TY - JOUR
AU - Johnstone, William
AB - REVIEWS bia. Here, Dawit IS ‘David’, and cannot be any other. If one Afro-Asiatic language can do this, so can others. And they do. In Egyptian, voiced terminal consonants in Semitic loanwords can become voiceless — e.g., Hebrew hereb, ‘sword’, appears as H-r-p in Egyptian. See J.E. Hoch, Semitic Words in Egyptian Texts of the New King- dom and Third Intermediate Period, (Princeton 1997), 233–5, No. 324. So, there is no practical problem whatsoever in Dwd becoming Dwt here. On Nos. 110–12, all three should be taken as one (against Na’aman), as ‘Arad of Beth-Yeroham’; there is no ancient rule against triplets! The interpretations of Nos. 121, 124–7, 130, 133, 139, 150 find wide acceptance as cited by Wilson (omitting, again, lost and dubi- ous entries). Finally, in row X, 2a–3a have wide acceptance; then, Ain-goren (Wilson) for 4a is certainly feasible, if still unattested. Space-limits preclude further comments on this topic. Wilson’s work is a useful discussion, but is not sufficiently au fait with the full available knowledge about topographical lists to provide a fully balanced view of that of Shoshenq I. doi:10.1093/jss/fgn062 K.A. KITCHEN UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL THOMAS B. DOZEMAN and KONRAD SCHMID (eds), A Farewell to 
TI - Thomas B. Dozeman and Konrad Schmid (eds), A Farewell to the Yahwist The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation (Society of Biblical Literature Symposium Series 34).
JF - Journal of Semitic Studies
DO - 10.1093/jss/fgn063
DA - 2009-01-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/thomas-b-dozeman-and-konrad-schmid-eds-a-farewell-to-the-yahwist-the-2k0MFfg6D0
SP - 276
EP - 278
VL - 54
IS - 1
DP - DeepDyve
ER -