TY - JOUR
AU - Tan,, Jiali
AB - Abstract Biomaterials as bone substitutes are always considered as foreign bodies that can trigger host immune responses. Traditional designing principles have been always aimed at minimizing the immune reactions by fabricating inert biomaterials. However, clinical evidence revealed that those methods still have limitations and many of which were only feasible in the laboratory. Currently, osteoimmunology, the very pioneering concept is drawing more and more attention—it does not simply regard the immune response as an obstacle during bone healing but emphasizes the intimate relationship of the immune and skeletal system, which includes diverse cells, cytokines, and signaling pathways. Properties of biomaterials like topography, wettability, surface charge, the release of cytokines, mediators, ions and other bioactive molecules can impose effects on immune responses to interfere with the skeletal system. Based on the bone formation mechanisms, the designing methods of the biomaterials change from immune evasive to immune reprogramming. Here, we discuss the osteoimmunomodulatory effects of the new modification strategies—adjusting properties of bone biomaterials to induce a favorable osteoimmune environment. Such strategies showed potential to benefit the development of bone materials and lay a solid foundation for the future clinical application. biomaterials, modification, osteoimmunomodulation, macrophage polarization, osteoimmune environment, bone regeneration Introduction Millions of people worldwide suffer from bone defects. Bone healing is affected especially for the individuals with systemic diseases like osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and diabetes [1]. Bone grafting is an essential method of bone loss treating. However, owing to the invasive ways, functional defect of the donor site and the limited satisfying grafts, it is not an ideal choice for a considerable proportion of patients [2]. From this perspective, developing more practicable bone substitute has a promising prospect. In recent decades, biomaterials as potential bone substitute have developed rapidly and been in great demand to work as the alternative therapeutic tools of bone regeneration [3]. However, biomaterials have always been considered as the foreign bodies to result in foreign body reaction (FBR) along with excessive inflammation, tissue destruction, and fibrotic encapsulation, interfering with the speed and quality of osseointegration [4]. Numerous traditional design theories focus on the composition formation and structure fabrication to obtain inert biomaterials, expecting to minimize the immune actions caused by biomaterials [5]. Although progress has been made in the field of bone tissue engineering, various kinds of bone biomaterials fabricated in the traditional ways did not work functionally in practical treatment and many were only feasible in laboratories, which indicates the traditional design principles may be inadequate [6]. Clinical innovation and practical application are hindered, due to the lack of profound understanding of the biological processes during bone remodeling. Currently, allowing specific cell responses has been reported to contribute to successful implantation. According to the mechanism of bone biology, bone formation is actualized via the close cross-talk of multiple systems. Among them, immune system deserves a place [7]. Events in the bone remodeling process like structural support, hematopoiesis and mineralization all need the close biological cooperation of skeletal system and immune system and they share various kinds of cells, cytokines, and signaling pathways [8]. The surprising intimate connection between the two systems is emphasized and defined as ‘osteoimmunology’ [9]. Nowadays, increasing strategies have confirmed the important position of immune reaction in the interactions. It inspires the shift from ‘immune-evasive’ biomaterials to ‘re-programming’ ones [10]. Osteoimmunomodulatory strategies aim to enable the biomaterials to modulate local immune environment from pro-inflammatory to be in favor of healing and regeneration [11]. This review outlines the intimate connection between the skeletal and immune system and highlights how can we integrate these underlying mechanisms into biomaterials modification. These strategies will provide ideas for new effective bone substitute development to become the potential solution to the challenges in osseointegration and osteogenesis. Interplay among biomaterials, immune system and skeletal system Immune response induced by biomaterials The host response is stimulated by biomaterials. Adsorption of proteins, recruitment of immune cells and secretion of signaling molecules are necessary for the healing process [12]. As the implantation proceeds, the protein layer and complement factors rapidly adsorb on the surface of biomaterials to form blood clots rich in growth factors, cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), thus to promote immune response and recruit neutrophils [13]. Activated platelets regulate the migration of monocytes which then differentiate into macrophages. The macrophages adhere and then form a fibrin matrix around the biomaterial, to regard the biomaterial as foreign body and try to phagocytosis and remove it. When the biomaterial cannot be swallowed and removed, the inflammatory response delays. And, a fibrous envelope is formed onto the substance to isolate it from the surrounding tissue (Fig. 1). The FBRs and fiber wrapping around the implant can directly affect the efficacy and result in the failure of implantation [4]. Therefore, the fate of bone biomaterials, to a great degree, depends on the immune response. Figure 1. Open in new tabDownload slide Biomaterials elicit immune reactions. As the implantation proceeds, the blood clots consist of protein, growth factors, cytokines, and MMPs adsorbed on the biomaterials surface and the injured area, which trigger a series of reactions in immune system. The neutrophils are recruited, and then monocytes gather and differentiate into activated macrophages which lead the secretion of various cytokines and take up biomaterials as foreign bodies by forming a fibrin matrix around the biomaterials Figure 1. Open in new tabDownload slide Biomaterials elicit immune reactions. As the implantation proceeds, the blood clots consist of protein, growth factors, cytokines, and MMPs adsorbed on the biomaterials surface and the injured area, which trigger a series of reactions in immune system. The neutrophils are recruited, and then monocytes gather and differentiate into activated macrophages which lead the secretion of various cytokines and take up biomaterials as foreign bodies by forming a fibrin matrix around the biomaterials RANK/RANKL/OPG axis Bone cells including osteoblasts and osteoclasts control bone formation and resorption, and the delicate regulations of them make much sense. Osteoblasts play a major role in osteogenesis; they derive from MSCs which secret bone-matrix proteins and promote mineralization [14]. As for osteoclasts, they have the same hematopoietic origin as the myeloid precursor cells which produce macrophages and myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) [15]. During the osteoblastogenesis, various factors, for example, Runx2, β-catenin, and NFAT are involved [16]. During the osteoclastogenesis process, ruffled membranes act as the isolated extracellular microenvironment to bridge matrix recognizing integrins and cytoskeleton. The demineralization of bone is achieved by the acidifying vesicles secreted by osteoclasts. Lysosomal protease and cathepsin K are responsible for the organic component [17]. RANKL/RANK/OPG axis is the most crucial pathway in bone metabolic process (Fig. 2). Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) is a type II membrane-bound protein expressed on osteoblasts, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC), T lymphocytes and neutrophils. As an important signal, it regulates osteoclast differentiation and participates in the physiologic and pathologic bone resorption. Besides, RANKL is able to stimulate DCs, playing an important role in osteoimmune environment [18]. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK) binds on the mature osteoclasts and their precursor; RANK is under the regulation of TNF receptor-associated factors 6 (TRAF6), which mediates gene expression of osteoclast survival and function. When RANKL interacts with RANK to form the RANKL/RANK system, the resorption events begin [19]. OPG (TNFRSF11B) is mainly released by osteoblasts. Be the decoy receptor for RANKL, OPG can compete with RANK and antagonize the effects of RANKL/RANK, to suppress the osteoclast differentiation and activation. So the ratio of RANKL/OPG is of much significance [20]. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is expressed by osteoblasts and binds to receptors (c-Fms) via the Akt and MAP kinase pathways. M-CSF can stimulate the expression of RANK, induce pre-osteoclast differentiation and regulate osteoclast apoptosis and survival. The physiological equilibrium of the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway is pivotal in bone metastasis [21]. Figure 2. Open in new tabDownload slide The function of RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway in osteoclastogenesis. Osteoblasts produce RANKL that is able to bind to the receptor RANK, leading osteoclast precursor cells to differentiate into preosteoclasts which can then fuze to nonfunctional multinucleated osteoclasts. After activation, the mature osteoclasts are formed to initiate bone absorption. OPG can also bind to RANKL to interfere with RANKL–RANK. M-CSF released from osteoblasts acts as a potent stimulator of RANK when binds to c-Fms. Neutrophils can also express RANKL to regulate osteoblast and trigger bone resorption. DCs are able to trans-differentiate into osteoclasts via RANK/RANKL pathway and interactions with CD4+ T cells Figure 2. Open in new tabDownload slide The function of RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway in osteoclastogenesis. Osteoblasts produce RANKL that is able to bind to the receptor RANK, leading osteoclast precursor cells to differentiate into preosteoclasts which can then fuze to nonfunctional multinucleated osteoclasts. After activation, the mature osteoclasts are formed to initiate bone absorption. OPG can also bind to RANKL to interfere with RANKL–RANK. M-CSF released from osteoblasts acts as a potent stimulator of RANK when binds to c-Fms. Neutrophils can also express RANKL to regulate osteoblast and trigger bone resorption. DCs are able to trans-differentiate into osteoclasts via RANK/RANKL pathway and interactions with CD4+ T cells Role of macrophage and the polarization Various kinds of immune cells get involved in regulating bone dynamics. As an important part of innate immunity, macrophages have aroused the most discussion [22]. And interestingly, macrophages are also pivotal in bone metabolism [23]. Indeed, given the proximity of macrophage lineage cells to bone cell, macrophages play a vital role. Bone marrow provides the same microenvironments for both bone and immune cells to harbor and share interrelated cellular and signaling pathways to engage and cooperate tightly in bone metabolism. It has been reported that macrophages can interact with mesenchymal precursors and promote osteoblast formation. To achieve this, various kinds of growth factors including oncostatin M are involved. In addition, the activation state and the polarization make sense. Currently, activated macrophages have been identified to potentially facilitate bone formation and accelerate tissue repair [24]. The