TY - JOUR AU1 - Silver, Nicholas R. G. AU2 - Ward-Flanagan, Rachel AU3 - Dickson, Clayton T. AB - Introduction Urethane, an acute laboratory anesthetic, produces neurophysiological and physiological effects distinct from other anesthetics which make it an effective model of the dynamics of natural sleep. It is unique from other anesthetics in that it allows for spontaneous and cyclical alternations between a REM-like and an NREM-like brain state accompanied by corresponding changes in peripheral physiological signals that are also observed during natural sleep [1, 2]. While some anesthetics do produce NREM-like activity, no other anesthetic studied to date features the spontaneous cyclic changes between both brain and physiological states typically observed in natural sleep, at a surgical plane of anesthesia [1–5]. Due to these uncommon effects, urethane currently represents the best model of sleep, other than sleep itself. Accordingly, urethane has been adopted as a model of both sleep-like neurophysiological activity and the downstream physiological functions associated with changes in brain state, such as: activity-dependent neuroplasticity during slow-wave states; sudden, unexpected death in epilepsy; urodynamic functions associated with brain states; respiratory-related oscillations; brain and body temperature during sleep; pupillary associated changes with brain state; the role of astrocytes in brain state alternations; and sleep-disordered breathing [2, 6–24] Urethane is further anomalous, in that it does not produce the severe cardiovascular or respiratory depression which are archetypal of most other anesthetics at a surgical plane [25]. The absence of this depression likely allows the physiological alternations accompanying brain state that are also observed in natural sleep. For example, heart rate is elevated during REM sleep as compared to NREM sleep and is likewise elevated during the activated (REM-like) state of urethane as compared to the deactivated (NREM-like) state [1, 26–28]. Furthermore, both breathing rate and breathing variability increases in REM sleep and the REM-like state in urethane [1, 23, 24, 29, 30]. Of importance is that a single bolus dose of urethane can produce a stable surgical plane of anesthesia for 6–24 hrs, with most research reporting at least 8 hrs of effective anesthesia [25, 31–33]. This level of anesthetic maintenance is advantageous, especially when compared to the negative impacts of infusing large quantities of other anesthetics over an extended period, and the added technical complications associated with continuous infusions [25, 32, 33]. However, despite the clearly established long-lasting nature of urethane anesthesia, it is unknown how stable individual physiological measures (within a particular state) remain across extended experimental recordings. Given that specific peripheral physiological measures, such as cardiac and respiratory rates, are important indicators of animal well-being during long duration procedures [25, 32], this is also an important ethical concern. Consequently, since urethane is an important model for a variety of sleep-like processes, it is imperative to fully characterize the longevity and stability of a variety of physiological measures to fully understand any potential limitations. Here we document the long-term stability of a variety of physiological signals within and across brain state fluctuations during multiple hours of urethane anesthesia while animals were maintained at a surgical plane. Animals, materials and methods Data was obtained from 6 male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 254 and 516g, averaging 360 ± 43g. Animals were initially kept on a 12 hour light/dark cycle at 20 ± 1⁰C, housed in cages of no more than 4 rats per cage. Cages were polycarbonate shoe-boxed shaped with wire tops, aspen wood chip bedding, and a PVC tube for enrichment. Standard rat chow and water were provided ad libitum. Welfare checks were preformed daily during housing before experiments. All methods were approved by the Biological Sciences Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Alberta, conforming to the guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Anesthesia and surgery Rats were initially induced in an enclosed chamber with gaseous isoflurane at a concentration of 4.0% mixed in 100% oxygen. Following a loss of righting reflexes, rats were maintained on isoflurane (2.0 to 2.5%) via a nose cone and implanted with a jugular catheter on the right side. Isoflurane was then discontinued and general anesthesia was achieved by slow intravenous administration of urethane (0.67g/ml; final dose 1.35g/kg). Body temperature was maintained at 37⁰C using a homeothermic monitoring system connected to a heating pad and rectal probe (Homeothermic Monitoring System, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) for the remainder of the surgical and recording procedures. Anesthetic plane was assessed throughout the experiment by monitoring for a reflexive withdrawal to a hind paw pinch. Stereotaxic procedures Stereotaxic placement of bipolar recording electrodes was conducted using bregma as the landmark for coordinates. Recording electrodes were constructed from twisting a pair of Teflon-coated stainless steel wires (bare diameter 125 um: A-M Systems Inc., Sequim, WA). The two tips of these wires were staggered in length by 0.3–0.8mm. Two of these electrodes were placed in each rat, the first was in the neocortex (AP: +2.8; ML: +2.0; DV: -1.0 to -1.3 mm). The second target was straddling the CA1 pyramidal cell layer of the dorsal hippocampus (AP: -3.5, ML: -2.5, DV: -3.0 to -3.5 mm). Following implantation, the electrodes were subsequently fixed in place using a jeweler’s screw and dental acrylic. A thermocouple wire (30 gauge Type K; Thermo Electric Co., Inc.; Brampton, ON, Canada) was placed in front of the right nasal passage and shielded with aluminium foil. A pulse transducer (AD Instruments, Colorado Springs, CO) was attached to the right hind paw. Recording procedures During the recording, the stereotaxic apparatus was connected to ground. Local field potentials and thermocouple signals were differentially amplified at a gain of 1000 and filtered between 0.1 and 500 Hz using an AC amplifier (Model 1700, A-M Systems Inc.). Amplified signals were recorded using a PowerLab AD board in conjunction with LabChart Pro (AD Instruments) and were sampled at 1000 Hz after anti-alias filtering. The thermocouple signal allowed for continuous online recording of breathing rate through measuring the difference in the temperature of inhaled and exhaled air. Heart rate was monitored throughout the recording period via the pulse transducer. Recording sessions lasted between 110–250 minutes. Following termination of the recording session, rats were transcardially perfused while under deep anesthesia. Data processing and analysis Signals were first examined visually using LabChart Pro (AD Instruments) to segment data into specific recording periods. Files were further analysed using custom scripts for Matlab Version R2020a (Mathworks; Natick, MA) and processed using Origin Pro (Microcal Software Inc.; Northampton, MA). Spectral analysis was accomplished using a series of 6-second long, Hanning-windowed samples with a 2-second overlap using Welch’s periodogram method. For spectrograms, a sliding window approach was used to analyze the data segment, wherein 30-second windows were moved across the data segment in 6-second increments. State changes could most reliably be characterized by large fluctuations in the power at 1Hz. Period analysis of these alternations was conducted by determining the saddle point of the bimodal distribution characterizing these power fluctuations, and this power value was used as a threshold for determining deactivated (>threshold) versus activated (threshold) versus activated (