination with temozolomide in patients with various cancer types, including ovarian cancer (NCT00526617). The PARP inhibitor olaparib is used in eight of the ongoing studies, administered either alone, with chemotherapeutic agents (in combination or sequentially with carboplatin with or without paclitaxel) or with antiangiogenic agents (cediranib) in BRCA-deficient or sporadic ovarian cancer. The PARP inhibitor veliparib is studied in five phase I trials that include patients with ovarian cancer, given alone or with irinotecan, topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab or temozolomide, as well as four phase II studies with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, temozolamide and cyclophosphamide. Iniparib is being studied in three phase II studies of recurrent ovarian cancer—as a single agent in one study and in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin in the other two studies. Two more trials are investigating PARP inhibitors AGO14699 (phase II) and MK4827 (phase I) in ovarian cancer [77]. Data on clinical trials was current as of April 10, 2012, updated from [77]. Results from these trials should clarify the role of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer and the need to identify BRCA-like cases. What Happens After PARP Inhibition? Tumor behavior after PARP inhibition therapy is also interesting. Preliminary analysis of olaparib-treated patients with chemorefractory ovarian cancer showed remarkable response to carboplatin and/or paclitaxel-based treatment after disease progression, although a causative relationship between olaparib and the subsequent enhanced chemosensitivity cannot be established [78]. Finely targeted therapy provokes critical, equally precise resistance mechanisms in the constantly changing cancer cell. A report from 2008 revealed a reversion of BRCA2 mutation in BRCA2-mutated platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer as a platinum resistance gaining mechanism [79]; similar restoring mutations in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 were recently described in primary and recurrent patients with BRCA1/2-mutated ovarian cancer who had previously received chemotherapy. These mutations appeared in 28% of recurrent ovarian carcinomas and 46% of the platinum-resistant cases and were predictive of platinum chemotherapy resistance [80, 81]. Reversion of the BRCA2 mutation also confers resistance to PARP inhibition therapy [82]. However, PARP inhibitor resistance can potentially occur through other mechanisms as well, such as upregulation of other DNA repair pathways, activation of cell proliferation pathways, or mutations in the PARP gene that alter the interaction of PARP with its inhibitor [83]. As it seems, BRCA-deficient ovarian cancer would be platinum-sensitive and taxane-resistant, so under the pressure of platinum-based therapy a BRCA-restoring mutation in these cells could reverse the sensitivity-resistance relationship, perhaps rendering the cells taxane-sensitive again. Alternating BRCA function could be of use in optimizing therapeutic gain from variants of taxane/platinum regimens [84]. In an attempt to predict sensitivity to PARP inhibition, si-RNA screen studies showed that defects in genes involved in DNA repair pathways other than HR can be used with PARP inhibition for synthetic lethality and revealed novel targets such as CDK5, MAPK12, PLK3, and the transcription coupled DNA repair proteins DDB1 and XAB2–9 [85, 86]. More recently, BRCA1 CpG island hypermethylation was also proposed as another predictive factor of PARP inhibition sensitivity [87]. Rad51 nuclear foci, which are formed when BRCA1 senses DNA double-strand breaks, were studied as a marker for adequate HR in ovarian cancer samples and correlated with in vitro response to PARP inhibition [88]. Synthetic lethality in BRCA-deficient tumors could be achieved with other DNA repair-disrupting molecules. ATM inhibition in FA pathway-deficient cells was shown to result in DNA breakage, cell cycle arrest, and apoptotic cell death [89]. Furthermore, ATM kinase inhibitor use sensitized mantle lymphoma cells to PARP inhibitors [90], underlining the potential of multitargeted DNA repair inhibition in already DNA-repair defective tumors. Decreased PTEN levels in BRCA-defective cells could enhance synthetic lethality with PARP inhibition, as PTEN-deficient cells were 20-fold more sensitive to PARP inhibition and showed decreased levels of Rad51 foci formation [32, 91, 92]. FOXM1 transcriptional factor network is upregulated in 84% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer [23] and is related to tumorigenesis and tumor proliferation [93]. FOXM1 crosstalks with the BRCA pathway [94] and could represent a novel therapeutic target in ovarian cancer. The role of hypoxia in this setting should also be assessed because the latter inhibits DNA repair mechanisms [95] and has been reported to lead to decreased expression of BRCA1/2 and Rad51 [96, 97] and, therefore, to