Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Paul Yushkevich, J. Piven, H. Hazlett, R. Smith, Sean Ho, J. Gee, G. Gerig (2006)
User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliabilityNeuroImage, 31
G. Vural, H. Keklikoglu, Ş. Temel, O. Deniz, K. Ercan (2013)
Comparison of Double Inversion Recovery and Conventional Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Relations with Disease DisabilityThe Neuroradiology Journal, 26
A. Seewann, Evert-jan Kooi, S. Roosendaal, P. Pouwels, M. Wattjes, P. Valk, F. Barkhof, C. Polman, J. Geurts (2012)
Postmortem verification of MS cortical lesion detection with 3D DIRNeurology, 78
I. Riederer, D. Karampinos, M. Settles, C. Preibisch, J. Bauer, J. Kleine, M. Mühlau, C. Zimmer (2015)
Double Inversion Recovery Sequence of the Cervical Spinal Cord in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Inflammatory DiseasesAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 36
L. Bonzano, L. Roccatagliata, F. Levrero, G. Mancardi, F. Sardanelli (2008)
In vitro investigation of poor cerebrospinal fluid suppression on fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery images in the presence of a gadolinium‐based contrast agentMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 60
P. Eisele, M. Griebe, K. Szabo, M. Wolf, A. Alonso, B. Engelhardt, M. Hennerici, A. Gass (2015)
Investigation of leptomeningeal enhancement in MSNeurology, 84
M. Wattjes, G. Lutterbey, J. Gieseke, F. Träber, L. Klotz, S. Schmidt, H. Schild (2007)
Double inversion recovery brain imaging at 3T: diagnostic value in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 28 1
T. Redpath, F. Smith (1994)
Technical note: use of a double inversion recovery pulse sequence to image selectively grey or white brain matter.The British journal of radiology, 67 804
C. Polman, S. Reingold, B. Banwell, M. Clanet, Jeffrey Cohen, M. Filippi, K. Fujihara, E. Havrdová, M. Hutchinson, L. Kappos, F. Lublin, X. Montalban, P. O'Connor, M. Sandberg-wollheim, A. Thompson, E. Waubant, B. Weinshenker, J. Wolinsky (2011)
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteriaAnnals of Neurology, 69
E. Uysal, Sukru Erturk, H. Yıldırım, F. Seleker, M. Basak (2007)
Sensitivity of immediate and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI after injection of 0.5 M and 1.0 M gadolinium chelates for detecting multiple sclerosis lesions.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 188 3
V. Mathews, K. Caldemeyer, M. Lowe, Stacy Greenspan, D. Weber, J. Ulmer (1999)
Brain: gadolinium-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging.Radiology, 211 1
N. Stefano, M. Stromillo, A. Giorgio, M. Bartolozzi, M. Battaglini, M. Baldini, E. Portaccio, M. Amato, M. Sormani (2015)
Establishing pathological cut-offs of brain atrophy rates in multiple sclerosisJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 87
M. Filippi, M. Rocca, O. Ciccarelli, N. Stefano, N. Evangelou, L. Kappos, À. Rovira, J. Sastre-Garriga, M. Tintoré, J. Frederiksen, C. Gasperini, Jacqueline Palace, D. Reich, B. Banwell, X. Montalban, F. Barkhof (2016)
MRI CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: MAGNIMS CONSENSUS GUIDELINESThe Lancet. Neurology, 15
J. Hodel, S. Badr, O. Outteryck, P. Lebert, D. Chechin, M. Benadjaoud, J. Pruvo, P. Vermersch, X. Leclerc (2017)
Altered signal intensity of active enhancing inflammatory lesions using post-contrast double inversion recovery MR sequenceEuropean Radiology, 27
R. Harris, T. Cloughesy, W. Pope, Sergio Godinez, Y. Natsuaki, P. Nghiemphu, H. Meyer, D. Paul, Y. Behbahanian, A. Lai, B. Ellingson (2013)
Pre- and post-contrast three-dimensional double inversion-recovery MRI in human glioblastomaJournal of Neuro-Oncology, 112
T. Redpath, F. Smith (1994)
Imaging gray brain matter with a double-inversion pulse sequence to suppress CSF and white matter signalsMagnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2
S. Khangure, M. Khangure (2011)
MR Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis: The Accuracy of 3D Double Inversion Recovery at 3 Tesla and the Potential for Single Sequence ImagingThe Neuroradiology Journal, 24
B. Simon, S. Schmidt, C. Lukas, J. Gieseke, F. Träber, D. Knol, W. Willinek, J. Geurts, H. Schild, F. Barkhof, M. Wattjes (2010)
Improved in vivo detection of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis using double inversion recovery MR imaging at 3 TeslaEuropean Radiology, 20
M. Calabrese, N. Stefano, M. Atzori, V. Bernardi, I. Mattisi, L. Barachino, A. Morra, L. Rinaldi, C. Romualdi, P. Perini, L. Battistin, P. Gallo (2007)
Detection of cortical inflammatory lesions by double inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis.Archives of neurology, 64 10
J. Geurts, P. Pouwels, B. Uitdehaag, C. Polman, F. Barkhof, J. Castelijns (2005)
Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with 3D double inversion-recovery MR imaging.Radiology, 236 1
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ADULT BRAIN Pre- and Postcontrast 3D Double Inversion Recovery Sequence in Multiple Sclerosis: A Simple and Effective MR Imaging Protocol X P. Eichinger, X J.S. Kirschke, X M.-M. Hoshi, X C. Zimmer, X M. Mu¨hlau, and X I. Riederer ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The double inversion recovery sequence is known to be very sensitive and specific for MS-related lesions. Our aim was to compare the sensitivity of pre- and postcontrast images of 3D double inversion recovery and conventional 3D T1-weighted images for the detection of contrast-enhancing MS-related lesions in the brain to analyze whether double inversion recovery could be as effective as T1WI. MATERIALSANDMETHODS: Apostcontrast3DdoubleinversionrecoverysequencewasacquiredinadditiontothestandardMRimaging protocol at 3T, including pre- and postcontrast 3D T1WI sequences as well as precontrast double inversion recovery of 45 consecutive patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome between June and December 2013. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed precontrast,postcontrast,andsubtractionimagesofdoubleinversionrecoveryaswellasT1WItocountthenumberofcontrast-enhancing lesions. Afterward, a consensus reading was performed. Lin concordance was calculated between both radiologists, and differences in lesion detectability were assessed with the Student t test. Additionally, the contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated. RESULTS: Significantly more contrast-enhancing lesions could be detected with double inversion recovery compared with T1WI (16%, 214 versus 185, P .007). The
American Journal of Neuroradiology – American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published: Oct 1, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.