TY - JOUR
AU - Wooster, Robert
AB - final report with recommendations, and a postreport effort to save the park. As a consequence, in 1886 the interview with the working group chair. It would have Interior Department formally requested assistance been nice to include a status update on the various from the War Department, which dispatched Com- recommendations at the time of printing, especially pany M, First Cavalry Regiment, to take over admin- as schools create reports but do nothing else. The istration of Yellowstone. Soldiers would remain in next section on the GU272 Descendants underscores control for thirty-two years. the need for a progress update. While Georgetown Previous scholars—most notably, H. Duane Hamp- wrung their institutional hands, Sandra Green Thomas ton, Paul A. Hutton, Harvey Meyerson, and Richard A. plainly stated her—and other GU272—reality in the Bartlett—have generally applauded the army’s efforts second New York Times exclusive written by Rachel to preserve the early parks (regulars also assumed Swarms: “Our families are still here” (260). While not responsibility over Yosemite, Sequoia, General Grant, unified on the solution, these documents make clear and Glacier). In Watching over Yellowstone: The US that they are demanding the end of whitewashed nar- Army’s Experience in America’s First National Park, ratives 
TI - Thomas C. Rust. Watching over Yellowstone: The US Army’s Experience in America’s First National Park, 1886–1918.
JF - American Historical Review
DO - 10.1093/ahr/rhad161
DA - 2024-03-13
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/thomas-c-rust-watching-over-yellowstone-the-us-army-s-experience-in-M8Cf0dFTwW
SP - 298
EP - 299
VL - 129
IS - 1
DP - DeepDyve
ER -