TY - JOUR
AU - Moyise, Steve
AB - Book Reviews this study lacks any real focus, and so, (as in Galatians) is in fact a dispute be- with a (significant) minority concerned other than the chapter on John, it does not tween gentile Christians who have had no about the fate of Israel and her customs contribute constructively to the topic. previous contact with Judaism and former (whether these are God-fearers or Jewish Stephen P. Ahearne-Kroll God-fearers who had come to appreci- Christians). On the other hand, it is all Methodist Theological School in Ohio ate a number of its customs. Das follows too easy to accept a lazy consensus and Delaware, OH 43015 Stowers in asserting that Romans 2:17 is imagine a church divided by ethnicity. I part of Paul’s rhetorical style and does look forward to more studies like his last Solving the Romans Debate. By A. An- not imply the presence of people who two chapters that seek to demonstrate the drew Das. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress actually called themselves “Jews,” and fruitfulness of this approach for under- Press, 2007. Pp. xii + 324. Paper, he shows how many of the “Jewish” de- standing Romans. $24.00. bates (Adam, Abraham, Moses, David, Steve Moyise Elijah etc.) 
TI - Book Review: Solving the Romans Debate. By A. An-drew Das. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007. Pp. xii + 324. Paper, $24.00
JF - Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture
DO - 10.1177/01461079090390020602
DA - 2009-05-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/book-review-solving-the-romans-debate-by-a-an-drew-das-minneapolis-mn-CL5MTLUiSw
SP - 96
EP - 96
VL - 39
IS - 2
DP - DeepDyve
ER -