increased PARP inhibition sensitivity in tumor cells [98]. Summary Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common female cancer in the western world. BRCA1/2 germline mutations are the most common defect that gives rise to hereditary ovarian cancer, accounting for about 10% of cases. Further study implicated these genes in sporadic ovarian cancer via multiple deactivating mechanisms that all lead to impaired function of BRCA1/2 and thus to a distinct phenotype called BRCAness. The central role of BRCA in DNA damage response and repair renders BRCA-defective cells sensitive to DNA damaging agents. Further inhibition of other DNA repair pathways can be deleterious for BRCA-defective cells. This synthetic lethality is employed in new targeted treatments in ovarian cancer, such as PARP inhibition, thus leading to the best example of personalized therapy in ovarian cancer to date. Improved BRCA defect characterization and detection will allow better patient selection and possibly improved clinical outcomes for a disease that is still the leading cause of death among gynecological malignancies. This type of extensive and in-depth rational understanding of a biological variant is rare and warrants further development—not only for its obvious, inherent therapeutic implications, but also as a model of studying and understanding core processes in cancer cells. (C/A) Consulting/advisory relationship; (RF) Research funding; (E) Employment; (H) Honoraria received; (OI) Ownership interests; (IP) Intellectual property rights/inventor/patent holder; (SAB) Scientific advisory board Author Contributions Conception/Design: Georgios Rigakos, Evangelia Razis Provision of study material or patients: Georgios Rigakos, Evangelia Razis Collection and/or assembly of data: Georgios Rigakos, Evangelia Razis Data analysis and interpretation: Georgios Rigakos, Evangelia Razis Manuscript writing: Georgios Rigakos, Evangelia Razis Final approval of manuscript: Georgios Rigakos, Evangelia Razis References 1 Li AJ , Karlan BY Genetic factors in ovarian carcinoma Curr Oncol Rep 2001 ; 3 : 27 – 32 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 2 Boyd J , Sonoda Y, Federici MG et al. Clinicopathologic features of BRCA-linked and sporadic ovarian cancer JAMA 2000 ; 283 : 2260 – 2265 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 3 Vencken PM , Kriege M, Hoogwerf D et al. Chemosensitivity and outcome of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy compared with sporadic ovarian cancer patients Ann Oncol 2011 ; 22 : 1346 – 1352 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 4 Aida H , Takakuwa K, Nagata H et al. Clinical features of ovarian cancer in Japanese women with germ-line mutations of BRCA1 Clin Cancer Res 1998 ; 4 : 235 – 240 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 5 Rubin SC , Benjamin I, Behbakht K et al. Clinical and pathological features of ovarian cancer in women with germ-line mutations of BRCA1 N Engl J Med 1996 ; 335 : 1413 – 1416 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 6 Gourley C , Michie CO, Roxburgh P et al. Increased incidence of visceral metastases in Scottish patients with BRCA1/2-defective ovarian cancer: An extension of the ovarian BRCAness phenotype J Clin Oncol 2010 ; 28 : 2505 – 2511 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 7 Jóhannsson OT , Ranstam J, Borg A et al. Survival of BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer patients: A population-based study from southern Sweden J Clin Oncol 1998 ; 16 ( 2 ): 397 – 404 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 8 Pharoah PD , Easton DF, Stockton DL et al. Survival in familial, BRCA1-associated, and BRCA2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer United Kingdom Coordinating Committee for Cancer Research (UKCCCR) Familial Ovarian Cancer Study Group Cancer Res 1999 ; 59 : 868 – 871 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 9 Chetrit A , Hirsh-Yechezkel G, Ben-David Y et al. Effect of BRCA1/2 mutations on long-term survival of patients with invasive ovarian cancer: The national Israeli study of ovarian cancer J Clin Oncol 2008 ; 26 : 20 – 25 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 10 Turner N , Tutt A, Ashworth A Hallmarks of “BRCAness” in sporadic cancers Nat Rev Cancer 2004 ; 4 : 814 – 819 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 11 Tan DS , Rothermundt C, Thomas K et al. “BRCAness” syndrome in ovarian cancer: A case-control study describing the clinical features and outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations J Clin Oncol 2008 ; 26 : 5530 – 5536 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 12 Foster KA , Harrington P, Kerr J et al. Somatic and germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene in sporadic ovarian cancer Cancer Res 1996 ; 56 : 3622 – 3625 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 13 Baldwin RL , Nemeth E, Tran H et al. BRCA1 promoter region hypermethylation in ovarian carcinoma: A population-based study Cancer Res 2000 ; 60 : 5329 – 5333 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 14 Esteller M , Silva JM, Dominguez G et al. Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors J Natl Cancer Inst 2000 ; 92 : 564 – 569 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 15 Geisler JP , Hatterman-Zogg MA, Rathe JA et al. Frequency of BRCA1 dysfunction in ovarian cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 2002 ; 94 : 61 – 67 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 16 Hennessy BT , Timms KM, Carey MS et al. Somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could expand the number of patients that benefit from poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer J Clin Oncol 2010 ; 28 : 3570 – 3576 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 17 Hilton JL , Geisler JP, Rathe JA et al. Inactivation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in ovarian cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 2002 ; 94 : 1396 – 1406 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 18 Kastan MB , Bartek J Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer Nature 2004 ; 432 : 316 – 323 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 19 Wang C , Horiuchi A, Imai T et al. Expression of BRCA1 protein in benign, borderline, and malignant epithelial ovarian neoplasms and its relationship to methylation and allelic loss of the BRCA1 gene J Pathol 2004 ; 202 : 215 – 223 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 20 Merajver SD , Pham TM, Caduff RF et al. Somatic mutations in the BRCA1 gene in sporadic ovarian tumours Nat Genet 1995 ; 9 : 439 – 443 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 21 Futreal PA , Liu Q, Shattuck-Eidens D et al. BRCA1 mutations in primary breast and ovarian carcinomas Science 1994 ; 266 : 120 – 122 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 22 Lancaster JM , Wooster R, Mangion J et al. BRCA2 mutations in primary breast and ovarian cancers Nat Genet 1996 ; 13 : 238 – 240 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 23 Bell D , Berchuck A, Birrer M et al. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma Nature 2011 ; 474 : 609 – 615 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 24 Zhang S , Royer R, Li S et al. Frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among 1,342 unselected patients with invasive ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2011 ; 121 : 353 – 357 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 25 Chiang JW , Karlan BY, Cass L et al. BRCA1 promoter methylation predicts adverse ovarian cancer prognosis Gynecol Oncol 2006 ; 101 : 403 – 410 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 26 Beckmann MW , Picard F, An HX et al. Clinical impact of detection of loss of heterozygosity of BRCA1 and BRCA2 markers in sporadic breast cancer Br J Cancer 1996 ; 73 : 1220 – 1226 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 27 Brown LA , Irving J, Parker R et al. Amplification of EMSY, a novel oncogene on 11q13, in high grade ovarian surface epithelial carcinomas Gynecol Oncol 2006 ; 100 : 264 – 270 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 28 Hughes-Davies L , Huntsman D, Ruas M et al. EMSY links the BRCA2 pathway to sporadic breast and ovarian cancer Cell 2003 ; 115 : 523 – 535 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 29 Cousineau I , Belmaaza A EMSY overexpression disrupts the BRCA2/RAD51 pathway in the DNA-damage response: Implications for chromosomal instability/recombination syndromes as checkpoint diseases Mol Genet Genomics 2011 ; 285 : 325 – 340 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 30 D'Andrea AD The Fanconi anemia/BRCA signaling pathway: Disruption in cisplatin-sensitive ovarian cancers Cell Cycle 2003 ; 2 : 290 – 292 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 31 Taniguchi T , Tischkowitz M, Ameziane N et al. Disruption of the Fanconi anemia-BRCA pathway in cisplatin-sensitive ovarian tumors Nat Med 2003 ; 9 : 568 – 574 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 32 Shen WH , Balajee AS, Wang J et al. Essential role for nuclear PTEN in maintaining chromosomal integrity Cell 2007 ; 128 : 157 – 170 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 33 Skytte AB , Waldstrøm M, Rasmussen AA et al. Identification of BRCA1-deficient ovarian cancers Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011 ; 90 : 593 – 599 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 34 Weberpals JI , Tu D, Squire JA et al. Breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) protein expression as a prognostic marker in sporadic epithelial ovarian carcinoma: An NCIC CTG OV. 16 correlative study Ann Oncol 2011 ; 22 : 2403 – 2410 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 35 Vollebergh MA , Lips EH, Nederlof PM et al. An aCGH classifier derived from BRCA1-mutated breast cancer and benefit of high-dose platinum-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer patients Ann Oncol 2011 ; 22 : 1561 – 1570 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 36 Soslow RA , Han G, Park KJ et al. Morphologic patterns associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 genotype in ovarian carcinoma Mod Pathol 2012 ; 25 : 625 – 636 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 37 Mavaddat N , Barrowdale D, Andrulis IL et al. Pathology of breast and ovarian cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012 ; 21 : 134 – 147 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 38 Jazaeri AA , Yee CJ, Sotiriou C et al. Gene expression profiles of BRCA1-linked, BRCA2-linked, and sporadic ovarian cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 2002 ; 94 : 990 – 1000 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 39 Konstantinopoulos PA , Spentzos D, Karlan BY et al. Gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with responsiveness to chemotherapy and with outcome in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer J Clin Oncol 2010 ; 28 : 3555 – 3561 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 40 Press JZ , De Luca A, Boyd N et al. Ovarian carcinomas with genetic and epigenetic BRCA1 loss have distinct molecular abnormalities BMC Cancer 2008 ; 8 : 17 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 41 Zweemer RP , Shaw PA, Verheijen RM et al. Accumulation of p53 protein is frequent in ovarian cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations J Clin Pathol 1999 ; 52 : 372 – 375 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 42 O'Donovan PJ , Livingston DM BRCA1 and BRCA2: Breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene products and participants in DNA double-strand break repair Carcinogenesis 2010 ; 31 : 961 – 967 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 43 Kennedy RD , Quinn JE, Mullan PB et al. The role of BRCA1 in the cellular response to chemotherapy J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 ; 96 : 1659 – 1668 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 44 Moynahan ME , Cui TY, Jasin M Homology-directed DNA repair, mitomycin-c resistance, and chromosome stability is restored with correction of a Brca1 mutation Cancer Res 2001 ; 61 : 4842 – 4850 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 45 Bhattacharyya A , Ear US, Koller BH et al. The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is required for subnuclear assembly of Rad51 and survival following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin J Biol Chem 2000 ; 275 : 23899 – 23903 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 46 Cass I , Baldwin RL, Varkey T et al. Improved survival in women with BRCA-associated ovarian carcinoma Cancer 2003 ; 97 : 2187 – 2195 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 47 Yang D , Khan S, Sun Y et al. Association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with survival, chemotherapy sensitivity, and gene mutator phenotype in patients with ovarian cancer JAMA 2011 ; 306 : 1557 – 1565 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 48 Lotti LV , Ottini L, D'Amico C et al. Subcellular localization of the BRCA1 gene product in mitotic cells Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2002 ; 35 : 193 – 203 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 49 Hsu LC , Doan TP, White RL Identification of a gamma-tubulin-binding domain in BRCA1 Cancer Res 2001 ; 61 : 7713 – 7718 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 50 Lafarge S , Sylvain V, Ferrara M et al. Inhibition of BRCA1 leads to increased chemoresistance to microtubule-interfering agents, an effect that involves the JNK pathway Oncogene 2001 ; 20 : 6597 – 6606 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 51 Harkin DP , Bean JM, Miklos D et al. Induction of GADD45 and JNK/SAPK-dependent apoptosis following inducible expression of BRCA1 Cell 1999 ; 97 : 575 – 586 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 52 Noguchi S Predictive factors for response to docetaxel in human breast cancers Cancer Sci 2006 ; 97 : 813 – 820 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 53 Tassone P , Tagliaferri P, Perricelli A et al. BRCA1 expression modulates chemosensitivity of BRCA1-defective HCC1937 human breast cancer cells Br J Cancer 2003 ; 88 : 1285 – 1291 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 54 Egawa C , Miyoshi Y, Takamura Y et al. Decreased expression of BRCA2 mRNA predicts favorable response to docetaxel in breast cancer Int J Cancer 2001 ; 95 : 255 – 259 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 55 Page C , Lin HJ, Jin Y et al. Overexpression of Akt/AKT can modulate chemotherapy-induced apoptosis Anticancer Res 2000 ; 20 : 407 – 416 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 56 Sylvain V , Lafarge S, Bignon YJ Dominant-negative activity of a Brca1 truncation mutant: Effects on proliferation, tumorigenicity in vivo, and chemosensitivity in a mouse ovarian cancer cell line Int J Oncol 2002 ; 20 : 845 – 853 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 57 Zhou C , Smith JL, Liu J Role of BRCA1 in cellular resistance to paclitaxel and ionizing radiation in an ovarian cancer cell line carrying a defective BRCA1 Oncogene 2003 ; 22 : 2396 – 2404 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 58 Quinn JE , James CR, Stewart GE et al. BRCA1 mRNA expression levels predict for overall survival in ovarian cancer after chemotherapy Clin Cancer Res 2007 ; 13 : 7413 – 7420 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 59 Hartwell LH , Szankasi P, Roberts CJ et al. Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs Science 1997 ; 278 : 1064 – 1068 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 60 Iglehart JD , Silver DP Synthetic lethality—A new direction in cancer-drug development N Engl J Med 2009 ; 361 : 189 – 191 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 61 Dobzhansky T Genetics of natural populations: Recombination and variability in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura Genetics 1946 ; 31 : 269 – 290 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 62 Underhill C , Toulmonde M, Bonnefoi H A review of PARP inhibitors: From bench to bedside Ann Oncol 2011 ; 22 : 268 – 279 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 63 Farmer H , McCabe N, Lord CJ et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy Nature 2005 ; 434 : 917 – 921 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 64 Bryant HE , Schultz N, Thomas HD et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase Nature 2005 ; 434 : 913 – 917 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 65 Fong PC , Boss DS, Yap TA et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers N Engl J Med 2009 ; 361 : 123 – 134 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 66 Fong PC , Yap TA, Boss DS et al. Poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibition: Frequent durable responses in BRCA carrier ovarian cancer correlating with platinum-free interval J Clin Oncol 2010 ; 28 : 2512 – 2519 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 67 Menear KA , Adcock C, Barlter R et al. 4-[3-(4-Cyclopropanecarbonylpiperazine-1- carbonyl)-4-f luorobenzyl]-2H-phthalazin-1- one: A novel bioavailable inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 J Med Chem 2008 ; 51 : 6581 – 6591 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 68 Tutt A , Robson M, Garber JE et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: A proof-of-concept trial Lancet 2010 ; 376 : 235 – 244 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 69 Audeh MW , Carmichael J, Penson RT et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: A proof-of-concept trial Lancet 2010 ; 376 : 245 – 251 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 70 McCabe N , Turner NC, Lord CJ et al. Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition Cancer Res 2006 ; 66 : 8109 – 8115 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 71 Gelmon KA , Tischkowitz M, Mackay H et al. Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: A phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised study Lancet Oncol 2011 ; 12 : 852 – 861 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 72 O'Shaughnessy J , Schwartzberg LS, Danso MA et al. A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) J Clin Oncol 2011 ; 29 : 1007 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 73 Liu X , Shi Y, Maag DX et al. Iniparib nonselectively modifies cysteine-containing proteins in tumor cells and is not a bona fide PARP inhibitor Clin Cancer Res 2012 ; 18 : 510 – 523 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 74 Patel AG , De Lorenzo S, Flatten K et al. Failure of iniparib to inhibit poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in vitro Clin Cancer Res 2012 ; 18 : 1655 – 1662 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 75 Kaye SB , Lubinski J, Matulonis U et al. Phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer J Clin Oncol 2012 ; 30 ( 4 ): 372 – 379 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 76 Telli ML PARP inhibitors in cancer: Moving beyond BRCA Lancet Oncol 2011 ; 12 : 827 – 828 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 77 Zorn KK PARP inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer: High hopes undergo a reality check Oncology 2012 ; 26 : 1 – 11 Google Scholar OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 78 Ang J , Yap TA, Fong P et al. Preliminary experience with the use of chemotherapy (CT) following treatment with olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), in patients with BRCA1/2-deficient ovarian cancer (BDOC) J Clin Oncol 2010 ; 28 : 5041 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 79 Sakai W , Swisher EM, Karlan BY et al. Secondary mutations as a mechanism of cisplatin resistance in BRCA2-mutated cancers Nature 2008 ; 451 : 1116 – 1120 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 80 Swisher EM , Sakai W, Karlan BY et al. Secondary BRCA1 mutations in BRCA1-mutated ovarian carcinomas with platinum resistance Cancer Res 2008 ; 68 : 2581 – 2586 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 81 Norquist B , Wurz KA, Pennil CC et al. Secondary somatic mutations restoring BRCA1/2 predict chemotherapy resistance in hereditary ovarian carcinomas J Clin Oncol 2011 ; 29 : 3008 – 3015 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 82 Edwards SL , Brough R, Lord CJ et al. Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic deletion in BRCA2 Nature 2008 ; 451 : 1111 – 1115 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 83 Yap TA , Sandhu SK, Carden CP et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors: Exploiting a synthetic lethal strategy in the clinic CA Cancer J Clin 2011 ; 61 : 31 – 49 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 84 Gabra H Dose density and altered scheduling of adjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: Teaching old dogs new tricks? Discov Med 2009 ; 8 ( 42 ): 140 – 144 Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 85 Lord CJ , McDonald S, Swift S et al. A high-throughput RNA interference screen for DNA repair determinants of PARP inhibitor sensitivity DNA Repair (Amst) 2008 ; 7 : 2010 – 2019 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 86 Turner NC , Lord CJ, Iorns E et al. A synthetic lethal siRNA screen identifying genes mediating sensitivity to a PARP inhibitor EMBO J 2008 ; 27 : 1368 – 1377 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 87 Veeck J , Ropero S, Setien F et al. BRCA1 CpG island hypermethylation predicts sensitivity to poly(adenosine diphosphate)-ribose polymerase inhibitors J Clin Oncol 2010 ; 28 : e563 – e564 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 88 Mukhopadhyay A , Elattar A, Cerbinskaite A et al. Development of a functional assay for homologous recombination status in primary cultures of epithelial ovarian tumor and correlation with sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors Clin Cancer Res 2010 ; 16 : 2344 – 2351 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 89 Kennedy RD , Chen CC, Stuckert P et al. Fanconi anemia pathway-deficient tumor cells are hypersensitive to inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia mutated J Clin Invest 2007 ; 117 : 1440 – 1449 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 90 Williamson CT , Muzik H, Turhan AG et al. ATM deficiency sensitizes mantle cell lymphoma cells to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitors Mol Cancer Ther 2010 ; 9 : 347 – 357 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 91 Mendes-Pereira AM , Martin SA, Brough R et al. Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN mutant cells with PARP inhibitors EMBO Mol Med 2009 ; 1 : 315 – 322 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 92 Puc J , Keniry M, Li H et al. Lack of PTEN sequesters CHK1 and initiates genetic instability Cancer Cell 2005 ; 7 : 193 – 204 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 93 Wang Z , Ahmad A, Li Y et al. Forkhead box M1 transcription factor: A novel target for cancer therapy Cancer Treat Rev 2010 ; 36 : 151 – 156 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 94 Tan Y , Raychaudhuri P, Costa RH Chk2 mediates stabilization of the FoxM1 transcription factor to stimulate expression of DNA repair genes Mol Cell Biol 2007 ; 27 : 1007 – 1016 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 95 Chan N , Pires IM, Bencokova Z et al. Contextual synthetic lethality of cancer cell kill based on the tumor microenvironment Cancer Res 2010 ; 70 : 8045 – 8054 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 96 Chan N , Koritzinsky M, Zhao H et al. Chronic hypoxia decreases synthesis of homologous recombination proteins to offset chemoresistance and radioresistance Cancer Res 2008 ; 68 : 605 – 614 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 97 Bindra RS , Gibson SL, Meng A et al. Hypoxia-induced down-regulation of BRCA1 expression by E2Fs Cancer Res 2005 ; 65 : 11597 – 11604 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 98 Meng AX , Jalali F, Cuddihy A et al. Hypoxia down-regulates DNA double-strand break repair gene expression in prostate cancer cells Radiother Oncol 2005 ; 76 : 168 – 176 Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat Author notes Disclosures: Georgios Rigakos: Sanofi Aventis (received a grant to participate in an oncology congress) (Other); Evangelia Razis: AstraZeneca, Sanofi Aventis (RF) © 2012 AlphaMed Press This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
TI - BRCAness: Finding the Achilles Heel in Ovarian Cancer
JF - The Oncologist
DO - 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0028
DA - 2012-07-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/brcaness-finding-the-achilles-heel-in-ovarian-cancer-PEy8VucDXh
SP - 956
EP - 962
VL - 17
IS - 7
DP - DeepDyve
ER -