TY - JOUR
AU - Stuart, C. E.
AB - This review has tried to meet Kellogg's criticisms of research in extra-sensory perception as specifically as possible, but with a view to their importance as alternative hypotheses to be considered by an investigator. There are permissible, however, many other defenses against the implications of the criticisms. An excellent one is Warner's single experiment in which all the critical points are avoided, yet significant scores are obtained. In the main it has been found that although Kellogg's mathematical demonstrations have been valid, his conclusions have not followed rigorously from them. Most of his discussion concerns points of no experimental concern to the results of the research chalenged. Camp states that the statistical analysis is essentially valid.
TI - A review of certain proposed hypotheses alternative to extra-sensory perception
JF - The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
DO - 10.1037/h0059568
DA - 1938-01-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/american-psychological-association/a-review-of-certain-proposed-hypotheses-alternative-to-extra-sensory-83u7d121FA
SP - 57
EP - 70
VL - 33
IS - 1
DP - DeepDyve
ER -