TY - JOUR
AU - DeVita, Vincent T.
AB - editorial n article was published in the n ew York t imes on merit-based grant system, they can outcompete those of an It is in the 22 s eptember by Gardner Harris entitled “Debate incumbent. n ew investigators are at a disadvantage under best interests a flaring over grants research”. it was based on a us the grant system as it is presently constructed; however, ‘‘ Government a ccountability office report that examined this disadvantage is of the ni H’s own making. t he ni H of both grant management practices at the ni H. i n essence, this distorts the system even further: it decries ‘targeted universities article discusses whether or not the ni H grant adminis- research’ but regularly influences the research process and the NIH trators are right to reach down to ‘make exceptions’ and by issuing requests for grant applications in specific fund grants with worse ni H scores to support new young (targeted) areas with set-aside funds. t he areas selected to leave the investigators. a pparently, the average age of investi gators are what the Congress, ni H staff, or a board of advisors system as has risen from 35 years in 1980 
TI - The NIH entitlement program
JF - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
DO - 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.164
DA - 2009-11-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/the-nih-entitlement-program-DY6QD4JrSA
SP - 613
EP - 613
VL - 6
IS - 11
DP - DeepDyve
ER -