Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Diagnostic Yield of Emergency Department Arch-to-Vertex CT Angiography in Patients with Suspected Acute Stroke

Diagnostic Yield of Emergency Department Arch-to-Vertex CT Angiography in Patients with Suspected... BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to investigate how often relevant diagnostic findings in an arch-to-vertex CTA scan, obtained specifically as part of the acute stroke CT protocol, are located in the head, neck, and upper chest regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiology reports were reviewed in 302 consecutive patients (170 men, 132 women; median ages, 66 and 73 years, respectively) who underwent emergency department investigation of suspected acute stroke between January and July 2010. Diagnostic CTA findings relevant to patient management were recorded for the head, neck, and chest regions individually. Additionally, the contributions to the total CTA scan effective dose were estimated from each of the 3 anatomic regions by using the ImPACT CT Dose Calculator. RESULTS: Of the 302 patients, 161 (54%) had relevant diagnostic findings in the head; 94 (31%), in the neck; and 4 (1%), in the chest. The estimated contributions to the total CTA scan dose from each body region, head, neck, and upper chest, were 14 ± 2%, 33 ± 5%, and 53 ± 6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinically relevant findings are in the head and neck, supporting inclusion of these regions in arch-to-vertex CTA performed specifically in patients with acute stroke in the emergency department. Further studies are required to investigate extending the scan to the upper chest because only 1% of patients in our study had clinically relevant findings in the mediastinum, yet half the CTA effective dose was due to scanning in this region. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Neuroradiology American Journal of Neuroradiology

Diagnostic Yield of Emergency Department Arch-to-Vertex CT Angiography in Patients with Suspected Acute Stroke

Download PDF
4 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-journal-of-neuroradiology/diagnostic-yield-of-emergency-department-arch-to-vertex-ct-angiography-hzHE64DyOB

References (25)

Publisher
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Neuroradiology.
ISSN
0195-6108
eISSN
1936-959X
DOI
10.3174/ajnr.A4112
pmid
25258370
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to investigate how often relevant diagnostic findings in an arch-to-vertex CTA scan, obtained specifically as part of the acute stroke CT protocol, are located in the head, neck, and upper chest regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiology reports were reviewed in 302 consecutive patients (170 men, 132 women; median ages, 66 and 73 years, respectively) who underwent emergency department investigation of suspected acute stroke between January and July 2010. Diagnostic CTA findings relevant to patient management were recorded for the head, neck, and chest regions individually. Additionally, the contributions to the total CTA scan effective dose were estimated from each of the 3 anatomic regions by using the ImPACT CT Dose Calculator. RESULTS: Of the 302 patients, 161 (54%) had relevant diagnostic findings in the head; 94 (31%), in the neck; and 4 (1%), in the chest. The estimated contributions to the total CTA scan dose from each body region, head, neck, and upper chest, were 14 ± 2%, 33 ± 5%, and 53 ± 6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinically relevant findings are in the head and neck, supporting inclusion of these regions in arch-to-vertex CTA performed specifically in patients with acute stroke in the emergency department. Further studies are required to investigate extending the scan to the upper chest because only 1% of patients in our study had clinically relevant findings in the mediastinum, yet half the CTA effective dose was due to scanning in this region.

Journal

American Journal of Neuroradiology – American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published: Feb 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.