enhanced function of alkaline phosphatase and increasing level of collagen I were observed, facilitating osteogenic differentiation, when the marrow stromal cells were co-cultured with monocyte/macrophage lineage [25]. Besides, osteoinductive factors including bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) from monocyte/macrophage lineage have osteoinductive effects [26]. Macrophage has two major phenotypes named M1 and M2, respectively [27]. Previous studies have indicated that the balanced function of M1 and M2 is of much significance. Particularly, macrophage polarization states can switch, to adapt to the cytokine and microenvironment. And in turn, the different phenotypes have different effects [28]. M1 leads inflammatory response to clear the damaged tissue at the initial stage. M2 promotes the healing and regeneration process [29]. M1 can promote antigen presentation and Th1 differentiation, release IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-12 to up-regulate reactive oxygen species genes and promote pathogen killing and the activation of inflammation [30]. IFN-γ, LPS, and M-CSF are pro-inflammatory cytokines to stimulate M1 polarization [30]. Anti-inflammatory M2a and M2b initiate Th2 lymphocyte through IL-10, IL-1ra and IL-6. M2 phenotype is induced by various signals and secretes kinds of cytokines which promotes cell proliferation, differentiation and tissue repairing. Stimulated by IL-10, M2c can assist tissue remodeling and inhibit inflammation via releasing TGF-β and IL-10 [31]. These signals from the local environment benefit the vascularization of regenerative biomaterials. M2 works throughout the whole healing process thereby improving the integration of the biomaterials [32]. The ratio of M1 and M2 makes much sense. Consistently high M1 response, an extended period of M1 and the lack of M2 will cause severe FBR and chronic inflammation, prolonged immune response, delayed tissue healing and the failure of biomaterial integration [33]. The switch between the M1 and M2 phenotypes is regulated by diverse factors such as the cells, cytokines and miRNAs, and in turn, when the macrophage phenotype has been changed, their inflammatory cytokines secretion and the gene expression will also change, thus affecting the local immune environment [34]. The better understanding of immune cells, especially the proper control of cytokines releasing and M1–M2 polarization, will provide inspiration for the bone regeneration field (Fig. 3). Figure 3. Open in new tabDownload slide Polarization of macrophage and secretion of cytokines Figure 3. Open in new tabDownload slide Polarization of macrophage and secretion of cytokines Other immune cells also play an important role. T cells have various subsets. Both Th1 and Th2 suppress osteoclast formation via the secretion of IFN-γ and IL-4. Th17 cells and Th17-related cytokines have been currently identified to significantly lead to higher level of RANKL, inducing osteoclastogenesis and involvement in bone diseases [35]. Th17 differentiation is triggered by TGF-β and IL-6 [36]. CD4+ T cells suppress osteoclast differentiation via IL-4, IL-10 and CTLA-4 [37], while NK T express M-CSF and RANKL to induce osteoclastogenesis [38]. OPG produced by B cells inhibits osteoclast function at the present of Th1 cytokines while playing a catalytic role via Th2 cytokines. B cells can cooperate with T cells to up-regulate OPG via CD40/CD40L co-stimulation pathways [39]. DCs affect T cell immune function. Mature DCs can activate Th17 cells and up-regulate IL-17 to promote osteoclastogenesis [40]. Additionally, DCs can trans-differentiate into osteoclasts via RANKL and M-CSF pathway, in the interactions with CD4+ T cells [41]. Mast cells also participate actively in osteoclastogenesis. The enhancement of systemic mastocytosis facilitates the bone loss. Additionally, the deficiency of histamine may contribute to decreasing bone loss [42]. Neutrophils can also express RANKL to regulate osteoblast and trigger bone resorption [43]. Considering the recruitment of neutrophils is closely connected with the adsorption density of proteins on biomaterials and then affects the biocompatibility, it is an essential cue to design biomaterials that regulate the neutrophils functions. MSCs and their secretions feature with immunoregulation [44]. For example, scaffold construction and composition may have an influence on the cell surface marker (like MHC-1, and MHC-2) [45] and immunoregulatory functions [46]. Diseases related to bone immunity Maintaining normal skeletal homeostasis needs to keep a dynamic balance of osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, which relies on the delicate regulation. Abnormal functions of the immune responses at the site of injury and throughout the body may cause degenerative diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoporosis and periodontal disease (PD), causing bone loss [47]. RA is a common autoimmune diseases with abnormal immune function which interferes with the bone homeostasis in the synovial joint, increasing the fracture risk. Cells include osteoclasts, T cells, monocytes and synovial fibroblasts all participate in the process and are mainly regulated by the above-mentioned RANKL signaling system and various kinds of cytokines [48]. Osteoporosis is common in postmenopausal women, because the low level of the estrogen can result in the bone loss. Bone cells including osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and osteocytes; immune cells including lymphocytes, macrophages, and DCs express the nuclear estrogen receptor ERα; So the inter-connectivity of the estrogen, bone cells and immune cells have intimate relationship and multiple effects of each other [7]. As for PD, bacterially derived factors and antigens activate the innate immune system. Cytokine including IL-1 and TNF-α, cells including B and T cells mainly participate in the pathology. And, via the RANK/RANK/OPG axis, the osteoclastogenesis and subsequent bone loss are initiated [49]. Early in the bone remodeling, acute inflammation triggers the recruitment T-cells and monocytes, leading the secretion of TNF and IL-6 that facilitate MSCs to differentiate into osteoblasts [50]. However, if the infection goes into long-term inflammation, the existing pro-inflammatory cytokines may negatively affect bone regeneration. Accumulating evidence indicated that, to treat these diseases, it was necessary to reduce osteoclast activity while to facilitate bone formation [51]. With the increasing comprehension, it has been discovered that the delicate cooperation of immune and skeletal systems and complex interplay of cells, signaling molecular and pathways in osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis are of much significance for bone healing [52]. Osteoimmunomodulatory effects of modification strategies Biomaterials can be modified to perform ‘osteoimmunomodulatory’ ability. Osteoimmunomodulatory biomaterials regulate the cell behaviors and osteoimmune environment systematically, thereby affecting the bone regeneration. Currently, incorporation of bioactive molecules or passive intervention of the physical and chemical characteristics to regulate appropriate immune response are considered as the main strategies [53]. Here, we summarized some osteoimmunomodulatory strategies of bone biomaterials (Fig. 4). Figure 4. Open in new tabDownload slide Modification strategies such as topography, wettability, surface charge, cytokines and bioactive molecules release of bone biomaterials can modulate the osteoimmune environment Figure 4. Open in new tabDownload slide Modification strategies such as topography, wettability, surface charge, cytokines and bioactive molecules release of bone biomaterials can modulate the osteoimmune environment Biomaterials applied in tissue engineering Biomaterials are usually classified into metallic materials and nonmetallic materials. Several kinds of biomaterials applied widely in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering are summarized in Fig. 5. Metal materials including stainless steels, cobalt, chromium, titanium and their alloys are commonly applied in orthopedics and dentistry [54]. Among them, titanium is most broadly employed in oral, maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery for bone repair due to its outstanding mechanical and osseointegration properties which help bones to be attached directly to the metal surface with less fibrous tissue formation [55]. Nonmetallic materials are divided into the organic and the inorganic. Organic materials include natural polymers and synthetic polymers. Polymeric materials occupy a large proportion of the tissue engineering field [56]. As for natural polymers, the key compositions are polysaccharides and proteins. The resemblance to the native extracellular matrix (ECM) allows them to be potentially applied to build highly biocompatible scaffolds [57]. For instance, chitosan is derived from chitin, characteristic with splendid biodegradability, biocompatibility, immunogenic and gel-forming properties [58]. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) participate in signaling of cells and assembling of the ECM [59]. Hyaluronic acid (HA) as the main composition of ECM is able to regulate tissue injury and accelerate tissue repair [60]. Adopting HA to fabricate scaffolds has been extensively researched [61]. Collagen is abundant and its natural network-like structure is beneficial to the formation of highly organized, 3D bone substitute [62]. With good biocompatibility, mechanical properties and biodegradability, silk has been extensively discussed [63]. Furthermore, silk is able to form hydrogel to obtain hydrophilic properties. And, silk fibroin-based materials are applied for vascular regeneration and bone scaffolds [64]. Natural polymers do not induce a typical foreign body response with decellularized tissue [65]; they are easily degraded by enzymes and release immunomodulatory molecules [66]. As tissue engineering scaffolds, hydrogels are similar to the ECM structure, maintaining the natural biochemical signals and delivering biological molecules [67]. HA and collagen are both biocompatible polymers and the composite hydrogels are not easily to be repelled by host, which is suitable for the implantation into human body [68]. Currently, synthetic polymers have a bright biotechnological application prospect [69]. With good biodegradability and surface modification potential, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) is widely used in the field of biomedicine [70]. Poly(caprolactone) (PCL) can be constructed in films, fibers and microparticles and has high bone inductive potentiality [71]. Poly(glycolic acid) is a bone-friendly tissue engineering biomaterial that can be almost completely degraded in vivo conditions within months [72]. However, the synthetic materials are prone to trigger classic FBR and can be degraded during implantation [73]. Thus, it is necessary to undertake prophylactic drug treatments on the surfaces of synthetic polymers to avoid potential complement-mediated reactions. To obtain better scaffold performance and make the natural polymer materials moderately operable, developing the customized immune regulatory structure of synthetic polymer materials is widely accepted [74]. As for inorganic materials, they mainly include bioactive glass and calcium phosphate, which are characterized by the good biocompatibility, osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity, owing to the similar chemical and structural formulations to bone tissue [75, 76]. Currently, calcium phosphate materials of various compositions and crystal phases have been developed and utilized in bone regeneration [77]. Composite materials are composed of two or more types of materials and the combination of several kinds of components can reinforce complementary advantages and obtain better performance than a single component [78]. Figure 5. Open in new tabDownload slide Biomaterials which are mainly applied in tissue engineering and their characteristics Figure 5. Open in new tabDownload slide Biomaterials which are mainly applied in tissue engineering and their characteristics Osteoimmunomodulation by delivering cytokines and bioactive molecules There are various kinds of signal factors and cytokines in the osteoimmune environment. Their interactions and functions are complicated and some data even indicate their dual roles. Regulation of the signal factors and cytokines on osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis will contribute to carrying out immunomodulatory approaches. Some cytokines showed anti-osteoclastogenic functions, and modulation of the temporal and spatial pattern to coordinate the different stages of the bone remodeling process have been investigated [79]. Kara et al. have designed scaffolds with sequential IFN-g and IL-4 release profiles in the murine subcutaneous implantation model to enhance vascularization. On the scaffolds, IFN-g was shortly released to facilitate M1 polarization. Then IL-4 was released to induce M2 polarization. The outcomes indicated that the osteoimmunomodulated scaffolds regulated angiogenic behaviors. And, via modulating macrophage polarization, the immune microenvironment of cells and cytokine secretion profiles can be modulated [80]. Besides, IL-4 [81] and IL-33 are also inhibitors of osteoclast function [82]. IL-33 accompanied by IL-4 was able to promote mononuclear to differentiate into DCs and macrophages, down-regulate osteoclast precursors and osteoclast differentiation to interfere with osteoclastogenesis [83]. Likewise, Spiller et al. designed scaffolds with sequential cytokines release. The results indicated that VEGF was released by M1 to initiate the angiogenesis. PDGF-BB and MMP-9 were secreted by M2 to regulate vessel maturation. The different function of M1 and M2 is crucial in the angiogenesis and scaffold vascularization [84]. Other cytokines like IL-10, IL-12, IFN family also play an important role in bone regeneration via different pathways. IL-10 can suppress bone resorption by interfering with the expression of nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1, an important factor for osteoclast differentiation [85]. IFN family mainly includes IFN-α, IFN-β and IFN-γ that all can inhibit the differentiation of osteoclasts. IFN-α and IFN-β participate in the innate immune responses and IFN-γ stimulates macrophage [86]. IFN-γ suppresses osteoclast differentiation via a negative feedback loop for RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway [87]. On the contrary, there are other cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 that related to excessive inflammation with higher RANKL/OPG ratio and more active osteoclast functions. Inhibiting these inflammatory cytokines has been demonstrated to be a powerful method to reduce inflammation and inhibit osteoclastogenesis. TNF can regulate osteoclast precursor cells via enhancing c-Fms, promoting osteoclast differentiation. TNF-α is prone to lead nonunion fractures and delay fracture healing, which is consistent in RA [88]. TNF-α has also been described to inhibit osteoblast differentiation as well as collagen formation via the down-regulation of IGF-1, Osx, and Runx2. Furthermore, TNF-α induced osteoblasts apoptosis via FaseFas ligand signaling [89]. However, previous researches have also revealed the concentration dependence, time dependence and dual function of TNF-α on bone metabolism. TNF-α of low concentration has performed the opposite functions in murine slow-healing fractures model, via enhancing Runx2, Osx, osteocalcin, ALP and BMP-2 to facilitate osteogenesis and fracture healing, which indicates the precise modulation of TNF-α makes sense for bone regeneration [90]. IL-1 (IL-1α and IL-1β) promotes bone resorption via the direct regulation of osteoclasts and enhancing OPG and RANKL expression [91, 92]. In addition, IL-1 inhibits the osteogenic-differentiation of MSC via interfering with Wnt signaling and suppresses osteogenesis through NF-κB and MAPK signaling [93]. IL-6 is identified to participate the excessive bone loss via participating in the RANKL expression and the osteoclast formation [94]. IL-17 leads to local inflammation, RANKL expression and activates osteoclast precursors by inducing TNF-α and IL-1 [95]. Chang et al. found pro-inflammatory TNF and IL-17 could interfere with osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and stimulate IκB kinase (IKK)-NF-κB. It has been observed that inflammation response was reduced and bone MSC-mediated formation was promoted by delivering IKKVI (IKK small-molecule inhibitor) [96]. Apart from the above-mentioned cytokines, IL-11 [97], IL-8 [82], CXCL12 and CCL2 may also be involved in the osteoclastogenesis [98]. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 is frequently used for osteogenesis. Wei et al. incorporated 20 mg/ml BMP-2 into the gelatin sponge to study the immunoregulatory role on macrophage and osteogenesis. And, increased macrophage recruitment has been observed. Furthermore, IL-1β, IL-6, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS, M1 marker) reduced, implying the positive osteoimmunoregulatory role of BMP-2 under inflammatory conditions. Additionally, BMP-2 has been described to activate macrophage alone via pSmad1/5/8 signaling pathway and produce a positive feedback loop via enhancing angiogenic factors. Conditioned medium collected from BMP-2-stimulated macrophage facilitated the osteogenic differentiation of BMSC, suggesting that BMP-2-induced osteogenesis could be involved in the meditation of the local osteoimmune environment [99]. In another study, considering that BMP-2 performs an osteoinductive role to initiate the osteoblastic differentiation and OPG as a RANKL inhibitor to block osteoclastic function, Bougioukli et al. [100] combined BMP-2 with OPG. By comparing the BMP-2 group, the outcomes suggested that osteoclasts can hinder the healing function of BMP-2 and using OPG to inhibit RANKL could facilitate BMP-2 efficacy. In OA cartilage, RANKL/OPG ratio was higher [101]; suppression of RANKL via systemic or intra-articular application of OPG may prevent bone and cartilage degradation [102]. Specialized pro-resolving mediators are endogenous molecules that suppress inflammatory cells recruitment and interfere with macrophage phagocytosis while promoting M2 macrophage polarization. The utilization of pro-resolution mediators facilitated to alter the inflammation [103]. Vasconcelos et al. used the pro-resolution lipid mediators Lipoxin A4 (LxA4) and Resolvin D1 (RvD1) to regulate chitosan scaffolds. Reduced inflammatory IL-1, IL-16 and TNF-α, less fibrous capsule, more CD206+ cells and down-regulated CCR7+ cells were observed [104]. In another study, Yin et al. [105] fabricated biomimetic anti-inflammatory nano-capsule which was coated with cytokines receptors on the surface to block activated pro-inflammation and coated with Resolvin D1 inside to facilitate M2 macrophage polarization. Besides, delivering drugs were also studied. For example, Riccitiello et al. fabricated electrospun nanofibers to deliver and release drug RSV which was able to down-regulate RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis and prohibit the maturation of osteoclast precursors [106]. These modification strategies served as promising potentials to be applied in bone regeneration. There were also strategies which introduce inorganic ions to modulate biomaterials. Shi et al. prepared hypoxia-inducing copper-doped mesoporous silica nanospheres (Cu-MSNs) with sustained released Si and Cu ions. The hypoxia induced by Cu was reported to promote angiogenesis. And, Cu-MSNs showed the osteoimmunomodulatory properties to enhance osteogenesis by stimulating OSM pathway, which suggested the potential for bone tissue therapies [107]. In general, based on the bone metabolism mechanisms, different approaches have been investigated and it has been the current development trend to design bone materials by delivering osteoimmunomodulatory cytokines and bioactive molecules (such as drugs, mediators, ions) to regulate the macrophage polarization and RANK/RANKL signaling pathways, to directly or indirectly modulate the osteogenesis. Although these discoveries are helpful to achieve a favorable osteoimmune environment, many exact mechanisms are still complex and call for further investigations. Osteoimmunomodulation by surface topography and architecture Potential of biomaterials to regulate the function of immune cells has been reported, which encouraged the design of biomaterials to trigger an appropriate immune response at the site of implantation. Surface modification of biomaterials has drawn more and more attention, and the osteoimmunomodulatory properties can stimulate immune cells functions, making it possible to build a favorable osteoimmune environment for bone regeneration [108]. The polarization ability of macrophage is quite sensitive to the physicochemical properties of biomaterials. Immunomodulatory regulations of macrophage and the phenotypes may be potential good strategies to meditate the local environment for bone tissue engineering [109]. Surface roughness is an important modification method to regulate osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, which was heatedly discussed. There are various approaches to modify surface roughness such as polishing and sandblasting. It has been evidenced that micropatterned scaffold can positively modulate the osteoimmune environment and the modified implant surface was considered able to improve the implantation success rate. For instance, Hotchkiss et al. described that Ti surfaces with microroughness benefited the healing process. Because while smooth Ti facilitated M1 polarization with increased pro-inflammatory IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, the Ti surfaces modified by microroughness promoted M2 with increased anti-inflammatory IL-4 and IL-10 [110]. Likely, in another study, Zhu et al. compared the smooth-surface BCP with hBCP (BCP with micro-whiskers and nanoparticles hybrid-structured surface). In hBCP group, it was observed that pro-inflammatory TNF-α and IL6 were prominently reduced. Meanwhile, the gene expressions of SLC20a1 and ATP2B2 were promoted, which were favor of phosphate and calcium ion transporters. And FGF23, known as a stimulator of osteogenic genes was >3-fold. It positively regulated osteogenic differentiation by facilitating Runx2, OCN and ALP. Additionally, it also hindered the expression of adipogenesis-related genes [77]. Additionally, the roughness of the surface not only influenced the cytokines secretion but also had an effect on angiogenesis and BMSC function. Yang et al. [111] demonstrated that rough titanium–blood interactions can promote the proliferation and recruitment of rat BMSC. And also, Pan et al. reported osteoimmunomodulatory potential of the hierarchical macropore/nanosurface. Enhancing function of CD206, Arg1 (M2 marker), anti-inflammatory IL-4, IL-10 and IL-1ra was observed. Up-regulated osteogenic differentiation, BMP-2 secretion, and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells were also described. While CD11c (M1 marker), pro-inflammatory iNOS, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ were down-regulated. The mechanism may be the multi-directional structure that regulated the cytoskeleton tension [112]. TiO2 nanotube structures were reported to provide more reactive area for the protein aggregation, interactions and macrophage adhesion, owing to their empty pore spaces and gaps between nanotubes. For instance, fibronectin and vitronectin acted as ligands absorbed on the surfaces to interact with macrophage through RGD-integrin receptor domains, followed by the secretion of cytokine [106]. Lu et al. [113] compared the different effects of the different diameters on TiO2 nanotubes, indicating that 80 nm group offered more appropriate sites that preferentially adsorb fibronectin and vitronectin to regulate macrophage adhesion and proliferation, while inhibiting IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1 and MIP-1α expression. Electrospun fibers have been recently regarded as promising bone regeneration scaffolds, because the morphology is significantly similar to the natural collagen fibrils [114]. Saino et al. made a comparison the effects of fibrous poly (l-lactic) (PLLA) scaffold with different fiber diameter and alignment. The results demonstrated that fiber diameter influenced the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Nanofibrous PLLA group showed much less inflammation than films and microfibrous ones and PLLA films showed the most infiltration of foreign body giant cells [115]. Pores are important for vascularization and nutrients transport; porous materials are wildly applied in the fabrication of engineering structures [116]. Pore size and porosity have been reported to act as important regulatory cues. Garg et al. reported that the increase of pore diameter and higher porosity of polydioxanone scaffold enhanced Arg1 (M2 marker) and angiogenic VEGF, TGF-β1, and bFGF. Additionally, it down-regulated iNOS, while materials with smaller pores or random size facilitate M1. It has been identified by microscopic analysis that large pores allowed more Mφ to orient in the 3D space while smaller pores were difficult to infiltrate Mφ [117]. Furthermore, a balance between the scaffold porosity and the structural robustness is supposed to be taken into account to ensure the strength, which is quite essential for the scaffold. For one thing, increasing structural porosity may affect the function of macrophage and the regeneration environment. For another, it may have a negative impact on mechanical strength. Regulating the surface properties or structure construction of biomaterials can change the protein layer and regulate different receptor binding as well as signal transduction, to lead changes in cell response, for example, to modulate the adhesion, activation and fusion of macrophage and FBGCs. The cellular response is usually triggered by the adsorbed factors, not the surface itself. And, various kinds of cytokines are involved in the regulation process [109]. In this regard, the modification of the physical of biomaterials can regulate the activation of immune cells especially on macrophages. Therefore, what has been found about the osteoimmunomodulatory behaviors of biomaterials on cellular behaviors provides strategies to optimally design the surface of bone biomaterials to regulate the osteoimmune environment. However, many mechanisms of different osteoimmunomodulation methods to decipher the complex interplay underlying cell behaviors still need further investigation. Osteoimmunomodulation by wettability It is demonstrated that the osseointegration enhanced with the hydrophilicity increased. Hamlet et al. compared the different effects of hydrophilic-modified SLA (modSLA) and SLA Ti. The modSLA group promoted the expression of CD163 protein and Arg1 gene, marking the M2 polarization. And, the gene expression of TGF-β/BMP signaling pathway in osteogenesis was up-regulated. On the contrary, macrophage of the SLA group was prone to switch to an inflammatory phenotype and enhance the pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion; the osteogenic gene expression was not observed. It has been identified that the polarization of macrophages is under the influence of the signaling factors from the biomaterial surface. And, the hydrophilic micro-rough ones stimulated anti-inflammation polarization [118]. Likewise, in another study, murine macrophage cultured on the hydrophilic surface down-regulated the pro-inflammatory secretion of TNF-α, IL-1 and CCL2. Lower expression of the corresponding protein confirmed the change of the cytokine gene expression [119]. Furthermore, compared with the surface roughness modification, increased wettability showed more activation of the anti-inflammatory macrophage. Additionally, the hydrophilic micro-rough surface was showed to lead to higher level of anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion than the smooth one. What is more, increasing surface roughness and hydrophilicity leveraged a synergistic solution to promote osseointegration and osteogenesis. The mechanism was reported that the micro-rough surface allowed less contamination while enhanced surface energy, which could improve wettability [110]. Furthermore, functional groups like amino (–NH2), hydroxyl (–OH), carboxyl (–COOH) and hydrophilic molecules like polyethylene oxide (PEO) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) were commonly researched [120]. Bartneck et al. found that –COOH-modified nanoparticles were able to lead inflammatory M1 phenotype polarization and pro-inflammatory IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and CCL2. Nanorods with –OH was observed to enhance IL-1 and CCL2. While –NH2 termination nanorods resulted in anti-inflammatory M2. Although the immunomodulatory effect on macrophage phenotype was observed, the exact mechanism of the superior performance has not been clearly clarified [121]. The wettability of biomaterial is closely associated with the surface proteins, blood clot and fibrin formation. The surface protein layer can interact with immune cells and activate various factors as well as signal pathways. Especially, macrophages cultured on surface with different wettability have been found to change the protein expression profiles, thereby changing cytokine secretions. Hydrophilic biomaterials are usually observed protein resistance while hydrophobic biomaterials have inherent immunogenicity. What has been discovered above gives clues for modifying biomaterials characteristics to guide the desired cellular biological behavior. Osteoimmunomodulation by surface charge Surface charge of biomaterials has also been reported to influence osteoimmune environment [122]. Brodbeck et al. compared the biomaterials with anionic functional group of poly (acrylic acid) and cationic functional group of poly (dimethylamino propyl acrylamide). The anionic substrate group increased IL-10 and decreased IL-8, while the cationic group down-regulated the important cytokine in the maturation of osteoblasts like IL-10 and IL-1RA. The outcomes showed that anionic group positively affected osteoblast function, while the cationic was prone to up-regulate pro-inflammatory secretion and interfere with osteoblasts activation [123]. Moreover, divalent cations may polarize macrophages. With Ca2+ and Sr2+ used to modify Ti surface, the enhancement of Arg1, MR, CD163 (M2 markers), TGF-β1, PDGF-B and VEGF were observed. BMP-2 released by macrophage was found to facilitate MSCs osteogenic differentiation and promote osteogenesis [124]. These results identified the up-regulated migration and proliferation of endothelial cells to enhance angiogenesis. Additionally, they also acted as the chemoattractant to circulate MSCs to induce bone regeneration, which indicates that the divalent cationic surface was prone to enhance osteogenic differentiation and osteogenesis [125]. Likewise, Bose et al. [126] demonstrated that Mg2+ and Si4+ in the TCP played a positive role in both osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Cell adhesion played a key role in cells differentiation. A positively charged culture surface enlarged the adhesion area of rBMMSC and promoted differentiation. However these results which described the early differentiation of rBMMSCs into osteoblast-like cells were not sufficient enough to explain the osteogenic differentiation of rBMMSCs [122]. What is more, the surface charge could be affected by other properties like chemical groups or roughness. So it would be difficult to carry out single-factor study of surface charge characteristics without any interference from other factors. Further future work could focus on the complex relationships between surface charges and cellular responses. Osteoimmunomodulation by decellularized ECM Biomaterials and host immune system components interact directly in the presence of ECM, which is the noncellular milieu to build fundamental physical framework and deliver cells as well as biological factors. The function of extracellular environment cannot be ignored [127]. The matrix of ECM can store signal molecules, take part in cell–matrix interactions, activate enzymes and regulate cytokine to control cellular morphogenesis, differentiation, and homeostasis in biomaterial integration and tissue healing process [128]. Currently, the employment of decellularized ECM for the regulation of osteoimmune environment is promising. While the native functional groups are exposed or masked via the matrix isolation process, the bioactivity of the ECM can be changed. The ECM decellularization retains only the native structure and removes tissue immunogenic components to reduce antigen, so as to supports infiltration of the host cells and promotes tissue recovery [129, 130]. ECM components are of much significance. Scaffold embedded in GAG modified by chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate to obtain the sulfated GAG linked to serine-rich protein-forming proteoglycan; The polysaccharide matrix acts as a repository as well as regulators for signal molecules [131]. Cells are attached to ECM through a variety of surface receptors such as integrin and selectin, which can specifically adhere to adhesion domains of scaffolds or bind to the polysaccharide matrix to trigger signaling pathways [132]. For example, the negatively charged sulfate groups of proteoglycan can form electrostatic interactions with the positively charged surfaces of signal molecules, affecting the concentration, biological behaviors and stability of the signaling factors [129]. Growth factors are sensitive to proteolytic degradation. The combination with ECM allows the growth factors to interact with its specific ligands and prevents them from enzymatic cleavage and diffusion. Therefore, it is easier to satisfy the local concentration of growth factors needed for signal transmission [133]. In one study, adding high-sulfated hyaluronan down-regulated pro-inflammatory IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12 and TNF-α while enhanced anti-inflammatory IL-10 and CD163 [134]. Huleihel et al. reported that matrix-bound nanovesicles to fabricate ECM bio-scaffolds, their miRNA cargo appeared to actively participate in the macrophage polarization. And, matrix-bound nanovesicles isolated from small-intestinal submucosa (SIS) and urinary bladder matrix (UBM) were found rich in miRNA1-5p, 143-3p and 145-5p. Inhibiting these miRNA had involvement with pro-inflammatory phenotype [135]. ECM glycoproteins have attracted much attention owing to the osteogenic potential and involvement in immune phenotype. S100A8 and S100A9 were damage-related molecular model proteins, which not only activated the osteogenic gene program but also had immunomodulatory function by interacting with the receptors of advanced glycation end products. Cartilage oligomeric matrix proteins and matrilin down-regulated the M1 polarization [136]. Furthermore, the type of immune response highly depends on the source of ECM, for different decellularization procedures result in different effects on macrophages. Dziki et al. demonstrated that M2 macrophage phenotype was observed with pro-remodeling and anti-inflammatory performance, when exposed to SIS, UBM, brain ECM (bECM), esophageal ECM (eECM), and colonic ECM (coECM). On the contrary, dermal ECM led to M1 phenotype, pro-inflammatory performance (iNOS+/Fizz1−/CD206−), while no significant difference has been observed between liver ECM (LECM) and skeletal muscle ECM (mECM) [137]. ECM architecture may also modulate macrophage phenotype polarization via micropatterning to modulate macrophage shape. McWhorter et al. demonstrated that elongation itself enhanced M2 markers and down-regulated pro-inflammatory cytokines without exogenous cytokines. Besides, elongation up-lifts M2-inducing IL-4 and IL-13 while avoiding M1-inducing LPS and IFN-γ. Furthermore, when the contractility forces of actin and actin/myosin were suppressed by inhibitors, shape-induced polarization is abrogated, which implies the importance of the cytoskeleton in modulating macrophage polarization via cell geometry. And, shape-induced polarization may act differently on cytokine-induced one via dissimilar pathway [138]. Mimicking the function of ECM contributes to obtaining optimal bone scaffolds that applied to tissue engineering. The osteoimmunomodulatory effects of different modification strategies are listed as follows (Table 1). Table 1. Modification strategies of biomaterials showed osteoimmunomodulatory effects Properties . Modification strategies . Effects . References . Surface topography and architecture TiO2 nanotube (80 nm) ↑ Macrophage adhesion and proliferation [113] ↓ Protein and TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-1β and IL-6 Hierarchical macropore/nanosurface M2 polarization [112] ↑Anti-inflammatory genes expression ↑Osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis ↓ Inflammatory genes expression Micro-whiskers and nanoparticles hybrid- structured (hBCP) ↑ Collagen content [77] ↓ Inflammatory genes expression Nanofibrous PLLA scaffolds ↓ Inflammatory response [115] Ti surfaces with microroughness M2 polarization [110] ↑ IL-4 and IL-10 Larger diameter fibers with larger pore sizes and porosity M2 polarization [117] ↑ Angiogenesis with VEGF, TGF-β1 and bFGF ↓ Inflammation and the M1 marker iNOS ↑Mφ infiltration Wettability Hydrophilic-modified SLA ↑ CD163 protein and Arg1 [118] ↑ The TGF-β/BMP signaling pathway Combination of increased surface roughness and hydrophilicity ↑ Bone healing and increases osseointegration [110] Surface charge Anionic and cationic functional groups Anionic surfaces ↑ osteoblast function [123] Cationic substrate ↑ pro-inflammatory cytokines Cationic substrate ↓ activation of osteoblasts Ti implant with Ca2+ and Sr2+ Divalent cationic surface ↑ osteoblasts effects [124] Mg2+ and Si4+ in the TCP scaffolds ↑ Osteogenesis and angiogenesis [126] Cytokines and bioactive molecules Sequential delivery of IFNg and IL4 M2 polarization [139] ↑ Vascularization Delivering IKKVI ↑ MSC-mediated bone formation [96] ↓ Inflammation Gelatin sponge incorporated with 20 mg/ml BMP-2 ↑ Macrophage recruitment [99] ↓ M1 markers Lipoxin A4 (LxA4), Resolvin D1 (RvD1) M2 polarization [104, 105] ↓Neutrophils recruitment, pro-inflammatory cytokines and fibrous capsule Copper-doped mesoporous silica nanospheres ↑ Osteogenesis and angiogenesis [107] poly(ε-caprolactone) PCL and poly(lactic) acid (PLA) loading resveratrol ↓ RANKL and maturation of osteoclast precursors [140] Decellularized ECM ECM glycoproteins Cartilage oligomeric matrix proteins and matrilin ↓ the M1 polarization [136] The origin of ECM SIS, UBM, bECM, eECM and coECM: pro-remodeling and anti-inflammatory [137] Dermal ECM: M1 phenotype, pro-inflammatory performance (iNOS+/Fizz1−/CD206−) Matrix-bound nanovesicles ↑ miRNA1-5p , 143-3p and 145-5p. [135] ↓ M1 phenotype Modify ECM architecture ↑ M2 phenotype [138] ↓Inflammatory cytokines without exogenous cytokines Properties . Modification strategies . Effects . References . Surface topography and architecture TiO2 nanotube (80 nm) ↑ Macrophage adhesion and proliferation [113] ↓ Protein and TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-1β and IL-6 Hierarchical macropore/nanosurface M2 polarization [112] ↑Anti-inflammatory genes expression ↑Osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis ↓ Inflammatory genes expression Micro-whiskers and nanoparticles hybrid- structured (hBCP) ↑ Collagen content [77] ↓ Inflammatory genes expression Nanofibrous PLLA scaffolds ↓ Inflammatory response [115] Ti surfaces with microroughness M2 polarization [110] ↑ IL-4 and IL-10 Larger diameter fibers with larger pore sizes and porosity M2 polarization [117] ↑ Angiogenesis with VEGF, TGF-β1 and bFGF ↓ Inflammation and the M1 marker iNOS ↑Mφ infiltration Wettability Hydrophilic-modified SLA ↑ CD163 protein and Arg1 [118] ↑ The TGF-β/BMP signaling pathway Combination of increased surface roughness and hydrophilicity ↑ Bone healing and increases osseointegration [110] Surface charge Anionic and cationic functional groups Anionic surfaces ↑ osteoblast function [123] Cationic substrate ↑ pro-inflammatory cytokines Cationic substrate ↓ activation of osteoblasts Ti implant with Ca2+ and Sr2+ Divalent cationic surface ↑ osteoblasts effects [124] Mg2+ and Si4+ in the TCP scaffolds ↑ Osteogenesis and angiogenesis [126] Cytokines and bioactive molecules Sequential delivery of IFNg and IL4 M2 polarization [139] ↑ Vascularization Delivering IKKVI ↑ MSC-mediated bone formation [96] ↓ Inflammation Gelatin sponge incorporated with 20 mg/ml BMP-2 ↑ Macrophage recruitment [99] ↓ M1 markers Lipoxin A4 (LxA4), Resolvin D1 (RvD1) M2 polarization [104, 105] ↓Neutrophils recruitment, pro-inflammatory cytokines and fibrous capsule Copper-doped mesoporous silica nanospheres ↑ Osteogenesis and angiogenesis [107] poly(ε-caprolactone) PCL and poly(lactic) acid (PLA) loading resveratrol ↓ RANKL and maturation of osteoclast precursors [140] Decellularized ECM ECM glycoproteins Cartilage oligomeric matrix proteins and matrilin ↓ the M1 polarization [136] The origin of ECM SIS, UBM, bECM, eECM and coECM: pro-remodeling and anti-inflammatory [137] Dermal ECM: M1 phenotype, pro-inflammatory performance (iNOS+/Fizz1−/CD206−) Matrix-bound nanovesicles ↑ miRNA1-5p , 143-3p and 145-5p. [135] ↓ M1 phenotype Modify ECM architecture ↑ M2 phenotype [138] ↓Inflammatory cytokines without exogenous cytokines Open in new tab Table 1. Modification strategies of biomaterials showed osteoimmunomodulatory effects Properties . Modification strategies . Effects . References . Surface topography and architecture TiO2 nanotube (80 nm) ↑ Macrophage adhesion and proliferation [113] ↓ Protein and TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-1β and IL-6 Hierarchical macropore/nanosurface M2 polarization [112] ↑Anti-inflammatory genes expression ↑Osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis ↓ Inflammatory genes expression Micro-whiskers and nanoparticles hybrid- structured (hBCP) ↑ Collagen content [77] ↓ Inflammatory genes expression Nanofibrous PLLA scaffolds ↓ Inflammatory response [115] Ti surfaces with microroughness M2 polarization [110] ↑ IL-4 and IL-10 Larger diameter fibers with larger pore sizes and porosity M2 polarization [117] ↑ Angiogenesis with VEGF, TGF-β1 and bFGF ↓ Inflammation and the M1 marker iNOS ↑Mφ infiltration Wettability Hydrophilic-modified SLA ↑ CD163 protein and Arg1 [118] ↑ The TGF-β/BMP signaling pathway Combination of increased surface roughness and hydrophilicity ↑ Bone healing and increases osseointegration [110] Surface charge Anionic and cationic functional groups Anionic surfaces ↑ osteoblast function [123] Cationic substrate ↑ pro-inflammatory cytokines Cationic substrate ↓ activation of osteoblasts Ti implant with Ca2+ and Sr2+ Divalent cationic surface ↑ osteoblasts effects [124] Mg2+ and Si4+ in the TCP scaffolds ↑ Osteogenesis and angiogenesis [126] Cytokines and bioactive molecules Sequential delivery of IFNg and IL4 M2 polarization [139] ↑ Vascularization Delivering IKKVI ↑ MSC-mediated bone formation [96] ↓ Inflammation Gelatin sponge incorporated with 20 mg/ml BMP-2 ↑ Macrophage recruitment [99] ↓ M1 markers Lipoxin A4 (LxA4), Resolvin D1 (RvD1) M2 polarization [104, 105] ↓Neutrophils recruitment, pro-inflammatory cytokines and fibrous capsule Copper-doped mesoporous silica nanospheres ↑ Osteogenesis and angiogenesis [107] poly(ε-caprolactone) PCL and poly(lactic) acid (PLA) loading resveratrol ↓ RANKL and maturation of osteoclast precursors [140] Decellularized ECM ECM glycoproteins Cartilage oligomeric matrix proteins and matrilin ↓ the M1 polarization [136] The origin of ECM SIS, UBM, bECM, eECM and coECM: pro-remodeling and anti-inflammatory [137] Dermal ECM: M1 phenotype, pro-inflammatory performance (iNOS+/Fizz1−/CD206−) Matrix-bound nanovesicles ↑ miRNA1-5p , 143-3p and 145-5p. [135] ↓ M1 phenotype Modify ECM architecture ↑ M2 phenotype [138] ↓Inflammatory cytokines without exogenous cytokines Properties . Modification strategies . Effects . References . Surface topography and architecture TiO2 nanotube (80 nm) ↑ Macrophage adhesion and proliferation [113] ↓ Protein and TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-1β and IL-6 Hierarchical macropore/nanosurface M2 polarization [112] ↑Anti-inflammatory genes expression ↑Osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis ↓ Inflammatory genes expression Micro-whiskers and nanoparticles hybrid- structured (hBCP) ↑ Collagen content [77] ↓ Inflammatory genes expression Nanofibrous PLLA scaffolds ↓ Inflammatory response [115] Ti surfaces with microroughness M2 polarization [110] ↑ IL-4 and IL-10 Larger diameter fibers with larger pore sizes and porosity M2 polarization [117] ↑ Angiogenesis with VEGF, TGF-β1 and bFGF ↓ Inflammation and the M1 marker iNOS ↑Mφ infiltration Wettability Hydrophilic-modified SLA ↑ CD163 protein and Arg1 [118] ↑ The TGF-β/BMP signaling pathway Combination of increased surface roughness and hydrophilicity ↑ Bone healing and increases osseointegration [110] Surface charge Anionic and cationic functional groups Anionic surfaces ↑ osteoblast function [123] Cationic substrate ↑ pro-inflammatory cytokines Cationic substrate ↓ activation of osteoblasts Ti implant with Ca2+ and Sr2+ Divalent cationic surface ↑ osteoblasts effects [124] Mg2+ and Si4+ in the TCP scaffolds ↑ Osteogenesis and angiogenesis [126] Cytokines and bioactive molecules Sequential delivery of IFNg and IL4 M2 polarization [139] ↑ Vascularization Delivering IKKVI ↑ MSC-mediated bone formation [96] ↓ Inflammation Gelatin sponge incorporated with 20 mg/ml BMP-2 ↑ Macrophage recruitment [99] ↓ M1 markers Lipoxin A4 (LxA4), Resolvin D1 (RvD1) M2 polarization [104, 105] ↓Neutrophils recruitment, pro-inflammatory cytokines and fibrous capsule Copper-doped mesoporous silica nanospheres ↑ Osteogenesis and angiogenesis [107] poly(ε-caprolactone) PCL and poly(lactic) acid (PLA) loading resveratrol ↓ RANKL and maturation of osteoclast precursors [140] Decellularized ECM ECM glycoproteins Cartilage oligomeric matrix proteins and matrilin ↓ the M1 polarization [136] The origin of ECM SIS, UBM, bECM, eECM and coECM: pro-remodeling and anti-inflammatory [137] Dermal ECM: M1 phenotype, pro-inflammatory performance (iNOS+/Fizz1−/CD206−) Matrix-bound nanovesicles ↑ miRNA1-5p , 143-3p and 145-5p. [135] ↓ M1 phenotype Modify ECM architecture ↑ M2 phenotype [138] ↓Inflammatory cytokines without exogenous cytokines Open in new tab Conclusions and future perspectives Biomaterials as bone substitutes have always been considered to trigger FBRs. Traditional designing methods were prone to fabricate biomaterials which can minimize the host immune response. However, the obtained biomaterials were not to the satisfaction for the clinical application. Not content with that, numerous researches have struggled to study the biological characteristics of immune and bone modeling. Currently, the concept of osteoimmunology was inspiring, which mainly emphasized the interaction among biomaterials, immune system and skeletal system. Immune response was not necessarily bad news, allowing specific reactions has shown to facilitate bone remodeling process. These reactions were under the delicate cooperation of cells (both bone cells and immune cells), cytokines and signaling pathways. Biomaterials would not simply act as foreign bodies, they can be modified to obtain different characteristics thus influence the protein adsorption and signaling factors binding. Numerous studies have shown that the modification strategies like drug delivery, topography, structure, wettability, surface charge have been evidenced to individually or synergistically regulate immune functions and bone metabolism. Reviewing the existing studies, we summarized the osteoimmunomodulatory effects of the different modification approaches, which described encouraging results and may develop functional biomaterials to be potentially applied in bone tissue engineering. And, we found that a considerable amount of studies had confirmed the significant role of the modulation of macrophages phenotypes, which has also been widely researched and applied in many modification strategies, however, many of the exact mechanism were still unclear and called for further investigations. Moreover, as we know, compared with macrophages, there were relatively less attention on other cells like DCs, B cells and T cells. Even though some studies mentioned their participation in the osteoimmune environment, very few studies could clarify their roles and potential in bone remodeling. Furthermore, the osteoimmunomodulation may also be a double-edged sword because the signaling pathways are complex and also play a dual role, it is difficult to control one element and other factors remain the same. Therefore, there is a need to carry out further studies on fabricating functional biomaterials to modulate the material-host response accurately and actively for bone regeneration. Acknowledgements This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873710), Guangdong Financial Fund for High-Caliber Hospital Construction (174-2018-XMZC-0001-03-0125/C-05), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (19ykzd15), Guangzhou Foundation for Science and Technology Planning Project, China (201704030083) and Open Fund of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University (KF2018120102), Sun Yat-sen University Science and Technology Achievements Conversion Project (87000-18843231). Conflict of interest statement. The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1 Woolf AD , Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions . Bull World Health Organ 2003 ; 81 : 646 – 56 . Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 2 Gavaskar AS , Srinivasan P, Jeyakumar B et al. Valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy for femur neck pseudoarthrosis: a simple solution to a complex problem that has stood the test of time . Int Orthop 2019 . doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04353-7. OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 3 Garg T , Goyal AK. Biomaterial-based scaffolds – current status and future directions . Exp Opin Drug Deliv 2014 ; 11 : 767 – 89 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 4 Anderson JM , Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials . Semin Immunol 2008 ; 20 : 86 – 100 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 5 Hench LL , Thompson I. Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials . J R Soc Interface 2010 ; 7 : S379 – 91 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 6 Tang D , Tare RS, Yang L-Y et al. Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration . Biomaterials 2016 ; 83 : 363 – 82 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 7 Okamoto K , Nakashima T, Shinohara M et al. Osteoimmunology: the conceptual framework unifying the immune and skeletal systems . Physiol Rev 2017 ; 97 : 1295 – 349 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 8 Criscitiello C , Viale G, Gelao L et al. Crosstalk between bone niche and immune system: osteoimmunology signaling as a potential target for cancer treatment . Cancer Treat Rev 2015 ; 41 : 61 – 8 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 9 Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems . Nat Rev Immunol 2007 ; 7 : 292 – 304 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 10 Franz S , Rammelt S, Scharnweber D et al. Immune responses to implants – a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials . Biomaterials 2011 ; 32 : 6692 – 709 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 11 Przekora A. Current trends in fabrication of biomaterials for bone and cartilage regeneration: materials modifications and biophysical stimulations . Int J Mol Sci 2019 ; 20 : 435 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 12 Kanczler JM , Oreffo R. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis: the potential for engineering bone . Eur Cell Mater 2008 ; 15 : 100 – 14 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 13 Medzhitov R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation . Nature 2008 ; 454 : 428 – 35 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 14 Tsao Y-T , Huang Y-J, Wu H-H et al. Osteocalcin mediates biomineralization during osteogenic maturation in human mesenchymal stromal cells . Int J Mol Sci 2017 ; 18 : 159 – 72 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 15 Adams GB , Chabner KT, Alley IR et al. Stem cell engraftment at the endosteal niche is specified by the calcium-sensing receptor . Nature 2006 ; 439 : 599 – 603 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 16 Fromigue O , Hay E, Barbara A et al. Essential role of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)-mediated Wnt signaling in osteoblast differentiation induced by strontium ranelate . J Biol Chem 2010 ; 285 : 25251 – 8 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 17 Florencio-Silva R , da Silva Sasso GR, Sasso-Cerri E et al. Biology of bone tissue: structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells . Biomed Res Int 2015 ; 2015 : 1 – 17 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 18 Boyce BF , Xiu Y, Li JB et al. NF-kappa B-mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis . Endocrinol Metab 2015 ; 30 : 35 – 44 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 19 Ono T , Nakashima T. Recent advances in osteoclast biology . Histochem Cell Biol 2018 ; 149 : 325 – 41 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 20 Trouvin A-P , Goeb V. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand and osteoprotegerin: maintaining the balance to prevent bone loss . Clin Interv Aging 2010 ; 5 : 345 – 54 . Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 21 Ma Q-l , Fang L, Jiang N et al. Bone mesenchymal stem cell secretion of sRANKL/OPG/M-CSF in response to macrophage-mediated inflammatory response influences osteogenesis on nanostructured Ti surfaces . Biomaterials 2018 ; 154 : 234 – 47 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 22 Jenkins SJ , Ruckerl D, Cook PC et al. Local macrophage proliferation, rather than recruitment from the blood, is a signature of T(H)2 inflammation . Science 2011 ; 332 : 1284 – 8 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 23 Pettit AR , Chang MK, Hume DA et al. Osteal macrophages: a new twist on coupling during bone dynamics . Bone 2008 ; 43 : 976 – 82 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 24 Horwood NJ. Macrophage polarization and bone formation: a review . Clin Rev Allerg Immunol 2016 ; 51 : 79 – 86 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 25 Spiller KL , Koh TJ. Macrophage-based therapeutic strategies in regenerative medicine . Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017 ; 122 : 74 – 83 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 26 Champagne C , Takebe J, Offenbacher S et al. Macrophage cell lines produce osteoinductive signals that include bone morphogenetic protein-2 . Bone 2002 ; 30 : 26 – 31 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 27 Sica A , Erreni M, Allavena P et al. Macrophage polarization in pathology . Cell Mol Life Sci 2015 ; 72 : 4111 – 26 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 28 Jeannin P , Paolini L, Adam C et al. The roles of CSFs on the functional polarization of tumor-associated macrophages . FEBS J 2018 ; 285 : 680 – 99 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 29 Wynn TA , Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis . Immunity 2016 ; 44 : 450 – 62 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 30 Shapouri-Moghaddam A , Mohammadian S, Vazini H et al. Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease . J Cell Physiol 2018 ; 233 : 6425 – 40 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 31 Mosser DM , Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation . Nat Rev Immunol 2008 ; 8 : 958 – 69 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 32 Sussman EM , Halpin MC, Muster J et al. Porous implants modulate healing and induce shifts in local macrophage polarization in the foreign body reaction . Ann Biomed Eng 2014 ; 42 : 1508 – 16 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 33 Smigiel KS , Parks WC. Macrophages, wound healing, and fibrosis: recent insights . Curr Rheumatol Rep 2018 ; 20 : 17 –25. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 34 Yu T , Zhao L, Huang X et al. Enhanced activity of the macrophage M1/M2 phenotypes and phenotypic switch to M1 in periodontal infection . Journal of Periodontology 2016 ; 87 : 1092 – 102 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 35 Kim HR , Kim KW, Kim BM et al. Regulation of Th17 cytokine-induced osteoclastogenesis via SKI306X in rheumatoid arthritis . J Clin Med 2019 ; 8 : 1021 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 36 Bettelli E , Carrier YJ, Gao WD et al. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector T(H)17 and regulatory T cells . Nature 2006 ; 441 : 235 – 8 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 37 Zaiss MM , Axmann R, Zwerina J et al. Treg cells suppress osteoclast formation – a new link between the immune system and bone . Arthritis Rheum 2007 ; 56 : 4104 – 12 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 38 Soederstroem K , Stein E, Colmenero P et al. Natural killer cells trigger osteoclastogenesis and bone destruction in arthritis . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010 ; 107 : 13028 – 33 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 39 Horowitz MC , Fretz JA, Lorenzo JA. How B cells influence bone biology in health and disease . Bone 2010 ; 47 : 472 – 9 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 40 Rojas IML , Mok W-H, Pearson FE et al. Human blood CD1c(+) dendritic cells promote Th1 and Th17 effector function in memory CD4(+) T cells . Front Immunol 2017 ; 8 : 971 – 82 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 41 Reinke S , Geissler S, Taylor WR et al. Terminally differentiated CD8(+) T cells negatively affect bone regeneration in humans . Sci Transl Med 2013 ; 5 : 177ra36 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 42 Kroner J , Kovtun A, Kemmler J et al. Mast cells are critical regulators of bone fracture-induced inflammation and osteoclast formation and activity . J Bone Miner Res 2017 ; 32 : 2431 – 2444 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 43 Chakravarti A , Raquil M-A, Tessier P et al. Surface RANKL of Toll-like receptor 4-stimulated human neutrophils activates osteoclastic bone resorption . Blood 2009 ; 114 : 1633 – 1644 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 44 Swartzlander MD , Blakney AK, Amer LD et al. Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells combats the foreign body response to cell-laden synthetic hydrogels . Biomaterials 2015 ; 41 : 79 – 88 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 45 Pan Z , Duan P, Liu X et al. Effect of porosities of bilayered porous scaffolds on spontaneous osteochondral repair in cartilage tissue engineering . Regen Biomater 2015 ; 2 : 9 – 19 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 46 Yang J , Chen X, Yuan T et al. Regulation of the secretion of immunoregulatory factors of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) by collagen-based scaffolds during chondrogenesis . Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 2017 ; 70 : 983 – 991 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 47 Harada S-i , Rodan GA. Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass . Nature 2003 ; 423 : 349 – 355 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 48 Dimitroulas T , Nikas SN, Trontzas P et al. Biologic therapies and systemic bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis . Autoimmun Rev 2013 ; 12 : 958 – 966 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 49 Cochran DL. Inflammation and bone loss in periodontal disease . J Periodontol 2008 ; 79 : 1569 – 1576 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 50 Loi F , Cordova LA, Pajarinen J et al. Inflammation, fracture and bone repair . Bone 2016 ; 86 : 119 – 130 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 51 Nacher-Juan J , Carmen Terencio M, Jose Alcaraz M et al. Osteostatin inhibits collagen-induced arthritis by regulation of immune activation, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and osteoclastogenesis . Int J Mol Sci 2019 ; 20 : 3845 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 52 Tsukasaki M , Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: evolving concepts in bone-immune interactions in health and disease . Nat Rev Immunol 2019 ; 19 : 626 – 642 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 53 Perez RA , Seo S-J, Won J-E et al. Therapeutically relevant aspects in bone repair and regeneration . Mater Today 2015 ; 18 : 573 – 589 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 54 Ribeiro AM , Flores-Sahagun THS, Paredes RC. A perspective on molybdenum biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity for applications in implants . J Mater Sci 2016 ; 51 : 2806 – 2816 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 55 Civantos A , Martinez-Campos E, Ramos V et al. Titanium coatings and surface modifications: toward clinically useful bioactive implants . ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2017 ; 3 : 1245 – 1261 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 56 Feng P , Wu P, Gao C et al. A multimaterial scaffold with tunable properties: toward bone tissue repair . Adv Sci 2018 ; 5 : 1700817 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 57 Florczyk SJ , Wang K, Jana S et al. Porous chitosan-hyaluronic acid scaffolds as a mimic of glioblastoma microenvironment ECM . Biomaterials 2013 ; 34 : 10143 – 10150 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 58 Dash M , Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM et al. Chitosan-A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications . Prog Polym Sci 2011 ; 36 : 981 – 1014 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 59 Mouw JK , Ou G, Weaver VM. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014 ; 15 : 771 – 785 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 60 Knopf-Marques H , Pravda M, Wolfova L et al. Hyaluronic acid and its derivatives in coating and delivery systems: applications in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and immunomodulation . Adv Healthcare Mater 2016 ; 5 : 2841 – 2855 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 61 Trombino S , Servidio C, Curcio F et al. Strategies for hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel design in drug delivery . Pharmaceutics 2019 ; 11:407 . OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 62 Levingstone TJ , Ramesh A, Brady RT et al. Cell-free multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds demonstrate layer specific regeneration of functional osteochondral tissue in caprine joints . Biomaterials 2016 ; 87 : 69 – 81 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 63 Xiao L , Liu S, Yao D et al. Fabrication of silk scaffolds with nanomicroscaled structures and tunable stiffness . Biomacromolecules 2017 ; 18 : 2073 – 2079 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 64 Farokhi M , Mottaghitalab F, Samani S et al. Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering . Biotechnol Adv 2018 ; 36 : 68 – 91 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 65 Morris AH , Stamer DK, Kyriakides TR. The host response to naturally-derived extracellular matrix biomaterials . Semin Immunol 2017 ; 29 : 72 – 91 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 66 Hotaling NA , Tang L, Irvine DJ et al. Biomaterial strategies for immunomodulation . Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2015 ; 17 : 317 – 349 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 67 El-Sherbiny IM , Yacoub MH. Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: progress and challenges . Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2013 ; 2013 : 316 – 42 . Google Scholar PubMed OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 68 Khanarian NT , Haney NM, Burga RA et al. A functional agarose-hydroxyapatite scaffold for osteochondral interface regeneration . Biomaterials 2012 ; 33 : 5247 – 5258 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 69 Song Z , Han Z, Lv S et al. Synthetic polypeptides: from polymer design to supramolecular assembly and biomedical application . Chem Soc Rev 2017 ; 46 : 6570 – 6599 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 70 Martins C , Sousa F, Araujo F et al. Functionalizing PLGA and PLGA derivatives for drug delivery and tissue regeneration applications . Adv Healthcare Mater 2018 ; 7 : 1701035 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 71 Malikmammadov E , Tanir TE, Kiziltay A et al. PCL and PCL-based materials in biomedical applications . J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2018 ; 29 : 863 – 893 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 72 Generali M , Kehl D, Capulli AK et al. Comparative analysis of poly-glycolic acid-based hybrid polymer starter matrices for in vitro tissue engineering . Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2017 ; 158 : 203 – 212 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 73 Trindade R , Albrektsson T, Tengvall P et al. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials: on mechanisms for buildup and breakdown of osseointegration . Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016 ; 18 : 192 – 203 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 74 Zorlutuna P , Vrana NE, Khademhosseini A. The expanding world of tissue engineering: the building blocks and new applications of tissue engineered constructs . IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2013 ; 6 : 47 – 62 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 75 Rahaman MN , Day DE, Bal BS et al. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering . Acta Biomater 2011 ; 7 : 2355 – 2373 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 76 Tang Z , Tan Y, Ni Y et al. Comparison of ectopic bone formation process induced by four calcium phosphate ceramics in mice . Mater Sci Eng C 2017 ; 70 : 1000 – 1010 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 77 Zhu Y , Zhang K, Zhao R et al. Bone regeneration with micro/nano hybrid-structured biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics at segmental bone defect and the induced immunoregulation of MSCs . Biomaterials 2017 ; 147 : 133 – 144 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 78 Dehnavi N , Parivar K, Goodarzi V et al. Systematically engineered electrospun conduit based on PGA/collagen/bioglass nanocomposites: the evaluation of morphological, mechanical, and bio-properties . Polym Adv Technol 2019 ; 30 : 2192 – 2206 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 79 Deng Y , Ma F, Ruiz-Ortega LI et al. Fabrication of strontium Eucommia ulmoides polysaccharides and in vitro evaluation of their osteoimmunomodulatory property . Int J Biol Macromol 2019 ; 140 : 727 – 735 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 80 Wang M , Yu Y, Dai K et al. Improved osteogenesis and angiogenesis of magnesium-doped calcium phosphate cement via macrophage immunomodulation . Biomater Sci 2016 ; 4 : 1574 – 1583 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 81 Ujiie Y , Karakida T, Yamakoshi Y et al. Interleukin-4 released from human gingival fibroblasts reduces osteoclastogenesis . Archiv Oral Biol 2016 ; 72 : 187 – 193 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 82 Amarasekara DS , Yun H, Kim S et al. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation by cytokine networks . Immune Netw 2018 ; 18 :e8. OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 83 Zaiss MM , Kurowska-Stolarska M, Boehm C et al. IL-33 shifts the balance from osteoclast to alternatively activated macrophage differentiation and protects from TNF-alpha-mediated bone loss . J Immunol 2011 ; 186 : 6097 – 6105 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 84 Spiller KL , Anfang RR, Spiller KJ et al. The role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds . Biomaterials 2014 ; 35 : 4477 – 4488 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 85 Walsh MC , Takegahara N, Kim H et al. Updating osteoimmunology: regulation of bone cells by innate and adaptive immunity . Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018 ; 14 : 146 – 156 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 86 Takayanagi H , Kim S, Matsuo K et al. RANKL maintains bone homeostasis through c-Fos-dependent induction of interferon-beta . Nature 2002 ; 416 : 744 – 749 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 87 Takayanagi H , Ogasawara K, Hida S et al. T-cell-mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis by signalling cross-talk between RANKL and IFN-gamma . Nature 2000 ; 408 : 600 – 605 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 88 Kobayashi K , Takahashi N, Jimi E et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha stimulates osteoclast differentiation by a mechanism independent of the ODF/RANKL-RANK interaction . J Exp Med 2000 ; 191 : 275 – 285 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 89 Walsh MC , Choi Y. Biology of the RANKL-RANK-OPG system in immunity, bone, and beyond . Front Immunol 2014 ; 5 : 511 –22. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 90 Huang H , Zhao N, Xu X et al. Dose-specific effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells . Cell Prolif 2011 ; 44 : 420 – 427 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 91 SH L , TS K YC et al. Osteoimmunology: cytokines and the skeletal system . BMB Rep 2008 ; 41 : 495 – 510 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 92 Steeve KT , Marc P, Sandrine T et al. IL-6, RANKL, TNF-alpha/IL-1: interrelations in bone resorption pathophysiology . Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2004 ; 15 : 49 – 60 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 93 Mao C , Wang Y, Zhang X et al. Double-edged-sword effect of IL-1 beta on the osteogenesis of periodontal ligament stem cells via crosstalk between the NF-kappa B, MAPK and BMP/Smad signaling pathways . Cell Death Dis 2016 ; 7 :e2296. OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 94 O’Brien W , Fissel BM, Maeda Y et al. RANK-independent osteoclast formation and bone erosion in inflammatory arthritis . Arthritis Rheumatol 2016 ; 68 : 2889 – 2900 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 95 Lubberts E. IL-17/Th17 targeting: on the road to prevent chronic destructive arthritis? Cytokine 2008 ; 41 : 84 – 91 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 96 Chang J , Liu F, Lee M et al. NF-kappa B inhibits osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by promoting beta-catenin degradation . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013 ; 110 : 9469 – 9474 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 97 Liang M , Ma Q, Ding N et al. IL-11 is essential in promoting osteolysis in breast cancer bone metastasis via RANKL-independent activation of osteoclastogenesis . Cell Death Dis 2019 ; 10 : 353 – 65 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 98 Coniglio SJ. Role of tumor-derived chemokines in osteolytic bone metastasis . Front Endocrinol 2018 ; 9 : 313 – 24 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 99 Wei F , Zhou Y, Wang J et al. The immunomodulatory role of BMP-2 on macrophages to accelerate osteogenesis . Tissue Eng A 2018 ; 24 : 584 – 594 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 100 Bougioukli S , Jain A, Sugiyama O et al. Combination therapy with BMP-2 and a systemic RANKL inhibitor enhances bone healing in a mouse critical-sized femoral defect . Bone 2016 ; 84 : 93 – 103 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 101 Tat SK , Amiable N, Pelletier J-P et al. Modulation of OPG, RANK and RANKL by human chondrocytes and their implication during osteoarthritis . Rheumatology 2009 ; 48 : 1482 – 1490 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 102 Sagar DR , Ashraf S, Xu L et al. Osteoprotegerin reduces the development of pain behaviour and joint pathology in a model of osteoarthritis . Ann Rheum Dis 2014 ; 73 : 1558 – 1565 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 103 Serhan CN. Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology . Nature 2014 ; 510 : 92 – 101 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 104 Vasconcelos DP , Costa M, Amaral IF et al. Modulation of the inflammatory response to chitosan through M2 macrophage polarization using pro-resolution mediators . Biomaterials 2015 ; 37 : 116 – 123 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 105 Yin C , Zhao Q, Li W et al. Biomimetic anti-inflammatory nano-capsule serves as a cytokine blocker and M2 polarization inducer for bone tissue repair . Acta Biomater 2019 : 416 – 26 . OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 106 Riccitiello F , De Luise A, Conte R et al. Effect of resveratrol release kinetic from electrospun nanofibers on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation . Eur Polym J 2018 ; 99 : 289 – 297 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 107 Shi M , Chen Z, Farnaghi S et al. Copper-doped mesoporous silica nanospheres, a promising immunomodulatory agent for inducing osteogenesis . Acta Biomater 2016 ; 30 : 334 – 344 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 108 Yi H , Rehman FU, Zhao C et al. Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair . Bone Res 2016 ; 4 : 16050 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 109 Sridharan R , Cameron AR, Kelly DJ et al. Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles . Mater Today 2015 ; 18 : 313 – 325 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 110 Hotchkiss KM , Reddy GB, Hyzy SL et al. Titanium surface characteristics, including topography and wettability, alter macrophage activation . Acta Biomater 2016 ; 31 : 425 – 434 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 111 Yang J , Zhou Y, Wei F et al. Blood clot formed on rough titanium surface induces early cell recruitment . Clin Oral Implants Res 2016 ; 27 : 1031 – 1038 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 112 Pan H , Xie Y, Zhang Z et al. Immunomodulation effect of a hierarchical macropore/nanosurface on osteogenesis and angiogenesis . Biomed Mater 2017 ; 12 : 045006 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 113 Lu WL , Wang N, Gao P et al. Effects of anodic titanium dioxide nanotubes of different diameters on macrophage secretion and expression of cytokines and chemokines . Cell Prolif 2015 ; 48 : 95 – 104 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 114 Khorshidi S , Solouk A, Mirzadeh H et al. A review of key challenges of electrospun scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications . J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2016 ; 10 : 715 – 738 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 115 Saino E , Focarete ML, Gualandi C et al. Effect of electrospun fiber diameter and alignment on macrophage activation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines . Biomacromolecules 2011 ; 12 : 1900 – 1911 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 116 Wally ZJ , van Grunsven W, Claeyssens F et al. Porous titanium for dental implant applications . Metals 2015 ; 5 : 1902 – 1920 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 117 Garg K , Pullen NA, Oskeritzian CA et al. Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds . Biomaterials 2013 ; 34 : 4439 – 4451 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 118 Hamlet SM , Lee RSB, Moon H-J et al. Hydrophilic titanium surface-induced macrophage modulation promotes pro-osteogenic signalling . Clin Oral Impl Res 2019 ; 30 : 1085 – 1096 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 119 Swartzlander MD , Barnes CA, Blakney AK et al. Linking the foreign body response and protein adsorption to PEG-based hydrogels using proteomics . Biomaterials 2015 ; 41 : 26 – 36 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 120 Ko Y-M , Lee K, Kim B-H. Effect of functional groups on biodegradation and pre-osteoblastic cell response on the plasma-polymerized magnesium surface . Jpn J Appl Phys 2013 ; 52 : 01AE01 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 121 Bartneck M , Keul HA, Singh S et al. Rapid uptake of gold nanorods by primary human blood phagocytes and immunomodulatory effects of surface chemistry . ACS Nano 2010 ; 4 : 3073 – 3086 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 122 Li J , Mou X, Qiu J et al. Surface charge regulation of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell on polarized ferroelectric crystal substrate . Adv Healthcare Mater 2015 ; 4 : 998 – 1003 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 123 Brodbeck WG , Nakayama Y, Matsuda T et al. Biomaterial surface chemistry dictates adherent monocyte/macrophage cytokine expression in vitro . Cytokine 2002 ; 18 : 311 – 319 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 124 Lee C-H , Kim Y-J, Jang J-H et al. Modulating macrophage polarization with divalent cations in nanostructured titanium implant surfaces . Nanotechnology 2016 ; 27:085101 . OpenURL Placeholder Text WorldCat 125 Brown BN , Ratner BD, Goodman SB et al. Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in and regenerative medicine . Biomaterials 2012 ; 33 : 3792 – 3802 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 126 Bose S , Tarafder S, Bandyopadhyay A. Effect of chemistry on osteogenesis and angiogenesis towards bone tissue engineering using 3D printed scaffolds . Ann Biomed Eng 2017 ; 45 : 261 – 272 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 127 Van Goethem E , Poincloux R, Gauffre F et al. Matrix architecture dictates three-dimensional migration modes of human macrophages: differential involvement of proteases and podosome-like structures . J Immunol 2010 ; 184 : 1049 – 1061 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 128 Poltavets V , Kochetkova M, Pitson SM et al. The role of the extracellular matrix and its molecular and cellular regulators in cancer cell plasticity . Front Oncol 2018 ; 8 : 431 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 129 Hynes RO. The extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils . Science 2009 ; 326 : 1216 – 1219 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 130 Kim TG , Shin H, Lim DW. Biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering . Adv Funct Mater 2012 ; 22 : 2446 – 2468 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 131 Hozumi K , Fujimori C, Katagiri F et al. Suppression of cell adhesion through specific integrin crosstalk on mixed peptide-polysaccharide matrices . Biomaterials 2015 ; 37 : 73 – 81 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 132 Walton KL , Johnson KE, Harrison CA. Targeting TGF-beta mediated SMAD signaling for the prevention of fibrosis . Front Pharmacol 2017 ; 8 : 461 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 133 Wei Q , Pohl TLM, Seckinger A et al. Regulation of integrin and growth factor signaling in biomaterials for osteodifferentiation . Beilstein J Org Chem 2015 ; 11 : 773 – 783 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 134 Kajahn J , Franz S, Rueckert E et al. Artificial extracellular matrices composed of collagen I and high sulfated hyaluronan modulate monocyte to macrophage differentiation under conditions of sterile inflammation . Biomatter 2012 ; 2 : 226 – 36 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 135 Huleihel L , Bartolacci JG, Dziki JL et al. Matrix-bound nanovesicles recapitulate extracellular matrix effects on macrophage phenotype . Tissue Eng A 2017 ; 23 : 1283 – 1294 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 136 Beachley VZ , Wolf MT, Sadtler K et al. Tissue matrix arrays for high-throughput screening and systems analysis of cell function . Nat Methods 2015 ; 12 : 1197 – 1204 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 137 Dziki JL , Wang DS, Pineda C et al. Solubilized extracellular matrix bioscaffolds derived from diverse source tissues differentially influence macrophage phenotype . J Biomed Mater Res 2017 ; 105 : 138 – 147 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat 138 McWhorter FY , Wang T, Nguyen P et al. Modulation of macrophage phenotype by cell shape . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013 ; 110 : 17253 – 17258 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 139 Spiller KL , Nassiri S, Witherel CE et al. Sequential delivery of immunomodulatory cytokines to facilitate the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages and enhance vascularization of bone scaffolds . Biomaterials 2015 ; 37 : 194 – 207 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS PubMed WorldCat 140 Riccitiello F , De Luise A, Conte R et al. Effect of resveratrol release kinetic from electrospun nanofibers on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation . Eur Polym J 2018 ; 99 : 289 – 297 . Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS WorldCat Author notes † " The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
TI - Osteoimmunomodulatory effects of biomaterial modification strategies on macrophage polarization and bone regeneration
JF - Regenerative Biomaterials
DO - 10.1093/rb/rbaa006
DA - 2020-06-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/osteoimmunomodulatory-effects-of-biomaterial-modification-strategies-3PFII0sJOR
SP - 233
VL - 7
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -